Print this post Print this post

Arlington Road

888 words

Arlington Road is a terrific film. From the gripping opening scenes, it is a psychological and political thriller that is suspenseful, stylishly directed, and superbly acted. But the amazing plot twist at the end raises it to something much higher.

I am sad that I did not hear about this movie when it was released.  But it turns out that Arlington Road was shelved by the studios for a year before release, and it was not effectively promoted. I can see why: From the point of view of Hollywood’s overall propaganda line, it goes “off message” in a major way.

Director Mark Pellington is apparently a white man who is primarily known for his music videos.

Jeff Bridges plays Michael Faraday, a widowed professor of American History at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. He lives in a McMansion subdivision in Northern Virginia, where he is raising his nine year old son Grant.

Faraday’s research focuses on domestic terrorism, with a special focus on patriotic militia groups. His interest can justly be deemed an obsession, and he has a very personal motive. His wife, an FBI agent, was killed three years before in a botched FBI raid/standoff that is an amalgam of the Ruby Ridge and Waco incidents.

It is remarkable that this incident is presented as a mistake by the government. The target of the raid was a law-abiding firearms collector who had just applied for a dealer’s license (shades of Waco), but the FBI charged in, killing the target’s wife and young son (shades of Ruby Ridge). This is the first way in which the film goes “off message.” (You’ll have to see the movie to learn about the other ways.)

Faraday is portrayed as a neglectful father and a bad neighbor. He does not even know the Lang family across the street until he finds their son Brady covered with blood after an accident. Faraday rushes Brady to the hospital (he recovers) and as a result becomes friends with Oliver and Cheryl Lang (Tim Robbins and Joan Cusak).

The friendship seems off to a good start. Grant and Brady become playmates when Brady is released from the hospital.

But Faraday begins to suspect that Oliver Lang is not who he claims to be. He begins to investigate Lang and discovers that he is really named William Fennimore and that he was imprisoned when he was 16 for sending a pipe bomb to the Bureau of Land Management. (The bomb never went off.) His motive was resentment against the federal agency that destroyed his family’s livelihood and drove his father to suicide.

Fennimore/Lang finds out that Faraday is on to him, and there is an emotional confrontation in which he explains himself, seemingly resolving the issue between them. Faraday even turns to the Langs for solace when his girlfriend Booke is killed in a car accident.

The misgivings, however, begin to mount again. Faraday begins to suspect that Fenimore is behind an Oklahoma City-style bombing of a Federal building in Saint Louis, a bombing that had been blamed on a single suicide bomber.

Lang, however, is one step ahead. He kidnaps Grant, holds him hostage, and tells Faraday that all he has to do to get his son back is be a good neighbor for a couple of days. Lang is clearly planning another bombing. Faraday, of course, tries to stop the bombing and rescue his son. But actions often have unintended consequences . . .

I highly recommend this film. It is suspenseful and well-made, but beyond that it provides much food for thought.

To my mind, the biggest question is the identity and motives of the bombers. They are portrayed as ordinary suburban white people who have beefs with the federal government. They are not portrayed as racists or White Nationalists, but they are all white, and the whites in the movie have a definitely “majority American” look, with names like Fennimore and Faraday. The only black character is an FBI agent, the former partner of Faraday’s wife.

Perhaps the best reason to think they are not White Nationalists is that they are part of a large, well-funded, well-organized network that is adept at strategic chess games and psychological profiling. Harold Covington could have come up with a plot like this, but nobody in the WN world could ever bring it off.

Of course the people who made this movie might not know that. Arlington Road might be merely the projections of paranoid left-wingers who have made us out to be something we are not.

But another interpretation suggests itself: Lang and company work for the government. They are the ultimate “controlled opposition”: terrorists spawned by the system in order to justify the creation of an ever-tightening surveillance state.

The Langs have Federal law enforcement written all over them. They are a nice, white family that moves around the country frequently, going from one safe, manicured subdivision to another. Dad is a bit vague about what he does for a living. Mom stays at home with the three kids. They seem to have plenty of money for a comfortable upper middle-class lifestyle. And when one job is completed, the “for sale” signs go up, and they await word on where they are being transferred next. Cheryl says “I hope it is someplace safe.” Oliver answers “Always.”

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)

5 Comments

  1. Posted October 24, 2010 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    I was alerted to this movie last year through an Amazon review by The Northern Light, a Scandinavian gentleman of pro-White sentiments. His book and film reviews, all from a consciously pro-White perspective, are a valuable resource.

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A7L6P7DJJ1JNA/ref=cm_cr_dp_auth_rev?ie=UTF8&sort_by=MostRecentReview

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted October 24, 2010 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

      Great tip. It is spooky, but it looks like this guy has read his way through my library. But he has seen far more B-movies than I could ever stomach. Yes, a valuable resource indeed.

      • Posted October 25, 2010 at 5:11 am | Permalink

        Yes, I was going to point out that convergence; Hamsun, for instance, for I guess obvious reasons. Also, he has an interesting technique of posting the same review for every version of the same book; not sure if there’s an easy way to do that on Amazon, but an excellent way to make sure your views are made known!

  2. Erik Nordman
    Posted October 24, 2010 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    I cheated and went to Wiki to read the plot. I seemed so good, I still want to watch it. The part about someone being framed for the St. Louis bombing has a certain Mc Veigh flavor to it, as do other things I won’t reveal.

  3. Posted October 25, 2010 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Kudos for bringing to light an unjustifiably forgotten film. While there is certainly nothing in the film to contradict your idea that the Langs may actually be government agents, there’s also nothing to directly support it – and I would imagine that the makers of this film, like everyone in Hollywood, are all in favor of the government just so long as the Democrats are in charge. When it first came out I saw it as part of the “domestic Right-wing terrorist” scare that prevailed in the popular imagination during the period between the Oklahoma City bombing and September 11, when it was displaced by the fear of Islamic terrorists. So, for me, your idea of it being a paranoid Leftist fantasy is more probable, although that in no way invalidates your own interpretation.

    While this is a worthwhile film, I definitely agree with your view that the “underground Right” portrayed in it is just as unrealistic as all other cinematic attempts to portray it. Hollywood always depicts the “radical Right” in one of two ways: as a movement comprised entirely of uneducated, redneck, socially inept, violent Nazi fetishists with no real power (as in “American History X,” “Blood in the Face” and “The California Reich”); or as a vast underground network with access to huge financial backing and covert support from within the political mainstream which is poised to take over the U.S. (as in “The Boys from Brazil,” “The Believer” or “Betrayed”). There is some truth to the former, although it’s certainly not the whole story, and if it were really as powerful as the latter films make it seem then the Right wouldn’t have been so ineffectual in recent decades.

  • Video of the Day:

  • Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    The Lightning and the Sun

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    The Wagnerian Drama

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    An eagle with a shield soaring upwards

    A Life in the Political Wilderness

    The Fourth Political Theory

    The Passing of the Great Race

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    The Prison Notes

    It Cannot Be Stormed

    Revolution from Above

    The Proclamation of London

    Beyond Human Rights

    The WASP Question

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Jewish Strategy

    The Metaphysics of War

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    The French Revolution in San Domingo

    The Revolt Against Civilization

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Archeofuturism

    Tyr

    Siege

    On Being a Pagan

    The Lost Philosopher

    The Dispossessed Majority

    Might is Right

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance