Print this post Print this post

None Dare Call It White Genocide

2,003 words

Graphic by Harold Arthur McNeill

The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake — this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national histories. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations? Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration. This observation is mostly accurate. However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations.

Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world. It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline. There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce. The elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system. The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate. Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent. Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor. Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan. There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans. Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration. Japan is not the target. Japan is free to remain Japanese. It is only White nations that are targeted for White genocide.

Egalitarians claim “the race problem” will disappear if the traditionally White nations assimilate and interbreed with non-White populations. Some imagine this will produce a utopia of brown-skinned beauties — society without race by homogeneous default. Others recognize this scenario as the systematic eradication of the White race — White genocide. To bolster the credibility of the latter position, put the shoe on the other foot.

Assume for the sake of argument that in a stunning reversal, political correctness dictates that Africans are racist oppressors. Africans disproportionately enjoy material niceties, unfairly subjugate other races, and an invisible “African privilege” pervades the air which mysteriously oppresses all other races. In this hypothetical world, institutional racism means that Africans are predisposed to success and worldly gain from birth, as a result of the current political power relationship. Now, follow the usual prescription for healing with plans for coercive diversity and watch the fireworks begin!

The continent of Africa can solve “the race problem” by a massive influx of non-Africans. These non-Africans will assimilate and interbreed with Africans over time. The end result will be a utopia of mocha-skinned beauties — society without race by homogeneous default. Everyone will hold hands in unity, hatred will be a thing of the past, and racial oppression will no longer be an option.

A sharp mind quickly realizes the solution to “the race problem” in the African example is actually the Final Solution for Africans. That is, the systematic eradication of the African people — African genocide. No rational Black man will agree with such a genocidal campaign. No reasonable Black man will stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans. No race deserves genocide. Every race has the right to exist biologically, ethnically, and culturally.

International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations. As far as the international recognition of the reality of race, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs. Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide. In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal. The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The present immigration and political policies of many traditionally White nations, especially the United States, are in violation of part (c) and possibly part (d). White nations have been subverted to conditions that heavily favor non-White immigration, restrict White birthrates, and encourage and support non-White birthrates, and are thus calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the White race. There are many quotations of politicians, professors, and pundits advocating this very point — the end of the White race. Genocide is not always an act of traditional murder. The United Nations Convention on Genocide covers violent genocide with parts (a) and (b). However, the remaining definitions cover indirect and incremental methods to clarify that any form of genocide is punishable under international law.

The United States employed an explicitly pro-White immigration policy for the entirety of its existence until the treasonous 1965 Immigration Act, which reversed this safeguard and subverted American immigration policy to discriminate against White Europeans in favor of non-White immigration. Prior to the 1965 Act, American immigration policy favored White European immigration to maintain the status quo of the American population. The behind-the-scenes architects of the 1965 Act realized that overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration would inevitably reduce the White American population over time. The political front men of the 1965 Act, such as Ted Kennedy, falsely assured the American public that the new immigration policy would not upset the racial balance of America. In 1965, America was approximately 89 percent White. Just a few generations later, America is around 65 percent White. In one more generation, White Americans will be a minority in their own country.

Illegal aliens create further demographic chaos, as White Americans are crowded out and out-bred by millions of mestizo illegal aliens from South America. Despite overwhelming public desire to seal the border and to deport and deny entry to illegal aliens, the federal government has willfully ignored its mandate to protect against all threats, foreign and domestic. Non-White legal immigrants and tens of millions of mestizo illegal alien invaders will dispossess the White American majority in the next few decades. White Americans will become a minority in their own nation.

Overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration and millions of non-White illegal aliens are inherently destructive to the White American population. Welfare and social benefit policies financially reward the generally poorer non-White groups for having large broods of children. Preferential hiring policies set aside jobs for non-Whites. Lax enforcement of employment law allows non-Whites to undercut the wages of educated White American citizens. The appalling aspect of these trends is that most of these policies, such as welfare, food stamps, and free emergency medical care, are predominantly financed by White American taxpayers. These White American taxpayers labor under conditions calculated to bring about their genocide as the progressive income tax discourages the most productive White Americans from having children.

Educated, self-reliant, and law-abiding White American taxpayers face the greatest disincentives to having large families. Instead, these White taxpayers work hard but are forced to financially support criminals, illegal aliens, and welfare abusers. The taxes paid by hardworking White citizens are transferred to illiterate illegal aliens to bankroll large broods of anchor babies that will produce an ever-increasing amount of welfare obligations and future criminals. The White American population dwindles while the non-White populations exponentially increase, further straining the welfare system, crowding prison cells, diluting educational standards, and destroying formerly safe White neighborhoods. White Americans face incremental genocide by design, which is precisely why so many fail to recognize the creeping trend. Genocide need not be associated with machetes, firing squads, or executions. The type of genocide White Americans face is far more subtle, which makes it all the more dangerous.

To deny White citizens of White nations the right to preserve themselves — biologically, ethnically, and culturally — is the true example of racism and hatred. Genocide is never acceptable. What can be more racist than the systematic eradication of an entire race? White Americans need not be ashamed of identifying on a racial basis, as every other race in America has a political license to do so. La Raza, the League of United Latino American Citizens, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith are all bound by racial or ethnic ties.

White Americans are now approaching minority status in the nation their forefathers fought for and built from the ground up. If the current birthrates continue, White Americans will be a minority group in a few generations. White Americans must be free to object to the immigration policy of White genocide without being shouted down as “racists,” a term which has lost potency due to its use as a political tool to silence White advocacy. “Racist” is a thinly-veiled attempt to silence a person who wishes to protect his or her race from extinction — a person who opposes genocide. “Racist” is an empty slur meant to shut down debate, silence White people, and obfuscate the reality of White genocide.

White Americans must be free to describe the racial injustices committed against White people. Introduce the term “anti-White” to mainstream political discourse in the only way possible — by starting with private conversation. The mainstream media attempts to mold public opinion, but when there is an seismic shift in American thought, the press has no choice but to bow to popular pressure. Demand an end to White genocide and anti-White policies.

White Americans have the same claims to identity, organization, advocacy, and existence as does any other group in America. Take a principled, adamant, and vocal stand against White genocide. Talk to neighbors and inform friends. Write letters to editors, television producers, media figures, and especially politicians. Let the muffled White voice clear its throat and speak up clearly and forcefully after decades of silence. Turn the tables and take back the moral high ground. The truth is dangerous, which is precisely why slurs like “racist” are currently used to shout down reasonable opposition to White genocide. Brush aside such denunciations, or better yet, mount the offense with a counterattack.

Anyone who opposes a return to traditional American immigration policies is pro-White genocide. Anyone who supports amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens is pro-White genocide. The current American immigration policy discriminates against White Europeans and is pro-White genocide. There is nothing more racist than genocide, because it is the destruction of an entire race. If someone shouts “racist!” in a petty attempt to silence debate, explain that a real racist is someone who wants to commit genocide against the White race. Stop White genocide one conversation, one talking point, one letter, one complaint, one comment, one remark, and one person at a time. Stay on a consistent message against White genocide. The future of the White race, if there will be one, will be grateful.

© 2010 by Christian Miller, all rights reserved

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

12 Comments

  1. JJ
    Posted February 7, 2011 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    You should have given credit to Bob Whitaker, a Washington insider, who has been repeating the mantra for many years now. The race problem is the white problem.

    http://whitakeronline.org/blog/

    • BUGSer
      Posted February 7, 2011 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

      Bob Whitaker’s goal is to get people to use his ideas, not to get credit for his ideas. As a political insider, this was the main thrust of his job. He has made this specific point many times over.

      Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everybody: White genocide.

      It’s a Mantra. You don’t trademark it, you repeat it.

      • Lucius
        Posted February 7, 2011 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

        Perhaps we need to ask ourselves what makes white nations so APPEALING to foreigners and non-whites and then modify our behavior, in a stratgic sense, to drive them out. They LIKE us, so this is the fundamental problem, isn’t it? How do we get them to hate us and WANT TO LEAVE? I’m not yelling, just trying to emphasize my point.

        We must not play into Jewish game theory. We must act in an unexpected way. Perhaps we have to descend into a sort of cultural and economic abyss in order to get these immigrants to leave. Notice no one is flooding into non-white countries? Yes, this is the phenomenon we must get to the bottom of, and quickly.

        Lucius

        • BUGser
          Posted February 13, 2011 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

          Lucius,

          They want to be in White countries because White countries are created and ran by Whites. White countries are prosperous and safe unless they are held back by Jewish ideas such as crony capitalism or communism.

          The appeal you speak of is social stability and the vast social welfare teats that brown immigrants wish to suck upon.

          We don’t want to end prosperity, civility, or social stability. But we SHOULD end any welfare that does not go to Whites, or perhaps end all welfare if need be. Pass strict laws that preclude the possibility of any brown scum getting free food, health care, education, scholarships, AA jobs, or anything else, and this will SLOW DOWN the flow.

          There will still be a mudslide. The rest of the action you speak of must be explicit White consciousness moving towards an explicit White ethnostate.

  2. Peter Brannan
    Posted February 7, 2011 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    This topic has been weighing on my mind, especially of late. Our children’s inheritance is being given away to strangers!
    Support your race, culture, and traditions!
    I am so pleased to hear that someone else is speaking on this grave issue.

    Fight against White genocide!

  3. Sebastian Ronin
    Posted February 7, 2011 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Nothing much new here. It would be a good op-ed in an MSM outlet to reach the audience that really needs to hear this message. I doubt if anyone is about to hold their breath. Re “Brush aside such denunciations, or better yet, mount the offense with a counterattack.” Not. There is nothing to mount a counterattack with.

  4. Posted February 7, 2011 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Miller, well written but my feeling was the same as Sebastian Ronin’s above: “Nothing much new here. It would be a good op-ed in an MSM outlet to reach the audience that really needs to hear this message.”

    I too have written much in the hope of “waking White people up,” but I fear there’s little to show for it. (If interested, see
    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/author/edmundconnelly/)

    I guess my main complaint is that yours is a Jew-friendly article. WHO is the elite working toward White genocide? You never say. Because the hostile elite is essentially Jewish-led, the recommendations you write make no sense. “When there is a seismic shift in American thought, the press has no choice but to bow to popular pressure.” HA! In my entire lifetime the press has NEVER followed “the people”; it’s always been top down. And do I need to mention who controls most of the press?

    Don’t write any letters to editors, politicians, media figures or especially television producers. The liberals among them cannot be reasoned with. More importantly, they’re either Jewish, and therefore deaf to the reasoning of goyim, or they’re smart enough to know that one slip-up will result in the Tribe gatekeepers showing them the door.

    Sorry to be hard on you but it’s late in the day, and more entry-level arguments on behalf of the White race don’t acomplish what they need to. I know, I’m one who has spent years dealing with mere words. It doesn’t work.

    • FWM
      Posted February 7, 2011 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

      Mr. Ed Connelly:

      You are exactly correct, but more importantly, your critique is perfect in its tone. One of the many problems in “the resistance,” is our seamless implementation of the critique process handed to us by our very enemies – the process that has rhetorically disenfranchised us. In fact, if I had to name (only) three characteristics unique to the resistance, the first would be the rancorous tone with which we converse to each other. Our opponent delights in this to no end. We must banish this bastard of critical theory, as quickly as we would state coerced miscegenation or opened borders. And I would go so far as to condemn those who cannot conduct themselves as such, also to permanent exile.

      We shall win, not because we are right, but because we are better. We recognize the benefits and responsibilities of brotherhood. Those of us who know the blood of Christ, should conduct themselves by that which they would treat a congregant in their idealized church (Agape). The same for warriors and brothers in arms.

      We talk much about our struggle. We have many who would tear down, justifiably. I call for those who would build, who effortlessly radiate a love for their people and civilization, to move to the front. It won’t be everything, but it will be one heck of a good start.

      Mike

    • Junghans
      Posted February 8, 2011 at 11:10 am | Permalink

      My sentiments as well, Ed Connelly, and you certainly have written some really great articles. Miller’s article is a good gateway piece for a place like Vdare or AmRen, but its kinda ‘lite’ weight material for the ‘vanguardists’ at C-C. I somehow doubt that there are many somnolent, apathetic Whites reading material here.

      • Greg Johnson
        Posted February 8, 2011 at 11:50 am | Permalink

        I agree that Miller’s piece is somewhat basic for our regular readers. But once on the net, articles circulate. I wanted it out there. Eventually, it will find the right audience. Surely you know someone who would be benefited by it. So pass it on.

  5. JJ
    Posted February 7, 2011 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    BUGser, I just thought some might enjoy a gander at his website, that’s all.

  6. jenny
    Posted February 15, 2011 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Good article, on message.

    One question: why does everyone use use this name “La Raza.” Why not just say, “The Hispanic Group, The RACE?”

    That’s a white perspective on it from another vantage point. But they always use spanish words, as if that makes them…what? More cosmopolitan? Less xenophobic? More multi-“cultural”? multi-racial? In English, it would just be the race. Two words doesn’t make you sound smart in another tongue, anyway.

2 Trackbacks

  • Video of the Day:

  • Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    The Lightning and the Sun

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    The Wagnerian Drama

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    An eagle with a shield soaring upwards

    A Life in the Political Wilderness

    The Fourth Political Theory

    The Passing of the Great Race

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    The Prison Notes

    It Cannot Be Stormed

    Revolution from Above

    The Proclamation of London

    Beyond Human Rights

    The WASP Question

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Jewish Strategy

    The Metaphysics of War

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    The French Revolution in San Domingo

    The Revolt Against Civilization

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    Archeofuturism

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Tyr

    Siege

    On Being a Pagan

    The Lost Philosopher

    The Dispossessed Majority

    Might is Right

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance