Print this post Print this post

Chicago: The Veil is Being Lifted

Donald Trump1,150 words

At the root of all politics is a threat of violence. Whether enacted from above or below, the ability to assert one’s political interests requires, at the very least, the threat of force.

Carl Schmitt wrote: “A world in which the possibility of war is utterly eliminated, a completely pacified globe, would be a world without the distinction of friend and enemy and hence without politics.”[1] This, as every last shred of history demonstrates, is an impossibility — despite centuries of (either naive or strategic) utopian rhetoric to the contrary. All groups assert their own interests in some way and these interests will always come in conflict at some point. Rarely, however, has a group of people been as unwilling to explicitly defend themselves as have whites. Modern white populations have been conditioned to hate themselves, to feel guilty for their accomplishments, and to proudly yet perversely assert the interests of competing groups over their own as a sign of sophistication and moral character.

As I write these words, a coalition of blacks, browns, Jews, and tragically misguided whites has managed to violently stop a Donald Trump rally in Chicago.[2] Mainstream and social media is ablaze with Leftists and neoconservatives celebrating this victory (an alliance that will come as no surprise to White Nationalists but very well might to many average Americans). The response, however, of Trump supporters has largely been to condemn such actions under the guise of gross violations of free speech, law and order, and common decency. While these things are certainly valuable, especially to white Americans, for whom these notions make up an essential part of their identity, they too can only be practiced, in one way or another, through violence. That which is decreed by the state requires the power potential of the state to make it “real.”

One of the many tragedies that has befallen post-war white civilization is the nearly universal acceptance that politics can be conducted by men in suits bantering back and forth in legalistic language until some sort of “both sides of the aisle” compromise can be reached. What this does is to create a veil between the violence inherent in the political process and any truly effective assertion of group interests. It creates an expectation of peace and civility that is never entirely possible. When this veil is lifted, as it has been for many average Americans tonight, it comes as a shock, as an affront to their cherished belief in the system, as a dizzying and frightening incomprehension. Not only are whites glued to their television sets watching the seemingly inexplicable revolt of those whom they have for so long been trying to help in good faith — blacks, browns, and assorted immigrants — but they are witnessing the exposure of the political id, the swirling and thunderous survival instincts that are at the root of the political process.

The American system has tried desperately to contain these impulses. It has tried to turn the art of politics into an exercise in complacency. Whites especially are instructed to refrain from anything that could disrupt this strange order. We are told to keep our mouths shut, to treat everyone as equals, to empathize with those who have destroyed our cities, made our schools unsafe, lived off our paychecks, and voiced their hatred of us at every turn. We are told that it is our fault for whatever ripples appear on the still waters of the American dream. And now we are told that the riots in Chicago are Donald Trump’s fault. But this can come as no shock to any racially-conscious white person. For the establishment, Donald Trump has become a stand-in for white interests and is therefore tainted — more than most — with the modern original sin of whiteness. So of course it is his fault that a black man bit the ear off one of his supporters.

What many, if not most, of these very same Trump supporters fail to grasp is that what is happening in Chicago is merely the physical manifestation of the very foundation of the political process: the advocacy by force of conditions best fit to ensure biological survival. The stuffed shirt mentality and fetishization of bipartisan compromise endemic in American politics is ultimately an historical aberration. What we are seeing in Chicago is a refutation of this style of governance as much as it is a refutation of egalitarian notions of race. How ridiculous does a Marco Rubio or a Hillary Clinton appear in the context of smashed police cars, bloody Trump supporters, and Mexican flags waved angrily on American streets? American politicians excel in disguising the reality of political struggle, in divorcing meaning from the political process. It is no wonder that “ideologue” is used as an epithet for any politician who purports to actually believe in something.

These riots should be seen as a step in the right direction for whites. They are a healthy reminder of exactly what is at stake and why politics are so important in the first place. Governance is not a game, nations are not social constructs, populations are not forever malleable and docile. On the contrary, the political process is based in a primordial necessity, a deep-seated collective evolutionary struggle. White America is long past due in seeing the real world results of their naiveté. The unending appeasement of every last minority group and the forced demographic displacement of whites cannot end any other way but in the radical readjustment of white political priorities based on racial self-interest. Just as there can be no compromise between a mountain lion and a house cat, there can be no compromise between the Judaic forces of globalization and nationalism or between Third World hordes and whites. There can be no compromise with those who seek our destruction. And tonight’s events, more so than any of the race riots we have seen recently, ought to make this crystal clear.

Whether or not this helps Trump is less important than the fact that Americans are, en masse, seeing the true meaning of politics: collective physical struggle against one’s enemies. For White Nationalists, anything that illuminates this foundational truth should be welcomed and used in our fight for survival — for that is precisely what it is. The charade of peaceful coexistence with non-whites in white territories is coming to an end. And what seemed to Jews to be the eternal submission by whites to their colonial rule is now being threatened. The practice of domestic politics has changed tonight. Expect more violence at Trump rallies. But also expect more awakened whites.


1. Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), p. 35.

2. It is true that Donald Trump voluntarily called off the rally, but it cannot be denied that this would not have happened without the threat of violence from the protestors/rioters.


If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. R_Moreland
    Posted March 15, 2016 at 5:04 am | Permalink

    We’re in a fight, no doubt about it. And the fight’s been going on for decades.

    Fronts have included the Rhodesian “bush war,” the Edmund Pettus Bridge, quite a few burned out banlieues and inner cities, Cologne on New Year’s, and now Chicago. It’s the general war against White people and White civilization.

    There are two challenges:

    1: Awaken White consciousness.
    2: Employ the right tactics.

    Whites have to see they are in a common struggle, whether it’s the defense of Boer farmers in ANC South Africa or repulsing the latest wave of third world “immigrants” into Europe. This has been a dilemma in the past. The anti-White side isolates the struggle into separate issues, allowing them to win one front at a time. The White struggle against, say, forced busing in the 1970s was just as much a part of the fight as Rhodesia against marxist insurgents. But few White people saw it that way. Now we have the Trump candidacy which has apparently distributed some Red Pills. How can WN exploit this?

    This gets to the tactics. The dilemma here is that in the past, the Left’s dominance of mainstream media meant it could spin any confrontation. For example, look at the way television news portrayed the 1965 Edmund Pettus clash as a cop assault against peaceful marchers rather than (as Paul Kersey would put it) a defense of White civilization against the forces of degeneration.

    White activists must therefore create their own agitprop, and/or use the tried and true methods to manipulate the mainstream media. For example, by exploiting the tactics of civil disobedience. And then using these tactics against the Left (and more critically, against the hostile elites who fund them). I’ll repeat what I have said before: the Left can dish it out, but it can not take it.

    Radical theory holds that to have a revolution, you need:
    A division in the ruling class; and
    The alienation of the middle class; and
    A revolutionary movement which understands the nature of the struggle and can act accordingly.

    The Trump campaign may just be that crack in the ruling class facade. And we are seeing more Americans reacting to hostile and alienated elite institutions (mainstream media, globalizing corporations, sellout politicos, ad nauseam). What is now needed is a movement which can capitalize on this. Certainly we are seeing nationalist movements rising in Europe.

    I want to add something else. I have heard quite a few people–most of them quite middle of the road–state that the time has come for another revolution in America. The system is too far gone to be salvaged. The Trump campaign is playing off of this sentiment, for better or worse. There is a potential movement out there, waiting for the leadership to mobilize and take it to the streets.

    • Peter Quint
      Posted March 15, 2016 at 10:52 am | Permalink

      “We’re in a fight, no doubt about it. And the fight’s been going on for decades.”

      The fights been going on for over 2,000 years.

  2. Peter Quint
    Posted March 14, 2016 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    I hope that Trump is not elected, it will give white people the impression that something is being done for the white race. Trump will not be able to make any changes; he will not have a majority house and senate. We need an overwhelming grass roots movement first. I think that the election of Clinton will serve our cause better.

  3. Bjørn
    Posted March 14, 2016 at 7:16 am | Permalink

    I smell an emerging battle cry here. About time!
    Now take the time to read Julian Langness’ article on this site a short month ago and get going! Nobody is going to blow cosy hot air up your soft academic backside once this catches on. And the thugs in the street will never listen to your wordy reasoning. Make sure you are prepared to meet them as well. They’re part of the enemy line.

  4. Gunnar Tyrsson
    Posted March 13, 2016 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    I agree. The veil of media decorum that hides the ugly realities of this foul, corrupt system was torn away. Our folk need to walk away from this with their eyes opened.

  5. Anja from Poland
    Posted March 13, 2016 at 5:29 am | Permalink

    These Trump rallies are very reminiscent of NSDAP meetings. To be honest so are the circumstances of Trumps rise. Similar movements going on in Europe aswell. We are looking at Aryan resistance to Jewish communism.

    Its great times for white nationalists. Everything that happened last 12 months was to our advantage. These protests are helping our cause. White beast is waking up. Its all coming together nicely.

  6. Juri
    Posted March 13, 2016 at 5:21 am | Permalink

    There will be a war. Or anybody really believes tha left just give up ????

  7. Nxx
    Posted March 13, 2016 at 5:13 am | Permalink

    The establishment’s reaction followed Auster’s First Law of Majority Minority Relations to a tee:

    Here’s the First Law expressed well in its three main variations:
    “1. The worse a designated minority or non-Western group behave, the more they are praised and their sins covered up.
    2. The worse a designated minority or non-Western group behave, the more racist it becomes to speak the truth about their behavior.
    3. The worse a designated minority or non-Western group behave, the more their behavior must be blamed on white racism.” [or on Donald Trump]
    4. The worse the behavior of minorities and non-Westerners, the more the behavior must be covered up or excused, and the more racist a white is for noticing it and thinking about it.

  8. Bobby
    Posted March 12, 2016 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    From the first paragraph, I knew this was one of those rare, extremely purified in its message, articles. I congratulate Mr.Thoresen for a great contribution to political realities.

  9. cecilhenry
    Posted March 12, 2016 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Well, here is an interesting a incident. Some family members with kids in school mentioned the new high school their son is attending. They were pleased.

    In a seemingly separate comment they asked me to guess what was ‘unusual’ about the school. I suspected the answer but would not absolve them of making the observation (they were hoping I would do it for them): namely that the school was over 95% White. And that was unusual.

    I just commented on White genocide and instead of the usual denunciations, I got a placid silence. They would of never made such a comment 5 years ago.

    • Sharkeisha
      Posted March 13, 2016 at 8:19 am | Permalink

      A Freikorps is just a way for white people to become glamorous robbers of other whites, like the Jayhawks of 1850s Kansas. I think for us to win, we need our people to be able to control the sale of Treasury Bonds. A sale of T Bills needs to be sold to wealthy nations like China, Korea, Israel, etc. With that money we deport Chinese, Koreans, etc. T Bills get paid off on time with interest. The East Asian nations in particular don’t care about their nationals in the US especially if they’re merely getting a plane ride under the efficient and gentle control on an American Civil Servant. Instead, they need a safe place to store their money in a place where their co-nationals and glorious post-colonial governments can’t steal it. They’ll take deportation over robbery every day of the week. For us it is good debt as the economic benefits of deported American blacks would be $trillons in savings.

  10. Posted March 12, 2016 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Justin Raimondo called for the creation of a defense force against the anti-Trump (and also anti-White) street criminals. I agree. Someone needs to design a t-shirt. Build a t-shirt and they will come.

    • Joe
      Posted March 13, 2016 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

      About 90 years ago, a similar group needed shirts to bolster the defenses of their meetings as well. Those shirts were brown… and those fighting men were effective to the point of eliminating their communist foes. Food for thought.

      • Adrian Davies
        Posted March 13, 2016 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

        True enough, but their own beloved leader then eliminated a great many of them on the Night of the Long Knives!

        • Joe
          Posted March 13, 2016 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

          That leader was not as “beloved” as you are lead to believe, Adrian. They were indeed, traitors to the man and movement which spawned them. The “leader” had no choice in the matter as to their continued existence – hence, his goals would have never had the chance to be met. I do not condone outright murder, but when it comes to intra-party politics of ANY movement, there are necessities which the layman cannot fully grasp until well after the fact. If Benedict Arnold was assassinated before his treasonous actions, would we so lithely condemn this act as barbarous? I think not.

  11. Proofreader
    Posted March 12, 2016 at 9:04 am | Permalink

    The response, however, of Trump supporters has largely been to condemn such actions under the guise of gross violations [of] free speech, law and order, and common decency.

    • dkmeller1
      Posted March 13, 2016 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

      “Trump supporters still are responding by “condemning such actions under the guise of gross violations of free speech, law and order, and common decency.
      Correctly so.

      While White people must learn, or re-learn to defend ourselves, maintaining as much legality and legitimacy of our violence as POLITICAL SELF DEFENSE is imperative. There will be every attempt by the “Jewsmedia” to portray Trump supporters (and Whites) as hooligans, street fighters, and even “terrorists” and this must be countered as much as possible by video and audio records who the ACTUAL instigators and aggressors are.

      In ANY conflict, Whites will be made to look bad compared with nonwhites, men against women, “straights” against homos, etc. As many records as possible posting the TRUTH about what happened will be necessary to continue to gather and expand public support.

One Trackback

  • By Trump is lighting that fire – Dixie Daily on March 14, 2016 at 1:13 am

    […] America during the summer of 1967. The Washington Post notes that Donald Trump has lighted a different kind of fire in the winter of 2016 – one which threatens to burn hot over the summer as Black, Latino, […]

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4


    The Node


    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes


    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance


    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy


    The Path of Cinnabar


    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace


    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above