- Counter-Currents Publishing - https://www.counter-currents.com -

White Spree Killers

[1]

Wade Michael Page

2,245 words

Killing sprees are becoming more common as “Western” civilization unravels.

If killing sprees per se mattered to elites, there would not be a sharp distinction made between killings committed by conscious (or unconscious) whites, and killings committed by non-white immigrants (VDare’s “Immigrant Mass Murder Syndrome” [2]most recent tally here [3]), non-white gangs, drug cartels, and so forth.

But often the FIRST thing the media and police recklessly do when such crimes occur is jump to the conclusion that politically or racially motivated “whites” are responsible—even when they are not. This institutionalized psychological-emotional reaction is reflexive.

Even a case of self-defense by a mestizo (George Zimmerman) against a black is trumpeted internationally by media, police, and prosecutors as a “white racist” killing.

Thanks to such behavior, most people, educated and uneducated, intelligent and unintelligent, harbor the belief that the Columbine killers, one of whom was Jewish and both of whom were anti-white, were . . . white racists.

The media and the Left likewise falsely implicated Jared Taylor’s American Renaissance in Jared Lee Loughner’s 2011 Arizona shooting of Jewish Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and others.

They reported that The Dark Knight killer James Holmes was a Tea Party member (a falsehood), and that he had read Norwegian revolutionary Anders Breivik’s manifesto. Equally damning, he had white skin and was not a Jew—although he had worked as a counselor at a Jewish day camp.

Two men who shot blacks, one an American Indian, were likewise reported to be white racists.

Ceaseless group defamation of this sort by a frighteningly powerful mass media is extremely pernicious. It sinks roots deep into the public psyche, the minds of elites, and the apparatus of domestic tyranny (police and national security agencies) exactly as if it were true.

Long-term, such racist lies and innuendoes are every bit as damaging as genuine crimes committed by racially or politically motivated whites. By being falsely reported as “racist” they become racist. The lies are internalized by society, not the truth.

Objectively, it is counterproductive for the System to behave in this manner, especially given the impotence and unconsciousness of the powerless, aging, defeated, demographically collapsing white population.

At present, non-whites are the future, and organized violence by them is inimical to the long-term health of the totalitarian state.

But anti-white hatred is an irrational emotion as well as a deeply-ingrained habit, so this feature of anarcho-tyranny will not disappear.

Anti-white racism and philo-Semitism are the religious cement that holds everything else together—for now.

Natural Occurrences

We have reached the point where anytime anything like this happens, a knot involuntarily forms in my stomach. Will the latest perpetrator be linked to white nationalism?

Linkage automatically evokes the “domestic terrorism” paradigm, whether this is reported by the media or not, making the case of prime importance to the media, the police apparatus, and state policy.

The first thing the ruling class does is check for Internet contacts and speech, websites visited, organizations the individual belonged to, books and magazines they read, things they wrote and said, and so on.

Everything is treated differently than in cases of run-of-the-mill non- and anti-white mass murders.

What matters are the ideas that motivated the killers: anti-genocidal ideas, pro-freedom ideas, white racial ideas.

Jews have a keen grasp of the power of ideas, facts, truth, and what suppressing them and replacing them with lies—Big Lies—accomplishes.

The entire academic and legal case against First Amendment liberty or, in other countries, freedom of speech, boils down to the assertion that ideas have (or potentially have) real-world consequences.

And who can deny it?

The incredible crimes against humanity committed in the Middle East are fundamentally the consequence of Jewish ideas. So was the slaughter of tens of millions of Europeans by Communists.

Likewise, Jews seized power in the West because their speech and activities were not ruthlessly suppressed in the manner they currently prescribe for us.

Jews, the Left, and government fully understand this.

Jews and the Left are fundamentally totalitarian. The 20th and 21st centuries represent the exteriorization, the global extension to Gentiles, of the age-old totalitarianism of the ghetto, the shtetl, and the synagogue.

Even Harold Covington has stated that he immediately feels queasy and checks his subscription and e-mail lists to see if the latest killer-in-the-news might at some point have contacted him.

I mention Covington because he’s a revolutionary, not a conservative. At present, I can think of only one other person who’s a white revolutionary. Both he and Covington were important players in the past, but are peripheral today.

By “revolutionary” I do not mean that they do anything other than write and speak. They don’t. Rather, they have revolutionary mindsets. They are realists about power and social change under present conditions.

I regard whites such as Benjamin Smith, Timothy McVeigh, James von Brunn, Anders Breivik, and Wade Michael Page as entirely natural consequences of genocidal policies.

They are human versions of thunderstorms or tornadoes—acts of God.

Does anyone seriously believe that rulers can destroy basic human rights, a morally advanced system of liberty and law unprecedented in human history, and intentionally wipe out a major race of mankind (the crime of genocide) without any blowback whatsoever?

Of course not.

What is remarkable isn’t that such killings occur, but how few of them do. Jews and government have to date paid no price for committing genocide. They could care less about the tiny collateral damage the population experiences, which merely serves as more grist for their “Hate Whites, Suppress Whites, Kill Whites” propaganda mill.

None of the killers told anyone what he intended to do, asked us what we thought about it, or paid any attention to our general counsel and advice on the subject. Nor will their successors in the future.

But they will be “linked” and “tied” to us by Jews and government because of ideas. Ideas are the real target.

Indeed, the killers will be “linked” and “tied” to everyone on the right, even thoroughly philo-Semitic, anti-white conservatives.

The effect will be to force all conservatives and white racialists continuously Leftward.

What Do Jews Believe for Themselves?

How do they expect whites to react?

What would Jews do if the situations were reversed?

The answer is obvious. Long ago there would have been organized bloodshed on a massive scale, including the use of nuclear weapons, crude or sophisticated, against the government and cultural elites.

Today Jews claim they face an “existential threat” to their survival.

How do these poseur-“victims” talk about themselves? What is the morality of opposing genocide according to their own statements?

Jewish journalist Seymour Hersh in The Samson Option (1991), a book about Israel’s illicit nuclear weapons, quoted a former Israeli government official with firsthand knowledge of that nation’s nuclear program as saying, “We can still remember the stink of Auschwitz and Treblinka. Next time we’ll take all of you [white Europeans] with us” (p. 42).

This quote was, until recently, included in Wikipedia‘s entry about Hersh’s book, classified as a “notable allegation” contained therein. At the moment it can still be read on an outdated cache of the web page. But the visible page has already been scrubbed clean by Wikipedia‘s philo-Semitic editors, so web surfers will no longer see it.

Far more people would have discovered the quote (and through it the book) on the Internet than will ever discover it independently, obscurely buried in a 20-year-old book.

I own The Samson Option, and the quote is accurate. (I did not post it; I have never contributed to Wikipedia, a viciously anti-white publication.)

This damnable, all-encompassing, free speech-smothering, unending Jewish/government censorship, this culture-distorting, twisted mass of lies, is another reason whites are in the situation they’re in. The truth cannot be told. Public opinion cannot take its natural course.

On pp. 260–61, Hersh reveals that Israel had previously targeted its nuclear weapons at the Soviet Union—i.e., whites—because of that country’s anti-Zionist policies and support for Arab states.

Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld said in 2003:

We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: “Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother. . . .” Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under. (Quoted in David Hirst, “The War Game,” The Guardian (UK), September 21, 2003 [4]; original interview in the Dutch weekly magazine Elsevier, no. 17, April 27th, 2002, pp. 52–53; Van Creveld, who is Jewish, was born in the Netherlands.)

David D. Perlmutter, director of the school of journalism and mass communication at the University of Iowa, wrote in a newspaper op-ed [5]:

What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a Nuclear Winter? . . . For the first time in history, a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away—unlike the Armenians, Tibetans, World War II European Jews or Rwandans—have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?

Recently a leader of the American Jewish community called upon Jews to assassinate America’s Zionist Negro president. Alfred Adler, owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, ran a column [6] suggesting that Israel should consider giving

the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.

Yes, you read [that] correctly. Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If I have thought of this Tom Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?

Other than a flurry of negative publicity that lasted a day or two, Jews suffered no fall-out from this affair.

Yet two powerful Jewish hate groups, the ADL and the SPLC, spied on Wade Michael Page for a decade, evidently feeding information about him to government security agencies.

Why? Because unlike their powerful Israeli and American Jewish compatriots mentioned above, Page was deemed (by them) to be a nascent “domestic terrorist”!

An earlier assassination attempt against an American president, George H. W. Bush (father of the neocon), was exposed by ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky.

In 1991, according to the ex-agent, the Jews plotted to murder Bush, who, like Obama, was deemed insufficiently servile, and then kill unwitting Palestinian collaborators who would be framed for the crime, thereby bringing the wrath of the United States down upon that horribly victimized people. (Other Side of Deception, New York: HarperCollins, 1994, pp. 278–82)

This, then, is the morality of the ruling class when it comes to genocide.

The threat to governments and civilian populations from Jewish terrorism is obviously substantial and ongoing. It dwarfs any danger posed by white racialists.

Yet the primary mission of globalist politicians, police, and security agencies is to cater to and serve these people while both groups jointly suppress white “potential terrorists.”

The “Senselessness” of White Violence

Conservative white nationalists maintain that Benjamin Smith, Timothy McVeigh, James von Brunn, Anders Breivik, and Wade Michael Page behaved foolishly and counterproductively.

As an aside, it is obvious that Tim McVeigh and Anders Behring Breivik, whatever one thinks of them, belong in an entirely different category than the others, despite the fact that Jews, the media, and law enforcement indiscriminately lump them all together.

As for the others, one wonders why, if they intended to sacrifice their lives anyway, they didn’t shoot for bigger game.

Decades ago Louis Beam, in Essays of a Klansman [7] (1983), published a chart with a point system designating the relative importance of potential targets, ranging from Category I, assigned 1 point, making the soldier an “Aryan Warrior,” down to Category IX, assigned a mere 1/1000 of a point, making him “Cannon Fodder.”

Everyone listed above, save for McVeigh and Breivik, is classified as cannon fodder under Beam’s system. In other words, his system ranked the revolutionary utility of their actions as very, very low.

Not that anyone would need a published chart to grasp the idea.

The fact that most of these people seem not to have thought of this on their own reinforces my belief that their actions are almost entirely spontaneous, engendered by sheer hopelessness and frustration.

On the other hand, both William Pierce and Breivik believed that even such arbitrary and seemingly senseless killings potentially served some revolutionary purpose. Clearly, not all whites think alike.

At any rate, victims of genocide will continue to lash out violently against a violent, racist System, and there is nothing that we can do about it.

Governments, Jewish organizations, academics, and the media will say that words and ideas were responsible for their actions, and ruthlessly suppress pro-white speech accordingly. That is their true motivation. The killings are merely pretexts.

The rulers are genetically programmed to behave the way they do. The idea of law and freedom as formerly understood in the West is completely alien to them. Their social system is composed of people who find totalitarianism congenial.

Such methods worked under Communism, destroyed the white race, destroyed the Middle East, and have established an embryonic global dictatorship.

Why won’t they keep on working?

Such is their reasoning.