Print this post Print this post

On Martin Luther & the Reformation

3,213 words

Lucas Cranach the Elder, Martin Luther, 1529

Today marks the fifth centenary of the Protestant Reformation. In Germany, October 31 is an annual public holiday in five states, but this year a nationwide holiday has been declared in all states to celebrate the Reformation. A search for books about Martin Luther and the Reformation on Amazon shows that a vast number of books about him have been published in recent months. It seems right to commemorate this pivotal event in the history of Germany and all of Europe, and the man responsible for it. 

Martin Luther (1483–1546) from Saxony in Germany began the Reformation when he posted his Ninety-Five Theses on the castle church door in Wittenberg on October 31, 1517 (although the posting itself is disputed). Others then translated the Theses into German, printed and distributed them throughout Germany and soon Martin Luther was one of the best-known men in his time.

The Theology of the Medieval System

“I took the matter very seriously as a person who was tremendously afraid of the Last Day and nevertheless desired from the bottom of my heart to be saved.” — Martin Luther, 1545[1]

To understand the Reformation an account must be given of the medieval theology regarding judgement and salvation and the institution of penance. A world chronicle, published in 1493 in Nuremberg, few months after Columbus returned from America, did not record that event, nor did it mention the discovery of the Cape of Good Hope in 1488. Rather, it ended with an account of Judgement Day. All serious minds concerned themselves with the Last Judgement. It was commonly held even that Christ himself had postponed Armageddon only for the sake of the pious Cistercian monks. But for how long? Young people were attracted to monasticism because it offered them the safest way to heaven. By austerity and mortification, their flesh grew old, though they were still in their youth. Luther witnessed a Prince who had forsaken the nobility to become a friar who walked the streets of Magdeburg with a bag, begging for food. “No one could look upon him without feeling ashamed of his own life,” Luther said after seeing this walking corpse. Earthly life was short, and hardship was a small price for the eternal joy in heaven. The damned would burn forever in the incandescent but unconsuming flames in hell. A torment without the mercy of extinction, lasting for eternity. So, Luther became a monk, like thousands of others, to save his soul.[2]

His father, Hans, who had paid for Luther’s Latin school education and for his law study at the University of Erfurt, was livid when Luther left the university for the monastery. Luther was supposed to become the lawyer of the family business and support his parents in old age. His father’s rage did not cease until two other sons died and he feared it was God’s punishment for his rebellion.[3] Having both a Bachelor’s and a Master’s degree, Luther was a prized acquisition for the Augustinian monastery in Erfurt. The father came to see Luther’s first mass and arrived with a company of twenty horsemen and made a considerable contribution to the monastery. Luther could only perform the mass with difficulty because a sudden fear seized him as he sensed the presence of God in the sacraments. Afterward he approached his father and asked him about his earlier rage. His father then burst with anger in front of the doctors, the masters, and the other guests: “You learned scholar, have you never read in the Bible that you should honor your father and your mother? And here you have left me and your dear mother to look after ourselves in old age.” Luther retorted, as all the manuals stated, that one was to forsake his father and mother for Christ’s sake, and told his father that he would actually do more for him by prayers than by staying with him. He reminded his father that he had been called by a voice from heaven in a thunderstorm to join the monastery. “God grant, it was not an apparition of the Devil,” his father replied.[4]

By the time Luther became a monk, the church had begun to offer indulgences that reduced time in Purgatory both for those living and those already dead. These could be acquired by visiting relics of the saints or by buying letters of indulgence. Some papal bulls even offered total forgiveness for sins and immediate reconciliation with God.[5]

When Luther visited Rome in 1510 he believed in the system of penance. There he visited relics and said the endless requisite prayers and thus thought he’d saved his grandparents from Purgatory. He regretted that his parents were not already dead so could save them too. But he was stupefied by the incompetence of the Roman clergy, and horrified to hear that they frequented the district of ill fame, and that those who confined themselves to women even considered themselves virtuous. There he began to have doubts about the medieval system of penance, “Who knows whether it is so?”[6]

Back in the cloister Luther would rely on the sacrament of penance, often confessing daily. But every sin had to be remembered and confessed for absolution. What if some sins eluded the memory? This troubled him greatly. Johann von Staupitz, the vicar general of the Augustinians in Germany, directed Luther’s attention from individual sins to the nature of man, and it began to dawn on Luther that sin was not some particular list of offences to be enumerated and confessed. The whole nature of man was sinful and in need of forgiveness. The penitential system was directed to particular offenses. Staupitz was a mystic and their way of salvation was directed to man as a whole.[7] The book Theologia Deutsch (or Theologia Germanica) also influenced Luther’s outlook. It was written in the fourteenth century by an unknown German mystic and published by Luther in 1516 and 1518. About it he wrote: “Next to the Bible and St. Augustine, no book has ever come into my hands from which I have learnt more of God and Christ, and man and all things that are.”[8]

After Luther had completed both a bachelor’s and a doctoral degree in theology he was sent to Wittenberg to lecture on Scripture at the new university there. There he had his so-called theological breakthrough in 1515 while lecturing on Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. He wrote later in life:

But I, blameless monk that I was, felt that before God I was a sinner with an extremely troubled conscience. I couldn’t be sure that God was appeased by my satisfaction. I did not love, no, rather I hated the just God who punishes sinners. […] I meditated night and day on those words [Romans 1:17] until at last, by the mercy of God, I paid attention to their context: “The justice of God is revealed in it, as it is written: ‘The just person lives by faith.’” I began to understand that in this verse the justice of God is that by which the just person lives by a gift of God, that is by faith. I began to understand that this verse means that the justice of God is revealed through the Gospel, but it is a passive justice, i.e. that by which the merciful God justifies us by faith, as it is written: “The just person lives by faith.” All at once I felt that I had been born again and entered into paradise itself through open gates.[9]

The division of theology into law and gospel which is central to Lutheranism was undoubtedly related to Luther’s experiences of Anfechtungen, the feeling of terror when the believer realizes that nothing stands between the him and God, and he can’t do anything to make himself acceptable, and nothing can be done to placate God’s infinite wrath. But this feeling is the birth of salvation, it is the true Purgatory. About this experience, Luther wrote:

God works by contraries so that a man feels himself to be lost in the very moment when he is on the point of being saved. When God is about to justify a man, he damns him. Whom he would make alive he must first kill. God’s favor is so communicated in the form of wrath that it seems farthest when it is at hand. Man must first cry out that there is no health in him. He must be consumed with horror. This is the pain of purgatory. I do not know where it is located, but I do know that it can be experienced in this life. […] In this disturbance salvation begins. When a man believes himself to be utterly lost, light breaks. Peace comes in the word of Christ through faith. He who does not have this is lost even though he be absolved a million times by the pope, and he who does have it may not wish to be released from Purgatory, for true contrition seeks penalty.[10]

The law of God as revealed in Scripture had for Luther no longer the role of normative precept for human behavior. Its main role was now the revelation of sin and judgement. It was to bring about the feeling of terror and awareness of the wrath of God, to bring the believer to contrition and true humility. Only then could he earnestly beg Christ for mercy and have a genuine relationship with God.

The Lutheran theological concepts of law and gospel, of judgement and salvation, were so brilliantly translated into music by Johann Sebastian Bach that he is known as the fifth evangelist. The abbreviation “J.J.,” meaning “Jesus help me,” is often found at the beginning of Bach’s manuscripts.[11]

The Politics of the Reformation

“I seek not my own, but only the whole of Germany’s fortune and welfare [Ich das nicht meine, sondern allein des ganzen Deutschlands Glück und Heil suche.]” — Martin Luther[12]

After Luther posted his Ninety-Five Theses, a complicated order of events took place. The Roman officials at first thought this was just yet another trouble from Germany and were not bothered. Pope Leo X had just been to France with his army to wage war against the king of France at the request of Henry VIII. And the Germans had complained for over a century about the extortion of the Church.

By the time Luther posted his Ninety-Five Theses, he had assumed the rank of district vicar and oversaw eleven monasteries, in addition to his position as a professor at the University. At Wittenberg, a circle of intellectuals, lawyers, printers, and artists had begun to form around Luther. Through his friend, Georg Spalatin, who was the right hand of Friedrich the Wise, Luther got access to the prince and his court, and also to an influential circle of supporters of the Renaissance in Nürnberg.

In August 1518, Luther received a letter with an order to appear at Rome within sixty days to answer to charges of heresy. At this point, reflecting on the trouble he was in, he said, “Now I must die. What a disgrace I shall be to my parents.” He then got an assurance from the prince of Saxony, Friedrich the Wise, that he would not go to Rome.[13] In October, Luther went to Augsburg to be examined by cardinal Cajetan. Cajetan was supposed to make Luther recant and didn’t want any debate. Their first meeting failed. At the second meeting the following day, Luther arrived with a group of witnesses, including four imperial counselors and a notary to record the meeting. Their meeting ended without a resolution, but as soon as Luther arrived in Wittenberg, he sent a copy of the written record of the meeting to the printer.[14]

In the spring of 1518, an anticipated debate took place in Leipzig between Luther and an ambitious young Catholic theologian named Johannes Eck. When Eck arrived, he was welcomed by the mayor and the town’s dignitaries. Luther arrived on an open wagon, followed by loyal students, armed with spears and halberds, and tellingly, their first stop was the local printer. Publications of Luther’s writings exceeded those of the seventeen next most published authors put together between 1518 and 1525. One fifth of works published in Germany between 1500 and 1530 were by Luther.[15] A papal bull threatening Martin Luther with excommunication was issued in 1520, and Johannes Eck was tasked with bringing it to Saxony and publishing it there. He managed to post the bull in Meissen, Merseburg, and Brandenburg, but only with a company of armed men. When the escorts left, counter-propaganda was posted by “pious children,” and Eck had to seek refuge in a nearby monastery. He was mocked and threatened by locals, and soon a gang of fifty armed students from Wittenberg arrived to hound him.[16]

When the great Renaissance painter, Albrecht Dürer, heard of Luther and his ideas, he was overcome with joy. To a secretary of the prince of Saxony he wrote,

. . . if God helps me to come to Dr. Martin Luther, then I will carefully draw his portrait and engrave it in copper for a lasting remembrance of this Christian man who has helped me out of great distress. And I beg your worthiness to send me as my payment anything new that Dr. Martin may write in German.

The secretary was to convey the gratitude of Dürer to the prince and, “beg him humbly that he will protect the praiseworthy Dr. Martin Luther for the sake of Christian truth. It matters more than all the riches and power of this world, for with time everything passes away; only the truth is eternal.”[17]

German nationalism was still inchoate in the sixteenth century. Its earliest representatives, the knights Ulrich von Hutten and Franz von Sickingen, became inspired by Martin Luther. Von Hutten, lamented the state of Germany and the first enemy to be repelled was the Church. In a pamphlet called The Roman Trinity, he wrote: “Three things are sold in Rome: Christ, the priesthood, and women. Three things are hateful to Rome: a general council, the reformation of the church, and the opening of German eyes. Three ills I pray for Rome: pestilence, famine, and war. This be my trinity.” Von Hutten stayed at Sickingen’s castle, the Ebernburg, during the winter of 1519–20 where read from the German works of the “Wittenberg prophet” to Sickingen, as Sickingen’s “foot and fist stamped assent.” They made it known that if the prince of Saxony should withdraw his protection of Luther, one hundred knights would be assembled for his protection. Luther intimated that the knights had delivered him from the fear of men, and now he could attack the papacy as Antichrist. “For me the die is cast,” he said.[18] In a letter to Staupitz from 1522, Luther wrote, “My Father, I must destroy that kingdom of abomination and perdition which belongs to the Pope together with all his hangers-on.”[19]

The fate of Luther was to be decided in an imperial assembly, called the Diet of Worms, in 1521. After negotiations between the Church, Emperor Charles V and Friedrich of Saxony, it was decided that the trial would be in the German city of Worms and not in Rome. Jerome Aleander, the papal nuncio, or representative, who oversaw the prosecution of Luther, reported that nine tenths of the Germans shouted “Luther!,” and one tenth, “Death to the Pope!” Sickingen controlled the Rhine Valley from Ebernburg Castle, and could stop the Emperor, who traveled without Spanish troops, from entering Germany. Von Hutten wrote to Aleander:

Do you suppose that through an edict extracted by guile from the emperor you will be able to separate Germany from liberty, faith, religion, and truth? Do you think you can intimidate us by burning books? This question will not be settled by the pen but by the sword.[20]

Aleander, who had come to Worms only to implement the excommunication of Luther, noticed that as the assembly was delayed, popular violence in the city increased. He reported to Rome that pictures of Luther were being sold by the thousands, and pictures of the Pope and the cardinals being bound by the soldiers of the guard. He said, “I cannot go out on the streets but the Germans put their hands on their swords and gnash their teeth at me. I hope the pope will give me a plenary indulgence and look after my brothers and sisters if anything happens to me.” A friend of von Hutten wrote to him from Worms:

A chaplain of the emperor and two Spaniards caught a man with sixty copies of The Babylonian Captivity. The people came to the rescue, and the assailants had to take refuge in the castle. A mounted Spaniard pursued one of our men, who barely escaped through a door. The Spaniard reined up so suddenly that he fell off his horse and could not rise until a German lifted him. Every day two or three Spaniards gallop on their mules through the market place, and the people have to make way for them. This is our freedom.[21]

Aleander insisted that Luther be dealt with as a heretic. “He is a heretic and an obstinate heretic. […] He is also a revolutionary. He claims that the Germans should wash their hands in the blood of the papists.” But Luther’s teaching was already so deeply rooted among the German people that if he were condemned without a hearing it would risk grave danger of insurrection.[22] So, eventually Luther got a hearing with support from many princes and electors of the Holy Roman Empire. There he spoke his famous words:

Unless I am convicted by scripture and plain reason — I do not accept the authority of the popes and councils, for they have contradicted each other — my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not recant anything for to go against conscience is neither right nor safe. God help me. Amen.[23]

Luther spoke those words in German. He had to repeat them in Latin because the emperor could not understand German. In fact, the Germans had not had a German emperor for over a century. Luther’s following among the German nation was no less due to his courage in standing up to the emperor and the Catholic Church, than to his theological ideas.

Notes

[1] Martin Luther, The Annotated Luther: Vol. 4, Pastoral Writings, ed. Mary Jane Haemig (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016), p. 493.

[2] Roland H. Bainton, Here I Stand: A Life of Martin Luther (Nashville: Meridian, 1995), pp. 22-25.

[3] Ibid, p. 26.

[4] Ibid, pp. 30-33.

[5] Ibid, p. 35.

[6] Ibid, pp. 37-38.

[7] Ibid, pp. 41-42. See also scene from Luther (2003), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbMtH0Q7-mA

[8] Martin Luther, Theologia Germanica, trans. Susanna Winkwortht, p. 1, retrieved from http://www.ntslibrary.com/PDF%20Books/Theologia%20Germanica.pdf

[9] Martin Luther, “Preface to the Complete Edition of Luther’s Latin Works (1545),” Project Wittenberg, trans. Andrew Thornton (March 17, 2006), retrieved from http://www.projectwittenberg.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/luther/preflat-eng.txt.

See also scene from the film Martin Luther (1953), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnZiqiq654A

[10] Bainton, p. 63.

[11] Here are some examples of Bach’s music where judgement predominates in my estimation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dgy6qPVPZ8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37Hi9PSs7og

https://youtu.be/ihCQsVJihYU?t=2m37s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fPg3suBQIc

 

And where salvation predominaties:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuFsMryY_Kk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvweJ1lLcZc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjYHG0k8pbg

[12] Martin Luther, “An die Rathsherren aller Städte Deutschen Ländes,” Sammlung Lutherscher Schriften: Erste Sammlung (Leipzig: Johann Umbrosius Barth, 1848), p. 26.

[13] Bainton, pp. 69-70.

[14] Lyndal Roper, Martin Luther: Renegade and Prophet (New York: Random House, 2017), pp. 91-111.

[15] Ibid, pp. 112-32.

[16] Ibid, pp. 133-60.

[17] Diana Severance, “Albrecht Dürer, Reformation Media Man,” Christianity.com, retrieved from http://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1201-1500/albrecht-drer-reformation-media-man-11629888.html

[18] Bainton, pp. 100-104.

[19] Roper, pp. 133-60.

[20] Bainton, p. 130.

[21] Ibid, pp. 136-37.

[22] Ibid, p. 138.

[23] Ibid, p. 144.

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

14 Comments

  1. BroncoColorado
    Posted November 1, 2017 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    According to the revisionist historian Michael Hoffman, who appears to specialize in religious questions, a long neglected and almost buried aspect of the Reformation was Luther’s condemnation of all forms of usury. The popes of that time were alleged to be conniving with the usurious practices of the Fugger and Medici banking dynasties.

  2. Sursum corda
    Posted November 1, 2017 at 8:50 am | Permalink

    Protestantism is judaizing. That’s why all the leaders of the protestant revolution spoke of themselves as Old Testament prophets.

    • David Halevi
      Posted November 1, 2017 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

      My understanding is that the Puritan strain exported from the British Isles to America was strongly philosemitic, whereas the Lutheran current had more of a Marcionite anti-semitic flavour. For the Puritans, Catholicism was a pagan adulteration of pure Mosaic religion; whereas the Lutherans saw the Church as irredeemably Judaic, a system of law, ritual and works. Crucified between two thieves!

      • Asklepios
        Posted November 1, 2017 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

        Already in 1593, a Lutheran theologian named Aegidius Hunnius wrote a book named The Judaizing Calvin.

        Luther himself wrote: “German money, in violation of nature, flies over the Alps.” It is not hard to look at Catholicism as a continuation of Judaism in many ways. A parasitic institution that demands payment and obedience, constucts a system of morality for you (of course it had another for itself) to make you afraid of not paying and obeying, and then uses its wealth and power against your interests.

        It would be interesting indeed to know how many Germans, Englishmen, Danes, etc. were never born because they could not be supported because of the money the Catholic church demanded.

        • David Halevi
          Posted November 2, 2017 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

          There are those who would apply your strictures against the Catholic Church – not least its alleged alienating effect on national/racial consciousness – to ‘Christianity’ in general.

          • Asklepios
            Posted November 2, 2017 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

            What do they suggest? And what have they accomplished?

          • Asklepios
            Posted November 3, 2017 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

            In any case, this same criticism may be directed at philosophy and secular thought, too. After all, national and racial consciousness has declined in recent decades, and so has the influence of Christianity in the West. When are we throwing the baby out with the bathwater? If Christianity is irredeemable, what would take its place? There are many good sounding ideas, but why natural selection has not favored them before, is a good question. Most of them aren’t new. There are things in our spiritual nature that formerly found outlet in religion. Now, society is ill adapted curb many of our destructive inclinations.

          • David Halevi
            Posted November 4, 2017 at 6:36 am | Permalink

            Part of the problem is that those who advocate various alternatives to Christianity – western paganism, eastern paganism, esotericism, satanism, even Islam – shy away from questions of what Mr Bowden called metaphysical objectivity, ie truth. Instead they look at it from the point of view of utility: “Which of the religions on offer will best help us defend the West and ensure the survival of the white race and defeat the machinations of Jewry?”

            Important goals to be sure, and of pressing urgency. But if they are to be the ultimate basis of religious allegiance, you could just as well argue that the white race should take the Khazar Option and convert en masse to Judaism, becoming the aryan vanguard of a new-look New World Order!

            (To be fair, Christians are not immune to this way of thinking, whether it be Protestants extolling the advantages of national churches or Catholics rhapsodising about the cultural flowering of the Middle Ages. Yes, but is it true?)

          • Asklepios
            Posted November 4, 2017 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

            That’s a good point. I think that the human mind is unable to comprehend ultimate truths, but we can aproximate them. I think it is important to conform society, institutions and the reigning philosophical and theological ideas to the eternal laws, of both the natural and the ethical, or human, worlds, as these laws are delineated, or aproximated, by science and true philosophy.

            I have written two other essays about German theologians who dealt with this question to some extent. I would very much like to know your opinion on their views.
            https://www.counter-currents.com/2017/10/friedrich-schleiermacher-part-1/
            https://www.counter-currents.com/2017/02/adolf-von-harnacks-dark-theology/

            I also look to Plato for guidance regarding the eternal things.

          • David Halevi
            Posted November 5, 2017 at 5:26 am | Permalink

            I look forward to reading those essays..

  3. Sursum corda
    Posted November 1, 2017 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    Give me a gigantic break. If anyone allowed the Jews to get a foot in the door and destroy Christendom, it was the rebellious priest, Father Luther. Protestantism was merely an excuse to plunder Church property and wealth. The theology was an after thought. Good grief.

  4. Lemur
    Posted October 31, 2017 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Really enjoying your précis of these Protestant thinkers and their relevance to the right today, Asklepios.

    I get rather tired of ‘trad’ Catholics and their snooty assumption they have an exclusive grasp on what constitutes a traditional or self-affirmative West. Likewise I’m suspicious of pagans who think we can afford a complete fracture with Christianity. Protestantism can provide the link with the past while providing the space for the re-capitulation of the Western numen.

    • Asklepios
      Posted November 1, 2017 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

      Thank you.

  5. Peter Quint
    Posted October 31, 2017 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    I get where you are going with this, we are in the position of Martin Luther. Perhaps we will have a modern-day Luther rise-up, and lead us to expel the Jews, and destroy Christianity.

    Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    The World in Flames

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance