Print this post Print this post

Toward a Europe of Carnal Fatherlands?

charnelles1,502 words

Translated by Greg Johnson

Racism is merely an awareness of racial differences. By no means does it imply the desire to oppress or destroy another race merely because it is different from our own. Quite the contrary! We are racist for the blacks as well as for Aryans and Jews. To revisit and slightly tweak a well-known phrase, “We are all Israelis!” Because for us, the SS, as well as for the sabras, the womb of one’s mother has the right to define the race of men that it brings forth — the same right that the she-wolf defines the species of wolves, which are different from dogs. If she commits the sin — that will one day be recognized as the true original sin — and couples with a dog, her descendants will no longer be wolves or dogs. The laws that govern the evolution of man and animals are exactly the same.

We remain the lucid bearers of Europe. And at her foundation is the concept of race, to the extent that a thousand years of obscurantism have not diluted it into the biological indifferentiation of the “gray world” being promoted. A second imperative calls Europe to the concept of territory. This is the most powerful of all those forces that condition the comportment of men and animals. Konrad Lorenz and Robert Ardrey have demonstrated and Heinz Heidiger has said: “The history of territorialism in the animal kingdom is the first chapter in the history of property in the human species.” The robin hopping in your garden is on his territory and does not share it with others, except his mate. The same garden, or park, or area is your territory. The instinct for one’s place of origin is directly related to the land, as well as procreation. Salmon cross oceans to spawn in the river where they were born, and die of exhaustion. Ignoring this instinct that love of genesis anchored deeply in all vertebrate species, including man, leads to political and social aberrations resulting in communism. But the Communist man who no longer possessed personal territory, ceased to love the land and cultivate it, placing the Soviet Union on the brink of starvation. In Communist countries, it is also the grayness of life, the apathy of the proletarian who, less fortunate than the beasts, no longer owns a piece of land of his own. But the current evolution of so-called capitalist countries leads to the same result. Although well-fed, his hands full of so-called consumer goods, deracinated men of the West vegetate within the sixty square meters of their public housing apartments, depressed, aggressive, ready to break anything, molest anyone, because they no longer possess the space required by their animal instincts.

Europe must be rethought starting from the biologically-based notion of blood, likewise the races, the terrestrial imperatives, and the soil. That is the meaning of the “carnal fatherlands.” Only small carnal fatherlands can exist with the nourishment of this double force. The greater the extent of a single space, the more racial reality is diluted by mixing and the more territory escapes the property of the individual to profit of the group. Basically, we must choose between the USSR and Brittany, the continental destiny or the regional one. A frog may well grow as big as an ox, then die, but it can also remain a frog. This is where I part company with my many nationalist friends, while sharing many of their basic opinions. This is where I part company with my many Catholic friends while sharing much of their morality. For France, which bears the dignified name of the kings who represented the most brilliant success in the history of the West, committed suicide by murdering Louis XVI and was not reborn. It will complete its disappearance in a Sovietized continent, dragging to oblivion the nuclei that gave it strength, the Germans, Celts, and Alpines.

The SS could still save Europe today, like thirty years ago, but it no longer exists on the temporal plane. As I showed in my book Les SS de la Toison d’Or [The SS of the Golden Fleece, Paris: Presses de la Cité, 1975], in 1944, the SS galvanized all that remained of true warriors and daring thinkers on the old continent. Carrying the oldest cross in the world, down from the North with the primitive Aryans, the Waffen SS was no longer German in the narrow nationalist sense of the term. It was European and wished to revive the basic values ​​of blood and soil. At Hildesheim, in the SS monastery “Germania Haus,” we mapped the “carnal fatherlands” which we demanded be recognized by our combat and imposed upon the Pan-Germanists who did not agree, if necessary with the support arms that we would keep after a military victory.

It was a racially based and denationalized Europe. I consider it perfectly valid today, because still the Bretons are not Nicians, Basques not Andalusians, Bavarians not Prussians, Corsicans not Picards, and Piedmontese not Sicilians! We said, to each his own, and the cows will be well guarded, but guarded by the SS, of course, because the masses remain incapable of self-care. Because we were the liberators of the ethnic groups that were prisoners of the nations, the cross-bearers of a new religion that preached that man was not created in God’s image, but is subject to evolution that God has directed for six hundred million years, because he will allow us only to discover his image one day through a superhumanity that will not be given to us but must be conquered.

Anyway, historically based nations are doomed. They have outlived their usefulness and cost too much pure blood. Example: is the tide turning now toward a love match between France and Germany? Mere appearance that overlays major economic interests. There will never be a true Franco-German entente. The contentious history between the two nations is too heavy. But between Brittany and Bavaria there is no historical dispute. The SS wanted to save the dominant racial ethnicities still evident, give them cultural sovereignty, that is to say, a higher level of freedom, allowing them to be administered according to the customs and traditions of the place. France would disappear. But Germany too! A Europe thus diversified would recover its genius and resume its upward evolution, because evolution lies in increasingly pronounced diversification.

These federated provinces would share the same economy of means of defense. Fifty million Waffen SS commanded by the racial elite of the continent would easily hold out against the two billion Asians and Africans who would inevitably assault us in the next century. The economy, which itself could be “regionalized,” was planned, for we do not envision a Renault designed by a Basque technician, built on a Pomeranian assembly line, receiving a Scandinavian finish. A minor problem. Since the Stone Age, man has been able to have whatever economy he pleases, and there is no other wealth than men.

With the carnal fatherlands hand-in-hand with the bearers of the new cross, Europe would again become the object of admiration, envy, and salutary fear which would inspire the world for a thousand years. By fighting a losing battle from 1939 to 1945, Europeans have lost that chance, perhaps for the last time.

Today, however, the disintegrating tendency of ethnic groups against nation states is more pronounced than thirty years ago. The German space is a federal republic where Munich is as independent of Hamburg as Nice or Bordeaux of Paris. If a referendum asking the Piedmontese, Bergasques, Venetians, and Lombards the question “Do you prefer an autonomous regime to the Republican domination of Rome?” Eighty percent said “Yes.” And already Aosta, South Tyrol, and Sicily have won their cultural independence. The Flemish want to split from the Walloons and the Belgian royal state. And if Franco had given autonomy to the Basques and Catalans, it would have prevented Marxists from becoming their spokesmen.

Old Europe will inevitably be forced to give freedom to its ethnic groups or to decimate them. Because in the short run, we do not see the means to unite these “carnal fatherlands.” Freedom through universal suffrage? It’s chaos, a knife fight to delineate the respective areas of influence. Adopt a common language complementing the regional languages ​​(what a fight between the French, English, and Germans!) . . . ?

Can the common market be anything other than big business playing in favor of some international powers? Lodges that might find in this liberation of peoples a humanist ideal dare not promote it. So who? Why perhaps the Russians, gentlemen! Remember that the USSR has a federal constitution that serves as the cover of the racist dictatorship of Great Russian Muscovites! So a continent of federated peoples from Gibraltar to Vladivostok? With a federating and communist Tsar like the great Stalin? After all, why not, since part of Europe spat on the prophet that the gods had sent her? But she will pay!

Source: Défense de l’Occident, no. 136, March 1976.

 

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

7 Comments

  1. It is I only
    Posted October 23, 2014 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Could we have an english translation of,

    Roger Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce
    Auschwitz :
    Le silence de Heidegger
    ou
    Le secret de la tragédie juive

    Plus some of his writing??

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted October 24, 2014 at 1:10 am | Permalink

      I am sorry, but it does not seem a high priority work.

  2. YL
    Posted October 23, 2014 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    The Third Reich collaborated with the Breton nationalists, and Himmler stated that in eastern Europe, Poland for example, the large nationalities should be split up into Lemkos, Rusyns, Goralens, and so on.

    Both of these were likely for selfish reasons. Poland and France were enemies of Germany, and it thus suited the Germans to divide up those nations. It didn’t suit them to divide up Germany, as this would make that country weaker.

    I would add that one of Hitler’s more notable mistakes was a huge overcentralisation of power, abolishing the old states. Bavarians, Prussians, Swabians, Rhinelanders and Saxons are all quite distinctive ethnic or sub-ethnic groups – Germans are a tribal people, and this should be recognised in government. Since 1945, Germany has developed a much superior federal system which I don’t hear any complaints about.

  3. Leon
    Posted October 23, 2014 at 8:40 am | Permalink

    Does the author have any evidence supporting his claim that the SS intended to replace the nations of Europe with autonomous ethnic groups? Because as I recall, as soon as Hitler came to power, he quickly clamped down on the Bavarian independence movement, which was still strong at the time.

  4. Proofreader
    Posted October 23, 2014 at 7:51 am | Permalink
  5. Ulf Larsen
    Posted October 23, 2014 at 7:16 am | Permalink

    Thank you for this translation, Greg. An inspiring piece! Do you still have plans to publish a translation of “Hitler or Judah” in hard copy? If so, when do you think that will be? (I miss the monthly newsletter with info on upcominc publications!)

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted October 23, 2014 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

      I hope to bring out Hitler or Judah? next year.

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4

    Reuben

    The Node

    Axe

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance

    Standardbearers

    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    Archeofuturism

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Tyr

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above