- Counter-Currents Publishing - http://www.counter-currents.com -
Vote with Your Ass
Posted By Jack Donovan On May 16, 2012 @ 12:20 am In North American New Right | 42 Comments
“Hey man, I still think we can turn this thing around.”
That’s what your vote says.
That’s what you’re telling people when you argue in favor of a candidate, or against one. You’re saying that a change in management could, at least potentially, create a better future. It’s not the system that’s broken; it’s those head-niggas-in-charge  who are ruinin’ everything. The bright idea is that if we get their guy out and put our guy in—our nigga—he could really turn things around.
Where, exactly, is your nigga gonna turn it to?
How far is he going to turn back the clock? How much cleaning up are they going to let him do? How many agencies is he going to close? How many amendments is he going to repeal? How many policies is he going to change, and why is he going to do these things for you? What’s in it for him?
Let’s say there’s an honest man in the race. Let’s just say there is—for the sake of argument.
Let’s say it for the laughs.
Let’s just say there is an honest man in the race who believes in the things that you believe in, a guy who is on your side. Let’s imagine a candidate—because there isn’t one, not one—who is willing to take a stand against global business conglomerates that wield more power than most nations. Let’s imagine a nationalist candidate—an anti-globalist who isn’t going to make things easier for companies to export jobs, import cheap goods, and price Americans out of their own market. Let’s imagine there’s a guy who is actually willing to draw a line where our borders are supposed to be and say “no more.”
Conjure in your mind, if you will, a fella who is going to side with men when women want something—who won’t beta down and give in every time women nag him a little. I’m trying to keep this fantasy realistic, so let’s not get crazy. Let’s not get into divorce laws or domestic violence polices or sexual discrimination lawsuits or women in the military. Just try to imagine a guy who can stand up and say that men ought to feel free to exclude women  from a private golf club  if they want to. Imagine that guy—because he’s about the best you can hope for.
This guy, your best hope, is going to get up every morning and tell companies wielding the wealth of nations and 51% of the voting population to go fuck themselves, because he’s on your side.
You see how unrealistic that is, right?
What’s your best-case-scenario for America? I think the best that most men can reasonably hope for is for this thing to keep limping along and not get too much worse—that we’ll still be able to find a way to make it, to play the system and win sometimes.
(Some men will inevitably prosper no matter how bad things get for most men. Maybe you want to be that guy. Good on ‘ya. The point here is about changes in your odds.)
The likelihood of feminist laws being rolled back, even as far as the 1980s, is slim. The best you can hope for from elected officials—who also depend on the votes of women—is to fend off deep, hen-pecked “Swedish” feminism .
Whites are going to become minorities in a lot of areas, and hopefully being a minority white man who isn’t wealthy won’t suck too much. We can hope that all of the “youths” and “vibrants” who have been taught that we are their natural oppressors—and that we are naturally to blame for everything bad that happens to them—will be kind and benevolent to us. We can hope that they won’t hold a grudge or take advantage of us or attack us in an angry mob  whenever the media winds them up.
We can hope that we’ll still have the right to bear arms and defend ourselves, and that we’ll be treated fairly by a legal system run by and for others. The average guy can hope that judges and legislators will at least be reminded of the Constitution when they give decisions and write laws.
We can hope that freedom of speech will outlast us. We know that writing or saying the wrong thing may get us fired, but we can hope that they won’t put us in prison for it , like they do in more “evolved” nations like France, Germany, or England.
Basically, we can take a conservative position. We can try to hold on to what remains from the past and what is good in the present. We can vote to keep things from changing too much, too fast. Maybe, if we’re really lucky, we’ll be able to regain some ground every once in a while—to right some wrongs, to correct some errors. Voting for the guy who is going to fuck things up the least is a conservative position.
Progressives—feminists, multiculturalists, socialists, and others—are more enraptured by their leaders and more excited about the future because they have an end goal in mind. They aren’t voting to keep things from getting too much worse, they are voting to achieve a State of Kumbaya. In the State of Kumbaya, every person of every sex and race is equal in every which way. Everyone shares and shares alike, and no one has a bad word to say about anyone else. In Kumbaya, there is no one to kill or die for (and no religion, too). This is not a radical position, because it is more or less the official position, but people who vote toward Kumbaya are still voting forward.
Conservatives vote to block them, or to go backward. They vote to restore, reclaim, and prevent. Conservatives believe that they can still turn this thing around.
I’m not a conservative.
I don’t believe we can turn this thing around by voting to put a new head-nigga-in-charge.
I’m not going to argue with you about why this nigga is better than that nigga.
I’ll be sitting it out entirely.
From now on, I’m voting with my ass.
I’m not advocating apathy. I don’t want you to stop caring. I want you to stop believing.
Voting implies consent. It implies that you still believe in the system and that you are satisfied with your options.
I want you to withdraw your consent.
In 2008, voter turnout was around 57%.  That’s actually high for elections in recent years, and for a variety of reasons I doubt we’ll see that kind of enthusiasm again soon. However, the fact that we are being governed with the active consent of less than 60% of the population is worth consideration. In 1924, less than 49%  of the voting age population turned out to elect an established incumbent challenged by a lackluster candidate who was actually a compromise between two other deadlocked candidates. 2012 looks like a great year to aim for under 50% again.
Let the head-nigga-in-charge claim he has a mandate from the people, when half of the voting age population couldn’t be bothered to vote either for or against him. And this isn’t even about him. It’s not about any one candidate. It’s about a system that can only produce globalists to act in our national interests. It’s about a system that makes it easier for men to pander to women than it is for them to stand up for men.
America is losing faith in its public institutions.  In a 2011 Gallup poll, only 12% expressed “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in Congress. 35% had faith in the presidency, 37% in the Supreme Court. As few had confidence in newspapers (28%) as they did in television news (27%). Less than 30% trusted the criminal justice system, the banks, the unions or big business.
Withdrawing your support for America’s political system is a more powerful statement than your vote.
Not voting is a vote of “no confidence.”
Your vote isn’t going to turn this thing around. The best thing you can do for your country—for the men around you, for the future—is to let the system tear itself apart. The way to increase personal sovereignty for men is to decrease the sovereignty of the state by withdrawing the consent of the governed. Sure, this could and probably will result in naked power grabs by “elected” officials. These actions will only decrease confidence further. That’s short-term. I’m thinking about the long game. If American men stop thinking of the government as “us” and start thinking of it as “them”—if we stop thinking of ourselves as Americans and start acting in our own interests, things could get really interesting.
So this year, don’t argue about politics.
Vote with your ass.
Or, if you really want to vote, don’t vote for any of the official candidates. Have fun with it. Vote for a write-in.
Vote for Zod. Vote for Cthulhu. Vote for Crom. Vote for fucking Cobra Commander for all I care.
Just don’t vote for any of the assholes on the ballot.
Article printed from Counter-Currents Publishing: http://www.counter-currents.com
URL to article: http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/05/vote-with-your-ass/
URLs in this post:
 Image: http://www.counter-currents.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/norman-rockwell-forward-america.jpg
 head-niggas-in-charge: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2v5KRcvFvhc
 to exclude women: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/white-house-weighs-in-on-augustas-men-only-policy-women-should-be-admitted/
 private golf club: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/mitt-romney-id-have-women-into-augusta/2012/04/05/gIQA0In6xS_blog.html
 deep, hen-pecked “Swedish” feminism: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/04/hen_sweden_s_new_gender_neutral_pronoun_causes_controversy_.html
 attack us in an angry mob: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/justice-for-trayvon-alabama-man-in-critical-condition-after-mob-beating/
 put us in prison for it: http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2012/02/all-about-women-introduction-by-jack-donovan/
 In 2008, voter turnout was around 57%.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections
 is losing faith in its public institutions.: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence-institutions.aspx
 Posted first at In Mala Fide.com : http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2012/05/14/vote-with-your-ass/
Copyright © 2011 Counter-Currents Publishing. All rights reserved.