-
Video of the Day:
-
Buy anything after entering any of these Amazon sites through Counter-Currents and we get a commission, at no cost to you!
(Right-click & bookmark!)
Amazon.com Amazon.co.uk Amazon.de Amazon.fr Amazon.es Amazon.ca Amazon.it Amazon.at Amazon.cn Amazon.co.jp -
Our Titles
Distributed Titles
Editor-in-Chief
Managing Editor & Webmaster
Our Authors
Distributed Authors
- Alain de Benoist
- Kerry Bolton
- Jonathan Bowden
- Corneliu Codreanu
- Alexander Dugin
- Julius Evola
- Guillaume Faye
- Samuel Francis
- Andrew Fraser
- Madison Grant
- Hans Günther
- Welf Herfurth
- Alexander Jacob
- Jorian Jenks
- Pierre Krebs
- Alex Kurtagić
- Pentti Linkola
- Anthony M. Ludovici
- Kevin MacDonald
- James Mason
- H. L. Mencken
- Revilo Oliver
- Ragnar Redbeard
- Wilmot Robertson
- Ernst von Salomon
- Savitri Devi
- William Gayley Simpson
- Oswald Spengler
- Lothrop Stoddard
- Bal Gangadar Tilak
- Francis Parker Yockey
Online Texts
- Departments
-
Contemporary Authors
- Michael Bell
- Alain de Benoist
- Kerry Bolton
- Jonathan Bowden
- Amanda Bradley
- Collin Cleary
- Edmund Connelly
- Jef Costello
- Sam Davidson
- F. Roger Devlin
- Christopher Donovan
- Jack Donovan
- Mark Dyal
- Guillaume Faye
- François Gardet
- Andrew Hamilton
- Derek Hawthorne
- Gregory Hood
- Richard Hoste
- Juleigh Howard-Hobson
- Greg Johnson
- Andrei Kievsky
- Alex Kurtagić
- Trevor Lynch
- Kevin MacDonald
- Frank Martell
- John Michael McCloughlin
- John Morgan
- Vic Olvir
- James J. O'Meara
- Michael O'Meara
- Christopher Pankhurst
- Matt Parrott
- Michael J. Polignano
- Edouard Rix
- Hervé Ryssen
- Ted Sallis
- Robert Steuckers
- George P. Stimson, Jr.
- Tomislav Sunić
- Dominique Venner
- Irmin Vinson
- Leo Yankevich
-
Classic Authors
- Maurice Bardèche
- Julius Evola
- Ernst Jünger
- D. H. Lawrence
- Charles Lindbergh
- Jack London
- H. P. Lovecraft
- Anthony M. Ludovici
- Sir Oswald Mosley
- National Vanguard
- Friedrich Nietzsche
- Revilo Oliver
- William Pierce
- Ezra Pound
- Saint-Loup
- Savitri Devi
- Carl Schmitt
- Miguel Serrano
- Oswald Spengler
- P. R. Stephensen
- Jean Thiriart
- John Tyndall
- Francis Parker Yockey
Archives
- May 2013 (33)
- April 2013 (83)
- March 2013 (70)
- February 2013 (72)
- January 2013 (84)
- December 2012 (66)
- November 2012 (88)
- October 2012 (78)
- September 2012 (72)
- August 2012 (92)
- July 2012 (71)
- June 2012 (78)
- May 2012 (78)
- April 2012 (81)
- March 2012 (70)
- February 2012 (58)
- January 2012 (75)
- December 2011 (72)
- November 2011 (70)
- October 2011 (98)
- September 2011 (62)
- August 2011 (78)
- July 2011 (68)
- June 2011 (63)
- May 2011 (68)
- April 2011 (68)
- March 2011 (70)
- February 2011 (72)
- January 2011 (94)
- December 2010 (92)
- November 2010 (75)
- October 2010 (78)
- September 2010 (77)
- August 2010 (57)
- July 2010 (74)
- June 2010 (50)
Recent Comments
- M.W. on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours - Stronza on The Stark Truth
Greg Johnson on Wealth Redistribution - rhondda on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours - M.W. on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours - m on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours - Fourmyle of Ceres on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours - James O'Meara on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours - Sylvanus Carpenter on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours - Jaego on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours - M.W. on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
My Wagner Problem—and Ours
- M.W. on Wagner Bicentennial Symposium
RSS Links
Meta
Who's Online
92 visitors online now-
-
-
Atlantis, Kush, & Turan:
Prehistoric Matrices of Ancient Civilizations in the Posthumous Work of Spengler, Part 1
Nicholas Roerich, "The Destruction of Atlantis," 1928–29
1,323 words
Part 1 of 2
Translated by Greg Johnson
Editor’s Note:
In this brief review essay, Robert Steuckers provides an introduction to Spengler’s writings on prehistory and early world history, which contain surprising theses, stunning metaphors, and quite interesting departures from The Decline of the West. These writings are almost unknown because they were never finished and were only published in incomplete form decades after Spengler’s death.
Oswald Spengler’s morphologies of cultures and civilizations in his most famous work, The Decline of the West, are widely known. However, Spengler’s positions changed after the publication of Decline. So claims the Italian Germanist Domenico Conte in his recent work on Spengler, Catene di civiltà: Studi su Spengler (Napoli: Ed. Scientifiche Italiane, 1994), which is a thorough study of the posthumous texts published by Anton Mirko Koktanek, especially Frühzeit der Weltgeschichte [The Early Period of World History], which gathers the fragments of a projected but never completed work The Epic of Man.
In his reflections immediately following the publication of The Decline of the West, Spengler distinguished four stages of human history which he designates simply as A, B, C, and D. Stage “A” lasted a hundred thousand years, from the first phases of hominization up to the lower Paleolithic. It is during this stage that the importance of the “hand” for man appears. It is, for Spengler, the age of Granite.
Stage “B” lasted ten thousand years and lay in the lower Paleolithic, between 20,000 and 7,000–6,000 BCE. During this age the concept of interior life was born: “then appeared the true soul, as unknown to men of stage ‘A’ as it is to a newborn baby.” In this stage in our history man was first “able to produce traces/memories” and to understand the phenomenon of death. For Spengler, it is the age of the Crystal. Stages “A” and “B” are inorganic.
Stage “C” lasted 3,500 years: it starts with the Neolithic era, running from the sixth millennium BCE to the third. It is the stage when thought started to be articulated in language and the most complex technological achievements became possible. In this stage are born “cultures” whose structures are “amoebic.”
Stage “D” is that of “world history” in the conventional sense of the term. It is the stage of “great civilizations,” each of which lasts approximately 1,000 years. These civilizations have structures of the “vegetable” type. Stages “C” and “D” are organic.
Spengler preferred this psychological-morphological classification to the classifications imposed by the directors of museums who subdivided the prehistoric and historical eras according to materials used for the manufacture of tools (stone, bronze, iron). In keeping with this psychological-morphological classification, Spengler also rejected the idea of the “slow, phlegmatic transformation” or continuous development, rooted in the progressivist ideas of the 18th century.
Evolution, for Spengler, is a matter of catastrophic blows, sudden irruptions, unexpected changes. “The history of the world proceeds from catastrophe to catastrophe, without any concern with whether we are able to understand them. Today, following H. de Vries, we call them ‘mutations.’ It is an internal transformation, which affects without warning all the members of a species, without ‘cause,’ naturally, like everything else in reality. Such is the mysterious rhythm of the world” (Man and Technics). There is thus no slow evolution but abrupt “epochal” transformations. Natura facit saltus [Nature makes leaps—Ed.].
Three Culture-Amoebas
In stage “C,” where the matrices of human civilization actually emerge, Spengler distinguishes three “culture-amoebas”: Atlantis, Kush, and Turan. This terminology appears only in his posthumous writings and letters. The civilizational matrices are “amoebas” and not “plants” because amoebas are mobile, not anchored to a particular place. The amoeba is an organism that continuously pulsates along an ever-shifting periphery. Then the amoeba subdivides itself as amoebas do, producing new individualities that move away from the amoeba-mother. This analogy implies that one cannot delimit with precision the territory of a civilization of stage “C,” because its amoebic emanations can be widely dispersed in space, extremely far away from the amoeba-mother.
“Atlantis” is the “West” and extends from Ireland to Egypt. “Kush” is the “South-east,” an area ranging between India and the Red Sea. “Turan” is the “North,” extending from Central Europe to China. Spengler, explains Conte, chose this terminology recalling “old mythological names” in order not to confuse them with later historical regions of the “vegetable” type, which are geographically rooted and circumscribed, whereas they are dispersed and not precisely localized.
Spengler does not believe in the Platonic myth of Atlantis, the sunken continent, but notes that an ensemble of civilizational remnants are locatable in the West, from Ireland to Egypt. “Kush” is a name that one finds in the Old Testament to indicate the territory of the ancient Nubians, the area inhabited by the Kushites. But Spengler places the culture-amoeba “Kush” more to the East, in an area between Turkestan, Persia, and India, undoubtedly inspired by the anthropologist Frobenius. As for “Turan,” it is “North,” the Turanic high-plateau, which he thought was the cradle of the Indo-European and Ural-Altaic languages. It is from there that the migrations of “Nordic” peoples departed (Spengler is not without racial connotations) to descend on Europe, India, and China.
Atlantis: Hot and Mobile; Kush: Tropical and Content
Atlantis, Kush, and Turan are cultures bearing morphological principles emerging mainly in the spheres of religion and the arts. The religiosity of Atlantis “hot and mobile,” is centered on the worship of the dead and the preeminence of the ultra-telluric sphere. The forms of burials, notes Conte, testify to the intense relationship with the world of the dead: The tombs always have a high profile, or are monumental; the dead are embalmed and mummified; food is left or brought for them. This obsessional relationship with the chain of ancestors leads Spengler to theorize the presence of a “genealogical” principle. The artistic expressions of Atlantis, adds Conte, are centered on stone constructions, as gigantic as possible, made for eternity, signs of a feeling of life which is not turned towards a heroic surpassing of limits, but towards a kind of “inert complacency.”
Kush developed a “tropical” and “content” religion. The problem of ultra-telluric life is regarded with far less anxiety than in Atlantis, because in the culture-amoeba of Kush a mathematics of the cosmos dominates (of which Babylon will be the most imposing expression), where things are “rigidly given in advance.” Life after death is a matter of indifference. If Atlantis is a “culture of the tombs,” in Kush tombs have no significance. One lives and procreates but forgets the dead. The central symbol of Kush is the temple, from which priests scrutinize celestial mathematics. If in Atlantis, the genealogical principle dominates, if the gods and goddesses of Atlantis are father, mother, son, daughter, in Kush, the divinities are stars. A cosmological principle dominates.
Turan: The Civilization of Heroes
Turan is the civilization of heroes, animated by a “cold” religiosity, centered on the mysterious meaning of existence. Nature is filled with impersonal powers. For the culture-amoeba of Turan, life is a battlefield: “for the man of the North (Achilles, Siegfried),” Spengler writes, “only life before death, the fight against destiny, counts.” The divine-human relationship is no longer one of dependence: “prostration ceases, the head remains high; there is ‘I’ (man) and you (gods).”
Sons guard the memory of their fathers but do not leave food for their corpses. There is no embalming or mummification in this culture, but cremation. The bodies disappear, are hidden in underground burials without monuments, or are dispersed to the four winds. All that remains of the dead is their blood in the veins of their descendants. Turan is thus a culture without architecture, where temples and burials have no importance and where only the terrestrial meaning of existence matters. Man lived alone, confronted with himself, in his house of wood or in his nomad’s tent.
Source: Nouvelles de Synergies européennes, no. 21, 1996.
You may also like . . .