1,926 words
The other day, I read an interesting article by David Cole over at Taki’s Magazine entitled “Prom Night Trumpster Babies.” It was the typical cleverness of Mr. Cole: starting with his anti-Semitic friends on the Alt-Right, seguing into irritating white liberal hipsters, and then to how stupid and ill-informed it is to make abortion the main reason for supporting Hillary, and then, finally, to how the Alt-Right may agree with Hillary supporters on abortion, but for completely different reasons. He brings it all home in the end. It was a good article.
But what really caught my eye was how Mr. Cole began his article:
I have to admit, I’ve never minded being the only Jew in a room full of anti-Semites. To be surrounded by people who sincerely believe you have preternatural inborn powers and abilities is actually quite the ego boost. When dealing with the segment of the alt-right that isn’t terribly fond of folks of the Jewish persuasion, I take absolutely no offense at any barbs thrown my way. . . . you’ve never been verbally fellated until you’ve been accused of being an evil, all-powerful, world-controlling demigod.
Hell, the alt-right won’t even let me cop to mistakes. When I tell some of my “fans” that, as a neocon, I supported the invasion of Iraq under a very mistaken belief that the outcome would be much better than it was, I’m always told, “Save them lies for the sheeple. You know damn well you Jews planned this whole thing — ISIS, anarchy, the refugee crisis, all so’s you can flood the West with mud people and build your damn ‘Greater Israel.’ Jews don’t make mistakes; they always know what they’re doing.”
So, is this how we really are on the Alt-Right? I know it’s not how I am. There is a big difference between abject conspiracy-theorizing about every single Jew you meet and simply noticing a pattern of Jewish political activity in the West which pulls entire nations pretty hard to the Left. That’s sort of like noticing that a large proportion of NBA players are black. It’s just true, you know?
I understand that correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but this Left-wing radicalism thing didn’t really get going, both in academia and the streets, until after Jewish emancipation in the 1870s. I mean, the Bolsheviks were not exactly Luddites in the way they used a coherent body of scholarly and political thought to justify what they did. And the Bolsheviks were disproportionately composed of Jews. So were the Mensheviks and many communist and socialist organizations throughout Europe and North America. Are we going to just say that this was all a coincidence?
Further, I think we can all agree that left-wingers in the West have been banging the drum the longest and the loudest to import the so-called “mud people” into the civilized world. It’s been that way in the United States since the 1920s at least. And many of the most influential of these left-wingers were and still are . . . you guessed it . . . Jews. In fact, the only place in the world in which Jews are predominantly Right-wing is in the one place in the civilized world where they don’t take in Third World gentile immigrants: Israel. Go figure that one.
So, if Jews were disproportionately responsible for Left-Wing radicalism in the first place, you can then link them to being disproportionately responsible for ruining Europe and America with Third World immigration. I wouldn’t call this a conspiracy, at least not any more than the way NBA franchises “conspire” to hire so many black players. But it’s not nothing, either.
Then again, Mr. Cole has a point. Why complain to him about how evil left-wing Jews can be? Given his history, he’d probably respond by saying, “You’re telling me!”
Anyway, this got me thinking about David Cole since he seems to be sui generis in the world of American Jewry. He’s a Holocaust revisionist who’s earned the enmity of Jews and refuses to apologize about it. He can also be relied upon for common sense conservatism and for sticking up for white people when it’s called for. He’s also pretty funny.
Yet, we don’t like him. He knows we don’t like him, and somehow I doubt that the feeling is mutual. I actually think he kind of likes us beyond any subconscious flattery we heap on hebes like him (sorry, but the triple alliteration — had to do it). In his article “The Day Reagan Yelled at Black People” he actually goes to bat for the Alt-Right a little bit. It seems he appreciates us for being conservative anti-establishniks and for dealing with issues that mainstream Republicans find radioactive. He just wishes that we were less . . . what’s the word . . . anti-Semitic?
No. Ironically, that he doesn’t mind so much. He just doesn’t think we’re being realistic when we pine for white homelands. He considers that part of the Alt-Right (a pretty big part, actually) to be wacky. In his words:
If the alt-right can put aside its wackier elements, it can indeed be an influential voice in this and all upcoming elections. . . .
That said, the influence of the alt-right won’t be limited by “the Jews” or any other shadowy bunch of conspirators, but rather by its own fantasists who seek to counter left-wing bullshit with right-wing bullshit.
Look, you wanna spend your days dreaming of the Northwest Territorial Imperative, you wanna devote your time to electing future gauleiters to administer Nueva Germania in the Rockies, knock yourself out. As long as you don’t go Buford Furrow on anyone, you’re only harming your own ability to have real-world impact. Because none of that North American white-homeland hogwash is ever going to happen.
Pick your battle. You can waste your life fighting reality, or you can embrace a little pragmatism and fight the left. Because the left can be defeated. Reality? Not so much.
Hence, we don’t like him. To quote a not-so-ironic lyric from the song “The Best Ever Death Metal Band out of Denton” by the Mountain Goats:
When you punish a person for dreaming his dream
Don’t expect him thank or forgive you.
The best ever death metal band out of Denton
Will in time both outpace and outlive you.
Hail Satan!
What Mr. Cole doesn’t understand is that just because we’re pushing for a white ethnostate doesn’t mean we’re not politically active. Who says we’re not an “influential voice in this and all upcoming elections?” Him? Is he saying that people on the Alt-Right don’t vote? Does he think that the rise of Donald Trump would have been as meteoric if not for race-realist Americans who are at the very least in synch with us? They would have to be to emphatically reject every other Republican candidate for the one guy who is not afraid to say politically incorrect things about Mexicans and Muslims. The one thing the Trump candidacy has taught the Alt-Right is that we are far more influential than we ever thought possible.
I think David Cole needs to double check to see who the wacky one is.
He should realize that no one on the Alt-Right is saying that a white ethnostate will happen tomorrow. This is not a short term thing. I, at least, view the Alt-Right as laying down the intellectual framework so when the white populations of America and Europe become primed for an ethnostate, they will have an easier time getting up to speed on what needs to be done. And what exactly will prime them? Picture descendants of today’s Black Lives Matter goons moving from killing cops to assassinating white judges and politicians — even liberal ones. Picture Mexican Reconquista mayors and police chiefs looking the other way as Hispanic gangs slaughter whites. Picture Islamic terrorists strategically selecting their target locations to allow for maximum white casualties — and then bragging about it later. I believe all of this will become commonplace in 20 or 30 years, and when it does . . . when whites lose faith in the system they created, they, our children and grandchildren, will fight back. They will find comfort and inspiration from writers such as Thomas Nelson Page and Lothrop Stoddard and J. Philippe Rushton and Sam Francis and Jonathan Bowden and Kevin MacDonald and many others (and, hopefully, from articles published on sites like this one). They will also resent us for bequeathing to them a world which will be impossible for them to control without civil war.
This is why I’m with the Alt-Right. If enough whites were to wake up to race realism and see Third World immigration for the invasion that it really is, all this trauma could be avoided. We still have the muscle, we still can deport the least loyal, talented, and productive non-whites. We can still make things difficult enough for law-abiding non-whites to encourage most of their leaving. We can still forge a good chunk of North America into a white-dominated ethnostate. We can still do the “Slow Cleanse.” As it stands, however, our logic is pretty hard to impugn. Here, follow along for me:
Axiom 1: Race realism is based on biological, demonstrable fact, with some races being inherently more intelligent and more moral than others.
Axiom 2: Third world immigration consists largely of less intelligent and less moral races immigrating to nations traditionally belonging to more intelligent and more moral races.
Deduction: As the numbers of these inferior races in these nations swell well past the fifty percent mark, they will exert immoral pressure on the superior races to distribute resources in their favor. They will also oppress the superior races in the immoral fashion they oppress their own kind in their home countries. We are seeing telltale signs of this now, and, unless something drastically changes in the near future, it will only get worse.
So, is the Alt-Right really wacky, Dave? Or are we just ahead of the curve?
This being said, I’ll go out on a limb a bit and admit that I do like David Cole. I read him. I learn from him. I enjoy him. Him and his world-weary, Ashkenazic wit. He may not grasp the big picture the way we do, but his control of the small one is solid and reliable. He’s also fearless, which is a rare thing. Most importantly, he seems to genuinely like white people. The Europhobic whiffs I get from Charles Krauthammer or Ben Shapiro, I don’t detect in him.
Really, if I applied to persons the inexorable logic I apply to peoples, I’d go crazy.
I look at conservatives writers the way I look at money. Sure, I like a fifty-dollar bill more than I like a five-dollar bill. But that doesn’t mean I’m going to throw away my five-dollar bills. As long as a guy is conservative and more or less honest it’s a net gain. Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly? One dollar bills. Ben Shapiro and David Horowitz? Fives. Rush Limbaugh, Anne Coulter, Ace of Spades? Tens. I know many of you would like to put Milo Yiannopoulos on the three, but really, he’s also a ten (and I’m sure he would think so too). On the twenty, I would scrub Harriet Tubman for John Derbyshire and Vox Day. Beyond that, on the fifty and the hundred, that’s where you would find your Jared Taylors, Peter Brimelows, Gregory Hoods, and others.
I would put David Cole on the ten. Until he realizes that the best-ever white ethnostate out of the west isn’t such a wacky idea after all, it’s where he belongs.
The%20Best%20Ever%20White%20Ethnostate%20out%20of%20the%20West
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy, Rozdział 2: Hegemonia
-
The Jewish Question Going Mainstream Before Race Realism: A Good or a Bad Thing?
-
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha, Capítulo 29: La Prueba de la Risa — los Multiculturalistas dan Consejos a los Etnonacionalistas
-
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha, Capítulo 28: Competición por Estatus, Judíos y Convencionalización Racialista
-
Orgasmus coby zbraň? Pornografie jako židovský antifašistický aktivismus a kulturní terorismus, část 2
-
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha, Capítulo 18: Los Peligros del Pensamiento Positivo
-
White Advocacy vs. White Nationalism
-
Is Censorship Creeping Back at Twitter/X?
19 comments
David Cole is an interesting fellow. Like the great majority of his tribesmen, he has that “revolutionary spirit”, which he directed for a time in his youth to uncovering the holocaust mythology rather than destroying Europa. Like his tribesmen, he is clever, quick to see opportunities, verbally skilled, and built a successful Hollywood Republican party group, rubbing shoulders with Goyish movie stars, an impressive accomplishment. Many Jews have achieved startling feats, the Google boys, Facebook boy and Amazon boy and so forth. Even the Chinese recognize that they run the show over here.
Cole is clever, funny, often insightful. Its tempting to try to see into his mind, maybe he likes us, likes Europa, maybe he is for us. That, to me, is the goyishe kopf. Cole, like his tribesmen, is a different breed, thinks and processes information differently and Europeans inevitably make the mistake of thinking we can know them. They will always be the scorpion to our frog. When we allow them in our movements, they frequently rise, like Judah Benjamin of the confederacy, a staunch confederate holding high positions until his fraud and theft of the treasury. They are not us, cannot identify with us and cannot love us and give their loyalty. Since that is contrary to our nature, we have the greatest difficulty keeping them out.
David Cole will inevitably reinvent and redefine himself in the future, rebrand himself and find success. If this means turning on Europeans, I expect he would do so with alacrity. As people age, they tend to rediscover their roots, especially Jews. I would not be surprised if in a couple of decades Cole has moved to a completely different political camp.
“I believe all of this will become commonplace in 20 or 30 years, and when it does . . . when whites lose faith in the system they created, they, our children and grandchildren, will fight back. ” — with what?
“This is why I’m with the Alt-Right. If enough whites were to wake up to race realism and see Third World immigration for the invasion that it really is, all this trauma could be avoided.”
— and if they don’t, then what.
OT, but I know this website likes to think it is at the forefront of defining the “Alt-Right”.
Check out what liberal jews think of the Alt-Right.
http://forward.com/opinion/politics/344258/the-alt-right-explained-in-7-must-know-terms/
I am not sure this site is very relevant.
Dont underestimate pink skins. They faced greater challenges than this and overcame them. This is just some healthy evolutionary pressure.
As for Jews problem this is going the predictable path. First the ignore us. Then they ridicule us. They they fight us. And then we win. Its particularly funny to observe them how they are individually progressing through the stages. Almost nobody is ignoring us anymore. Those most arrogant are still ridiculing us. A lot of them are fighting us. But most of them already know they wont win. They are already in damage control mode trying to save what they can.
Great answer, thanks.
The ‘Alt-Right’ can most accurately be viewed as a collection of Pro-White, anti-immigration, jewish critical positions which were gradually excluded from right wing politics post 1945.
The part which gets the most attention is the ‘shitposting’ on social media and comment sections which is what the Jewish Forward is ‘triggered by’. However the same people doing this are also visitors to the more ‘high brow’ sites: Counter Currents, Occidental Observer, Radix Journal.
I still don’t think you are very relevant to any serious degree.
The question is whether or not any of your efforts are going to make any meaningful change, or in the zeitgeist of our ancestors, are YOU going to be remembered? If so, by whom and by how many?
I think Andrew Anglin and Matthew Heimbach are both rapidly gaining in notoriety and name recognition and are already considered more dangerous/influential than Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer, at least among the Alt Right aware jews and deep state elite, and may soon surpass David Duke as the Ulitmate Living Goy Boogeymen (Oy Vey, the Nazis, the Nazis).
The question is relevance, which means the ability to impact in real-time, not argue amongst ourselves on little visited webzines.
The cattle are dull witted and contented to eat grass wherever they are lead, 24/7. The only way to start a stampede is to spook the herd.
Mr. Quinn, in your opinion does Roosh V rate at least a one dollar bill? Not the womanizer Roosh, but the current, evolved, alt-rightish Roosh. If not, what is your rationale, because he seems to fit your criteria
New Roosh is probably a five, though the platform he gives people makes him a five invested and earning interest. Milo I’d be happy to put on a twenty. O’Reilly is more like a quarter that’s been out of circulation for a while, but at least he published those new photos of Obama and called him out. Ben Shapiro is a shekel. Julius Evola is a thousand dollar bill!
New photos? And just in time! (?)
Hi David. I like Roosh all right. I agree that the five is the right place for him. By my subjective criteria, if a person is not open about racial differences, then they can’t get past the ten. I’d keep him on the five because he seems more interested in gender issues than racial ones. But I haven’t looked at him in a while.
I don’t think we should be anywhere near Roosh because of his past comments. There’s no longer any strategic reason to ally with him for ‘exposure’: he’s no longer bigger than us, we’re bigger than him.
I don’t know how involved Roosh is meeting other alt-right groups in private but I have always been skeptical that he is playing a long game in trying to ‘get’ with racially aware White women as an ultimate ‘conquest’; or just inventing liasons like he did in his ‘Bang Ukraine’ book:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1irc5ZZu9OM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2INybBpXkM
Bang Poland
Bang Estonia
Bang Lithuania
Bang Ukraine
Bang White Supremacists
Enjoyed this article. I like David Cole too.
Thank you very much, GM.
Have you read Gilad Atzmon’s “The Wandering Who”?
Aside that he is a leftist, what are your thoughts on Atzmon?
Thanks,
In regards to David Cole rejecting what some people say as being caused by jews then ignoring his own jewish ancestry it highlights, in my opinion a lack of really high quality source which compiles all of the sources primary sources and secondary sources of validity.
For example Kevin McDonald’s Culture of Critique book is the most widely cited source in response to someone saying “prove to me that jews have a major role in mass immigration”. Even though arguably the areas that the particular book covers is quite narrow (predominantly subversive Jewish intellectual movements) the quality of scholarship and the quantity of primary and strong secondary sources
When it comes to the ‘sceptic’ sphere which post content which goes against the official narrative then every man and his dog has their own blog or website where they will present a few sources then make (to a neutral observer) a controversial accusation e.g. jews are complicit/supportive or significant enablers of ISIS. On such websites and blogs it is a hobby and because they are so convinced by it they do not feel the need to justify it by providing a greater quantity of resources or quality of scholarship.
Now as an open minded individual when you follow the disproportional control of the us Congress by AIPAC/Israel, Clinton’s leaked emails, it being open knowledge that US aid to ‘rebels’ gets siphoned off to Islamists (ISIS), Israeli ministers being on record saying that ISIS is more preferable to the current Syrian government.
The war is between ‘information products’ and effectively dossiers are required which can be ‘dumped’ on anyone who goes against what you are saying.
Good article until the very end. Hannity a $1, BEN SHAPIRO a $5?? Gimme a break. Shapiro is a minus $50 at least, whereas Hannity, whom I never listened to until the last year, but a change in schedule for me now has me listening to him frequently, is at least a $5 and maybe a $10. He may very much want to remain in the mainstream of Conservatism, Inc, but he has been moving relentlessly to the Right side of Con, Inc. He never lets up on his … anti-antiwhite positions. He never goes Full Cuck (other than occasionally speaking approvingly of the mythic MLK, the apostle of “equal rights” and “colorblindness”, which I would do, too, in his position). He never concedes anything to the BLM mentality (as the Full Cucks at NRO have in the past). He never apologizes for white history, and he often speaks approvingly of The Wall.
Sheesh – how much more do you want from the guy??
Harry,
I will gladly stand corrected about Sean Hannity. The reason why I find Shapiro to be a net positive is because he took on the Black Live Matter people over the white privilege canard and causes riots among SJWs whenever he goes to a university to speak. But if you want to demote him to a single for his #NeverTrump business, I wouldn’t argue.
“You’ve never been verbally fellated until you’ve been accused of being an evil, all-powerful, world-controlling demigod.”
‘Anti-Semites’ are always ridiculed for ascribing superhuman powers to Jews. But the truth is it’s not particularly difficult to exert great power when one is devoted to destructive and evil ends. In fact power is, by definition, an intrinsic part of any true evil…that’s what makes evil so seductive.
Fundamentally, Jewish people like the one mentioned in this article are absolutely horrified of white nationalism so it logically follows that they will attempt to downplay any sincere movement that revolves around white nationalism.
He can attempt to minimize how fast the Alt-Right is growing so as to make it the Alt-Right seem like a sort of fang-less boogeyman but he’s incorrect. The Alt-Right is the natural expression of racially white conscious white people in our day and age. It doesn’t take much to inform white people about what is happening and what will happen if we don’t do something.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment