Author Archives: Tomislav Sunić

Tomislav Sunić

Counter-Currents Radio
Tragedy & Myth in Ancient Europe & Modern Politics

64:50 / 32 words

[jwplayer file=”http://cdn.counter-currents.com/radio/Sunic-Tragedy_&_Myth_in_Ancient_Europe_&_Modern_Politics-2014-02-01.mp3″ streamer=”rtmp://s3cxt7hxkp9tvh.cloudfront.net/cfx/st” provider=”rtmp” duration=”3890″]

To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save target or link as.”

To subscribe to our podcasts, click here.

Video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BOiDyxAo7M

Was soll man lesen? (Teil 2)

Tomislav Sunić

Charles Krafft, “NVA Dinner Set,” 2012

2,022 words

Übersetzt von Auziwandilaz

Literatur: Harold Covington

Lassen wir die politische Plausibilität oder den post-historischen Wahrheitsgehalt von Covingtons Romanen, die vom weißen Unabhängigkeitskrieg zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts im pazifischen Nordwesten handeln, beiseite. Read more …

Published: April 17, 2013 | Posted in North American New Right | Tagged articles, Harold Covington, in German, in translation, North American New Right, originals, Tomislav Sunić | Comments closed

Print this post

Titans are in Town:
Preface to Pierre Krebs, Fighting for the Essence

Tomislav Sunić

1,844 words

There are books that are timely, but there are also books whose time is yet to come. The time has come to urgently read and reread Pierre Krebs’ book Fighting for the Essence, Read more …

Published: March 9, 2012 | Posted in North American New Right | Tagged book excerpts, book reviews, Christianity, European New Right, Fighting for the Essence, Friedrich Nietzsche, neo-paganism, North American New Right, paganism, Pierre Krebs, reprints, Tomislav Sunić | Comments closed

Print this post

Louis-Ferdinand Céline—An Anarcho-Nationalist

Tomislav Sunić

1,766 words

In his imaginary self-portrayal, the French novelist Louis-Ferdinand Céline (1894–1961) would be the first one to reject the assigned label of anarcho-nationalism. For that matter he would reject any outsider’s label whatsoever regarding his prose and his personality. He was an anticommunist, but also an anti-liberal. He was an anti-Semite but also an anti-Christian. He despised the Left and the Right. He rejected all dogmas and all beliefs, and worse, he submitted all academic standards and value systems to brutal derision. Read more …