863 words
On a recent date with a semi-suave Australian venture capitalist, I experienced what all western women currently go through to find a proper mate. Things started out nicely. Over VIP treatment, he complimented me on my natural beauty and told me that he was impressed with my “real” conversation skills – only to demand a short time later direct control of my nether region’s grooming habits.
“Do you mind if we order dinner first?,” I casually replied.
Welcome to modern day misogyny, a.k.a. the Seduction Community: an online community where lust-filled beta males devour techniques of trickery to strip unsuspecting members of the opposite sex of their panties along with their honor. As Andy Nowicki has said, game is a “reverse feminism” that has become a national “machoism” phenomenon.
If you’re white and under the age of 45, you know all about it. You’ve been introduced to it by osmosis within your frat clique or by reading the New York Times bestseller The Game by Neil Strauss. There’s even been a prime time reality show on VH-1 following poor schmucks around as they implement the game under the tutelage of pick up artist legends.
Just as feminism has brainwashed women into acting like men, Pick Up Artistry brainwashes men into acting like monsters. Primitive animal behavior that whites criticize as beneath them is now glamorized and analyzed by millions of white youths eagerly awaiting their turn to swap whatever moral fabric is left in Western Civilization for soiled sheets as proof of their promised instant sexual gratification. Forget about Negroes, are we no better than gorillas?
Just as feminists guilt-trip women for not joining the “liberation” bandwagon (“Men deserve to be hated!”), Pick Up Artists have hijacked the term “Alpha” and used it to manipulate insecure men into following them like good little betas.
Case in point, on a recent mega-misogynist website, a Lolita-inspired story was hailed and glorified as the epitome of Alphadom. Where is the chase when a school teacher preys on a minor, again? With that logic, I guess child molesters must be über-alpha since they deflower little girls before they have chance to form syllables and object to foul play. Shouldn’t Jim Bob Duggar — a happily married stud who we know has had sex at least 19 times — be considered Alpha man of the month and not a creepy professor gone wild? Only in the seduction community are “Alpha” and “Honor” mutually exclusive and always will be. They can’t sell books otherwise.
In regards to the general population, pick up artistry is not surprising. Most men and women accept whatever trends the mainstream media gives them. But when it comes to my racially aware white brothers, I expect better insight. Why? Well just as modern feminism is a Jewish intellectual movement from Friedan and Steinem on down, the PUA movement has Jewish roots and promoters as well: Ross Jeffries (born Paul Jeffrey Ross), the Anthony Robbins of the seduction community; Nick Benedict (Savoy) founder of Love Systems; dating guru Jesse Krieger (Starlight); and last but not least Mr. Strauss himself all belong to the tribe. “Jews set up, Jews knock down.”
The clash between feminism and PUA is just a Jewish family quarrel, the natural reaction of narcissistic, emasculated, manipulative men against aggressive, neurotic, castrating harpies. And whites, like the children we are, just sit in the backseat and listen to them bicker and then try to act just like them — until they drive us off a cliff.
Furthermore, a lot of the language and techniques of “game,” as well as its general atmosphere of degeneracy, comes straight from the ghetto. But this wouldn’t be the first time that Jews have profited packaging black degeneracy for white consumption. (I’ll give you one clue: it rhymes with “crap.”)
So, why have White Nationalists embraced this obvious Jewish manipulation of their libidos?
And don’t tell me that “game” is about restoring patriarchy. If it were, I would be all for it. But game is only about being on top for a few minutes in the sack, with no subsequent commitments or consequences. It is not about a restoration of male power and the responsibility that goes along with it. Roissy says it best: “Feminism has been very, very good indeed for men who want to play the field, and have the skills to do so. A return to patriarchal norms would really cramp my style.”
Fellas, if you want to halt the destruction of the white race, you need to stop being part of the problem and start embodying a real alternative. So, please, stop taking out your frustration and anger with modernity on us, as if we were disposable blow up dolls. Stop hating us. You can’t win without us. You need us. The war between the sexes is just another way that Jews profit from our decline.
Game is merely a reaction to feminism. Game follows feminism just like conservatism follows liberalism: right into the abyss. And don’t tell me that women have to change first. That puts women in the lead. But women will never restore patriarchy. Besides, aren’t Alpha males supposed to be leaders, not followers?
183 Comments
I still think this article is literally a joke.
Not to be taken seriously.
Also, what is the evidence game works? Someone else asked this. The men here reporting back that game works, how is it that you know “game” made the difference in the situations where you think it made a difference? I’m skeptical physical chemistry can be that easily manipulated. Chances are, she already liked you and found you attractive. You would not have been on her radar otherwise. And given that she was already attracted to you, you probably could have skipped using game and got the same outcome.
Pre-selection is crucial, but there’s some work to do thereafter and that’s where a routine comes in handy. Having even three or four keywords at one’s disposal can make the difference, and have done so for me. On the other hand, NOT being mindful of technique, letting my game slip for just a moment with one careless remark, has utterly obliterated an opportunity on two or three occasions.
Her tactless investor had the right idea (talk about her pussy) and the wrong approach (not in a controlling manner until a sexual bond is established). As someone else noted, has to be kept playful to start.
I don’t rely on the neg anymore, and as far as I could tell, it was never instrumental in sealing the deal and from a psychological perspective seems to be more valuable in the depedestalization process (not reflexively ceding females higher value with obsequious behavior). Far more efficient for guys who are not Roissy is simply talking about her pussy in a playful yet assertive manner. “Whatever works.”
I nabbed my last girlfriend — who dumped me for a Finnish diesel engineer, at my urging — by doing my GreatBooksForMen impression. I don’t know if there’s a lesson in that, lozozozlzlz.
As ugly as it is, every action (in this case feminism and grrl power) is going to have a reaction (in this case game and pick up artistry)
However if the .alt right can restore somehow a world in which the traditional values actually work well at that point shame away. Until then, they have no floor to stand on.
The PUA, MRA’s, MGTOW’s and all of them are doing what they can to get some happiness and in this world its the best anyone can do.
Since this thread is already way too long, rather than write from scratch I’ll just state that my own thoughts on the issue are best represented here by Michael Bell and by F of C. Bell said everything he needed to say in a single comment. And the always prolix F of C posted only three times in a thread of over 140 comments.
It stands to reason that anyone who understands the underlying concepts also understands the futility of arguing about them here.
The one thing I really dislike about PUA — aside from those who use it merely to get laid — is that the PUA community, whose members are explicit about psychological differences between the genders as well as their evolutionary basis, are unwilling to admit the role of evolution and natural difference in other areas of life. Why are PUAs, who recognize the value of “peacocking” and of social nonconformity, afraid to speak the truth by challenging politically-correct ideas on race, philosophy, political and socioeconomic theory? For them, evolution and nature seem to only apply to sexual differences, when in fact they go well beyond.
I would love to see a New Right PUA community form, PROVIDED it is composed only of men who are committed to BOTH New Right activism AND finding a suitable long-term wife by the time they reach 40, or within five years of joining the group, whichever comes sooner. Much fun can be had doing both. The goal of PUA for WNs/Traditionalists/New-Rightists isn’t merely to “ride the tiger” for the sake of sexual gratification and self-mastery, it’s also to raise large, healthy families.
Yep, almost 150 + comments on this brilliant article. Its all about the genitals, not the ideas for most men. In total, I don’t think the collection of Enoch Powell articles recently published received close to a tenth of the number of comments this article will ultimately receive.
I wonder how many men would be commenting on an article written on improving child education to produce superior young adults?
Not many. So its not about family, its about p*ssy and male loneliness (narcissism). End of story.
Its all about the genitals, not the ideas for most men.
Does the smell of cooking meat bother you as well?
What a goofball you are. I suggest you just leave the planet. This is life. Life is not debating an obscure and worthless Tory that made a stupid speech fifty years ago.
Patriarchy is a social construct and a very fragile one at that. Game is about biology and has nothing to say with regard to non-biological and non-psychological ideas. Totally different spheres. Limp-wristed Counter-Currents types should refrain from engaging people on the subject if they can’t take it.
You really believe we are going to build an entire race of philosopher kings or what?
‘This is life.’
HAHA! The fact that you are upset at not being able to get laid on a regular basis, and think that that circumstance is more important than the commemoration of a genius who addressed mass immigration and miscegenation of the West decades before the tidal wave (yet to arrive) is testament to your level of narcissism.
Our enemies look at us as animals to be controlled. Too many of us are just that, animals, with no higher dimension.
Personally, I like Greg Johnson and think he’s a Great Man (in the Carlyle sense).
Others here on CC make me discouraged and hopeless.
HAHA! The fact that you are upset at not being able to get laid on a regular basis, and think that that circumstance is more important than the commemoration of a genius who addressed mass immigration and miscegenation of the West decades before the tidal wave (yet to arrive) is testament to your level of narcissism.
It was a fucking worthless, unsystematic one-off.
A – I do not have a problem getting laid and I have plenty of children.
B – The fact that you don’t care about getting laid indicates a sever dysfunction in you.
We are animals. Why is it that the Christian always has to remind the atheists of this?!
Life is shit and blood and semen and death first. Everything else is Burkean clothing that we cover our naked, shivering, disgusting flesh with. We must acknowledge biology to move past it.
Roissy Hater’s anger seems genuine, and worth addressing, at least in the part I can deal with.
In an earlier posting on this site, the topic was “Women and White Nationalism.” It was a highly educational thread in many ways, and it showed something many, many women fear:
The Red Pill.
The Red Pill is the Symbol of Initiation; putting aside Childish things, and seeing in a more mature Light.
Thus, Roissyites use PUA more as vaccination against the nonverbal control tactics *cough* manipulation*cough* described in Esther Vilar’s book, which is available for free online as a PDF. Vilar says she received bona fide death threats from women, and it’s easy to see why.
We have been subtly manipulated to brutal ends on so many levels, it is overwhelming to too many people, far too often. It’s easier to reject the Red Pill as a “misunderstanding” as you return to the Matrix, where you take more and more tranquilizers and engage in more and more fervent distractions (SportsCenter!), to avoid the painful Work of transforming your life into something more than it was.
Most people really would prefer the crib, or the playpen. No one wants to do the hard foundational work they need to do the make themselves better people, and the world a better place.
For most of the last CENTURY, White Nationalism has been the best Idea, promulgated by the worst people, at least as it has been portrayed in the media. One of its greatest foundational flaws is it chose to define itself in practice in terms of what it was AGAINST, rather than what it was FOR. This lent itself to an adolescent behavior, Oppositional Defiance, where asll of our concerns were blamed on “the Jews/The INSIDERS/the Bilderbergers/you name it.” Most felt by naming the Conspiracy, they had done their duty, and, as The Conspiracy was so powerful, well, there really wasn’t anything they could do about it, anyway. Back to football…
Two men realized that we would never win if we were seen as cranky people who were helpless victims, professional Losers, in the eyes of those around us. they were George Lincoln Rockwell, whose Plan was for a national political organization representing the Race, and Harold Covington, who saw the status quo as being beyond saving, and saw the only answer was a new nation, formed consciously with the intention of being a Racial Homeland, the Northwest Republic.
THOSE were examples of people who successfully took the Red Pill, and learned how far down the rabbit hole ran, and came out wiser fr it.
That takes us to counter-currents, which is developing the metapolitical framework needed for Racial Growth; not merely to survive, but to conquer. This means being Aware of the thousands of Suggestions that face us daily, and attempt to shape our thinking, our values, our actions – US – to serve Others without conscious thought.
Game is simply an inoculation against Feminine control systems. Like any prescription, used to excess, it can be harmful. In a proper dosage, properly applied, it acts to inoculate you against excessive control by nonverbal Suggestion.
What is more important for us to remember is that Game helps you to counter the Mindset of Victimization, the learned helplessness where you awake one morning, and wonder what happened to your life.
In short, Game is one variation on the process of Adult Individuation the Red Pill helps call forth. The ability to act as an Adult, with Intent, is fostered by this particular Red Pill Process, as long as you see it as a means to end, and not an end unto itself.
That is where the metaphor of the Red Pill comes to the fore, as our Enemies only have the power over us we allow them. That is the importance of doing all we can, starting where we are, in an “apple pie, strictly legal, sort of way.” (HT: Jim Giles)
Their control begins with the control of our Thoughts. As WE take responsibility for our Thoughts, and act with clarity of Intent and Purpose, with an Adult perspective, their power over us is diminished dramatically.
We then take the energy that that ours all along, and Intentionally, Consciously, Create better lives, better relationships with Others of all stripes, better Families, better Communities, and finally, a better Nation, OUR Nation, a Northwest Republic.
Yes, ROISSY HATER, sex is still the most interesting subject under the sun to sexual beings.
A mystery, it’s, and proof of mental illness, that vasocongestion is not reserved for articles on Enoch Powell.
And Europeans never philandered.
And men bragging about conquests is unmanly.
And intellectual broads are what entire peoples made out of.
But seriously — that this generated so many comments is a good, healthy, normal thing. We all ought to be relieved Enoch Powell articles aren’t ballooning to 150 comments.
“I wonder how many men would be commenting on an article written on improving child education to produce superior young adults?”
For the millionth time, bro, there need to be babies first. You IQ-worshipers act like the only humans who matter are this fetishized list you carry in your heads of ‘geniuses, artists, inventors’ — the rest of our kind, of mankind, are so many insects in your elevated conception. And even though you affect on one hand to have a hard-on for “superior” people, just wait a day or two and we’ll find you lamenting the drop-off in white birthrates. Which is it: Do you want the majority or the minority? What shall we be for you, O arbiters of our worth?
Better question:
What are the conditions conducive to higher numbers of children? are they:
- Individualism
- Intellectualism
- Internet essays
- Serial monogamy
- Affluence & tailored personal comforts
- Highly discriminate fucking
or are they:
- Tribalism
- Superstition / backwardness
- Monoculture
- Poverty
- Indiscriminate fucking
or again:
- Tribal doctrine
- Lots of money
- Polygamy
- Caste /professional network
(Indo-Pak higher castes, Mormons)
I won’t be blamed, and have my chums blamed, for someone else’s failures amid the total failure of our culture. Don’t like us? Marry a German or something. Like we alone are poisoned by the zeitgeist. She’s pure. Her state of grace hath been interrupted by the monstrous counsels of Game i.e. die Juden in her pitiless search for just the right intellectual sugardaddy. We’re hate-filled lepers who talk about her pubic hair. That has to stop, O my brothers!
It’s a pity all this is refracted by internet journalism. This is a false dimension exacerbating the thing into truly monstrous proportions. Anytime a WN female can put words together, she’s going to take her shot at PUA, and the “alpha” web editor is going to let it through and ignore the surge of discontent that invariably follows. Then we’re accused of resentment of someone who wrote something about her resentment, about a phenomenon that arose from popular male resentment at feminism, which arose from pampered Englishwomen and radical Jewesses who resented white male patriarchy. We’re mad because we can’t find good wives, then we couldn’t get laid, then we discovered a way to get laid, now we discover getting laid is wrong and monstrous, some woman we don’t know and who couldn’t possibly be cut up into enough pieces to provide us all with a wife is mad at that thing that maybe got us laid, so instead of just saying hey I’m mad at this, all I want is to be loved and find someone to love without all this madness, she encodes her resentment in weird ideological terms which just makes us all the more mad, and calls us “brothers” when she just got through calling us “monsters”, but how are we her “brothers” when genetically we aren’t and we’ve never met, and anyway doesn’t she despise “inferior” people with “low IQ”?
All in all, I’m beat and need a smoke.
It has nothing to do with babies (there are plenty of less-than-super attractive Aryan women who would be willing to have your children). Grow up. Its all about sex.
There are more white people alive today than at any other time period. Numbers are not our problem, IDEOLOGY is.
If we controlled the ideology, white people could be 3% of the world’s population and still dominate the planet.
Oh! Now you’re talking my language!
DOMINATION uh! Can you believe this guy?
Do you not see what you’re doing here Roissy hater?
Hats off. Very well written.
Roissy Hater in blockquote:
Well, in the short run, Game is about sex. In the longer run, Game is a consequence of taking the Red Pill. And, the issues is one of Quality of children, and no quantity. We have lost the quantity race.
China, which seems to have done pretty well in the quantity race, is focused more intently than we can imagine on the Quality issue; in their case, achieved by genetic engineering.
That is the sort of Long View Thinking we should be taking. Am I speaking of positive eugenics for us? No, no need to. Somewhere in what we can see of our DNA we have the Talent for Creativity. Only the White West is innovative, and only we Create. What we can do is remove what does not work, such as the genetic foundation for Alzheimer’s.
Fascinating observation, and the foundation of Ideological effectiveness is Confidence; pure, Patriarchal CONFIDENCE, that we have a Duty to Manifest.
Terrible Tommy Metzger nailed in in one his podcasts; what you are seeing in the former Los Angeles is what happens as life leaves. The carrion, Eaters of the Dead, simply do what is their ecological duty. It is virtually unthinking behavior on their part.
We lost our confidence, thanks in large part to Freud, Bernays, and their followers. We can regain it by committing ourselves to the fulfillment of a transcendent purpose, a metapolitical purpose. The temporal bridge, of course, is Harold Covington’s masterful formulation, the Northwest Repiblic.
Fascinating observation. Can you imagine a race that is only three per cent of the population and controls America?
I can, and it should be US.
If enough of us has the courage to take the Red Pill…
They could start by reading Covington’s Northwest novels, starting with “A Distant Thunder.”
They could move forward by contributing to counter-currents, each and every month.
Even as we condemn her, we compete for her Favors. She is H Rider Haggard’s “She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed. Perhaps O’Meara is right and only Gays can be trusted to rule. But how does one attain such an exalted happy state?
James O’Meara never said anything of the kind.
Sure sounded alot like it, but since he wasn’t willing to talk about it with me, I’ll take your word for it. I did appreciate him providing the link to the Laksha Darkmoon article where he got eviscerated in the comments section. Apparently alot of other people thought like I did. Again for the record, I did make the attempt to find some middle ground – but sala vi.
And seriously, Gay Men often do have deep insights into feminine behavior. Such insights come more easily to them since they aren’t under the sway of women’s charms and affectations.
Jaego Scornzne in blockquote:
Credit where credit is due!
“Christopher from Oregon,” famed commenter on Marky Mark’s blog, as well as in the forum on Happy Bachelors, made the same observation. Why women support homosexuals in their workplaces is beyond me, as Christopher’s experience has been the homosexuals see the nonverbal controlling signals from women coming five miles away, and can advise men on how to deal with them, VERY effectively. More drama, perhaps?
His story is fascinating. Believe me, when the PUA crowd grows in maturity, they will be in his corner.
Women have no idea what will hit them as this goes on. None whatsoever. Might as well buy stock in Ralston-Purina, makers of Purina Cat Chow. You WILL be on the winning side of history with that investment.
One of his practices (from what I can tell), is that he is totally honest with women, in a diplomatic, forthright, sort of way. They seem really thrown by this, by his accounting.
I re-read the article and the comments. There is definitely some sick, hateful, misogynistic sh*t being expressed here that is no better than the rancid misandry that circulates on the feminist sites. The roots of this bitterness have got to be personal misjudgments and failings with women. There is no other reasonable explanation.
Hatred isn’t always bad – it can be creative and it has the Power to effect change. If someone punches me in the face out of the blue, and I punch back – are we equally guilty? That’s what is taught throughout our school system and in the justice system. It is pure slave morality. Likewise, if I hate those who hated me without our Cause, it is not the same thing.
Review your Nietszche. The Great Man has great hatred. Lesser Men have litte hatreds. Let our hatred be worthy of us. If I hate women and I respect myself – that is a mark of respect for them in that they are worthy of my hatred as opposed to just my contempt. Some are and some aren’t. In any case, the opposite of love is indifference not hatred. And hatreds differ in quality – the hot kind is creative and can change into other emotions; the cold kind is for deadly enemies and leads towards violence and warfare. Both kinds have been thrown at us in abundance. Lesbians specialize in cold deadly rage – as do women divorcing their husbands.
Those are interesting distinctions, and you are right there is nothing wrong with hate in certain contexts. But is this the right context for expressing hate? The kind of hate you’re talking about needs to be directed toward appropriate targets. I don’t think Ava Moretti is an appropriate target for hate. In fact, she ought to be applauded. There is a lot of truth in her claim that PUA/game has a distinct whiff of Jewishness about it. If people to disagree with her thesis, fine. Her ideas are a fair target for disagreement, but a number of these responses are not really responses at all, just nasty personal attacks. It’s the bitterness, the personal nature of these attacks in a situation that isn’t really personal, that leads me to think these men are bitter over their own personal misjudgments or rejections.
Side Note:
I agree with poster “uh.” I love your comments. They’re always interesting and educational, and you write with a rare verve and sparkle.
I agree.
When all is said and done, we really need to re-evaluate what we’re all about, especially in regards to how we treat each other. We should be Aryan, not only in blood, but (more importantly) Aryan in character also: noble, respectful, honourable, faithful and worthy.
This is an awkward subject because there are genuine issues
- marriage/divorce
- entitlement
- women married to the state (the real alpha male)
etc
but so much of game is just bile.
Firstly there seems to be a lot of men who judge women on an entirely materialistic basis (as a 5 or 7 or a 9) and then complain about women viewing men on an entirely materialistic basis. Anyone who is blind to reciprocal morality to that extent is worthless trash imo.
Secondly there seems to be a lot of men who want to have one night stands with lots of women and resent women not facilitating this. Why should they? What’s in it for them? If a woman does want uncomplicated casual sex then it might as well be with the Brad Pitts of this world. For men who want this but aren’t Brad Pitts then i guess game might be useful for them as a tool but it has no social or poitical significance.
Also because they’re looking at it from the view of one-night stands rather than a long-term deal it leads them into believing total nonsense like women prefering a share in an “alpha” to a permanent deal with a “beta.” This might be true in the context of casual sex but when it’s for children the very last thing the average woman wants is a time-share man. You can only believe nonsense like that if your only experience been looking for a long-term one night stands.
If you want marriage and kids and dating for you is a genuine process of trying people on for size first – and by genuine i mean for example dropping women you dislike rather than pretending to like them to get them into bed – then th whole thing is a lot easier than gamers make out. Your score will probably be lower but so what. The bileful dating experience gamers describe is mostly a result of going into it with a bileful agenda imo.
TL;DR: anyone who sees dating as a “sexual marketplace” is guaranteed to only ever experience a sexual marketplace.
However, although that is 90% true it’s not 100%…
The good part of game, even when it’s wrong is that it is looking at these things from an HBD point of view. If you imagine an island where food is got by hunting wild boar with a spear and you have two sets of women one of which by random mutation is attracted to men with traits that are bad for boar-hunting with a spear and the other set who by random mutation are attracted to men with traits that are good for boar-hunting with a spear then three guesses which set of women are going to reproduce their genes.
So gamers are right that for the most part women are wired up to respond to what you could call masculine traits. So far so good.
Then two things happened
1) Young men sneakily read their sister’s Cosmo magazines and accept at face value the articles which say women want men to act like women. Jerks ignored it and carried on being masculine while non-jerks started acting like women and then got angry when it wasn’t true. That’s because – very simple rule of thumb – everything the media promotes is poison.
2) Young men from college backgrounds who don’t do sports are no longer masculinized by activity. If you came up in a bluecollar background in the past you’d automatically do a lot of activities that made you physically more confident – masculinized you – by basically getting knocked about in various ways and thereby losing your fear of getting knocked about. The whitecollar life doesn’t provide that by default any more so if a young man from that background wants to masculinize themselves they have to do a bit of self-terraforming.
Any of the old ways should do it, any activity that
- gets your hands dirty
- gets you cut and bruised
- could get your nose broke
- is dangerous
should all work.
Don’t do it to impress anyone. Do it to terraform yourself into being more physically confident through becoming skilled at a physical/manual activity or an activity that gets you knocked about enough to realise pain and a bit of blood are no big deal. It will change how you carry yourself and that will make you more attractive and they won’t know why.
If you took identical twin boys from a very safe whitecollar environment and one of them was
into computers and one skateboarding the skateboarder would be more physically confident and less tentative simply through smashing himself up more often.
Also
1) All white culture is based on shaming language – for good reason. It’s not unique to women.
2) “After all, as Roissy so astutely noted, there is nothing in what marriage has become for us.”
Even if everything gamers say is 100% true there’d still be children – which is huge.
3) “They betrayed us and now they must pay.”
a) Whiny little bitch. b) Look at the stats for childless career women. Women have paid for marxified-feminism in the most fundamental way possible.
4) “As a white male, I am disgusted by “game” and genuinely want to treat women romantically”
If you want to be a white knight remember what a Knight was. Polite is good but a polite wuss is still a wuss.
5) “Although masochism is an element of female psychology, frankly women who openly prefer assholes or abusers are probably damaged goods, and you should hope that they are not attracted to you.”
At one end of the spectrum child-abuse victims often blame themselves and get self-destructive as a result. At the other end of the spectrum “negging” (exemplified by uh on this thread) is a way of acting dominant and it obviously works – but if you’re looking for a mate rather than a one night stand then it’s not a good way.
6) “As for the charge that game encourages white men to act “black”, all I can say it, so what? If a black man is doing something right”
This is how you know game is Jewish in origin – taking the most dysfunctional black behavior and re-packaging it as a cultural weapon against whites.
It’s not even true in the black context. You see stories in the media about this or that but the reality is there’s a small segment of *very* stupid welfare queens with lots of kids by lots of different men but a lot more women with one kid from when they were young and naive off some guy who said he loved them. That’s what 95% of real-life “game” is and always has been – lying about the l-word.
Change is slow work. The Feminists are now noticing the Men’s Movement and the Marriage Strike and they are freaked out – and lashing back. They haven’t suffered enough yet by any means while Men have been tormented for generations now. Change will happen when women realize that we’re dead serious and it’s in their interest to change. Appeals to their better natures are in vain – most of them don’t have any.
So hopefully young women will want marriage and children and be frightened of what happened to their aunts and older co-workers. And thus the women’s studies departments will close down. And when we move towards changing the laws back to sanity, there will be little opposition except from the obviously evil.
anon made two points that need to be addressed.
anon on blockquote, cites in bold
Children which can be removed from your life in their entirety, virtually forever, while YOU pay her to “maintain” them, while she’s hitting it with another man, who your Children will be told repeat TOLD to call “Dad.” Wait until, out of the blue, your son tells you he has to call you “Roger,” because Mom’s new boyfriend is to be called “Dad.” Oh, by the way, they are leaving the state forever real soon, and there is not a damn thing you can do about it.
Did you read my links to the-spearhead.com, particularly walking in hell’s comments?
Note, by the way, a lot of the under 30 crowd specifically say they do not want children.
I was talking with a urologist who said the dick docs are amazed at the number of TWENTY-FIVE year old guys who are coming to the office for vasectomies. That is a function of the Teachings of Father Himself, Tom Leykis, Of Blessed Name. This is unheard of in modern medical history. He also said we would be surprised at the number of young women who are getting themselves fixed.
Years ago, I did not get a position I really wanted, and was told by my friend I was turned down because, with all of my education and credentials, I was not married, with children. The Mother Corp would not spend a year training me, just so I could walk across the street to Digital Equipment. He also told me, “Look, you are not missing a damn thing.”
I looked at the lives of my Beaten Dog co-workers. He was right.
Charlie Brown is a classical White Knight, always seeking the approval of Lucy. Good luck with that football, Charlie Brown.
Actually, it is a behavior developed from the Black society, which is MATRIARCHAL. If you want to see what a matriarchal social order looks like, get “The Wire” on dvd. The most Masculine male in the series is Omar Little, the homosexual, and no apologies about it. That is the best outcome we can expect from a matriarchy.
There is something else we need to deal with here, and that’s blindly rejecting something that is (nominally) “Jewish in origin.” Let’s look at Judaism as social technology, and admit they are ten for ten against us. What are they doing right we can learn from? What stops us from doing that?
No, Game is about doing what works, and not being victims; not playing Someone Else’s Game (if you will) by Someone Else’s Rules.
Plugging the energy leaks on our side is an invaluable first step. If a knowledge of Game helps us to do so, and stop being victims, for a change, so much the better.