Print this post Print this post

Remembering Adolf Hitler:
April 20, 1889–April 30, 1945

405 words

Adolf Hitler was born on April 20, 1889. In commemoration of his birth, I wish to draw your attention to the following pieces on this website.

Hitler’s Significance for Our Struggle

Historical Accounts of Hitler and the Third Reich

Significant Admirers of Hitler

Film in the Third Reich

The Legacy of Hitler and National Socialism:

Humor

 

Related

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

15 Comments

  1. me
    Posted April 22, 2012 at 3:38 am | Permalink

    Lew, thank you very much for your response!

  2. icr
    Posted April 21, 2012 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    Koch was actually a “good” choice, from Hitler’s point of view. To someone who views Ukrainians as biologically inferior scum, appointing this man to RK of Ukraine would be a no-brainer.

    The other point of view is that Hitler primarily viewed Ukraine as a primarily a buffer against
    the inevitable second Anglo-American starvation blockade.

  3. Lew
    Posted April 21, 2012 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Henry Ford alludes to wars being a Jewish “harvest” in Chapter 3 of The International Jew.

    the trend of “Americanism” is so different from the trend of “Judaism” that the two are in conflict. This does not indicate treason toward American nationalisms perhaps, so much as it indicates loyalty toward Jewish nationalism. But the reader must himself be the judge, on the facts given in this book, as to how far the difference really goes and the effect of the struggle between the two ideas. The fact of the antagonism which exists between the two is clear and complete. The Gentiles do not notice that antagonism, but the Jews are always and everywhere keenly aware of it. This throws a very strong light on all the revolutionary programs to break up the present control of society, by sowing dissensions between so-called capital and labor, by cheapening the dignity of government through corrupt politics, by trivializing the mind of the people through theaters and movies, but it is in the study of Jewish money-making out of war that the clues are found to most of the great abuses of which the Jews have been guilty. “Wars are the Jews’ harvests,” is an ancient saying. Their predilection for the quartermaster’s department has been observed anciently and modernly. Their interest being mostly in profits and not in national issues; their traditional loyalty being to the Jewish nation, rather than to any other nation; it is natural that they should be found to be the merchants of goods and information in times of war.

    When I looked it up, I discovered this quote is usually attributed to a 19th century Rabbi named Reichorn. It’s all over the internet on anti-Jewish sites hosted by sundry anti-Semites (mostly WNists and Muslims). I haven’t been able to locate the original source. Given this, it’s possible the quote is a fabrication and has been falsely attributed to a Jewish rabbi in the same way The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were also falsely attributed to Jews. There is a discrepancy as to when Reichorn supposedly said it. On some web sites, the quote is attributed to Reichorn in 1869 and on others it’s 1859.

    If I recall correctly, one reason William Pierce rejected the authenticity of the Protocols was because Jews don’t generally speak so openly about their plans. Using this logic, perhaps the authenticity of Reichorn quote should be rejected out of hand for this reason alone — Jews do not always express their pathological hate so openly. On the other hand, however, sometimes they do just that. In the Old Testament, the Jewish God and Jews speak often of the need to cheat and kill non-Jews, and Jews openly express their hatred of non-Jews in the Talmud as well.

    Even if the quote is a fabrication, it still accurately captures how Jews think. There is plenty of evidence besides that quote that modern wars are at least partially a Jewish harvest.

    • Lew
      Posted April 21, 2012 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

      Meant as a response to Me up top.

  4. rhondda
    Posted April 21, 2012 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    So much to read, so little time. Thanks, I have found some books I should read to help fill in the holes in my head.

  5. icr
    Posted April 21, 2012 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    Despite all the inducements to say otherwise, all of Hitler’s personal staff (maids, cooks, butlers, chauffeurs, secretaries, etc.) seem to have stuck by the story that H. was kind, considerate and a had a remarkably well-balanced personality. Check out, by way of striking contrast, the appalling stories that Civil Rights hero LBJ’s underlings have told about him.

    That said, Erich Koch was a stunningly bad choice for RK of Ukraine. He was such a good recruiter for the Partisans that the latter decided against an assassination attempt.

    • Tanja
      Posted April 21, 2012 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

      Despite all the inducements to say otherwise, all of Hitler’s personal staff (maids, cooks, butlers, chauffeurs, secretaries, etc.) seem to have stuck by the story that H. was kind, considerate and a had a remarkably well-balanced personality.

      Yes, the ridiculous stereotype of Hitler as a mouth-foaming lunatic is rather widespread. I may not agree with all the things the man did, but he was most definitely a sane person. He wasn’t any more “insane” than Genghis Khan or Julius Caesar or Alexander the Great were.

      That said, Erich Koch was a stunningly bad choice for RK of Ukraine.

      Koch was actually a “good” choice, from Hitler’s point of view. To someone who views Ukrainians as biologically inferior scum, appointing this man to RK of Ukraine would be a no-brainer. Hitler knew exactly what would happen when he appointed Koch, despite the loud protests from Alfred Rosenberg and the Wehrmacht high command.

      Ukraine during WW2 was basically a story of evil vs. evil. The only guys who come out look good were the UPA, and even they were rather morally ambiguous.

      • Calgacus
        Posted April 27, 2012 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

        There is no evidence Hitler beleived the Ukrainians were “biologically inferior scum”, as you so poetically put it.

  6. Tanja
    Posted April 21, 2012 at 6:06 am | Permalink

    Even though I’m definitely not fond of Hitler myself (he’d probably think the same of me), he did have many good ideas. The “volksgemeinschaft” idea of an ethnic community was very admirable. Germany was reborn from the ashes during his reign, the German people thrived, and the Third Reich became the only racial state in the 20th century. Not a small accomplishment, that.

    Ironically, the constant demonizing of Hitler by the media will ensure that nobody will ever forget him.

  7. Hyperborean
    Posted April 20, 2012 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Hitler’s legacy is a testament to the great irony of living in the Kali Yuga. The greatest man yet to be born of the modern age has been slandered and vilified to the point where he has become the very symbol of evil. It fills me with despair when I reflect on the fact that the Anglo element of the germanic population was tricked into sacrificing close to a million of its best young men to destroy the movement which had the potential to bring about our salvation.

  8. Lew
    Posted April 20, 2012 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

    Hitler was right about international finance and right about Jews.

    Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews’ Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet.’

    – Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah, 1869

    As I listened to Gottfried Feder’s first lecture about the ‘breaking of interest slavery,’ I knew at once that this was a theoretical truth which would inevitably be of immense importance for the future of the German people. The sharp separation of stock exchange capital from the national economy offered the possibility of opposing the internationalization of the German economy without at the same time menacing the foundations of an independent national self-maintenance by a struggle against all capital. The development of Germany was much too clear in my eyes for me not to know that the hardest battle would have to be fought, not against hostile nations, but against international capital.

    – Hitler, 1925

    • me
      Posted April 21, 2012 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

      Lew,

      What’s the source of the Rabbi Reichorn’s quote?

  9. Posted April 20, 2012 at 6:59 pm | Permalink
  10. Free Man
    Posted April 20, 2012 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    The greatest man that ever lived!

  11. Ten White Words
    Posted April 20, 2012 at 9:38 am | Permalink

    TYSPOMYDDA- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-6L_hT3QtQ

    In appreciation for Mein Kampf, we offer this inspiration:

    Jed DeValleyism’s Racism Test, from his “Forbidden thoughts on the dangers of Diversity and Inclusion,” 2011:

    Imagine that all the full blooded black Negroes in New Orleans traded places with an equal number full blooded white Nordics from North Germany.

    Crime in New Orleans will stay the same, increase, or decrease?

    Crime in North Germany will stay the same, increase, or decrease?

    If you said that crime in New Orleans will decrease and crime in North Germany will increase, you are a “vile, disgusting, ignorant, sick racist.”

One Trackback

  • By Anonymous on April 20, 2012 at 3:54 am

    […] […]

    Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    The World in Flames

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance