Print this post Print this post

A Dearth of Intelligence
Robert Durst, Jinx or Jew?

2,768 words

Robert Durst

Robert Durst

“What the hell did I do? Killed them all of course.” — Robert Durst

One of the oddities of the current scene is that only White Nationalists, or “race realists,” are allowed to mention the intelligence of the Jews. In fact, they seem to have a shameful obsession with it, especially the latter group, who seem to think it can provide evidence for another of their hobby-horses, the all-pervasive relevance of IQ and genetics. 

Among this group we hear dark whispers, or envious whining,[1] of the fearsome Ashkenazi program of selecting especially smart tailors and dairymen, arranging their marriages and frequent reproduction, and thereby engineering a general lifting of the European Jew’s IQ.

Usually, there is an aside, in which the old Protestant myth of the Roman Church doing the reverse, selecting the intelligent among the peasants and confining them to celibacy and monasteries, is morosely recalled.[2] The Protestant is the Eddie Dezen of religions, always bullying others to curry favor with its big buddy, Judaism.

One problem with the super-intelligent Jew meme is the remarkable dearth of science and culture among the Jews as such. I say, “as such,” meaning among themselves, outside of their participation in the Dead White Man’s world.[3]

Prior to their “liberation” by Napoleon, the intelligence and industry of the Jew was devoted exclusively to the study and explication of the Torah, the Talmud, and, if he still had any life in him, the Qabbala.[4] If this is culture, then Bob Jones University is Harvard.[5]

And in the present day, now in possession, more or less, of their “own” country and fully-subsidized by the goyim, one would imagine Israel, The Jewish State, would be pouring forth masterpieces of the arts and sciences. Instead, apart from some software companies — nothing but crickets, or locusts.

But another problem is this: supposing this Lamarckian conspiracy theory is true, what if, as breeders all know, breeding for one desirable characteristic brings along other, less wholesome traits? Especially when done with the pre-Mendelian ideas of the resolutely anti-secular knowledge rabbis?

Consider the great “Jewish Geniuses.” Has any one person been responsible for more pain and death than Marx or Freud?

And Einstein? Sure, general relativity sounds pretty good, though he might have stolen it from Poincare. But Sophocles was a pretty wise man, for a goy, and he famously said “Count no man happy until he dies.” In short, or in New Yorkese (to anticipate our theme): “we’ll see.” If mankind annihilates itself, or the Israelis enact the “Samson option,”[6] I’d say any future, alien history would suggest nuclear fission was, in the long wrong, a net loss.[7]

In short, then, what if, on balance, the Ashkenazi are smart; but Hannibal — excuse me, Dr. Hannibal — Lekter smart?[8]

Comes now a six part HBO series The Jinx — The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst, premiering in February and March, 2015.

From Andrew Jarecki and Marc Smerling (the Oscar® nominees behind Capturing the Friedmans), comes The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst, a six-part examination of the reclusive millionaire at the heart of three killings spanning four decades. Robert Durst, the scion of a New York real estate empire, has long been a suspect in the notorious 1982 disappearance of his wife, Kathie [McCormack]. Further suspicion was raised with the unsolved killing of his confidante, Susan Berman, thought to be a key witness in the investigation into Kathie’s disappearance in 2000, as well as the subsequent killing and dismemberment of a neighbor in Galveston, Texas. Durst has consistently maintained his innocence and remains a free man today.[9]

It says something about the modern world, or modern America, that one has to ask: is Robert Durst in fact a Jew? The filmmakers have been as meticulous as any crime scene investigators — or serial killer — in removing or withholding any tell-tale evidence thereof. No yarmulkes, no film or stills of young Bob’s bar mitzvah (one can only imagine the crass opulence displayed), no film of Bob receiving the grateful thanks of some Judaic organization.

Thanks to the internets, of course, it’s an easy matter to confirm:

Durst’s paternal grandfather, Joseph Durst, a penniless Jewish immigrant tailor from Austria-Hungary, eventually became a very successful real estate manager and developer, founding the Durst Organization in 1927.

“Eventually” is a nice touch. I wonder what the story there is. No funny business at all, I’m sure, just hard work, pluck, and the chance America gives its immigrant guests. From rags to real estate fortune, only in America![10]

Even more interesting is this sidelight:

Durst went on to become a real estate developer in his father’s business; however, it was his brother Douglas who was later appointed to run the family business. The appointment in the 1990s caused a rift between Robert and his family, and he became estranged from them.[11]

Fascinating, since the Holy Book of Jewish Fairytales is most notable, after being a record of gleeful genocide,[12] as a series of tales in which a Jewish “hero” proves his worth by deceiving others, mostly the ignorant goyim (the fleecing of which is expressly permitted by the tribal deity they have taught the Christians to so arrogantly arrogate the name “God” itself, YHVH-1).

So pervasive, that a subtheme emerges in which the thievery and deceit is internalized, and brother preys on brother, not just Cain and Abel right from the start, but other pairs, most notably Jacob (whose name means “he usurps”) and Esau.[13]

So it’s no surprise to read, in the New York Times of January 2015, older brother Douglas saying about Robert “There’s no doubt in my mind that if he had the opportunity to kill me, he would.”[14]

Dougie needn’t have worried;[15] rather than turning inward, Bob directed his attention to the wide open spaces of his host country, first murdering his shiksa wife, then his “confidante” who had moved to LA, then — the murder of a mere tribeswoman,[16] apparently unsatisfying — shooting and dismembering a neighboring drifter in Galveston, TX.

An especially egregious example the talents of Jacob is how Durst flim-flams a jury of good ol’ boys (and girls) that the most damning evidence against him — the dismemberment and attempted disposal of the body, surely not the act of an innocent or even sane man — was, in fact, irrelevant. The charge was murder (not defiling a corpse), and the jury was supposed to consider only whether the State could prove that; which, of course, it couldn’t, the head, where the shot was fired, being missing, due to Bob’s dismemberment and disposal of the body.

“I didn’t murder my friend,” he says, “but I did dismember him.”

Contrary to the media myth of “them redneck anti-Semites,”[17] the good Judeo-Christians fell all over themselves to turn the other cheek, do unto others, and all the rest of their nauseating creed, eager to curry favor with the Lord by “not judging” one of God’s special lambs.

“When Mr. Durst was on the stand, I felt he was talking from the heart.”

Well, I guess that would explain the hollow reverb. We’ll get back to Bob’s voice in a moment.

I have no doubt that Bob himself came up with this eminently Talmudic strategy, perhaps even before the dismemberment idea itself. But even if it came from his high-priced lawyers, it matters not; the legal system, the natural hunting grounds of the Torah-trained Judaic, has been thoroughly Judaizied,[18] and only those WASPs and Erse flourish, who have Judaized themselves.[19]

In his interviews filmed in current time, Durst appears to be a nice, well-preserved though somewhat scrawny old man (he’s 71). Looking at him, he reminded me of the rich young man (wealth does keep one young) that infuriates Joe Lampton when he looks around his new town in Room at the Top:

Everything about him was easy and loose but not tired or sloppy. He had an undistinguished face with a narrow forehead and mousy hair cut short with no oil on it. It was a rich man’s face, smooth with assurance and good living.[20]

As he speaks, however, the façade cracks, the mask slips. Anyone who’s lived in New York, or Miami, or Beverly Hills[21] will instantly recognize the type. The facial tics, the smirk (as uncontrollable as Strangelove’s arm), and above all, the voice, the smooth voice that tries to sound like Long Island Lockjaw but can’t keep that supercilious sneer out of it.[22]

In the first interview (Episode 4), Bob comments on the trial strategy thusly:

The most intriguing moment of the episode occurred when Durst (in the present) was told that they should take a break by the documentary’s filmmaker Andrew Jarecki. However, Durst sat in his chair and began muttering some practiced phrases to himself.

“I did not knowingly, purposefully lie,” he whispered to himself, saying it again and adding the word “intentionally” to the phrase. “I did make mistakes,” he added.

Durst’s lawyers then came over to tell him that his mic was still on and that they were able to hear everything, but he did not seem to care at all.

It’s the voice of the Talmudist, bobbing up and down, repeating his goy-deluding gobbledy-gook. Earlier, Bob recalls his lawyers telling him to swear to tell the truth, and nothing but the truth, but to ignore that part about the whole truth:

“I did not tell the whole truth. [Pause] Nobody tells the whole truth.”

The sneer, the toss of the head, the eyelid tic, you can just hear him complete the thought in his head:

Only a goy would be so stupid.

If only Bob could keep his thoughts to himself. But not only does he mutter like this in public, in the second interview (Episode 6), he takes foot-shooting to a new level. The interview is over, he excuses himself to the bathroom, and despite the debacle of the first interview, keeps his mike on again. (Perhaps he thinks the bathroom is soundproof?)[23] As Bob attends to his business, we hear:

“There it is. You’re caught . . . What the hell did I do? Killed them all of course.”

Well, stupid is as stupid does, I suppose. The only way to understand Bob’s blunders — other than senility — is that, like Jews in the West in general, he’s been so successful at pulling the wool over the eyes of the sheeple that he’s gotten a little over-confident, a little cocky (or, too cocky, he having been cocky as his birthright).

And indeed, I have no doubt Bob will walk again. I can hear his lawyers now:

What, you thought he was serious? That’s funny, it’s funny that you would think that. Clearly he was being ironic. Don’t you know about irony, our people’s sense of humor that has preserved us through centuries of oppression?[24]

As yes, those centuries of oppression. Just like Bob, pursued from pillar to post, for no reason at all, by those meshuganah goyim.

The tale of The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst is the story of the Jews in White civilization, especially in America; his life, our deaths.

Notes

[1] “Gee, I wish we had one of them Doomsday Machines!” — Gen. Buck Turgidson, Dr. Strangelove.

[2] Just as the Jews are proud to acknowledge The Myth, priests are proud to only mildly pooh-pooh a myth that implies they are smarter than average. In fact, as anyone who knows history, or has interacted with priests, knows they are hardly the cream of the crop; in mediaeval times, their ignorance and illiteracy was proverbial. And nuns! If they taught you, or later you taught them, you know what I’m talking about. My mentor, Dr. Deck, a graduate of the Pontifical Institute, sneered that modern “Thomists” based their ideas on the two Summas, one written for Arabs, the other for nuns.

[3] As relentlessly documented by Israel Shahak: Jewish History, Jewish Religion The Weight of Three Thousand Years; Foreword by Gore Vidal (London: Pluto Press, 2008); online here.

[4] The study of which was reserved for elders who had already mastered the first two; sorry, Madonna.

[5] Of course, the Ptolomeans here add another epicycle: the Talmud itself is a tool to sharpen the wits!

[6] Despite the feverish efforts of the Judeo-Cons to promote the idea of Islamofascism and the unique depravity of the Koran, the first suicide terrorist (or “homicide terrorist,” to use the Foxism) was, of course, Samson, another “hero” of the Good Book. The Jew hysterically points elsewhere — especially his brother Semite, the sons of Ishmael — to distract attention to his own disease. Say, isn’t “De.” Charles Krauthammer a practitioner of the Freudian voodoo?

[7] Einstein’s “contribution” was more than just theoretical; while German scientists dragged their heels, Einstein relentlessly beat the brows of his Golem, FDR, to hurry up and produce a bomb to nuke the Germans.

[8] Michael Mann changed the names of both “Lektor” and “Dolarhyde” in Manhunter, his version of the book Red Dragon, to sound “less Jewish” as Mel Brooks might say; presumably to avoid the charge of anti-Semitism, or perhaps as a good Shabbos goy?

[9] http://www.thejinxhbo.com/

[10] Yockey emphasized how America, with its lack of roots and even its anti-traditional “tradition,” was especially helpless before the Judaic onslaught. Hitler sneered that America was the Jews’ new Promised Land.

[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Durst#cite_note-keyplayers-9

[12] All scholars not attached to evangelical colleges agree that the tales of Hebrew conquest are entirely fictional, the Hebrews having arisen quite naturally among the indigenous tribes of that godforsaken land. Every nation and people embellishes their past; but given the chance to fictionalize, this is what they came up with? What does that tell you about their psychology? It’s as if Howard Zinn wrote the first history of the USA, and Pastor Weems came along later.

[13] The story of Joseph combines both themes: his brothers sell him into slavery, which allows him to swindle the Egyptians,

[14] “Real Estate Chief Fears Troubled Sibling Has New Weapon: TV; Douglas Durst, in Rare Move, Speaks About Robert Durst Ahead of HBO Documentary,” New York Times, Jan. 1, 2015, here.

[15] At least, not yet. The HBO filmmakers show Bob skulking around the Durst offices, and in January he was arrested for violating Douglas’ restraining order by sauntering up the stairs to his townhouse (also on film).

[16] Whose father was an associate of Las Vegas mobsters Bugsy Siegel and Meyer Lansky.

[17] One can just hear the boys of MST3K mimicking the old salsa commercial: “Neeew York City!”

[18] The only thing funnier than the “white patriots” who squawk when someone mentions the “debt we owe” to the Torah, is the efforts of Eddie Deezen’s like “Justice” Scalia to ever more explicitly endorse the Torah as “the Law of the Land.”

[19] “Jimmy McGill” is already a Chicago shyster; his need to transform himself into “Saul Goodman,” because it impresses his immigrant and Mexican drug cartel clients in the Southwest, summarizes the degeneration of the post-war American legal profession, and perhaps America itself.

[20] Room at the Top, Chapter Three (1957; Valancourt, 2013).

[21] Or, as Durst would write, “Beverley Hills.”

[22] He reminds me of a handsomer Martin Kosleck, a “German-Russian” who fled Hitler and made a career in Hollywood B movies and TV: According to the Times, “Mr. Kosleck’s icy demeanor and piercing stare on screen made him a popular choice to play Nazi villains. He portrayed Joseph Goebbels, Adolf Hitler’s propaganda minister, five times, and also appeared as an SS trooper and a concentration-camp officer.” The decline of the “Nazi Villain” led him to branch out into mad scientist parts, but the Cold War provided opportunities to play his “Russian” angle. In Agent for H.A.R.M. (1966) his Eastern European bad guy is, in a weird B-movie touch, surrounded by henchmen who look and sound like they stepped out of the Abercrombie and Fitch catalog (and one who looks like Prince), which is mercilessly parodied on the MST3k episode (#815); “I wouldn’t want to put a lead pill into the old family jewels.”

[23] There’s a clear, to me at least, fart sound in the middle of this. Such is Bob’s contempt for the justice system: “I fart in your general direction”: see Monty Python and the Holy Grail (Jones & Gilliam, 1975). The bathroom business can’t help but recall the bumptious alien intruding on WASP civilization, and rather than conform to its “repressions” instead formulating subversive “intellectual” campaigns for “letting it all hang out, daddy-O.” See John Murray Cuddihy, The Ordeal of Civility: Freud, Marx, Levi-Strauss, and the Jewish Struggle with Modernity (Boston: Basic Books, 1974).

[24] If Bob Odenkirk isn’t available, consider Martin Short’s Nathan Thurm, here.

 

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

15 Comments

  1. Posted December 23, 2015 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    Pathetic Goy! We no longer need to pretend that Goy are human, more like pigs and filthy at that. We will have and do control every aspect of your pathetic lives whether you know this or not. We have done so since the time of our Great Architect. We have taken lands made them ours, we have controlled every war, controlled the monies of all Goys, harvested all of our Silver and Gold which has always been rightfully ours, every President, king,Queen, Caliph, Pope, Buddhist, 33rd Master Masons, Emperor, Dictator, Czar, Fascist, Socialist, Commander, General, Banks, CEO, Federal Reserve, IMF, Bilderberg, CFR , Judicial (Jewdicial) system, Hollywood, Media, Program (Your Minds) CIA, Mossad, Hamas, Isil, Taliban, Nazi, Hitler himself. I can continue for centuries and you pig minds will not comprehend. Soon the order will fall into place, then you will see your true masters in the open. We do not go to jail we own it, we have the right to put to death any we choose as long as it is not one of our own. We have no rules, we make rules. Then and only then you will see the same you curse and hate are the same you call n*ggers which in fact and obviously in history which you do not know of only what we choose for you to know are the real Hebrews. Your bible exist but we put the false prophets to teach it so you do not read it for yourselves, which contain all the answers. THE GREAT DECEPTION.

  2. anon
    Posted March 28, 2015 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    “race realists,” are allowed to mention the intelligence of the Jews. In fact, they seem to have a shameful obsession with it, especially the latter group, who seem to think it can provide evidence for another of their hobby-horses, the all-pervasive relevance of IQ and genetics.

    Bear in mind cui bono here. They need that belief to be mainstreamed before coming out into the open so some of the people promoting it may be on their team.

    I think there is some truth to the belief but the rabbi mechanism is bogus – the same mechanism would apply to muslim religious scholars for example. The rabbi argument is used as a smokescreen for the much more likely cause which is having banking and money lending as an exclusive ethnic economic niche for centuries *ought* to lead to higher average IQ.

    This would also be the reason for the lack of noticeable effect of this high IQ in areas like science – it was almost exclusively devoted to making money – which is where it was noticeable.

    Lastly – at least to most – as far as leadership roles go high IQ is not the only criterion; a sense of stewardship is at least as important and they have a SQ of zero unless it’s their own people. As leaders with high IQ and low SQ are the worst possible option they are the last people you’d want in charge high IQ or not.

    breeding for one desirable characteristic brings along other, less wholesome traits

    If selection is *solely* on a single trait then it will lead to negative traits over time because mutations are random – some will be positive for the trait being selected for and negative in some other way because random chance is random and if selection is *solely* on that trait then the negative part will be ignored. It is self-evidently true (given enough time).

    In reality the selection probably won’t really be 100% on intelligence. If a negative trait was bad enough it would outweigh any benefit but the closer to 100% on one trait selection is the more certain it is that negative traits would accrue eventually. It’s no different from pedigree dogs.

  3. Margot Metroland
    Posted March 21, 2015 at 1:04 am | Permalink

    You have addressed, and maybe demolished, a great sticking-point in WN philosophy. Namely, the Jews tell us they’re really smart, but what have they really done? Anyone? Anyone?

    • James O'Meara
      Posted March 24, 2015 at 10:06 am | Permalink

      What have they done? Well, this for example: A great scholar, pillar of the community, and practitioner of “family values” to the tune of 10 children. A model for the White community, no?

      “Todros Grynhaus was a respected religious scholar in England’s Orthodox jewish community as well as teacher at several jewish religious schools. (1) He was married with ten children, but one day in late 2012 his world came crashing down around him. He was accused by a former pupil of having raped her when she was in his care. (2)
      “It turns out that Grynhaus had been well-known in jewish community as a child molester of both boys and girls in his care for a considerable time before this. (3) He had even been caught by his wife in the bedroom of one of his underage female students. (4)”
      http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2015/03/todros-grynhaus-jewish-child-molester.html

      SC goes on to note the role of “no informing” in the Judaic community, which certain WN’s would have you believe is a negro value (“snitches get stitches”). But like “No homo” (“Both boys and girls,” a nice touch) it’s a Judaic value, imbibed through their Baptist culture.

    • James O'Meara
      Posted March 24, 2015 at 10:09 am | Permalink

      Another Durst-like touch: “However as the 16th March he has to be re-tried as the jury couldn’t apparently find it in their hearts to convict him. (12)”

      What does it take with these people, a stake through the heart. Oops, no heart!

  4. Posted March 19, 2015 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    “But another problem is this: supposing this Lamarckian conspiracy theory is true, what if, as breeders all know, breeding for one desirable characteristic brings along other, less wholesome traits? ”

    First of all, Lamarck believed that if scientists cut the tails off rats, generation after generation, the rats eventually would be born without tails, which, of course, is untrue. The Soviets exposed wheat seeds to freezing temperatures so they would “learn” to grow in the winter, but of course it was a disaster. (Somehow this idea has been attributed to Lamarck.)

    I really don’t think that selection for one good trait would necessarily result in the appearance of undesirable traits. If undesirable traits are ignored completely (whether there’s selection for a positive trait or not), then they could naturally accumulate to an extent in the gene pool.

    There was an interesting study in which scientists tried to breed a cow that produced a great deal of milk, AND great meat, but they could never really achieve that. They could produce one or the other, or, they could produce a cow that was quite good, but not great, in both. I don’t fully understand that. I wish Glayde Whitney were still alive!

    • James O'Meara
      Posted March 20, 2015 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

      Thanks for your thoughtful response. By ‘Lamarckian’ I tried to convey the idea of these mediaeval rabbis, proudly ignorant of even existing biology, [Mendel being one of those supposedly non-reproducing monks, oddly enough] basically just marrying off two “smart” people and expecting the progeny to be smarter yet. I’m not sure if that would work; consider all the other factors, such as consanguinity in such a ghetto-ized community. Although the results would not necessarily bring out other, less desirable traits, I think there’s a good chance they would. Since Judaism resembles, as someone has said, a world-wide organized crime family, I question whether the breed has been ‘improved’ overall.

  5. Ike
    Posted March 18, 2015 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    His eyes give him away. They’re the black glassy eyes of a monster.

  6. Peltast
    Posted March 18, 2015 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    “So pervasive, that a subtheme emerges in which the thievery and deceit is internalized, and brother preys on brother, not just Cain and Abel right from the start, but other pairs, most notably Jacob (whose name means “he usurps”) and Esau.[13]

    So it’s no surprise to read, in the New York Times of January 2015, older brother Douglas saying about Robert “There’s no doubt in my mind that if he had the opportunity to kill me, he would.”[14]”

    Professor Revilo Oliver remakerd that jews are not only predatory among non-jews but also there is a intense competion between the jewish elite to see who will rule the non-jews.

    • James O'Meara
      Posted March 18, 2015 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

      Michael Hoffman II occasionally tries to reconcile his anti-Judaism with his bible thumping, by pointing out that ordinary, God-approved Jews are the “real victims” of the Jewish elites (Talmudic rabbis). If he thinks it makes his “hate” “acceptable,” he’s wrong, so why bother?

      We need to get them to turn on each other, like the alien spiders turn on Dr. Smith in the Lost in Space movie.

    • Peter Quint
      Posted March 19, 2015 at 9:18 am | Permalink

      “There is a intense competion between the jewish elite to see who will rule the non-jews.” Right your are, Peltast; William L. Pierce covered that subject one time when he stated that the friction between Ashkenazi and Sephardic jews was over who was going to rule the world.

  7. Peter Quint
    Posted March 18, 2015 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    “Consider the great “Jewish Geniuses.” Has any one person been responsible for more pain and death than Marx or Freud?” Yes, the jew Jesus! Millions of our women were burned as witches, women who could have produced children to help us survive. Millions more have been tortured in Catholic dungeons. Several genocidal wars, the more famous being: the British Civil War; the Thirty Years War and several other wars can be traced to Christianity as a philosophical impetus: The French Revolution; The American Revolution; The American Civil War and there probably are several wars and revolutions that I am unaware of. There is also the incalculable wealth spent on spreading Christianity. Let’s not forget the incalculable number of man hours spent studying that degenerate tome of jewish folk tales, i.e., the old testament and propaganda, i.e., the new testament. We also must remember how for centuries the Catholic Church suppressed the advance of science, science that would have helped us survive as a race. It is not possible to calculate the damage Christianity has done to our race. I almost forgot the crusades, incalculable resources, man hours and children were wasted on them.

    • James O'Meara
      Posted March 18, 2015 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

      True enough. Yet, as Evola pointed out, the Roman Church was at least half Roman. The Church part was enough to brake and distort, but look what Europe accomplished! The Jews. left to themselves, nothing but volume after volume of Talmudic and Qabbalistic claptrap.

  8. Mr. Chesterton
    Posted March 18, 2015 at 5:12 am | Permalink

    “Political Correctness Is A War On Noticing.” ~ Steve Sailer

    • Walter
      Posted March 18, 2015 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

      Steve Sailer “Political Correctness Is A War On Noticing.” One of the reasons for the galloping speed with which depravity is becoming embedded in everything heretofore normal is that we are not supposed to notice the hypocrisy and the evil that emerges from Israel and its apologists, yet are expected to somehow be decent and just in any other circumstance in life. This tension is unbearable and will tear up even the strong in time – if not counter-acted by the conscious recognition of the cause.
      Involvement with the Jewish element provides the essence that stops the blood flow of -Western Civilization. In looking back, it is to be noticed that the methods employed in modern warfare: the atom bomb (Oppenheimer, Einstein); the hydrogen bomb (Teller) the neutron bomb Cohen); gas war (Haber); city bombardment (Lindemann) as a means of large scale terrorization of civilians; atrocity and hate propaganda (Delmer), have their origin in Jewish brains.
      Freud reduces human motivation to primitive copulation envy, and Marx to the envy of the economic situation of one’s neighbors; the theory of relativity trivializes our existence to taking place in some sort of comic strip world in which scientific miracles occur, such as the bending of space, the stretching of time, the serious discussion of the possibility of an effect to occur before its cause. The general Jewish approach to reality is that of an abstraction, which is not considered anymore as an “as if” but as an “is”. Hence, the parallel universes, the bent space and so on which is now taken as something that actually exists.

      In short, everything is turned upside down and nothing makes the kind of sense anymore humans need to acquire to be able to live in this world with a minimum of belonging into it.

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4

    Reuben

    The Node

    Axe

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance

    Standardbearers

    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    Archeofuturism

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Tyr

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above