Print this post Print this post

Moral Seriousness

NewRightOldRight1crop1,061 words

Translations: Czech, Spanish

Author’s Note:

This essay is excerpted from my book New Right vs. Old Right, available in hardcover, paperback, and Kindle and Nook Ebook formats.

“This ain’t no party. This ain’t no disco.
This ain’t no foolin’ around.”
—Talking Heads, “Life During Wartime”

I have been involved with the White Nationalist scene since the year 2000. My experience has been overwhelmingly positive, but not entirely so. The hardest thing to take has not been the crooks and crazies, but the pervasive lack of moral seriousness, even among the best-informed and most principled White Nationalists. I know people who sincerely believe that our race is being subjected to an intentional policy of genocide engineered by the organized Jewish community. Yet when faced with a horror of this magnitude, they lead lives of consummate vanity, silliness, and self-indulgence.

I am convinced that more people will get involved with our cause if we follow two rules: (1) each person gets to determine his own level of explicitness and involvement, and (2) the rest of us have to respect those decisions. But our cause will never move forward unless we can also persuade people to (1) do everything they can within their own individually determined comfort zones, and (2) expand their comfort zones, so they are willing to take greater risks for the cause. But to do that, we need to grapple with the issue of moral seriousness.

I know White Nationalists who would run down the street in broad daylight shouting “thief!” at the top of their lungs if their car were being stolen. But when confronted with the theft of our whole civilization and the very future of our race, they merely mutter euphemisms in the shadows.

I know White Nationalists who are fully apprised of the gravity of the Jewish problem, who have seen the Jewish takeover and subversion of one Right-wing institution after another, and yet still think that they can somehow “use” Jews.

I know White Nationalists who are fully aware of the corruption of the political establishment yet still get caught up in election campaigns. I know outright National Socialists who have donated far more to Republicans than they have to the movement.

I know White Nationalists who spend $50,000 a year on drinks and lap dances—or $30,000 a year dining out—or $25,000 a year on their wardrobes—or $100,000 on a wedding, yet bitterly complain about the lack of progress in the movement.

I know White Nationalists who tithe significant portions of their income to churches which pursue anti-white policies, yet never consider regular donations to the pro-white cause.

I know people with convictions to the right of Hitler who argue that we should never claim that we are fighting for the white race or against Jewish power, but who still think that somehow our people will want to follow us rather than 10,000 other race-blind, Jew-friendly conservative groups.

I know White Nationalists who believe that our race is being exterminated, yet insist that our enemies “know not what they do,” that they are deceiving themselves, that they are fundamentally people of good will, and that this is all some sort of ghastly misunderstanding.

I know White Nationalists who would never admit to hating anyone or anything, even the vulture gnawing at their entrails.

None of them are being forced to behave this way. All of them are operating within their self-defined comfort zones. All of them could do more, even within their comfort zones. So why do they fail to comport themselves with the urgency and moral seriousness called for by the destruction of everything we hold dear?

I want to suggest two explanations. First, deep in their hearts, they don’t believe that we can win, so they aren’t really trying. Second, and more importantly, they are still wedded to the bourgeois model of life.

People display their true priorities when facing death.

The true intellectual values truth more than life itself. Socrates is a hero to intellectuals because when forced to choose between giving up philosophy or death, he chose death. Most intellectuals do not face that choice, but if they do, they hope they are capable of heroism too, for nothing reveals fidelity to truth more clearly than a martyr’s death.

The true warrior values honor more than life itself. Leonidas and the 300 are heroes to warriors because when faced with death or dishonor, they preferred death. Again, not every warrior faces the choice so starkly, but if he does, he hopes he will choose a glorious death, for nothing reveals fidelity to honor more clearly than a heroic death.

Bourgeois man values nothing higher than life itself. He fears nothing more than a violent death. Therefore, there is no form of heroic death that demonstrates true fidelity to bourgeois values. The true intellectual dies a martyr. The true warrior dies on the battlefield. The true bourgeois looks forward to a comfortable retirement and dying in bed.

Yes, countless American soldiers have died fighting for “freedom,” “democracy,” and college money. But they have been suckered out of their lives by men who think there is nothing worth dying for, so that the bourgeoisie can make money, play golf, and die in bed.

You only have one death. Thus even people who would glory in heroic martyrdom have to choose their battles wisely and make their deaths count. Yes, you have to pace yourself. Yes, you have to save yourself. Yes, you can’t live as if every day were your last.

But these truisms easily serve as rationalizations for cowardice. Because, at a certain point, you have to ask what you are saving yourself for. You can’t take it with you. And ultimately, accomplishments do not come from saving ourselves but from spending ourselves. What we do not give, will be taken by death in the end.

Yet the whole bourgeois dream is premised on evading this simple, grim reality. Bourgeois man seeks eternal springtime and perpetual peace, a “happily ever after” on sunlit putting greens, free of tragic choices and tragic grandeur, free of ideals that can pierce his heart and shed his blood.

But you can’t overthrow a system you are invested in. You can’t challenge the rulers of this world and count on reaching retirement age. You can’t do battle with Sauron while playing it safe. In the face of world-annihilating evil, we can no longer afford to be such men.



  1. R_Moreland
    Posted April 27, 2014 at 6:14 am | Permalink

    People might be more willing to donate money if they could do it non-electronically, say by anonymous cash donations to a P.O. box.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted April 27, 2014 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

      PO Box 22638
      San Francisco, CA 94122

  2. Armor
    Posted April 21, 2014 at 7:05 am | Permalink

    “I know White Nationalists who would run down the street in broad daylight shouting “thief!” at the top of their lungs if their car were being stolen. But when confronted with the theft of our whole civilization and the very future of our race, they merely mutter euphemisms in the shadows.”

    It shows that our behavior is inspired by social conformism more than by logic. People are tricked by the government and the media into ignoring the race-replacement disaster. Most people stay impassive. Some of them, brainwashed by the government and the media, are ready to shout “racist!” is anyone breaks the politically correct silence.

    Some of us may have moments of panic when we realize that we have to take action urgently. But we don’t know what to do exactly. We see other people doing nothing. It helps us to fall back into apathy, and we congratulate ourselves on how we managed to beat our stress. Then we renounce to speak up about race-replacement and the Jews, and we congratulate ourselves for our moderation, when we are actually yielding to intimidation. And so on. In fact, the anti-white lobby is interfering with our minds. That is why there is no general reaction to the present crisis.

    Even when a disaster strikes, people remain lemmings and wait for other lemmings to take the initiative. For example, it is interesting to see what people do when a fire alarm starts ringing :

    People are inertial creatures. People don’t like to stop what they’re doing, and often a fire alarm isn’t enough of a cue to get them to drop their everyday tasks and exit a building. It’s the accumulation of multiple cues–fire alarm, smoke odor, urging from co-workers and such–that will finally convince them to do so.

    When the plane hit Elia Zedeno’s building on 9/11 (…) Then she shouted, “What’s happening?” You might expect that her next instinct was to flee. But she had the opposite reaction. “What I really wanted was for someone to scream back, ‘Everything is O.K.! Don’t worry. It’s in your head.'”

    She didn’t know it at the time, but all around her, others were filled with the same reflexive incredulity. And the reaction was not unique to 9/11. Whether they’re in shipwrecks, hurricanes, plane crashes or burning buildings, people in peril experience remarkably similar stages. And the first one–even in the face of clear and urgent danger–is almost always a period of intense disbelief.

    [Pdf] A more relevant concern for these public officials should be how to create warning messages that the public will heed. Several factors serve to improve the response to warnings. The public is more likely to act on warning messages if they understand the warnings, if they believe that the warnings are true, and if they believe they are personally at risk. They are more likely to heed warnings if past warnings were accurate and did not “cry wolf.” Warning messages are also more likely to be believed if they are issued by a credible source, such as police or fire officials, emergency management or disaster officials, or elected officials, such as the mayor or governor. The specificity of the warning influences its effectiveness. Recipients need to know more than just the fact that there is a threat. Effective warnings are those that state, in terms clear to the recipient, the urgency of the situation, likelihood of impact, and exact localities at risk.

    I think the fire prevention literature could help us elaborate good ways to wake people up. With a few modifications (instead of fighting panic, we must encourage it), maybe it could be turned into a manifest for the salvation of the White race.

  3. Russophile
    Posted April 18, 2014 at 6:51 am | Permalink

    This essay – tragically – describes me. Just one thing though:

    “He fears nothing more than a violent death.”

    That’s just not true. Me – and many with me – are not physical cowards. Most would describe me even as physically reckless. The fear I have is more subtle: It’s the fear of my parents shame and displeasure, the fear of being the failure in my peer group and compared to my siblings, the fear of shunning and loneliness.

    You’ve talked about the difference between belief and conversions before, and how conversions are a social process. I’m a believer – but I haven’t embraced my faith. I haven’t made the leap because I fear the abyss.

    In a way I’m jealous at the Islamists. They have Syria – the place young men from Rotterdam or London or Hamburg go to reinvent themselves, to strip their life of their old identities and re-emerge as part of a new, self-contained social reality. We have nothing like that, no land of jihad nor a movement vast and rich enough to approximate it, and so we can’t really escape the risk of ostracism.

    You might despise me for it, but I don’t think I will ever make the leap unless I either become prosperous enough to care, or the situation on the ground changes dramatically to the better. Untill then I will keep my edgy opinions to myself and to my non-professional friends and occasionally to an online message board like this.

    • Richard Edmonds
      Posted April 18, 2014 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

      Most definitely you are not to be despised. My advice would be to take it slowly. Be content to be an observer of the White Nationalist movement. The movement certainly needs millions of informed, knowledgeable followers. And the abyss that you talk about and fear: it is certainly there, but one can learn, over time, how to manoeuvre around it. Best of Luck.

  4. R_Moreland
    Posted April 18, 2014 at 5:20 am | Permalink

    “…Ness discovers him and Malone asks, “What are you prepared to do?”…”

    That’s from James J. O’Meara’s review of Brian de Palma’s The Untouchables, one of the essays that got me interested in Counter Currents. O’Meara’s analysis of the Mannerbund was brilliant and hit upon a central truth. Malone’s question can be alternatively stated, “What are you prepared to let go of?”

    Let me give an example (bear with me even if you do not agree with the political goal in the following):

    Years ago I knew an activist working to legalize marijuana. One day he took a vow that he would not light up a joint again until it was legal to do so. Given the war on drugs, his friends thought he was going to be abstaining for a very, very long time, if not forever. Yet here we are in 2014 and several states have decriminalized marijuana in various ways (notably for “medical” use). I have no idea what happened to that activist, but I’d venture to say he is lighting up in some state of the Homeland.

    I have also known cannabis activists who have given up their careers, been railroaded on sting operations, gone to jail, even been killed, in the pursuit of legalization. Why do they do it?

    Because they have a vision of an end state, a sort of Grail, which superseded bourgeois concerns if you like. Yeah, a lot of it’s tied up with 1960s psychadelia, expand your mind, groovy. But that is what keeps them going, the vision of something transcendental.

    Now here’s the question I’d raise: what exactly is the vision for white nationalists? What future is being offered that transcends the wasteland that the Western world is becoming? And which justifies the sacrifices to be made?

    Ness’ transformation in the movie is in breaking self-imposed bonds. He creates a band of men who achieve a higher purpose. That is something that white men and women have done for thousands of year, culminating in landing on the Moon.

    I don’t have an easy answer here. But it’s something which needs to be thrown open for discussion.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted April 18, 2014 at 10:36 am | Permalink

      The world we want 200 years from now is, minimally, one in which the white race and all the wonderful stuff that that implies, still exists and prospers. Imagine the most beautiful white place you have ever seen, populated with the most beautiful people you have seen, and imagine the warm feeling of being a part of that community, and now imagine it 200 years from now — as opposed to a global Detroit or Chinatown where everything and everyone that makes you feel at home and happy has been obliterated. Its as simple as that.

      It is shameful to contemplate that White Nationalism cannot inspire one millionth of the idealism and self-sacrifice of pot legalizers and animal rights advocates for something that is far more important.

  5. Dan
    Posted April 18, 2014 at 2:37 am | Permalink

    And with this, I decide to make a recurring monthly donation to Counter-Currents. Well said, Mr. Johnson, well said. I cannot help but think of myself in my lazier, weaker moments in this essay, and thank you for the quick slap on the cheek to wake me up.

    You mentioned the two goals of having people do what they can within their comfort zone and also expanding those comfort zones. One idea I have that has no doubt been mentioned before is establishing awards for those who distinguish themselves in advancing our cause. published a piece late last year decrying the man who more than anyone set whites back. Isn’t it time we celebrate those who are doing the most for us and our posterity?

    I myself am in my mid-20s and don’t think I have the stature in White Nationalist circles as of yet to create an annual award or the like. It would be fantastic however if someone who did would read this and go on to start one, and in the process, foster moral legitimacy for our movement that would help push people outside of their comfort zones.

    One critique, though: I don’t believe this essay is actually in New Right versus Old Right.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted April 18, 2014 at 11:36 am | Permalink

      Thanks for your kind words and for your financial support.

      I have been thinking about the award idea for some time now. We do need to create an alternative society with its own ways of conferring status.

      The essay is the last section of “The Moral Factor.”

  6. Missouri Rhineland
    Posted April 17, 2014 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    Excellent essay.

    I can never understand why WN/Nationalists/Far Right would ever spend money on cable TV, McDonald’s, Starbucks, etc.

    Frankly, I think they see the future as a losing situation. So they have the “edgy” political beliefs in private while enjoying the surface level prosperity of Liberalism.

  7. Sandy
    Posted April 17, 2014 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    </i I know White Nationalists who spend $50,000 a year on drinks and lap dances—or $30,000 a year dining out—or $25,000 a year on their wardrobes—or $100,000 on a wedding, yet bitterly complain about the lack of progress in the movement.</i

    An old priest I once knew would have said that these men believe but are not yet converted. Or as Mackenzie said, "knowledge is said to be power and it is power in the same sense that wood is fuel. Wood on fire is fuel. Knowledge on fire is power.

  8. Augustus Rex
    Posted April 17, 2014 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    I’m literally clapping. Those are some sharp words that will wound deeply the heart of the WN that are stucked. I hope this makes them move.

One Trackback

  • […] He estado involucrado con la escena del nacionalismo blanco desde el año 2000. Mi experiencia ha sido grandiosamente positiva, pero no del todo. La cosa más dura de tomar no fueron los locos y rufianes, sino la penetrante falta de seriedad moral, incluso entre aquellos nacionalistas blancos mejor informados y con principios. Yo conozco gente que sinceramente cree que nuestra raza está siendo sujeta a una política intencional de genocidio ingeniada por la comunidad judía organizada. Pero, frente a un horror de tal magnitud, conducen sus vidas consumando vanidad, tontería y auto indulgencias. Yo estoy convencido de que más gente se verá involucrada en nuestra causa si seguimos dos reglas. Primero, cada persona debe determinar su propio nivel de explicitud e involucramiento, y segundo, el resto de nosotros debe respetar tales decisiones. Pero nuestra causa nunca avanzará hasta que los podamos persuadir primero de hacer todo lo que puedan dentro de su propia zona de confort individual determinada, y segundo expandir sus zonas de confort, de manera tal que estén dispuestos a tomar mayores riesgos por la causa. Pero para hacer eso, necesitamos asir el problema de la seriedad moral. Conozco nacionalistas blancos que correrían una manzana (cuadra) gritando “¡ladrón!” a toda voz si su auto estuviera siendo robado. Pero cuando confrontados con el robo de toda nuestra entera civilización y el futuro mismo de nuestra raza, ellos apenas murmuran eufemismos en las sombras. Conozco nacionalistas blancos que están informados de la gravedad del Problema Judío, que han visto la toma del poder y subversión de las instituciones de derecha una tras otra por judíos y aún siguen pensando de qué de alguna manera pueden “usar” a los judíos. Conozco nacionalistas blancos que son completamente conscientes de la corrupción de la organización política, pero igual son enganchados en las campañas electorales. Conozco nacional socialistas correctos que han donado más dinero a los republicanos que al movimiento. Conozco nacionalistas blancos que gastan 50 mil dólares al año en bebida y bailes eróticos –o 30 mil en cenas- o 25 mil al año en ropa –o 100 mil en una boda, pero amargamente se quejan de la falta de progreso en el movimiento. Conozco nacionalistas blancos que donan porciones significantes de sus ingresos a iglesias que siguen políticas anti blancas, pero nunca consideran donaciones regulares a la causa pro blanca. Conozco gente con condenas a la derecha de Hitler que argumentan que nunca debemos decir que estamos luchando por la raza blanca o contra el poder judío, pero que aún piensan que de alguna forma nuestro pueblo querrá seguirnos a nosotros en lugar de a los otros 10,000 grupos conservadores judeoamigables y con ceguera a la cuestión racial. Conozco nacionalistas blancos que creen que nuestra raza está siendo exterminada, sin embargo insisten que nuestros enemigos “no saben lo que están haciendo”, que se están engañando a sí mismos, que son fundamentalmente gente de buena voluntad, y que todo esto es una especie de fantasmal malentendido. Conozco nacionalistas blancos que nunca van a admitir odiar a algo o a alguien, incluso con el buitre rasguñando sus entrañas. Ninguno de ellos está forzado a comportarse de esta forma. Todos ellos están operando dentro de sus zonas de confort autodefinidas. Todos ellos podrían hacer más, incluso dentro de dichas zonas. ¿Entonces porque fallan ellos en comportarse con la urgencia y seriedad moral que es llamada por la destrucción de todo lo que consideramos valioso? Quiero sugerir dos explicaciones. Primero, en lo profundo de sus corazones, ellos no creen que podamos ganar, por lo que no están realmente intentando. Segundo, y más importante, ellos aún están casados con el modo de vida burgués. La gente muestra sus verdaderas prioridades frente a la muerte. El verdadero intelectual valora la verdad por sobre la vida. Sócrates es un héroe para los intelectuales porque forzado a abandonar su filosofía o morir, él eligió la muerte. La mayoría de los intelectuales no enfrentan esta decisión, pero si lo hacen ellos esperan ser capaces de heroísmo también, porque nada revela la fidelidad a la verdad más claramente que una muerte de mártir. Los verdaderos guerreros valoran más el honor que la vida misma. Leónidas y los 300 son héroes para los guerreros porque enfrentados entre la muerte y el deshonor, eligieron la muerte. Nuevamente, no todo guerrero se enfrenta la decisión de tal forma, pero si lo hace espera que él tenga una muerte gloriosa, porque nada revela fidelidad al honor más claramente que una muerte heroica. El hombre burgués no valora nada más alto que la vida misma. No hay nada a lo que le tenga más miedo que a una muerte violenta. Entonces, no hay forma de muerte heroica que demuestre la verdadera fidelidad a los valores burgueses. El verdadero intelectual muere mártir. El verdadero guerrero muere en el campo de batalla. El verdadero burgués busca un retiro cómodo y morir en la cama. Sí, cientos de soldados americanos han muerto peleando por la “libertad”, “democracia”, y dinero para el college. Pero ellos han sido chupados de sus vidas por hombres que creen que no hay nada por lo que valga la pena morir, para que el burgués pueda hacer dinero, jugar al golf y morir en la cama. Vos sólo tenéis una muerte. Entonces incluso la gente que moriría en la gloria del heroísmo de ser mártires deben elegir ellos mismos cuidadosamente sus batallas y hacer que las muertes cuenten. Sí, tienes que calmarte. Sí, tienes que salvarte. Sí, no puedes vivir cada día como si fuera el último. Pero estas perogrulladas sirven fácilmente para racionalizacionesde la cobardía. Porque, en cierto punto, tienes que preguntarte a ti mismo para qué te estás guardando. No puedes llevártelo contigo. Y al final, los logros no vienen por salvarse uno mismo sino por gastarse uno mismo. Aquello que no demos, será tomado por la muerte al final. Pero aun así el entero sueño burgués está basado en evadir la simple, cruel realidad. El hombre burgués busca la eterna primavera y la paz perpetua, un “felices para siempre” en putting greens iluminadas por el sol, libre de elecciones trágicas y grandeza trágica, libres de ideales que pueden perforar su corazón y derramar su sangre. Pero no podes derribar a un Sistema en el cual estás invirtiendo. No puedes desafiar a los que dominan el mundo y contar en llegar a la edad de jubilación. No puedes pelear con Sauron y jugar seguro. En la cara de un mal aniquilador del mundo, nosotros no podemos permitirnos ser tales hombres. Traducido por Ea el 27 de Abril de 2014 […]

Post a Reply to Dan Cancel reply

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace