Print this post Print this post

Remembering Lee Kuan Yew

1,208 words

leekuanyew-listeningOn March 23rd, Singapore’s founding father died at the age of 91.

While Lee was an anti-colonialist, in that he sought the devolution of power from Westminster, he did not start out as a Singaporean nationalist. He oversaw the devolution of power and a merger with Malaya. When the Federation of Malaya and Singapore was dissolved by Malaya’s Prime Minister, Lee cried on television stating that his dream had failed. It may be hard to imagine any Governor who wouldn’t jump at the chance of becoming Prime Minister or President, but Lee was thinking of the good of his country. 

The Chinese in Singapore were facing a situation similar to White people in America. They were the majority of the country, but their demographic trajectory was toward minority status. Singapore was abandoned by Malaya because of its recurring, violent race riots. Also, a self-destructive ideology had swept his own people, as Communist Chinese were also causing riots and unrest. Though the Communist Party was illegal, they had infiltrated every trade union, cultural organization, and club in the Chinese community. In fact, the PAP, a bourgeois and nominally Socialist party, first came to power by offering itself as a fig leaf to Communists who were in need of a proxy.

Through rather illiberal tactics he managed to overcome the post-Independence challenges to order and development posed by Communists, Islamists, and decadent liberalism. He compared the dilemma of using authoritarian tactics to having sex . . . the first time is difficult and a big deal, but each subsequent time it becomes easier. Malaysia, unlike Singapore, had vast swaths of jungle and mountains, and they were dealing with communist insurgents (mostly ethnic Chinese) until 1989.

Lee tried to delay the departure of the British military as a guarantor of security until as late as possible (December 1971). This was both because they offered some confidence to the business community, despite the precedent of capitulation in WWII, but perhaps more importantly because their consumption contributed to 20% of GDP at the time. Also, the costs of replacing them would equal about 5% of GDP. Singapore was growing as an important shipping port, but was not yet the financial hub that it is today.

Singapore stands above all its neighbors in having suppressed petty corruption. Lee paid his government employees very well and harshly punished the corrupt. Senior government leaders are compensated as well as business leaders in the region. This is often criticized in the financial press, who would never dream of criticizing CEOs of publicly traded companies who are overpaid by their hand-picked Boards or who fend off acquirers to the detriment of shareholders.

Lee’s leadership focused on economic development and demographic stability (race, religion, class, and age profile). Unlike contemporary Western countries where the government forces racial neutrality in residential real estate transactions, or the free-for-all that existed before the civil rights movement, Lee’s government ensured continuity in racial ownership so as to limit racial discord. The PAP forced a population which mostly did not speak English to accept it as an official language. This would ensure that no community would have the upper hand in the new system and that there would be minimal opposition to its choice as a lingua franca.

Lee was a eugenicist, who explicitly tried to find mates for and encourage the motherhood of Singapore’s best female graduates. He was an avowed anti-egalitarian yet did not see sex as a basis for unequal treatment. This was evident in his private life as well as in his policy.

Lee married an academic rival, Lee Geok Choo, who was three years older than him and had outperformed him in a number of classes. They eloped while studying in England and had a traditional marriage later in Singapore. Lee told a crowd of students, “You either have the Western view, you marry the woman you love, or you have the Eastern view, you love the woman you marry . . . I tried to match both, and I think it wasn’t a bad choice.”

He said that the fact he married a woman who could both be a sole breadwinner and raise his children was an “insurance policy” which made it possible for him to pursue his role as founding father of Singapore. She was a skilled lawyer. Despite the fact that she did not have a formal role in the government at the time, she was asked to write the section of the Dissolution of the Malaya Singapore Federation relating to fresh water provisions to be guaranteed by Malaysia. Lee described her as his “powerful critic and helper.” She would revise his speeches and his memoirs. She is credited with leading Singapore into being a garden city, something which sets it apart from every other Asian megacity.

Lee Kuan Yew is known as Minister Mentor Lee, a kind of Prime Minister Emeritus title which is unique in the world. I never had the opportunity to meet him, but I did have close and sustained contact with some business leaders who worked with him. These non-Singaporeans never failed to refer to him as Minister-Mentor Lee. They had greater respect for him in private conversation than I have seen given to any leader. He was a true visionary and statesman, without being a narrow-minded ideologue or a petty demagogue. Lee recorded 32 hours of very candid interviews titled, “Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going” which will ensure his shadow is cast over decision makers for decades to come.

Was Minister-Mentor Lee one of us?

I have heard on good authority that Lee’s party, the People’s Action Party, had full time advisers in its early days who were former senior members of the British Union of Fascists. Lee is undoubtedly a Fascist of the futurist tendency. He was guided by the goals of order, economic development, stability, and security. If he was a racialist, he sublimated that for short term stability while pursuing long term demographic goals for his people. Had he, at any point, expelled en masse Malays or Muslims, he would have faced invasion from one or both of his massive neighbors. Through positive eugenics and selective migration he has managed to maintain a Chinese supermajority.

This is while they are surrounded by less intelligent and more fecund Malays. This has not stopped some Chinese bloggers from referring to him as a Hanjian, race traitor, for adopting the English language and seeking non-Chinese allies to counterbalance the People’s Republic of China. Whether he was a racial nationalist can only be speculated upon, but Minister Mentor Lee left no doubt that he was a Race Realist.

In 1986, after nearly 30 years of leading Singapore, he stated, “What are our priorities? First the welfare [and] the survival of the people, then the democratic norms and processes . . . which from time to time we have to suspend.” This is the approach we must take with the predicament of our people. Constitutionalism and “Rights endowed by our Creator” must be set aside until our demographic crisis has passed and our parasitical masters have been expelled.

Minister-Mentor Lee was a model of realism that should be followed by any of our comrades who may find themselves at the head of a small state while surrounded by hostile neighbors and the threat of regional war.

 

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

7 Comments

  1. Frankc
    Posted April 4, 2015 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    My central concern is for white survival. Before one can think about eugenic programs, one must first address the survival issue. You or I or many others can come up with eugenic programs that might be desirable, but what effect would that have in the real-world today? I, for one, have no more enthusiasm for having a purely intellectual discussion where concerned and above-average in intelligence whites debate what “can” be done when in fact nothing is actually being done in the real world (nor is likely to in the near future) to confront the existential crisis of low birth-rates in the White (i.e. European-descended) World. Bottom line: If I could present President Putin with a suggestion to confront the real-world demographic problem that Russia faces ( and which he has often justifiably expressed concern about), I would disregard theoritical solutions and simply say: “If you are truly concerned about the Russian Demographic Crisis, then I suggest you study and learn from the example of Romania in the late 1960’s. The policies implemented there actually worked.”

  2. Bryan Sylvain
    Posted April 4, 2015 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Notes from Jonathan V. Last’s book

    “What to Expect When No One’s Expecting:
    America’s Coming Demographic Disaster”

    “If Singapore, with its authoritarian government and natalist bonanza – cash bonuses! tax credits! preferential housing! paid maternity leave! childcare from grandparents! – can’t convince its modern, sophisticated population to have babies, what hope does anyone have?”

    Last’s hopeful counter-example to Singapore and Japan:

    war-torn, post-Soviet Georgia!

    Why?

    1. High marriage rate, low divorce rate – if marriage suffers, fertility suffers.

    2. Patriarch Ilia II – head of the Georgian Orthodox Church – “would personally baptize any child born to parents who already had two or more children.”

    Golden Rules for Natalism:

    (1) Below a certain point, there’s no turning back.

    (2) Any efforts to stoke fertility must be sustained over several generational cohorts.

    (3) People cannot be bribed into having babies.

    Undoing America’s One-Child Policy:

    1. Reform Social Security – distorts “market value” of children and forces fertility rate down.
    2. College – it dampens fertility (Solution: eliminate the need for college).
    3. The Dirt Gap – the cost of family formation (Solution: telecommuting).

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted April 4, 2015 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

      I would add: create ethnically homogeneous spaces where whites can breed without the threatening presence of non-whites.

      Does Social Security really depress fertility? Do whites really have children for the same reason that Chinese peasants do? As retirement plans?

      Reducing the need for college is an important idea.

  3. Posted April 3, 2015 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    About Romania — it’s a virtual certainty that banning abortion and limiting contraception was horribly dysgenic. The lowest segments of the population are an economic and social liability. They may have raised the birth rate, but harmed the country at the same time.

  4. Frankc
    Posted April 2, 2015 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Lee Kuan Yew finally gave up on trying to increase Singapore’s birthrate, saying it was because of affluence and a “lifestyle choice” that Singapore’s young upwardly -mobiles simply would not significantly change their lifestyles to accomodate having more children. I know of only one historic example where a modern nation has dramatically increased its birthrate: Romania. In the late sixties, the leader of Romania banned abortions and limited the access to easy birth-control. The result was a doubling in the birth-rate (of approximately 1.66 to 3.20). So, the empirical historic evidence is that negative rather than positive reinforcements work. If survival is the #1 value, then this historical lesson should be learned from.

  5. WN
    Posted April 2, 2015 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    I am no expert on Singapore but it might be worth noting here that the Chinese presence in Southeast Asia was to a large extent manufactured by the British for financial gain. They used the Chinese as economic and bureaucratic intermediaries between the colonial governments and the indigenous peoples of the region. The Chinese, as has been oft said, are the Jews of Asia. Their presence is largely unwanted by the natives, both from a cultural and economic perspective, in all the nations of which I am familiar. They are a ruling class everywhere they go, mostly refuse to integrate into their host cultures while posing as having done so (in precisely the same way as do Jews in the West: changing their names, working behind the scenes, assuming facades of indigeneity, etc. while remaining privately separate and “above” the native populations). They are heavily involved in the pauperization of the indigenous peoples while providing economic support to the ruling classes. There is in Southeast Asia tremendous anti-Chinese sentiment (even, among some, explicit recognition of their similarity to Jews in Europe) accompanied by the same “we all bleed red” moral indignation and “war on noticing” from Leftists and neoliberals that we Whites are so accustomed to hearing.

  6. Posted April 2, 2015 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    Wow! This is fascinating! I’ve been interested in Singapore and Lee Kuan Yew for many years now because of his eugenics program. It sounds like he doesn’t feel like he’s had a great deal of success with it, but the question really is, What would the birth rate of college educated couples have been *without* his efforts? This is also the case with European countries which have tried to increase their birth rates with all kinds of incentives — there’s been no dramatic increase. It’s discouraging, but it doesn’t mean it’s impossible.

    I also admire Singapore for “caning” violent criminals. Just think of all the money they save! It seems to be pretty effective, too. The desire for revenge is natural, in my opinion, and caning gives citizens a greater sense of satisfaction, that the low-life bastards got what they deserved!

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4

    Reuben

    The Node

    Axe

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance

    Standardbearers

    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    Archeofuturism

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Tyr

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above