Video of the Day
Holding the Moral High Ground
Video of the Day
7:02 / 142 words
I have to congratuate the woman in this video for her cool comportment under pressure. She defended herself without seeming defensive. She stood firm while remaining relaxed and open. She radiated moral certitude and self-confidence. She maintained the moral high ground in all her interactions, using her opponents’ liberal premises against them. Unable to defeat her in debate, they were reduced to chanting slogans at her. It was wise of her to have the entire event videotaped, not only to share it with the world but to deter violence against her.
I would love to interview this woman for Counter-Currents Radio. If anyone out there knows how to reach her, please put her in contact with me.
Share your thoughts about strengths of her performance, areas for improvement, and ideas for how to apply these lessons below.
Greg Johnson
Editor-in-Chief
Video%20of%20the%20Dayandnbsp%3BHolding%20the%20Moral%20High%20Ground
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
The Last Boy Scout
-
White Women Got 99 Problems, but Being White Ain’t One
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy, Rozdział 4: Teoria i praktyka
-
The Woman-Punching MAGAts of Manhattan
-
Reclaiming Country Music’s Imaginary Black Roots
-
White Girl Twitch a Lot
-
The Sticky Matter of Intent
-
How to Argue the Case for Ethnonationalism
22 comments
“this is who I am and I am not going to compromise.” She nailed it. “I have no hate in my heart” Wonderfull!!!! Kind of like Buddhist equanimity. Yes, yes, find her!!
She said nationalist.org- find her.
Nothing there unfortunately.
Yes, and that makes me a bit suspicious. Why put yourself out there so publicly and then give out a bunk Website address? And why was she out there alone? Nor do I recognize the banner she’s flying.
@ John Morgan
She could not be alone as someone obviously took the video. Could this be the White Nationalist version of political street theatre?
The website nationalist.org was a British-based National Socialist forum, but it no longer exists because it was taken down for some reason a couple of years ago. The only reason someone would reference it at this point in time is probably either as a sarcastic comment or simply to get people to look up things about nationalism in general.
Actually I just looked up nationalist.org on the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine and I realized that the flag in the video was also on the website (the symbol appears to be the arrow cross, by the way). I’m still not really sure why she would reference a now non-existent website.
Nevermind about the site being British-based (it was actually American), I was confusing it with another similar site.
@John Morgann
It is the flag of “Nationalist Movement”: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalist_Movement
That was hilarious. They just couldn’t come to grips with the idea that she wasn’t going to sing kumbaya with them.
What flag is that? I’ve gotta get me one if it works up the herd that well.
Cheers to the mysterious Lady
The flag she’s flying appears to be the fictional flag of a hypothetical German-controlled Europe, inspired by Robert Harris’ alt-history novel Fatherland:
http://graemeshimmin.com/alternative-history-flags/
Their ignorance is criminal. They accuse her of racism while they say nothing about the country of Israel, a country that discriminates against Christians, Muslims and any non-Jewish person, even prohibiting marriage between a Jew and a gentile. Israel is racist and the USA is threatening Syria for Israel and Jews and these ignorant bigots are complicit with the US gov’t in its desire for an attack against Syria by not identifying that Jews and Israel are behind America’s threats.
Their silence on Israel and Jewish war mongering (while hounding this lady) makes them complicit with the war mongers.
She got right to the heart of the issue, that is what they didn’t like.
That girls name is Rebecca.
Listen to the most recent podcast here http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=120821&cmd=tc. Go to about the hour and fifty three minute mark, thats when they get her on the show.
There is another broadcast of WP Radio with that girl on it that I found. Its episode 62(date: 08/28/2013) at the hour and twenty minute mark.
Also just saw a picture of her on the American Freedom Party facebook page. She is posing with 3 other people. Hopefully this stuff helps you contact her.
Her stance on those accusing her is simple: I am a certain way, I have certain beliefs, they don’t concern you or interfere with you in any way, now let me support this anti-war cause. Period. She has reduced her message for the leftist flakes to the form of an axiom–(self evicdent truth), which it is futile to argue against.
This is very similar to how leftists operate. They have the truth, there is no other, now shut up and go away. So the right attitude as demonstrated by this young gal is, don’t engage them on their terms and don’t even try to reason with them.
This gals attitude towards her dectractors is this: I’m here to support the same cause you are supporting and I believe what I believe, so don’t try to convert me to your belief. I won’t engage you on any terms other than mine. It’s like an axiom, it can’t be argued with. This is how the left handles things, only Rebecca was more polite and didn’t try to smear people as the left ALWAYS DOES.
Nationalist.org and the flag the woman is flying were both associated with Mississippi-based attorney and white nationalist Richard Barrett, founder and head of the Nationalist Movement, who was murdered by a Negro in 2010. Barrett argued and won the US Supreme Court case Forsyth County, Georgia v. The Nationalist Movement (1992), which forbade local governments from charging whites outrageous fees (allegedly for police personnel, etc.) before they could march or hold public demonstrations. This was an important precedent, but governments frequently ignored the law, knowing white citizens lacked funds to judicially enforce their First Amendment rights. Barrett personally had to litigate many cases against local governments after Forsyth County simply to be able to hold his own demonstrations.
The Jews (the ADL) now say, “The group’s current headquarters is in Wisconsin”—but such information is frequently out of date.
A few lessons I see here:
1. There’s a certain kind of power women possess in those kinds of situations that men don’t. She’s not as likely to be physically attacked, for one.
2. There’s also something symbolic about a woman being up front, especially one as composed and attractive as this one. They aren’t prepared for her. She confounds their expectations of what an evil white supremacist is. Imagine a bloc of just 20 or 30 of her!
3. Co-opting a left wing demo is brave and clever. It’s harnessing the left’s message-sending ability to pro-white ends, and by showing that a pro-white view is compatible with theirs, it again shatters left-wing clichés about who pro-whites are.
It’s also an opportunity to bring some over to the pro-white side. Energetic, bright, activist young white adults like being around other whites like themselves. Pride rather than self-hate and self-destruction could be very compelling. It certainly hasn’t been tried in this country. I’m thinking of something like Generation Identitaire, the little I know of them.
Hello!!!! Why do you think McCain put Sarah Palin upfront? Why do you think that Hilary Clinton is upfront? Why do you think all those other women are upfront? PAWNS!!!!
Come on. I am so tired of being shoved upfront because the guys think that will get them the votes they need. (look how politically correct I am. I so care about women.) One of the excuses for going to Afghanistan was to LIBERATE THE WOMEN. Hello. Oh women identify with women who SEEM to have power. Who really has the power? This is the whole scam of feminists. WHO REALLY HAS THE POWER? That is the game. The appearance and the reality. A mighty big distraction played out on white people’s sense of fairness.
rhondda,
I can understand your frustration, but shouldn’t we utilize everything we can to put an end to white genocide? If it means putting pro-white women in the spotlight because anti-whites are less likely to assault them, feel less comfortable arguing with them, and because it disrupts their stereotype of us, would you agree it is something we should consider doing?
Personally, I don’t think it’s some kind of secrete weapon or the “key” to anything, but I do think it’s a good idea to have some visible women in our ranks. My point is not for or against putting women in the spotlight, but that we shouldn’t take political means personally if it benefits our race. We should be open to using whatever effective means are at our disposal.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment