Print this post Print this post

Will Jews Change Sides?

3,037 words

ArchofTitus2The history of Jews in Europe is full of conflict and tragedy. From the days of the Roman Empire, the Jews have been a conspicuous nation, a nation apart from all others. They have appeared to us as a self-segregating and culturally arrogant people, a people who refuse to assimilate. A people who even when they do ostensibly assimilate, cause even greater harm than they did before desegregating: violating our taboos, propagating bizarre ideologies, and even killing Europeans in their host countries en masse when given the power to do so.[1] This long, uncomfortable and often bloody history of Jews in Europe has left a lasting scar on Europe’s collective psyche that survives even to this day, despite non-stop Jewish propaganda aimed at deracinating and inducing guilt in Europeans.

The Jewish collective consciousness has, of course, interpreted history very differently, and see themselves as eternal victims rather than agitators and provocateurs. They tell themselves and their children that their history in Europe was and is one of constant danger and uncertainty, with an ever-looming possibility of violent spasms from the beastly goyim, resulting in pogroms.

Certainly, there is truth in both points of view. White Nationalists often downplay European anti-Semitism in a similar way that Jews downplay their own historical chauvinism, thus seeing whites as the eternal and undeserved victims of dodgy Jewish financial practices, communistic agitation, cultural subversion, etc.

While both of these viewpoints are chauvinistic and prejudiced, only one of these viewpoints has gradually become the popular and accepted narrative. While it is considered highly anti-Semitic to talk about, say, the Jewish role in communism, it is taken for granted that all conflicts between Europeans and Jews were the fault of Europeans. While it may be true that no one says this blatantly, the almost complete absence of not only criticism of Jews, but criticism of biased Jewish historiography on European-Jewish relations is a clear indication of who controls the narrative.

Jews, on the other hand, talk freely of being “persecuted,” frequently comparing anti-Semitism to a disease, without ever even acknowledging that they may be at least partially responsible for their own misfortunes. Take Abe Foxman, for example, who answers the reason for anti-Semitism in just one word: “Jealousy.”[2] It seems psychologically impossible for most Jews to comprehend that they have been partially responsible for their misfortunes throughout history, much like a lousy housemate preserves his self-esteem after being kicked out of house after house by convincing himself that the problem is with his housemates’ prejudices and intolerance, and not the fact that he dirties the house and is forgetful with the rent.

Europeans, namely those in Western Europe and the Anglosphere, on the other hand, are on far end of the other side of the spectrum. They are more than happy to accept blame and guilt, after decades of propaganda designed specifically to wear down their ethnic consciousness and pride. Some accept this guilt passively, like a Christian going to church twice a year to keep the faith, while other self-flagellate profusely like zealous monks. Nearly all accept that the suffering of Jews in Europe was due to the intolerance of their ancestors, their elaborate theories of Jewish child sacrifice, or their belief in Jews’ being complicit in the crucifixion of Jesus, etc.

It is a bleak realization when one sees his kin consume the poison of a hostile alien, especially one that appears as invulnerable as the Jew. They have helped lead us down a suicidal path of self-hatred, nihilism, and materialism.[3] However, there is reason to hope. There are glimmers of light in the darkness. While it is obvious that history never goes in one straight line and we cannot predict too far into the future, there is every reason to believe that eventually the Jews will have to give up their subversive shenanigans. Allow me to explain.

Jews, as explained by both Jews[4] and non-Jews[5] alike, promote cultural subversion in order to weaken the host population’s ethnic consciousness. Historically, this would have made sense in European countries, where they were nearly always the most obvious outsider in every way. Their cultural distinctness and hostility to outside cultures made them obvious aliens as well as targets, sometimes justifiably, sometimes not. In order to reduce their own salience as a minority, they promoted communism as a means of downplaying the significance of nationality, religion, and ethnicity. Such things, they said, were tools of the bourgeoisie and the elite.


As much as I hate to admit it, such notions probably had some sense then. While nationality, religion, and ethnicity obviously mean nothing, and are indeed hindrances, to our current elite, there was a time and place where they could indeed have been tools of the elite instead of obstacles. Such was the case in Tsarist Russia, where the Orthodox religion and even celebration of Russian nationality was a source of power for the monarchy. This power would occasionally be used against the Jewish population, to which the Tsarist regime had no particular sympathy.

Thus, communism was a natural Jewish response (though certainly not always a justifiable one) to certain conditions that existed in those times. Not too long after Jews started promoting communism, they also started diligently agitating for the “rights” of minorities, both racial[6] and sexual.[7] All of these efforts essentially worked to undermine a traditional, monocultural society and turn it into an anything-goes society. Race, religion, sexuality, all such things were meaningless. Everything was of equal value, hence there is no reason to be worried about that Jewish lobbyist giving money to the frontrunner presidential candidate any more than that transsexual undocumented Mexican over there. Whites lost their power, minorities became “empowered,” and Jews were easily able to blend in. For some time.

Enter Israel and the Muslim Problem

Many have pointed out the follies of the Jewish promotion of multiculturalism with regard to Muslims. It is absurd for Jews to invite Muslims into countries where they hold influence, as Muslims are nearly always against the very existence of the Jewish state, are unmoved by the holocaust story, and are often anti-Semitic. Of course, the situation is not so black and white. There are a few Jews who hold Israel in contempt and indeed scold it in the same way they scold White Nationalism, just like there is an even smaller number of Jews who, for all practical purposes, come close to being White Nationalists. Nonetheless, it cannot be denied that the Jews as a whole unequivocally support mass migration seemingly without concern for the Muslim problem. This is in spite of the fact that Jews have now on many occasions been the victims of the migration that they helped bring to their host countries.[8]

But the troubles don’t end there. While Muslim immigration is certainly the most visible problem from a Jewish perspective, it is certainly not the only one. In fact, other non-whites besides Muslims are also not too keen on the “chosenites” either. A study undertaken by none other than the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) showed the prevalence of “anti-Semitic” beliefs among both Blacks and Hispanics stood at 35%, in comparison to 17% of the general population.[9] Damn. Oh well, at least it’s not as high as Poland’s 45%.[10]

Of course, one must always take the ADL’s conclusions with a grain of salt. Their conclusions are based on the pre-determined conviction that any negative opinion and even some neutral observations about Jews, regardless of factual validity, are inherently morally wrong. Hence why Old Abe finds opinions such as “Jews have too much power in international financial markets” to be “distressing.”[11] However, to the perpetually paranoid such results must indeed be threatening.

Furthermore, Blacks and Hispanics are less likely to be sympathetic to Israel.[12] This may come as no surprise, as many of these non-whites are probably wondering what the hell the government is doing sending three billion dollars to some country on the other side of the world when that money could be put to other uses.[13]

So what are the prospects for American Jews, and by extension, Jews as a whole? If current demographic trends continue it will mean that American Jews will live in a country where the population most sympathetic to them is the one most quickly declining. It will mean that a large segment of the population believes the “myths” that they have been trying to combat for so long. But perhaps most importantly, it will mean that they will live in countries populated by people that can’t feel guilt about such things as pogroms, the holocaust, or historical exclusion from WASP-dominated universities. It will mean that they no longer live in a high trust society governed by the type of egalitarian value system that enabled them to get into the positions of power they hold.

The practical implications of this future are up for speculation. Robert Weissberg said that Jews prefer to support blacks over whites because they believe blacks to be “too stupid” to organize mass murder on the scale that Europeans were capable of in decades and centuries past. Perhaps this is true, however, one should never underestimate one’s ethnic opponents. The more radical elements of the Black population in South Africa may not have committed a massacre on the same scale that Europeans have in past years, however, they have certainly made life sufficiently unbearable for the Whites in order to coerce vast numbers of them to flee the country. And while the Whites in South Africa have thus far avoided genocide at the hands of Blacks, certain Black groups have not been so lucky.[14] The Rwandan genocide shows how destructive even disorganized black violence can be.

It isn’t just American Jews who are suffering the effects of Third World immigration. In Malmö, the third largest city in Sweden, Jews have already started leaving amidst growing anti-Semitism in the form of abuse, desecration of Jewish cemeteries and chants of “Hitler!”[15] Certain schools have even ceased holocaust education in order not to offend the newest victim class. German Jews have been advised to look “less Jewish” in order to not be the targets of anti-Semitic attacks, indicating that their status as the most protected group is no longer guaranteed.[16] And while the priorities of the Swedish establishment is to do everything in their power to keep the Sweden Democrats at bay, we can be reasonably sure that the Sweden Democrats are not the ones abusing the chosenites on the way back from synagogue. More generally, several terrorist attacks targeting Jews specifically have happened in recent times.

To the cold, logical, and unbiased observer it would seem absurd for Jews to continue degrading the societies where they have been safe for so long. But we are all affected by our emotions, and Jews often both consciously and unconsciously allow their turbulent European history, not to mention their unique psychology, to guide their politics. Even as the ship is clearly heading for an iceberg, the captain has invested too much emotion into his present course to change it.

So the question is just how bad things will get before the Jewish elite realizes that multiculturalism just isn’t that good for the Jews. Chances are, they will get pretty bad indeed. The Jewish elite isn’t that much different from the Gentile elite in the sense that both will be far removed from the actual effects of the policies they are supporting. They are not likely to get beaten up, mugged, gang-raped, lose their jobs to immigrants, or evicted from home to make way for cultural enrichers.[17]

There seem to be virtually no Jewish organizations denouncing immigration, with only a select few individuals such as Paul Gottfried and Éric Zemmour speaking out. There are, of course, also the neoconservatives. However, focusing on radical Islam will not address the issues of creeping Islamization or the anti-Semitism and “apatho-Semitism” of Blacks and Hispanics. In fact, so severe is the delusion of some Jews on the position of race and immigration that some are even content with being victims, as long as they are victims for being perceived as being “white.”[18]

There is a long road ahead of us, but I believe that we must play these points to our advantage. Not that we should become obsessively philo-Semitic like Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen, or — God forbid — Tommy Robinson.[19] These people have benefited little from their obsessive pandering. Nor should we assume that there is no possibility of victory without appeasing the Jewish community. It will, however, be a lot easier for us if at least a good portion of the Jewish community realize that if we go down, they go down. We should realize that the situation that Jews have played a major role in bringing upon the West has given us a good deal of bargaining power.

The Jewish Survival Instinct

Some may argue that the Jews will never turn, that it is in their nature to be subversive. There may be a degree of truth to this, as stories of Jewish subversion can be traced back all the way to the Old Testament.[20] However, I would argue that eventually a survival instinct has to kick in. After all, even if your enemy and you are on a boat together, you’re not going to sink the boat just to kill him.

If we look for examples where this survival instinct had kicked in in the past, there are few and they are far between. But they are there.

For example, during the civil rights movement, Southern Jews were

[T]ypically reluctant participants in the Civil Rights movement. . . . The general perception of northern Jews and southern blacks and whites was that southern Jews had adopted white attitudes on racial issues. Moreover, southern Jews adopted a low profile because southern whites often (correctly) blamed northern Jews as major instigators of the civil rights movement and because of the linkages among Jews, communism, and civil rights agitation during a period when both the NAACP and mainstream Jewish organizations were doing their best to minimize associations with communism.[21]

This makes sense, especially in the context of living in a largely Black area where they were considered just as much crackers as the Whites.

Another example of this reluctant outreach to the goy can be found more in more recent times, where Ukrainian Jewish leader Vadim Rabinovich met with Marine Le Pen. Of course, they met so that they could discuss the need to “combat anti-Semitism.” However, a Jewish leader meeting the leader of any far-right nationalist party would have been unimaginable only a few decades ago. Rabinovich apparently sees that the FN are the only party that can protect the Jews against the Islamic horde.

If there is one point that needs to be made, however, it is that whatever alliance can be made between some Jews and White Nationalists in the future, we must not allow ourselves to become stooges. We must assert our own demands, that is, that our countries remain not just Christian, not just non-Islamic, but White. We want neither moderate Muslims nor Christian blacks. All non-European immigration must be immediately halted.

As for the Jews living in our midst, that is a matter for another time. There are multiple possibilities; they could either be allowed to live in their own communities, assimilate in small numbers,[22] or move to Israel. Anything as long as they refrain from subverting our societies in the name of some ill-intentioned crusade for “justice.” However, it must be made clear that after the matter of mass migration (and hopefully repatriation) is settled, our countries will be just as officially white (or British, or French, or Romanian, or whatever . . .) as Israel is Jewish.


1. For example, during the Soviet invasion of Poland, Jews would often greet the Soviet invaders and help weed out patriotic resistance. Some might argue that this was a choice of the “better of two evils,” however, the German extermination of Jews did not start until much later in the war. And besides, Jewish over-representation in communist movements was a phenomenon long before the Second World War. For a detailed description of Polish-Soviet collaboration during the Second World War see Tomasz Piotrkowski, Poland’s Holocaust: Ethnic Strife, Collaboration with Occupying Forces and Genocide in the Second Republic, 1918-1947 (MacFarland & Company, 2007).

2. Tuvia Tenenbom, “The Only Abe Foxman Interview You Need to Read,” The Jewish Daily Forward, July 12, 2015.

3. Greg Johnson, “2015: The Year in White Nationalism,” North American New Right, December 31, 2015.


5. Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (1st Books Library, 2002).

6. Howard Sachar, “Jews in the Civil Rights Movement,” My Jewish Learning.

7. Andrew Joyce, “The Assault on Gender and the Family: Jewish Sexology and the Legacy of the Frankfurt School,” The Occidental Observer, December 27, 2015.

8. “Porte de Vincennes siege,” Wikipedia.

9. ADL press release, “Anti-Semitism on the Rise in America – ADL Survey on Anti-Semitic Attitudes Reveals 17 Percent of Americans Hold ‘Hardcore’ Beliefs,” June 11, 2002.


11. Steven Weiss, “Janet Yellen Is Poised to Be the Third Jewish Fed Chair in a Row. Where Are the Anti-Semites?,” The Tablet, December 16, 2013.

12. Gram Slattery, “Americans Still Support Israel, But Views Vary by Age and Race, Poll Finds,” Christian Science Monitor, July 29, 2014.

13. Neil Smelser et al, America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences, volume 2 (2001), chapter 8.


15. Nick Meo, “Jews leave Swedish city after sharp rise in anti-Semitic hate crimes,” Daily Telegraph, February 21, 2010.

16. (Talk about victim blaming.)


18. David Harding, “German Jewish leader says Jews should avoid wearing traditional garb in ‘problem areas’ of Berlin,” New York Daily News, March 15, 2015.

19. “Le Pen Frightens Jews as FN Regional Elections Victory Looks Certain,” Jewish Press, November 16, 2015.

20. Exodus: 34, for example, clearly commands Jews not to assimilate with non-Jews, and to “Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones . . .” Sometimes it seems there are no sacred stones left.

21. Kevin MacDonald, “Jews, Blacks, and Race,” book chapter in Samuel Francis (ed.), Race and the American Prospect: Essays on the Racial Realities of Our Nation and Our Time (The Occidental Press, 2006).

22. Adolf Hitler, for one, insisted that patriotic Mischlinge be blended into the German gene pool by requiring any marriages be with pure-blooded Aryans.


If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Anti-Jacobin
    Posted March 8, 2016 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    “Europeans, namely those in Western Europe and the Anglosphere, on the other hand, are on far end of the other side of the spectrum. They are more than happy to accept blame and guilt, after decades of propaganda designed specifically to wear down their ethnic consciousness and pride.”

    In the case of the Anglosphere it is also because of Protestant philo-Semitism.

  2. Isaia Bukarest
    Posted March 7, 2016 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    I would like to present a Romanian perspective and some (not so) random thoughts on the topic:

    1.While I am “White”, I am not a (White) Nationalist and even less so a “fascist”. I think that White Nationalism doesn’t make much sense from a European perspective. While America is divided between races, Europe is divided between nationalities and ethnicities.
    As for “fascism”, “Fhurerprinzip”, etc., no thanks! Just other …isms for me, to be enjoyed only in books.

    You may ask though whether I am at least a (Romanian) patriot or rather “a steady patriot of the world alone, the friend of every country but his own…”. LOL. I consider that at present the “world system” is a humanity divided between states and “destiny” allocated Romania as my state and even though it is not the best country one can imagine I am content with it as I am content with my body though again is not the best of bodies (though the gender is –man ;-). That said I try to see what is common in people of various nationalities and ethnicities because “it is a small world after all” as a hated song says.

    2.The argument that now it is irrational for Diaspora Jews to hold on to their liberalism is not new. Some would argue that they already made the turn:

    Jonah Goldberg in the USA
    The Jewish nouveaux philosophes (André Glucksmann, Pascal Bruckner, Bernard-Henri Lévy) + Alain Finkielkraut in France
    Melanie Philips, Nick Cohen in the UK.
    Etc, etc.

    What do you want more?… LOL.
    You may say that they are not the real thing (real conservatives). But maybe that is the maximum they can give (be) while remaining Jews. Because there is also the possibility of Jews converting to a Christian denomination and becoming real conservatives. There are examples of such Jews, too few unfortunately.

    3. I would like to give here a Romanian example:

    Andrei Cornea is a Romanian Jewish intellectual (philosopher), the son of a communist intellectual (literary critique) Paul Cornea, who writes the leaders for the Romanian neocon magazine “Revista 22”.

    Recently he wrote two contradictory leaders that just illustrates the typical attitude of Diaspora Jews worldwide.

    In the first leader he takes position on the issue of the building of a huge mosque in Bucharest (the first) with Turkish money! Here he takes a rational position showing concern for the possible incubation of terrorist cells that such mosques can provide, Jews being among the first targets of such terrorists. But he also didn’t waste the occasion to lambast Islam for its putative anti-Semitism.

    In the second leader he praises the attitude of the Germans (that was before the Cologne sex incidents) for their warm welcome of the Syrian “refugees”. Again, he didn’t waste the occasion to talk about the obscure Évian Conference where the fate of the German Jews was decided.

    It was pointless that commenters admonished him that the two articles contradicted themselves. That a person concerned with domestically grown Islamic terrorism should also be concerned the influx of Muslims immigrants into Europe. He didn’t reply even though he sometimes replies to comments.

    How can a “philosopher”, a smarty pants, an Yiddishe Kop for short ;-), contradict himself so blatantly?…

    I think the answer is that Cornea in the two articles didn’t intend to say something constructive, to give a solution to a problem, but merely to express a Jewish sentiment:

    The planned construction of the mosque offered him the occasion to insult Islam (a hobbyhorse for Jews nowadays) while the “refugee crisis” occasioned him to remember (and remind us) the “lachrymose” history of the Jews – a people that throughout history suffered the same plight as the today “refugees”.

    This Romanian example I think backs the opinion of commenter WWWM that Jews are not rational in their positions but emotional.

  3. A. Schopenhauer
    Posted March 6, 2016 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    This is what I wrote on Jews more than 165 years ago!:

    “This desirable result [their total assimilation], however, will be frustrated if the emancipation of the Jews is carried to the point of their obtaining political rights, and thus an interest in the administration and government of Christian countries. For then they will be and remain Jews really only con amore.

    Justice demands that they should enjoy with others equal civil rights; but to concede to them a share in the running of the State is absurd. THEY ARE AND REMAIN A FOREIGN ORIENTAL RACE, and so must always be regarded merely as domiciled foreigners.” (Parerga and Paralipomena, Ch. 9, On Jurisprudence and Politics, 1851, Berlin)

    And I don’t think that history proved me wrong…

  4. Andrew
    Posted February 20, 2016 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    ” Their cultural distinctness and hostility to outside cultures made them obvious aliens as well as targets, sometimes justifiably, sometimes not.”

    The Jews never belonged in Europe, they were strangers, aliens. Europe is a land for indigenous Europeans, where Semites and all other non-Europeans have no place, and should be cast out of. If in the past they would not leave voluntarily, they deserved to be expelled forcibly. Europeans are always justified in targeting aliens within their own lands, just like Jews target them in Israel. I think this concern with universal “Justice” in regard to non-Europeans is completely misplaced. Morality is what is good for Europeans.

  5. Ray
    Posted February 19, 2016 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    The Jews of Iran behave themselves, at least from what I can tell from the documentary “Don’t Tell My Mother I’m in Iran”. For example, the Jewish parliament member is a strong supporter of Iran and critic of the Zionist state, although the one Jewish shopkeeper shows the camera the equivalent of 19th century porn, a little nudie pic in an elaborate wooden box, and pours some alcohol. But that was as far it went. In general think Jews coooperate out of fear and calculation and not out of a mutual understanding and warm feelings. You know, probably because they lack the emotions conducive to reciprocity. And I think the dynamic Ashkenazi may be less cooperative than the more middle eastern Iranian Jews. But I think Jews that marry gentiles might be more likely to side with us because they rationalize it as in their children’s interest.

    So there has to be something in it for them. Right now they have a monopoly on perceived moral right to ethno-nationalism, and they would stand to gain little from giving it up because although they might placate a few WNs they’d open themselves up to being banished or boycotted from a potentially profit-generating group of ethnically conscious white gentiles. They want all doors open to them and some doors closed to us. In other words, they want entry into every European nation and institution, and they want to keep out whites away from Israel and to some degree from ivy league schools like Harvard. Only by getting power as a group can we bargain with them, and to do this we have to get more whites to identify as a racial group.

    But yeah, I mean I’m more worried about persuading the WASP elites to come to our side. They need to start being loyal to their race just as the rich Jews are to theirs.

  6. WWWM
    Posted February 19, 2016 at 5:45 am | Permalink

    Uh, no. I recommend people look up the old Insturation Magazine article entitled “What the Jews Can Do for Us”. Wilmot Robertson addresses most of the above ideas and concludes the Jewish nature is not rational. That, after all, is the whole problem. The Jews are not evil, they are simply Jews. Subversion has been their survival strategy, but on a grand scale with Western democracy and the ability to have mass immigration, it is a cancerous combination. Whether some Jews recognize the logic of aligning with White Nationalism is irrelevant to tendencies of a whole people. I would love to read a Kevin MacDonald response to this piece.

    The author seems to believe the Holocaust, or some lesser version was true. There was no mass extermination program as a German policy Counter-Currents, and therefore no Holocaust. I would like to see the Jews switch sides on that issue.

  7. Posted February 18, 2016 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

    I believe we can work with anyone, but putting Jews in positions of influence in pro-White institutions or future polities isn’t going to happen. This is easy.

    The more complicated question is what about the current White elites in the West? These are the people who I believe to be the truly dangerous ones. While the Jewish primary loyalty is to the tribe (which makes it more obvious), the White elites are primarily loyal to extended family (clans really). Their main goal is global government with them at the top of the pyramid. And the day will come when they’ll throw their current Jewish allies under the bus. Today they push the anti-White, multiracial NWO plan. But as this method starts to fail, they’ll change to a pro-White NWO; as long as they get to rule.

    This is what we need to start thinking about. The Jewish question is easy. It’s the White elites (Anglo Aristocracy and American Eastern establishment families) that pose the bigger challenge.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted February 18, 2016 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

      This is actually a good point. These people will never try to ally with us unless they fear us. So let’s focus on becoming a fearsome movement.

      Under no circumstances, though, will we consent to be ruled by these rootless sociopaths. The worst offenders will be punished. As for the rest, the best option they can expect is either to throw in with the New Order as subalterns or be destroyed.

      Most oligarchs are capable of being good citizens and good human beings. But, like the grandmother in Flannery O’Connor’s “A Good Man is Hard to Find,” that moral regeneration might depend on having someone there to shoot them every minute of their lives.

      • Posted February 18, 2016 at 8:19 pm | Permalink

        “Under no circumstances, though, will we consent to be ruled by these rootless sociopaths.” (Greg Johnson)

        Damn right Greg Johnson. Because whether you believe they’re just shabbos goy, or that they’re the real top of the globalist hierarchy (as I believe), the obvious fact is they’re not fit to lead us anywhere. They’re not going to jump on our side once things really start changing and declare “it was all the Jews, they made us do it! ”

        Think about the respect that the British Royal Family has in Great Britain. If the British Royal family wanted to, they could rally the whole Island tomorrow to end non-White immigration, smash the anti-White apparatus, and bring proper order back to Britain.

        The best thing any of these elites (Jewish or non-Jewish) can do is start exposing each other in their complicity in White genocide. Those who come forward with information or those who help in financing this movement will be shown clemency. But they shouldn’t think that funding us will give them any power over us.

  8. Peter Quint
    Posted February 18, 2016 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    We should never allow non-whites, especially jews into our camps. We should take money from them if they want to give it to us, but we never give anything in return. We should take information from them, but never take it at face value, and if it is bad information we know we have a saboteur. We never allow jews or other non-whites into our groups or be allowed a leadership position or important function. How would it make us look if we allowed them to participate in our movement? If we cannot supply our own leadership, we do not deserve to live. We must nurture our hatred of the non-whites with all our being, it will make us strong; it works for non-whites, because they are always winning. We must be on guard against the White Christian Cleric (WCC) who walks among us and preaches tolerance and love thy enemies. They are trying to create cognitive dissonance and weaken the will. Never love the enemy, always hate the enemy with all our beings. Anybody who expresses concern for a non-whites physical and spiritual well being will eventually betray us. A WCC that is not out there speaking for our race and leading from the front is a fake. True spirituality is, “Excellence for the sake of excellence without regard for personal consequence.” All the WCCs out there now are nothing more than careerists and pallbearers bearing the white race to the grave. The WCC has always been the jews man on the ground for 2,000 years, and the jews would not have been so successful if the WCC had not been paving the way.

    • Posted February 20, 2016 at 11:36 am | Permalink

      “We must nurture our hatred of the non-whites with all our being, it will make us strong; it works for non-whites, because they are always winning.” (Peter Quint)

      I disagree with these sentiments. Hatred causes people to make bad decisions and hateful people are usually not pleasant to be around. It doesn’t make you strong, it makes you unfocused and irrational.

      “Anybody who expresses concern for a non-whites physical and spiritual well being will eventually betray us.” (Peter Quint)

      I disagree again. I would much prefer leaders who respect other people than leaders who think hate is some high virtue. I personally wish all people well and advocate entering in reciprocal relations with any group if they respect White self determination. The current globalist power structure harms everyone so it would be wise to give everyone a stake at bringing it down. Unlike the Jewish belief in their own tribe, I don’t see Whites as superior to others; just different with a different path to divine. I believe in giving unique peoples spaces to reach this divinity and that the world will be much more harmonious than it is now under the current forced integrationist regime.

  9. MK Lane
    Posted February 18, 2016 at 4:56 am | Permalink

    I’d like to clarify a few points. First off, I agree that the majority of Jews probably won’t change their stance. There is certainly a degree of truth in the statement that they hate us more than they love themselves. Though they may not actually believe that, they act in such an irrational way that they may as well. However, if even a small but seizable portion of the Jewish community sided with us then imagine how much easier it would be to accomplish our goals. Think about what would happen if one board member of the federal reserve, one media mogul, one influential political lobbyist changed sides. Like Trump, it could set off a domino effect that would bring down a wide range of taboos.
    Secondly, I do not advocate pandering or cuckholdery. Rather, I advocate a “we can do this the easy way or the hard way” approach. I don’t for one second believe that we cannot secure our nations without the help of the Jews. However, it would arguably be easier for both parties if we received a degree of cooperation from that community.
    Regarding Israel, as far as I’m concerned White Nationalist support for this state only go so far as to provide a “safe space” for Jews (preferably as manny as possible) to go to. Obviously we shouldn’t get into any wars or conflicts on their behalf. As I mentioned earlier, however, the darkening of America would be detrimental to Israel, as it would lose its “bigger brother” that stands up for it whenever it pisses off too may of the other school kids. And some of those school kids are already pissed off enough that they would probably like to attack Israel at the soonest given moment.

  10. Anja from Poland
    Posted February 18, 2016 at 4:28 am | Permalink

    The choesnites like to consider themselves smarter than whites but the are making same mistake now that led to rise of Hitler. They should have atleast left our economy system intact for their sick plan to work. But as Greg pointed out they are like scorpion who cant help themselves. Western economy is now a ticking time bomb waiting to implode. New Hitler will arise and this time (because of nuclear deterent) they wont be able to military defeat him like they did in 2nd world war. Of course they are mad enough to want a nuclear war but to get one they would need to subvert whites into OKaying it and that simply wont happen.
    Even if Western countries would succumb to their plans (and I dont think they will) the central Europe back with Russia WILL NOT. I have seen Greg saying many times that Putin is not on our side. But you cant get past the fact that we have common enemy and therefore we are natural ally. Thatswhy Russia is funding White Nationalists accross Europe.

    But honestly the way things are unfolding I am more and more certain that there is some bigger player making his moves and Jews are only his pawns. I could be wrong and our western brethrens are so subverted and brainwashed that they really cant see the picture but Jews are pushing their agenda way too fast and too strong. They cant be that stupid.

    • Miha M
      Posted February 18, 2016 at 7:00 am | Permalink

      I want to comment on too strong and too fast part. Jews are forced to speed up the process because of several reasons.
      1: They lost control of Russia. Putin was put into power by them but he back stabbed them. International Jewry is desperate to get Russia back in line for their NWO project. I agree with your view on Putin. He is not our friend per se but we have common enemy.
      2: Internet and phone cameras destroyed their media monopoly. Sure they still hold all the big MSM media but alternative sources are soaring and those pesky phone cameras are making nationalism rise much faster and stronger than planned.
      3: Economy collapsing. Western welfare states are about to collapse. When that happens its highly likely people will blame immigrants, it will recreate circumstances led to rise of Hitler. Circumstances are already very similar and if you listen to Orban speeches they are very similar to Hitlers or Goebels speeches before war. Orban knows how to play the game so he doesnt mention Jews but the rest is the same. And he is not the only one.
      4: Uneven immigration through white countries. Balkans, Central and Eastern Europe is still very much white. Current crisis was designed to fix that. Luckily for us its only making it worse because those countries have now closed immigration altogether and they are still very much white (e.g. Poland over 99.5%).

      Jews arent stupid but the circumstances of implementing their plan have changed and they were forced to speed up the plan. It has backfired in major way and right now they are out of options. They need to economically or military defeat Russia. Jews destroyed their host countries way too much for economic defeat and military action is complicated because of nuclear deterrence. I think Putin has a wrench in the works of their plan and once they are defeated it will be possible to assert our white interests.

  11. Leon
    Posted February 18, 2016 at 4:07 am | Permalink

    In addition to the criticisms that have already been raised in the comments, I’d like to add some of my own:

    “It seems psychologically impossible for most Jews to comprehend that they have been partially responsible for their misfortunes throughout history”

    Partially responsible? Really? I suppose that when you muscle your way into the economic and intellectual elite of a society, then use your influence to directly weaken your host nation, you can’t be held entirely accountable for your actions? That certainly seems to be the narrative promoted by Jews, but it’s hardly an objective middle ground. I recommend refreshing your knowledge of Jewish influence in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union to get an idea of the role they played. Here is a good place to start: Also I think that the attitude of the Tsarist regime towards Jews was generally pragmatic and opportunist, rather than simply hostile. They certainly were not motivated by any form of racial feeling. Unlike the Jews themselves, who being motivated more by hatred and paranoia than by reason, are unlikely to adopt a different attitude towards Whites, even if it harms them in the end.

    “And while the Whites in South Africa have thus far avoided genocide at the hands of Blacks” According to Genocide Watch, violence against Whites has reached “pre-genocide stage 6 of 8: “Preparation.”” Here are some links: ; ;

    • MK Lane
      Posted February 18, 2016 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

      What I meant was that there is no total genocide. Of course I am aware of the harsh reality for Whites living in South Africa. However, it must be said that despite these harsh ships there is not yet a “full scale” genocide against them ie like in other instances of African tribal warfare.

  12. Richard Benson
    Posted February 18, 2016 at 3:14 am | Permalink

    ‘n22. Adolf Hitler, for one, insisted that patriotic Mischlinge be blended into the German gene pool by requiring any marriages be with pure-blooded Aryans.’

    Provide a citation for this assertion.

  13. Shub-Niggurath
    Posted February 17, 2016 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    We should be terrified of the prospect of Jews “changing sides.” Look how cucked the “counter-jihad” movement is.

    Everywhere Jews go, their interests grind violently against ours, and sparks fly. If White Nationalism becomes pozzed with Jews who have changed sides, we are less likely to procure the white ethnostate we desire.

  14. dolph911
    Posted February 17, 2016 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    If Jews haven’t changed in thousands of years of recorded history, what makes you think they’ll change now?

    It’s the same with the blacks. Why bother. Oh, right, because we are completely, totally, 100% deluded in the modern world.

    The tolerance of Jews and blacks is the terminal endpoint of the modern western world. You all know this to be true.

  15. Posted February 17, 2016 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    I’ll keep saying it, we should not support Israel because they’re God’s chosen people or our friend, but because

    1) Israel is an ethnostate, and as an ethnostate, they legitimize the prospect, making it a greater potential reality for ourselves,

    2) it’s 6 million less Jews in the West- a situation safer for both parties, and

    3) the Jews have done more with the land than the Palestinians ever did or could. We should support civilization over barbarism if we are to claim ourselves champions of civilization.

    • Verlis
      Posted February 17, 2016 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

      It’s a shame this cucked out post was approved, though it’s understandable given the essay it was responding.

      (1) The existence of Israel has in no way whatsoever helped legitimate European ethnonationalism. On the contrary, European ethnonationalism was being assailed at the very same time as Israel was engaging in land-grabs, effecting ethnic expulsions and erecting segregation.

      The number of white anti-racists who have moved towards ethnonationalism is dwarfed by the number who have chosen to disregard fallacious charges of ‘anti-semitism’ and begun to assail Israeli ethnonationalism (in addition European ethnonationalism).

      (2) True enough, but on the other hand catering to Zionism leaves the present six million Jews in the west – firmly ensconced in their positions of power and influence.

      (3) This view is premised on Israel being just like any other modern European liberal democracy. Israel, however, is not a liberal democracy; it is a Jewish democracy, which is a very different animal. Moreover, Israeli Jews are steadily becoming more Jewish, not more secular. The upshot of that trend is that Israel will have even less in common with European countries than it already does. Defending the civilization of the hate-bitten, black-hatted orthodox scum Israel will soon be crawling with is the farthest thing from defending ‘civilization’ to my way of thinking.

      • Verlis
        Posted February 17, 2016 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

        I meant to say in (1) that the number of white anti-racists who have been moved towards ethnonationalism on the basis of Israeli ethnonationalism is dwarfed…etc.

      • Posted February 17, 2016 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

        Regarding #1) It doesn’t matter whether Zionism has helped white ethnonationalism or not. What I am proposing is taking a current situation we’re living with now, in 2016, and using it to our advantage. Zionism, and by Zionism I mean Jewish identitarianism (not the David Duke definition by which he makes it synonymous with Jewish supremacism), has nothing (directly) to do with white ethnomasochism.

        Saying “If whites can’t have their own ethnostate, then Jews shouldn’t either” doesn’t help us. What we should be saying is “If the Jews can have their own ethnostate, why can’t we?”

        Regarding #2) Supporting the Jewish ethnostate doesn’t have anything to do with legitimizing Jewish occupancy/abuse in the Western World. I suppose you could try to use the former to legitimize the latter, but they don’t necessarily have to go hand in hand.

        Regarding #3) Perhaps you are right. I can’t say I disagree with you. It certainly sounds plausible, however only time will tell. Having said this, at least with a civilized country you know who you’re dealing with. You can negotiate with them. You cannot negotiate with savages (aka ISIS and those like them).

        • Verlis
          Posted February 18, 2016 at 1:02 am | Permalink

          Zachary, I apologize for the shrill tone of my original reply. It’s just that I’ve heard similar subversive angling from zionists posing as allies so many times I have developed a very low tolerance for it. (The distinguishing characteristic of this angling is their suggestions of what you can do for them; never their pledges of what they’re prepared to do for you, probably for fear that this would require at least an implicit acknowledgement of Jewish wrongdoing.)

          Regarding (1), by definition this argument supposed to appeal to non-ethnonationalists. But what is the response of non-ethnonationalists to it? My point was that liberals and socialists (whom I called “white anti-racists”) are more likely to take exception to Israeli ethnonationalism (ie to apply their ideology more consistently) than to become ethnonationalists themselves. Conservatives are really the only candidates for this sort of appeal. So far, they have proven perfectly willing to live with Jewish double standards, but even if some significant portion of them could be turned with your argument, the next problem with it is that it implies that an ideology is only legitimate if Jews approve of it. Needless to say, that is a very bad idea. I think a far healthier attitude is to build up European ethnonationaliasm while simultaneously assaulting Jewish ethnonationalism, double standards be damned, just as Jews did to us; our tit for their tat.

          Regarding (2), the argument is that if Israel fails, the west is going to have to absorb another six million (that number!) Jews therefore it’s in western interests to support Israel. But what does this mean in practical terms? What can western countries do that they’re not already doing? As far as I can tell, Israel already gets all the support it needs (and more). For all practical purposes, then, this argument reduces to support for the status quo – one which, to repeat, leaves Jewish power and influence in western countries intact.

          Regarding (3), for all my scoffing, I can’t deny it retains residual appeal. Islam is such a thoroughly rebarbative culture that on many an occasion I’ve experienced a vicarious thrill from recalling the details of Israel’s victories over its Arab foes. I ask myself would I have acted any differently if I were in Jewish shoes in Palestine? For all the vileness of Jewish supremacism, my truthful answer is no, I wouldn’t have; I just cannot see how the Arabs may have accepted a more equitable settlement of their differences with the Jews in Palestine, even if the Jews were prepared to offer such a thing (which, to be clear, they were certainly not prepared). Even so, realpolitik, as I see it, requires me to go on the offensive against Israel, which in turn requires championing the Palestinian cause, even if my heart is not really in it. To this end, I find reminding myself of just what kind of people are increasingly populating Israel, and fanning the revulsion I feel toward them, rather helpful. If they are as reasonable as you claim they are, let them, for once in their lives, take unilateral measures to demonstrate their goodwill towards us, rather than constantly demanding that we prove our goodwill towards them. I will not be holding my breath waiting.

  16. Matt Edge
    Posted February 17, 2016 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    Jews hate us more than they love themselves.

  17. gwood
    Posted February 17, 2016 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    Here we may reign secure, and in my choyce

    To reign is worth ambition though in Hell:

    Better to reign in Hell, then serve in Heav’n

  18. Greg Johnson
    Posted February 17, 2016 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    Every Jewish infiltrator and agent provocateur in history has “changed sides” in order to get into the enemy camp and subvert it. Since there is no way to tell whether a Jew is a sincere turncoat or an enemy out to subvert us, we simply have to assume that they are all enemies and treat them as such. Any sincere Jewish well-wisher should understand this. They know their people better than we ever could.

    The idea that Jews might ease up on destroying Europe out of self-interest or self-preservation presumes that they are rational. I see little evidence of that. Jews are above all spiteful people, and spite is a very self-destructive and morally corrupting emotion. It could very well be the case that Jews hate us more than they love themselves. Which means that they will continue pushing for the destruction of Europe, even if that results in their own destruction.

    Jews also lack a sense of personal responsibility to such a degree that they find it almost impossible to see themselves as the authors of their own fate. So not only is it conceivable that Jews could destroy themselves out of hatred of whites, it would be perfectly in keeping for them to blame us for their ultimate destruction.

    Whites also think that Jews feel safer among whites than among Muslims. Such whites then reason that as Muslim immigration grows, Jews will appreciate us more and want to back off on non-white immigration. I think this is wishful thinking, for two reasons.

    First, look at where Jews created their ethnostate. They feel safer in a sea of hostile Muslims than they do around whites. Thus they feel safer by diluting Europe with Muslims too.

    Second, Jews will not change their strategy just because some Jews are also destroyed by Muslim immigration. Jews in Israel pursue policies that they know will lead to Jewish deaths through Muslim retaliation. Yet this does not deter them from their long-term policies in Israel, and there is no reason to think that they view the lives of diaspora Jews as any more valuable. Losing a few Jews is a small price to pay for the destruction of the hated white race.

    Sure, it is conceivable for some Jews to change sides, or at least become less opposed to white self-assertion. And yes, any decrease in Jewish opposition to White Nationalism would be a good thing. But I don’t think we should pin any hopes on this. We should certainly should not plan for it. And under no circumstances should we depend upon it.

    • Theodore
      Posted February 17, 2016 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

      I have to agree with Greg here. Two points:

      1. Amren can be viewed as a small-scale experiment in having Jews as allies. It has been a failure. Most of us are aware of the Duke-Hart “scuffle” at the 2006 meeting, and the subsequent Hart-Auster-Berman-Jobling breakaway faction. But, fact is, Hart and Weissberg had been promoting racially destructive memes at Amren years before the Duke incident. Simply put, Jews have different interests than do Europeans. They always promote multiculturalism and diversity, even in the context of racialism and white separatism. Thus, Hart argued for a White separatist state that would not only include Jews but also “Asians and others.” Weissberg defended the “racial status quo” and later compared racial activists to child molesters (or to the effect that they are publicly perceived as equivalent).

      2. Even if some Jews are sincere, moral legitimacy for White racial nationalism necessitates that Jews be held responsible for their crimes against Europeans, just as Jews have been adamant that “Nazi war criminals” must be held to account. Do we let them off scott-free simply because some of them belatedly profess support for White interests?

    • Proofreader
      Posted February 18, 2016 at 2:03 am | Permalink

      Jews can change their masks, but they can’t change their nature. If Jews are rational, it’s only in the sense that Captain Ahab was rational: “all my means are sane, my motive and my object mad.” There’s no reason to believe that Jews, that most collectivist of peoples, will collectively adopt a position that would make a modus vivendi between us and them even worth considering.

      When the part-Jewish monster named Lenin remarked that spite generally plays the basest of roles in politics, he was quite correct, and his remark may well have been influenced by his heavily Jewish milieu. Jewish politics is nothing if not spiteful.

  19. Posted February 17, 2016 at 7:55 am | Permalink

    I’m sorry but I must respectfully disagree. Dr. Pierce has warned us over and over again about this type of faulty wishful thinking when he sites the story of the Frog and Scorpion. Many European leaders made this same mistake, thinking that Jews would change if it were in their self interests and were all proven wrong. Jews are what they are. We can expect no assistance from them.

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4


    The Node


    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes


    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance


    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy


    The Path of Cinnabar


    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace


    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above