Print this post Print this post

The Burden of Hitler

1,988 words

French translation here

Adolf Hitler was born April 20, 1889. Every April 20th, White Nationalist websites inevitably see an increase in discussion and debate about Hitler and his legacy. Positions usually array themselves between two poles: Hitler is the problem and Hitler is the solution.

The claim that Hitler is the problem is basically a rejection of an intolerable burden of guilt by association. Hitler is the most hated man in our whole Judaized culture. Indeed, hating Hitler is the only moral judgment not stigmatized by modern moral relativists. The only absolute moral standard we are allowed is Hitler as the incarnation of evil, and all lesser evils are evil by being “like Hitler” — which ultimately means that all white people are evil due to our kinship to Hitler.

The “blame Hitler” argument boils down to this: If only Adolf Hitler had not started World War II, killed six million Jews, and tried to conquer the world, White Nationalism would get good press and perhaps make some progress in the political realm. Hitler is the reason why race realism, eugenics, immigration control, and nationalism have been discredited in the eyes of whites the world over. Thus if White Nationalism is to have any chance of changing the world, we need to ritually condemn and repudiate Hitler and everything he stood for, as well as all his present day followers.

I find this argument to be morally contemptible and politically naïve.

It is contemptible, because it is essentially an attempt to curry favor with our enemies and pander to ignoramuses and fools by throwing a loyal white man under the bus. And make no mistake: Adolf Hitler, whatever his faults, was a loyal white man who fought and died not just for Germany, but for our race as a whole.

Blaming Hitler is also morally obscene because it absolves a whole host of villains who are the real architects of our race’s doom: the slave traders and plantation owners who introduced blacks into the Americas, the railroad magnates and other plutocrats who brought Orientals to our shores, the traitorous capitalists who are destroying the white working and middle classes by importing non-white labor (legal or illegal) and shipping American jobs to the Third World, the egalitarians who have not hesitated to spill oceans of white blood to promote the moral and political equality of non-whites — and of course every politician who has done the bidding of all of the above.

Blame must also be placed on the organized Jewish community which has used its control over the entertainment and news media, academia, and the professions, as well as its vast wealth, to corrupt all aspects of American politics, business, and culture and to engineer and promote multiculturalism, mass non-white immigration, miscegenation, racial integration, and a poisonous culture of white self-hatred and non-white truculence.

Blaming Hitler is also politically naïve. Our race was not set on the path to destruction when Hitler was elected Chancellor of Germany in 1933. The problem started long before then, but a real turning point began in the 1880s with the immigration of millions of Jews from Eastern Europe to the United States, a country that was simply not culturally or politically capable of understanding and containing the threat they posed. By 1917, the organized Jewish community — operating through a cabal around Woodrow Wilson — had sufficient power to bring the United States into the First World War as a quid pro quo for the British Empire’s Balfour Declaration, which paved the way for the foundation of the state of Israel.

When Jews arrived in America en masse, they found a largely innocent and trusting people and only the weakest barriers to their rise to wealth and power. And what gratitude did the Jewish community feel toward America and its people? As soon as they were able, they traded the lives of 116,000 of the sons of those trusting Americans, plus the suffering of 205,000 more young men who were wounded, some of them unspeakably, plus the mental anguished suffered by ten million soldiers and their loved ones, plus the years robbed from the lives of the ten million soldiers and all those who worked to support them, plus the untold millions of Europeans who suffered and died because America’s entrance prolonged the war — all in order to gain a British promise to allow Jews to displace the Arabs of Palestine to found a Jewish state.

This was a pivotal moment in world history: In the United States, it became clear that whites had lost control of our destiny to Jews, and ever since then, Jews have been able to use their hegemony in the United States to take control of the destinies of white nations around the world and turn more and more of them onto the path to extinction.

No, their control was not absolute. In 1924, white Americans passed immigration restriction. But by 1941, Jews and their allies had delivered America into another World War; in the 1950s and ’60s they spearheaded, funded, and controlled the civil rights movement; and by 1965, after more than 40 years of lobbying, Jews were pivotal in opening America’s borders to non-white immigration.

If Hitler had never been elected Chancellor of Germany, if the Second World War had never happened, Jews would still have lobbied for open borders; they would still have promoted multiculturalism, feminism, and generalized cultural decadence; they would still have promoted pseudo-scientific race denial, racial egalitarianism, and racial integration; they would still have corrupted our political system to pursue Jewish interests at the expense of American interests. How do I know this? Because they were already doing all these things long before Hitler came to power.

Jews are promoting conditions that are leading to the genocide of the white race. They are not doing this out of “self-defense” against Hitler’s aggression, since they were doing it when Hitler was just a common soldier in the Great War. Indeed, the truth is that Hitler did whatever he did in self-defense against Jewish aggression — the same Jewish aggression that we are suffering today in a much intensified form.

The “blame Hitler” argument also commits what I like to call the “one little thing” fallacy. The way some people talk, Adolf Hitler is the one thing standing in the way of our victory. If only he had remained a painter, we would be living in a White Republic today. But history is not that simple. History is the net result of billions of causal factors interacting with one another. Therefore, chances are “one little thing” is never responsible for any large scale historical phenomenon, good or bad.

A choice example of the “one little thing” fallacy is a spurious quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin that floats around right wing circles. According to this legend, Franklin claimed that America needed to exclude Jews from the very beginning, else that one little thing will undo our otherwise perfect culture and political system. This kind of thinking is appealing because it simplifies matters considerably and a spares us from the necessity of reflecting on broader, deeper, systematic problems that might implicate us as well.

Blaming Hitler is just another form of blaming ourselves for our ongoing racial decline. It deflects attention from the real culprits — white traitors and aliens — and replaces righteous anger at our enemies with demoralizing self-reproach and self-doubt. Anger motivates action. Self-reproach promotes passivity. So our march to oblivion continues uninterrupted.

White Nationalists who feel like Hitler is a burden on our cause need to recognize that ritually condemning him on his birthday does no good. Hitler is dead and cannot be harmed. And they are still goyim slated for extinction. The only thing that has changed is their own moral status. They may have won the esteem of knaves and fools, but better men see them as ignorant and vile. What good is the friendship of the corrupt and cowardly if it costs you the friendship of the honorable and upright?

How, then, can one lessen the burden of “Hitler” — the Hitler of anti-white propaganda? If a person damages your car, cursing him might feel good, but the only way to fix things is to get some sort of compensation.

How can Hitler compensate us for the burden of “Hitler”? All he has to offer us today is knowledge. So if we can learn something from Hitler that actually helps our race, that would at least contribute to lessening or lifting the burden of “Hitler.” If you really believe that “Hitler” is keeping the white race down, then pick Hitler up: read Mein Kampf, Hitler’s Table Talk, etc. and see if you can glean some useful truths.

There is a lot of truth there: about race, history, the Jewish question, political philosophy, economics, culture, religion, and the dead ends of bourgeois liberalism and conservatism. Mein Kampf is filled with practical advice about radical political organizing and propaganda that remains valid to this day.

Hitler was right about another thing as well: “On the one hand, there are those who strive for the happiness of mankind in the abstract and who pursue the chimera of a formula applicable all the world over. On the other, there are the realists. National Socialism is interested only in the happiness of the German race and strives only to secure the well-being of the German man. [. . .]The National Socialist doctrine, as I have always proclaimed, is not for export. It was conceived for the German people” (Hitler-Bormann Documents, Feb. 21, 1945).[1] What he means is that the ideas behind National Socialism may be universally and eternally true, but the National Socialist movement — its political platforms, symbolism, and other external trappings — are the products of a particular time and place. Thus people who dress up like Storm Troopers in 21st century America have only a superficial understanding of Hitler’s teachings. A real follower of the Leader would look as American as apple pie.

You might also pick up a few good books about Hitler and the Second World War, just so you do not fall into the trap of discussing them in terms of preposterous war propaganda like “Hitler started the Second World War” and “Hitler was out to conquer the world.” Begin with Patrick Buchanan’s Churchill, Hitler, and “The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World. I would also look at A. J. P. Taylor’s The Origins of The Second World War. And be sure to read David Irving’s enthralling and fact-packed books The War Path and Hitler’s War, available in a single volume: Hitler’s War and the War Path. Lesser researchers routinely plunder them, so you might as well go back to the source.

I do not think that the progress of White Nationalism in the 21st century requires the rehabilitation of Hitler and the Third Reich, which in any case would be an infinite task for scholars and a distraction for political activists. But when historical clichés are regularly lobbed at us like grenades, every responsible adult needs the basic knowledge necessary to defuse them. We don’t need to be learned doctors of revisionism, but we should be able to apply some battlefield first aid.

Perhaps the most subversive thing one can do regarding Adolf Hitler is simply to ignore those who hate or love him blindly and instead discuss him rationally and objectively, like any other historical figure. If you follow this advice, I guarantee that the burden of “Hitler” will begin slowly to fade.

But you may also discover that the burden of thinking “Hitler” was wrong is nothing compared to the burden of believing that Hitler was right.

Note

1. The Testament of Adolf Hitler: The Hitler-Bormann Documents with an introduction by L. Craig Fraser (No publisher listed), pp. 57–58. David Irving claims that the late François Genoud told him that these documents were fakes that he created, but I would need additional evidence before accepting this claim.

 

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

35 Comments

  1. Posted April 20, 2011 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Very interesting yet again, thank you.

    Chateaubriand wrote that in politics the result of an action or a decision is usually the contrary to that wished for. Concerning Hitler and his passage upon this earth, we can agree both with him and with Greg Johnson.

    French litterature offers a great deal of sources which can greatly contribute to the debate around WWII and more particularly around Hitler. Unfortunately, most of these documents and books are banned or very difficult to get.

    A great participant and witness of the European nationalist movements around WWII, as well as a great writer and politician, was Leon Degrelle. Leon Degrelle was very close to Hitler. Degrelle reported that Hitler had publicly declared that if he had a son, he’d wished it were Degrelle.

    I doubt that his texts are translated in English. I publish his absolutely fantastic LA CAMPAGNE DE RUSSIE, which, besides being a great text, is a unique document about the war on the Eastern front. The book has been forbidden since 1949.

    The war we are engaged in dates from the crucifixion of Christ. All gentiles must disappear, it is as simple as that.

    • icr
      Posted April 20, 2011 at 8:28 pm | Permalink
      • icr
        Posted April 20, 2011 at 8:59 pm | Permalink

        The preface says it’s a translation of the latter of these two works:
        La Campagne de Russie, 1941-1945, Le Cheval Ailé, 1949
        Front de l’est, 1941.1945, La Table Ronde, 1969

        • Posted April 21, 2011 at 7:10 am | Permalink

          Difficult to say whether it is the text of LA CAMPAGNE DE RUSSIE without reading the whole lot.

          “But against all odds he survived, building a new life in exile for himself and his family. Living and working in Spain today, Degrelle is the last and most important living witness of World War Two and the German campaign on the Eastern front.” says the site. In fact, Degrelle had a lot of a hard time in Spain, persecuted by the Jews although he declared several times not being antisemitic nor having had any antisemtic activities (documents available tend to go his way), living mostly in hiding and without money, escaping several kidnapping and murder attempts.

          Degrelle is the only nationalist leader that survived WWII. His testimony and writings are therefore essential for an undestanding of the period and for another version of that proposed by the system and the establishment. He was therefore not permitted to exist and survived only by sheer grit.

          Degrelle wrote Hitler pour mille ans, and several books on Hitler. He wrote a very interesting LETTRE AU PAPE when for the first time the pope paid a visit to Auschwitz.

        • Posted April 21, 2011 at 9:11 am | Permalink

          It is possible that La Table Ronde which used to be a moderately conservative publishing house published a shortened or expurged version of some of Degrelle’s writings.

          • Posted April 21, 2011 at 9:54 am | Permalink

            Addendum : Léon Degrelle was a staunch catholic, of the crusader type (nothing to do with modern catholics issued from Vatican II). Crawling under ennemy fire he used to drag along a priest to bring the Eucharist to those of his men on the frontline.

          • White Republican
            Posted April 24, 2011 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

            I remember that Zentropa (http://zentropa.info/) once published a photograph of soldiers of the Wehrmacht receiving holy communion. The caption read “Liberation Theology.”

          • icr
            Posted April 23, 2011 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

            I’ve read the English language book “Campaign in Russia.” Only one brief episode in the book could possibly be construed to be “anti-Semitic.”

          • Posted April 24, 2011 at 6:27 am | Permalink

            Only if you have time, which one for there is none in the French version ?

      • Joe Smith
        Posted April 25, 2011 at 9:36 am | Permalink

        Russian soldiers and the younger generations there hate the American Neoconservative government. American NeoConservative Bolshevism slaughter of Russians is mandatory reading in all Russian schools. It’s amusing watching some elders in both countries believe they can cling to the brief history WW2 history of cooperation as some idea which should be re-embraced for the sole purpose of engaging in the very things they are ultimately against just because it feels good at the time. Since Bolshevism is Neoconservativism, there is no nostalgia since the entire world has moved against it.

        It seems Rus-Americano relations are cementing around other historical cooperation between the countries, such as when the Rothschilds were booted to the curb back in the 1800s. Last some checked, Russia controls their own currency these days and remembrance of the 1800s has been memorialized at the central financial institution in recent years. It is proper since that alliance actually resulted Russian liberation.

        May 9 represents the successful defense of the Russian homeland, a day that is larger than any one ideology, person, or alliance of convience at the time. Stalin shouldn’t have planned on breaking the cooperation agreement which prompted the invasion in the first place as preemptive measures. Typical untruthworthy Bolshevik. All the military junk sent to the Bolsheviks from Washington really helped since it was really Russian grit that won the war.

        There is more than one option. Russia can decide what is best for them. The brief period of World War Two Neoconservatism from American South, who otherwise have been their historical enemy throughout American history of Russia, or the Northern-centric alliance, which has always been their real friend aside from the couple decades of Bolshevism.

  2. rev odin
    Posted April 20, 2011 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    GJ is a literary leader of WN. We just wish he’d apply his talents to attacking, by name, the worst of our race traitors, and suggesting remedies, such as means of holding them accountable. They protect themselves from the same Diversity Curses they foist upon us. GJ has the writing talents to call them on it.

    Why not get some wider attention? Pick someone, investigate them, write a hit piece, and go viral. You’ve got the talent, just like Oliver did.

    Best you’d said yet is that we should play the deception game and get into positions of authority so that we can not hire Jews because they are White. Return them the favor- good plan.

  3. Petronius
    Posted April 20, 2011 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    Yes, since Hitler remains the Satan of the liberal world, the most subversive thing one can do is de-demonize him and treat him as any other historical figure.

    I do not think that a sincere historical study would support the idea that Hitler “fought and died for our race as a whole.” Consider especially his treatment of submitted Slavic peoples, especially Poles and Ukrainans, which had disastrous c0nsequences for the course of the war. Drieu La Rochelle pointed out that Hitler remained a German nationalist, chauvinist and imperialist instead of really embracing a broader, more modern Pan-European perspective. That was not his only grave mistake. He is probably just as responsible for the destruction of Europe as anybody else involved in WWII.

    • Joe Smith
      Posted April 24, 2011 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

      Hitler was a liberal. He purged Conservatives. Remember mad dog Churchill. What party was he in when they went to war? Anyhoo, the Swastika will not re-emerge until victory. Anything else is Central Casting fodder. Ideas…not symbolism. Only the symbolism has been defeated via German Federal Constitution and thought-control in Western establishment. Condemn the symbolism as the ideas are marched forward.

      • Fourmyle of Ceres
        Posted April 25, 2011 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

        Joe Smith has given us the most blindingly obvious Insight since Covington realized the choices we were offered were false choices.

        Joe Smith wrote:
        Ideas…not symbolism. Only the symbolism has been defeated via German Federal Constitution and thought-control in Western establishment. Condemn the symbolism as the ideas are marched forward.

        That statement deserves an entire thread.

        After all, WHERE did the symbolism come from, originally?

        What Principles are at work that we should incorporate into our own thinking?

        Why aren’t we doing this?

        Fear?

        Masking your excuses as (unsupported) claims of moral superiority, Charlie Brown?

        Focus Northwest

  4. Justin Huber
    Posted April 20, 2011 at 7:09 pm | Permalink

    I hate to sound like a broken record, but this is another great post by Greg.

  5. Posted April 20, 2011 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Another excellent piece for this April 20th.

    @ “I do not think that the progress of White Nationalism in the 21st century requires the rehabilitation of Hitler and the Third Reich, which in any case would be an infinite task for scholars and a distraction for political activists.”

    Rehabilitational revisionism is unavoidable, especially after an ethno-state is created—even before, since, for decades, the Enemy has been harping on with one-sided propaganda on this subject 24 hours a day.

    Just imagine what would happen in the Aryan psyche if we were rich enough to take Thomas Goodrich’s
Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944–1947
(book review: here) to TV and even the big screen…!

    I cannot imagine how to cure White guilt unless the current anti-Hitler propaganda is debunked through scholarly research and future films and documentaries on Hellstorm; the crimes of Stalin’s Jews, and the color of crime in America and Europe—but especially getting the facts straight about WW2. The current vision of that war is the main virus of the mind that induces a false sense of guilt among the white people.

    I would say that this century requires the rehabilitation of Hitler and the Third Reich.

    • Fourmyle of Ceres
      Posted April 20, 2011 at 8:43 pm | Permalink

      From The Burden of Hitler, to the Blessing of Hitler.

      Chechar is right, but the “rehabilitation” of Uncle Adolf and the NSDAP Cultural Moment might be well-served by learning from them, rather than blindly adopting their forms.

      Thus, a new economics might be developed from Steve Keen’s leading thoughts, natural capitalism, and, especially, ecological economics (Herman Daly).

      One day, soon, all too many of our brethren will have nothing, and nothing to lose.

      Laying the groundwork to offer them and their Families a new life, with Something Better, like a Northwest Republic, seems worthwhile.

      Focus Northwest

  6. Jimmy Marr
    Posted April 20, 2011 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Hitler’s birthday will fall on Easter in 2014. Let’s work for the resurrection of Nordic strength from the tomb of semitic servitude between now and then.

  7. Posted April 20, 2011 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    As these things do, this article comes at a good time for me. I am now reading Michael Collins Piper’s book “The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme,” which is about the Rothschilds. The subheading to chapter seven bolsters the arguments made by Greg Johnson about Jewish power in America predating Hitler. The heading reads:

    “The Rothschilds and America: First a Colony, Then the Engine of Imperial Power.”

    I must say I am impressed with the material Piper uses. I would appreciate feedback from others about this book in general and Piper’s work more generally. Thank you.

    • Junghans
      Posted April 21, 2011 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

      Ed, it’s been a while since I’ve read Piper’s books, but I found them all to be interesting and useful, overall. He is a prolific writer and a good one. His works seem to be under appreciated in some WN circles, however, as I don’t see them discussed or reviewed at the sites that I frequent. I found the ‘New Babylon’ book to be an excellent tome, and I recommended it to Kmac, but don’t know if he ever read it or not.

    • Mr. Dithers
      Posted April 23, 2011 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

      I have not yet read “The New Babylon” but plan to at some near future date. I heartily recommend all of Michael Collins Piper’s books as he is virtually peerless in documenting the hand of Judah behind major and seemingly minor historical events.

      I especially recommend “The Judas Goats” which details the numerous cases of informers and agent provocateurs within the patriot and racialist movement. Some of the names will shock you. His books are a very enjoyable reads while at the same time informative and educational. Most of his books can be found at American Free Press (www.americanfreepress.net)

  8. Captainchaos
    Posted April 21, 2011 at 2:43 am | Permalink

    “I do not think that the progress of White Nationalism in the 21st century requires the rehabilitation of Hitler and the Third Reich, which in any case would be an infinite task for scholars and a distraction for political activists.”

    If individual rights and the self-determination of peoples are to be considered moral bedrocks then the moral rehabilitation of National Socialism as historically incarnated is simply insurmountable as it ran roughshod over the former.

    “But when historical clichés are regularly lobbed at us like grenades, every responsible adult needs the basic knowledge necessary to defuse them.”

    The future of Europe in the event of a German victory in WWII would have been Judenrein (sans “Holocaust”) and under German hegemony. Nordics incorporated into the Greater Reich, Latins playing second fiddle in their Fascist sphere, Slavs put to work as a helot class for their German masters in the East. Might as well call a spade a spade.

    • Joe Smith
      Posted April 25, 2011 at 8:09 am | Permalink

      Any rehabiliation must include all events and leaders preceeding Hitler. NS is greater than one man. It must also include all in history beyond Hitler, including al-Husayni, Kennedy, Brezhnev, Chernenko, Nasser, Hussein, Enlai, Peron, and a whole list of others concerning historical purposes. For what it is worth, Idi Amin said Hitler was right and aided Genoud’s revolutionaries.

  9. Captainchaos
    Posted April 21, 2011 at 3:37 am | Permalink

    “Patrick Buchanan’s Churchill, Hitler, and “The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World.”

    I’m not sure how much of his own thesis Buchanan actually believes himself. For instance, on the face of it, one gains the distinct impression Buchanan is a believer in the traditional “Holocaust” narrative. To wit: consistent with Hitler’s 1939 “prophesy” in which Hitler stated if the Jews managed to bring all the (White) world to war once again it would not result in the destruction of Germany but the destruction of Jewry in Europe. It was after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, and the United States entrance in the European theater of war all but a fait accompli, that Germany declared war on America. True to his word, so Buchanan would have it, on the face of it, Hitler a short time later commissioned the Wannsee Conference so that the logistics of the Final Solution to the Jewish Question in the form of their physical extermination could be hammered out.

    There is one problem, however. In the past, Buchanan has expressed skepticism about the feasibility of the alleged methods of extermination. Buchanan is clearly familiar with forensic refutations of the traditional “Holocaust” narrative contained in revisionist literature. So then, it is not unreasonable to conclude that Buchanan gives his readers to believe something he does not believe himself. If that is the case, Buchanan is acting as a propagandist. Although from our perspective, a well-intentioned one. In Straussian fashion, at the exoteric level, he is telling noble lies so as to achieve a reverse moral polarity without tampering too greatly with the by now canonical traditional WWII narrative. His one bit of true revisionism, again, at the exoteric level, is to cast Hitler as not implacably bent on conquest in the East, open to negotiation, and thus to shift the blame to English and American (and Jewish) warmongers who failed to negotiated judiciously. Assuming one buys this, and also subscribes to the traditional “Holocaust” narrative, at the esoteric level one is given to conclude that the Jews brought “the Holocaust” on themselves because of their warmongering. It is a very sly, very subtle gambit.

    However, I am not convinced Buchanan actually believes Hitler was not from the start bent on waging war for the primary purpose of gaining living space for Germans in the East given that it is highly questionable Buchanan actually believes in the verity of other set-pieces of his book he gives his readers to believe – namely, the traditional “Holocaust” narrative. (Hitler is very clear in Mein Kampf that he believed gaining living space in the East was a matter of existential importance to Germans. A nationalist as fanatical as Hitler would not likely have compromised on an issue he believed to be of such existential import to Germans.) More noble lies from Buchanan?

  10. Mimir's Well
    Posted April 21, 2011 at 6:41 am | Permalink

    Impressive! Very good points in a succinct article.

  11. Gary.SS
    Posted April 21, 2011 at 7:02 am | Permalink

    Very good article. Being a National Socialist myself, I guess I’m the choir.

    In regards to white guilt; the problem is the cowardice of the white man, not guilty feelings. Most white folk don’t really have all these guilty feelings, they just don’t have the guts to stand up to the accusations and finger pointing. Rather than debunking the lies about A.H. and WW2, how about we resolve to become men that fear nothing from our enemies, along with the physical ability to defend our positions.

  12. FrankC
    Posted April 21, 2011 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    The question “What do you think of Adolf Hitler?” is perhaps the best litmus test to determine a white person’s success at combating the brainwashing that the controlled mass media has sought to impose on everybody for the past 70plus years.

    One needn’t be a reflexive admirer of Hitler. After all he, like every other mortal, had his faults (for ex., he was anti-Slav-even ordering Dr. Joseph Goebbels to break with his mistress expressly because she was Slavic). Even Savitri Devi, one of his most ardent admirers, thought Hitler had his weaknesses (she thought he was too gentle with his enemies).

    But the crucial questions a racially-conscious white person should be able to answer objectively (i.e. free of media-conditioning) and rationally relating to Hitler are the following: #1– Is the survival of the white race the #1 value? Answer: Of course, because without it nothing else much matters. Barring the complete extinction of life on the planet, the extinction of the white race is about the greatest catastrophe imaginable.

    #2 — Is the white race in dire jeopardy of extinction? Answer: Yes it is — largely because of the policies of the ruling elites in white nations, the mass media (the #1 cause — it shapes the Zeitgeist), liberal academia, liberal churches and race-less capitalists).

    #3 — Would the white race be in this situation if Hitler had won the war? Answer: Most definitely not.

    #4 — Therefore, “What do you think of Adolf Hitler?” Answer: After all is said and done, it would have been better for white people if Hitler had won the war. Without a doubt.

    Once a white person is able and willing to agree to the above logisms, he is on the road to being effectively cured of his brainwashing. He will have broken free of the chains that have been sought to be imposed on his thinking by the mass media and he is now able to begin to think freely and reflect honestly on all the important issues that confront his people.

    That being said, happy birthday A. H. You are able to serve your people still.

    • Posted April 21, 2011 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

      FrankC,

      You hit the nail. “What do you think of Hitler?” really is the acid test to know who’s still sleeping in the Judeo-liberal Matrix and who has been unplugged from it.

      If Judeo-liberal America is the cancer of the white race, and if those who haven’t recognized that fact by now are probably beyond saving, then declarations such as the above one by a commenter (“individual rights and the self-determination of peoples are to be considered moral bedrocks…”) make no sense. Reason: only a Greater Deutschland, stretching from the Rhine to the Urals, could have been match for the most serious threat of the white race: a US which Judaized media, as you say, is the Number One cause for the current zeitgeist.

      This does not mean that we must idolize Hitler. He was as flawed a man as the rest of us are. It only means that almost all whites, and quite a lot of white nationalists, still hold implants under their skin at their arms and backs with big holes in the back of their necks, looking almost blissfully in their gelatin cocoons (our sleep is so profound that I would claim that even liking those films, with its Negro heroes and Zion City inundated with mulattos, means that we are still sleeping in it).

  13. Junghans
    Posted April 21, 2011 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    A very good assessment of the Hitler phenomenon, Greg. The ghost, or ‘burden’ of Hitler is something that organized Jewry forces upon all White people constantly, (everywhere that their influence reaches, and that’s worldwide, of course). This incessant demonization of Hitler and everything that he stood for, is intended to poison and disarm White people’s sense of perspective and racial identity. Their intent, in thus warping history, is to twist our spiritual & moral values, to instill a sense of collective White ‘guilt’, to thwart any sense of collective White national identity, and to crush any incipient White political organization. In this, to our chagrin, but not our historical knowledge, Jewry has been unbelievably successful.

    Every White person on earth is affected by this devious propaganda assault, whether they are aware of it or not. Through their media and financial power, Jewry is able to manipulate the popular mindset, and corrupt culture and history to suit their peculiar agenda. To ‘divide and conquer’ intellectually, is just one aspect of this low level race war that is being waged against the White gnome. The other, is of course, to rationalize their self-centered view of history. The preposterous accusation that Hitler wanted to “conquer the world”, (with a population of 80 million people, a country smaller than the state of Texas, and with a minuscule navy), is quite ludicrous, yet most people still believe that ‘canard’. This is the power of the manipulation of history by an embedded alien oligarchy, and what we are up against. Most White people may not ‘like’ Hitler, and it’s currently futile to expect them to, of course, but without knowing the objective truth about him, his ideas and his times, they are never going to be able to realistically deal with their self-imposed intellectual dilemmas. Willful ignorance is ignorance of the worst kind.

  14. Fourmyle of Ceres
    Posted April 21, 2011 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    “But you also may discover that the burden of thinking “Hitler” was wrong is nothing compared to the burden of believing that Hitler was right.”

    Mein Kampf is the equivalent of Neo’s Red Pill.

    The conquered West was transformed by one Man, and one Book.

    The gelding of the Western Warrior/Priesthood Caste can be reversed with one Book, rigorously studied, and applied.

    Ever notice WNists are encouraged to wear NSDAP-era clothing, but NEVER developed a study course based on the Book that made it possible?

    Wonder why?

    Impotent entertainment versus transformational effectiveness?

    Choose wisely…

    Charlie Brown.

    Focus Northwest

  15. Andy
    Posted April 21, 2011 at 8:02 pm | Permalink

    And be sure to read David Irving’s enthralling and fact-packed books The War Path and Hitler’s War, available in a single volume: Hitler’s War and the War Path. Lesser researchers routinely plunder them, so you might as well go back to the source.

    Mr. Irving has also made Hitler’s War and the War Path available as a free PDF download if you don’t want to/can’t spend the $80 for a hard copy.

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Hitler/

    I’m currently working my way through The War Path and it is truly fascinating.

  16. Joe Smith
    Posted April 24, 2011 at 7:04 pm | Permalink

    The National Socialists in Germany were not “White Nationalists” per se, they were Pan-European Nationalists and Global Unitists. The construct of European nations at the time of their existence was solidly of European extract and politically there was a promotion for a continuance of the only thing they ever knew for the continent. Those days are over. The central tenants of National Socialism continues concerning Pan-European Nationalism and global unity. “White Nationalism” has a home in National Socialism along with other racial nationalists, but there is a difference between racial nationalism and racial supremacism.

    There was were racial supremacism elements present in the NS state, which has been exploited and distorted historically to paint the entire state as such, but none of the legislation and acts reflected a contempt or oppression for most of the world’s races.

    For example, Indian-Germans were exempt from race laws, along with Eastern Asians. NS Germany was aligned with Arabia and had Arab-Germans/Europeans within their ranks, along with Indians and others. The NS state had alliances with a plethora of other nations of a different genetic abstract, as well as religious, including Muslims, Hindus, and others. Was the state geneticist, yes.

    One particular group of individuals deemed as threats to this construction were the Khazars. The feud between Central and Eastern Europe and the Khazarian empire dates back thousands of years to their forebearers in Caucasia and Ghengis Khan. Those aligned with that political entity during the period and in the recent modern history, such as the use of French Mulattos in the lost Rhineland following World War One to subjugate the German population, undoubtedly suffered for such, including the use of race as a tool in a war, not the overall view of the country. Many Hungarians, the name reflecting their heritage, were of this hybrid Caucasian race, but aligned with NS Germany. It was a matter of alliance, not race, in the end.

    Master race was more or less master copy. The protection of blonde Europeans’ influence and role on the rest of the continent’s genetics and heritage was important to the overall continental idea of National Socialism. Remoralization attempts showing a glamorous German could be miscontrued, and some say overdone. But the remoralization of the entire people in the end was successful.

    To some, especially the Khazars, blondes are a commodity to be owned, such as gold. In most cases, it is nothing more than a pure jealousy, hatred, and contempt of those of that makeup. For evidence of why this was necessary in NS Germany one only needs to examine the history of discrimination against blondes which continues into the modern era. This reality was at the forefront of NS Germany remoralization attempts because it can probably be scientifically validated that most of the European extract, regardless of other racial influences found in Southern and Eastern Europe, originate from a blonde ancestor. It speaks also for many Arabs, North Africans, and Latinos who have some kind of European haplogroup origin.

    This minor element of German policy within Europe has been distorted historically to make people believe it was some blonde global supremacist movement when it wasn’t. How could it be when a large contigent of the leaders weren’t even blonde? Hitler was a Pan-German, not a national German.

    Through the distortion of history, it is easy to blame Germany for the loss of so-called “White Nationalism.” However, “White Supremacism” which has contributed largely. Those ideas were mostly found in the American South and U.K.’s historic foreign policy, as well as modern-day Israel. The importation of millions of non-White slaves into the American Southern system highlights the difference between “White Supremacism” and “White Nationalism”; “White Supremacism” being a system which historically has never succeeded and was just another repeated historical mistake.

    If there is to be blame for the the destruction historically of “White Nationalist” constructs, an equal eye can examine English-based supremacists. This supremacism clashed with so-called “White Nationalism” and “White Supremacism” is what won World War One and the first phase of World War Two, finished in the late 1940s.

    National Socialism and elements of “White Nationalism” are reconstructing themself in the modern era through importation of their historical racial allies. But the Arab, Asian, and Latino hate movements are not “White Nationalist”, they are Central Casting “White Supremacists.” This only continues to further “burden” “White Nationalism” with the nonsensical reactionarism that follows from all sides. One must examine who desired and changed the laws, first, for their own benefit, and the two-step which followed. This has resulted in a battle of racial alliances still yet to be cemented in the West.

    Gerhard Schroeder’s government moved to limit Western-aligned Khazar immigration into Germany in his final years as Chancellor. Between Iraq, Schroeder government demonization of the American government, and particular moves such as this, the backpage story is found concerning modern-German politics.

    The only complaints coming out of World War Two directed at the Germans were from those aligned with the Western-backed Khazarians. Everywhere else around the world, from Central and Eastern Asia, partially; Arabia, Latin America, and the across the racially diverse world they are usually greeted with a fair history and nostalgia. Many miseducated Westerners, aided by their elders, continue to proliferate the hatred and distortions of the real history from this period and the gross victor’s justice needed to protect the way it is desired to be remembered, regardless if it was the truth or not. Most complaints aimed at “White Nationalism” actually stem from the grievances against “White Supremacists.”

    Chaos in the cradle is not a proper upbringing, which is “White Supremacism” and which is at the root of the destruction of so-called “White Nationalism.” One believes it is ok to be proud while getting along with the world and other races, and it wasn’t the one which was victorious in the history books last century.

  17. Joe Owens
    Posted April 25, 2011 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    A brilliant article!!!

    Adolf Hitler saved us when the world stood on the brink of a Bolshevik revolution. Had Adolf Hitler not taken power in 1933, then the whole of Europe (and possibly America) would have fell under the heel of Jewish Bolshevism. Adolf Hitler gave us time to re- organise and fight.

    Adolf Hitler was a gift from providence

3 Trackbacks

  • Video of the Day:

  • Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    The Lightning and the Sun

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    The Wagnerian Drama

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    An eagle with a shield soaring upwards

    A Life in the Political Wilderness

    The Fourth Political Theory

    The Passing of the Great Race

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    The Prison Notes

    It Cannot Be Stormed

    Revolution from Above

    The Proclamation of London

    Beyond Human Rights

    The WASP Question

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Jewish Strategy

    The Metaphysics of War

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    The French Revolution in San Domingo

    The Revolt Against Civilization

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Archeofuturism

    Tyr

    Siege

    On Being a Pagan

    The Lost Philosopher

    The Dispossessed Majority

    Might is Right

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance