Print this post Print this post

The Green Cockroach

Superhero Seth Rogen

Superhero Seth Rogen

1,225 words

The “superhero movie” [less reverently, the “comic book movie”] has always been an ‘implicitly White’ genre, for fairly obvious reasons; indeed, the whole notion of a “black superhero” seems a contradiction in terms, despite heroic efforts on the part of good-thinking Liberals in the MSM, hoping to expiate their guilt over profiting from such a “white supremacist” enterprise. [Stuff Black People Don’t Like has covered this issue in all its ramifications, from the failure of M.A.N.T.I.S. to the casting of Black Thor, collected here].

Most recently, it has, in the hands of director Christopher Nolan, even been the vehicle, if only by accident, for such radical, not-ready-for-mainstream ideas as what Trevor Lynch has called “weaponized Traditionalism” [see his reviews of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight].

In keeping with the theme, it was perhaps inevitable that after such a ‘new hope‘ the entertainment Empire would ‘strike back,’ and another film critic, Armond White, is here to give us the good news.

Van Williams, the original Green Hornet

White is himself an interesting figure. As so often happens in this mongrelized country, he is, despite his name, of the African persuasion. Despite writing for a free, throwaway newspaper in New York, itself despised as a sort of hipster/neocon hybrid answer to the legendary Village Voice, he is a prominent voice among the city’s, and thus the nation’s film critics. Rather than toe the line of supporting “our people” he has used his pulpit to pursue a maverick line that many, including myself, have suspected of being not so much based on a coherent artistic vision as simply “automatically gainsaying,” as the Pythons would say, whatever the critical “consensus” is. As such, he has not only dared to refuse to worship such brothas as Spike Lee, and publicly attack the integrity of the incestuous little clique praising the sneering Jewish hate-fest Greenberg, but also written in defense of the simple White pleasures of Mamma Mia [see my take on his review here].

Still, since the touchstone of his “vision” seems to be a positioning of Steven Spielberg as “our greatest film maker,” [the increasingly sophistic defense of which leads many to suspect he is, indeed, kidding], it comes as no surprise to see him rushing to greet the arrival of The Green Hornet as the Judaic comeuppance to the genre that Some People have been waiting for. White’s review is well worth consideration, if not intense study, for what it tells us about the strategy of White displacement that lies at the heart of even the most “non-MSM” cultural products.

But first, a refreshing taste of the “bad old days”:

Right out of the barrel, White is in your face: the TV Hornet, played by Van Williams, was “stiff,” and you know what that means; he’d probably look worse on the dance floor than Adam West doing the “Bat-tusi”.

Moreover, he “embodied the straight-arrow WASP handsomeness Hollywood idealized until the counterculture revolution of the ’60s validated ethnic facial irregularities.” I guess this is what White has in mind:

But have no fear, the wait is over:

The new screen version of The Green Hornet flips Williams’ square-jawed virility for tall, goofily boyish Seth Rogen. This time, affluent crime fighter Britt Reid is also the embodiment of the Jewish schlemiel, a satirical take on superhero convention that responds to the inanity of Hollywood’s contemporary franchises.

Wow! One paragraph in, and an entire cultural stratagem is revealed! Holy Mason Mind control! Under the guise of the famous “self-deprecating humor,” and supposedly as a hip “critique” of Hollywood, the Jewish changeling is switched for the Aryan ‘stiff’ [as in dead, man]. By rudely barging into the superhero role, as the Ost-Juden rudely barged into German society [Cuddihy], the “lovable goofball” mocks and debases the Aryan ideal. And if anyone complains: get a sense of humor, he’s just kidding, laugh a little, don’t be a Stiffly Stifferson!

We’ve seen this before in other genres; here’s Woody Allen as “Jimmy Bond“:

Indeed, White immediately celebrates the Freud-Kafka-Allen treatment:

Now Britt Reid displays father issues, obnoxious infantilism and ineptitude from the Woody Allen archetype of ambitious Jewish self-deprecation.

Huzzah! From the people who replaced Christmas with Festivus, now a Superhero for the Restovus!

Now it’s time for White to flex those “film critic” muscles and take us to school:

It conveys the prolonged adolescence that usually goes unmentioned in American pop culture and is key to the superhero genre’s apparently undying appeal. Most superhero action films exploit adolescent response; a bratty-satirical version of The Green Hornet is the first to reckon with this fact. Exchanging WASP handsomeness for ethnic childishness means The Green Hornet’s best moments are actually about something.

See, it’s an improvement! Just as Our Freud and St. Marx ripped off the thin veneer of civilization to expose the nasty “reality,” so we learn that the Superhero genre is actually about: masculine inadequacy!

Now The Green Hornet’s entire law-and-order pretense instantly cuts to the secret of superhero fiction: . . . the childlike neediness of masculine insecurity . . . in his need to appear potent and fearsome.

Actually, we’ve seen this before as well. It’s so old a schoolyard taunt [excuse me, “critical theoretical trope”] that event these well-schooled White boys from Minneapolis were hip to it years ago:

As in the earlier “Ordeal of Civility,” the weak and neurotic Jew deals with his justified sense of inferiority not by attempting to ‘man up’ but by tearing down the “illusions” of the Aryan, whose strength and self-confidence are mere masks covering up the “reality” of HIS weakness. Genius!

And lest the dense WASP, like the hapless Winkelvoss brothers whose fleecing at the hands of Mark Zuckerberg White celebrated from his ’get Whitey’ persona in reviewing The Social Network, fail to get the point still, White makes it country simple:

Simply put: Gondry corrects such gloomy superserious nonsense’s [sic] as The Dark Knight, where Christian Bale embodied the bland WASP ideal. Gondry corrects Christopher Nolan’s entire lugubrious con game (including Inception) using psychological comedy. Better yet, using ethnic comedy.

Corrects! Not since the boys at Delta House got the answers to the psych exam from The Jewish House have we owed so much to our Hebrew guests. Thank you, sir, may I have another!?

Genug! You can read for yourself as White lovingly details the debasing of characters, plot, and romance, but the bottom line is that White sees that the eviscerated corpse of the superhero genre can now, perhaps, have some potential:

[T]hese childlike elements help The Green Hornet put superhero fiction (its devices as well as its insufficiencies) in a context that almost revitalizes the genre. … Thanks to Gondry, the superhero franchise that has become a blight on Hollywood suddenly shows unexpected potential.

Potential for what? One hesitates to ask, fearing an answer worthy of H. P. Lovecraft at his most “racist.” As Portnoy’s psychiatrist said, suddenly speaking up at the very end:

Now We May Perhaps to Begin?

For now, let’s wash that stench of kasha from the nostrils of our souls by enjoying this double does of White Supremacy: White Superhero Van Williams and White Jazz musician [yes, White, and from New Orleans — Chocolate City!] Al Hirt.

Source: http://jamesjomeara.blogspot.com/2011/01/green-cockroach-superhero-movie-less.html

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

6 Comments

  1. Posted January 15, 2011 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    “From the people who replaced Christmas with Festivus, now a Superhero for the Restovus!”

    LOL!

    This article is a perfect demonstration of how a Traditionalist can do more than merely keep up with the Zeitgeist, but run circles around it.

  2. Larry
    Posted January 15, 2011 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    I usually don’t comment on articles, but this review was excellent. I’m very impressed to see an article of this quality on this site. I also have to say that Seth Rogen is perhaps the most annoying deviant in Hollywood right now. Someone could literally write a book about this guy and his subversive attack on tradition via “humor.”

  3. Reginald
    Posted January 15, 2011 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Despite writing for a free, throwaway newspaper in New York, itself despised as a sort of hipster/neocon hybrid answer to the legendary Village Voice, he is a prominent voice among the city’s, and thus the nation’s film critics. Rather than toe the line of supporting “our people” he has used his pulpit to pursue a maverick line that many, including myself, have suspected of being not so much based on a coherent artistic vision as simply “automatically gainsaying,” as the Pythons would say, whatever the critical “consensus” is. As such, he has not only dared to refuse to worship such brothas as Spike Lee, and publicly attack the integrity of the incestuous little clique praising the sneering Jewish hate-fest Greenberg, but also written in defense of the simple White pleasures of Mamma Mia.

    The critical consensus is that Spike Lee isn’t that good, Greenberg lacked integrity, and Mamma Mia was worth defending?

  4. Reginald
    Posted January 15, 2011 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    Okay you said gainsaying, not yeasaying.

    Why does this guy mindlessly say the opposite of what other critics say?

    That’s the opposite of the cliche of how critics are influenced by the opinions of other critics.

  5. Hrolf
    Posted January 17, 2011 at 8:02 am | Permalink

    Hollywood’s new found obsession with the super hero genre is easy to explain; virtually all of these characters were created by Jews. Why not pay yourself royalties? The only ones I have liked were the first two X-men and the original 1980s Superman.

    I wonder if you could give some references on Lovecraft’s racism. This dove tails with a project I am working on.

    • Posted January 24, 2011 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

      Hrolf, just click on the Lovecraft link on the front page or do a search; there was a series of posts on “Lovecraft’s worldview” that reproduced incendiary passages from his letters. Good stuff! The passages on NYC could have been written today!

  • Video of the Day:

  • Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    The Lightning and the Sun

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    The Wagnerian Drama

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    An eagle with a shield soaring upwards

    A Life in the Political Wilderness

    The Fourth Political Theory

    The Passing of the Great Race

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    The Prison Notes

    It Cannot Be Stormed

    Revolution from Above

    The Proclamation of London

    Beyond Human Rights

    The WASP Question

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Jewish Strategy

    The Metaphysics of War

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    The French Revolution in San Domingo

    The Revolt Against Civilization

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    Archeofuturism

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Tyr

    Siege

    On Being a Pagan

    The Lost Philosopher

    The Dispossessed Majority

    Might is Right

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance