I am not a Catholic, or even a Christian, even though I was brought up in a liberal Protestant church, but sometimes I do appreciate E. Michael Jones for his insights about people. His latest discussion on YouTube about Harvey Weinstein is particularly interesting, as he declares Harvey to be the official scapegoat for Jewish Hollywood. The idea of the scapegoat is an old Jewish custom. The people would gather and place all their sins upon the goat, and then the goat would be killed or sent out into the desert to die. The people then could go about their business free of guilt.
Basically Jones is arguing that Harvey was being a good Jew. He was seducing and befouling shiksas, which is a derogatory term for non-Jewish women, and undermining the goyim’s morals and way of life in his movies. This is their revenge for all the humiliations and insults they have endured forever at the hands of white people. So why is he the Hollywood scapegoat when he has been such a good Jew? Well, he was the best one at it, I suppose. It is not a sacrifice if you don’t hand over the best.
The most interesting part of Jones’ argument is about the white starlets whom he “victimized.” Their shame is demonstrated by this display of victimization where each of them denounces him now, but not when it allegedly happened. Each one of these fame-obsessed women went on to star in a movie, and particularly by taking of her clothes, and some even got starring roles in holocaust porn. He calls out in particular Kate Winslet, who won an Oscar for her role in the holocaust movie The Reader where an older woman seduces a 15-year-old boy. Now, where is the shame?
- Her meeting with Harvey.
- Taking off her clothes in a movie.
- Seducing a child in a movie.
- Playing a “bad” white in a holocaust movie.
- Getting an Oscar for submitting to Harvey and getting an Oscar for playing a pedophile in a holocaust movie.
If movies are to have effects upon the audience, what effect does it have on the actors? Oh, someone got these career-obsessed women to totally debase themselves as white women, hence their shame and guilt and the projection upon poor old Harvey who was just being a good Jew. After all, as Jones stated, the Simon Wiesenthal Center has not taken back his Humanitarian award which he won just two years ago in 2015. He is a good Jew, and an outstanding member of the tribe. However, the tribe needs a scapegoat, and so he loses all those other awards and status. I am sure a good Jewish therapist will help him cope.
This reminds me of Shirley Jackson’s short story “The Lottery,” which was first published in The New Yorker in 1948. People were so outraged that they cancelled subscriptions and wrote nasty letters. It is a wonderful story and everyone should read it. It is only eight pages.
The other interesting tidbit that Jones discusses is that the relaxation of censorship laws in movies was first allowed for holocaust porn movies. From there, it is anything goes. He also talks about the book Portnoy’s Complaint by Philip Roth, where the Jewish obsessional fantasy with sex with white women is thoroughly discussed. I have heard it called the adolescent’s bible.
Jones segues into a discussion of gay pride parades by means of the allegations of males who had been abused by older men when they were young, which would be pedophilia, and actually not just homosexual pedophiles, but he does not say that. He thinks gay pride parades are also a demonstration of shame for their behavior by exaggerating it and performing in public and demanding public acceptance.
If Jones’s theory is correct, we can apply it to feminists, who insist that women who have been raped and beaten by immigrants or refugees keep quiet about it and don’t rock the boat of equality and multiculturalism. It seems to me that this is the height of hypocrisy, for the women’s movement was supposed to be about improving the lives of women and they scream about rape culture. So what is going on? Where is the shame? If you have invested your whole life in an ideal that has been hijacked by another group and you are getting rewards and a good career, how do you declare that it has proven to be a failure and actually wrong without condemning yourself and all the time and investment you have put into it? They don’t. They go along with the new game plan and find rationalizations to deceive themselves. This is the feminist double-down syndrome. However, they have effectively betrayed the actual victims of crime who were supposed to be the women whose lives they were to improve. Their hysterics about the poor refugees is how they disguise their shame and totally befuddles any thinking person. It is very hard to admit shame in a shameless society when shamelessness is rewarded by others who do not want to admit it to themselves either. The bikini or the burka becomes the amusing dichotomy for feminist as movies about sexual abuse of fifteen-year-olds are presented as attractive, and stories about women taking refugees as lovers proliferate in social media. Sexual shame exists, and denying it just makes it worse for everyone. In a moral society, discernment and discretion also exist. I believe there is a tribe who do not care or think about this and advocate transgression in every aspect of life, especially the lives of normal white people who feel confused and degraded.
I don’t know if making Harvey the scapegoat will save Hollywood. It seems a lot of people are avoiding movies these days according to box office reports. Perhaps the goyim are waking up. We have been had.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
Nowej Prawicy przeciw Starej Prawicy, Rozdział 2: Hegemonia
-
Notes on Japan: Not the Nationalist Utopia Some Imagine
-
Looking for Anne and Finding Meyer, Part 2
-
The Establishment’s Radicals
-
Korean Capitalism and Prussian Socialism
-
The Jewish Question Going Mainstream Before Race Realism: A Good or a Bad Thing?
-
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha, Capítulo 29: La Prueba de la Risa — los Multiculturalistas dan Consejos a los Etnonacionalistas
-
Nueva Derecha vs. Vieja Derecha, Capítulo 28: Competición por Estatus, Judíos y Convencionalización Racialista
9 comments
I believe that E. Michael Jones is definitely on to something here, Rhondda. I’ve been thinking much the same thing since the stories started rolling out.
And I HOPE that “the goyim” indeed ARE waking up… because time is of the essence! We literally have no time to lose. I for one “cut the cable” about 4 years ago, dropped my (((Netflix))) subscription, etc., and I do know several more White people who’ve done the same as I, not to mention all of the Whites I “know” on the Internet who say they’ve likewise trimmed as much Jewish filth out of their lives as they could.
But we’ve only BEGUN this war… against enemies who’ve been 100% engaged in it against us for over 100 years.
“But we’ve only BEGUN this war… against enemies who’ve been 100% engaged in it against us for over 100 years.”
More like 2,000 to 6,000 years!
“More like 2,000 to 6,000 years!”
Yep. That’s why I said OVER 100 years.
I had much the same theory as jones, but mine was of a scapegoat in the real sense of a fall guy. I thought that there is a relation to the canning of bill Reilly for nominal sexual misconduct. This creates a huge double standard when Juxtaposed with the rampant sexual abuse and the rest of the entertainment/media industry, not unnoticed by the conservative white remnant in Hollywood. Weinstein is probably the tip of the iceberg, and we know from the accusations coming out about other people that they’re probably much worse things afoot such as pedophilia, from the Feldman accusations. So Weinstein is offered up as sort of a fall guy, as one of the longest and most conspicuous perpetrators. His alleged sexual misconduct was an open secret, openly joked about an satirized in the media. But really, he is at the end of his career, and insanely wealthy, and has had his fun, so to speak. If he gets off merely with pillory, or at worst mild judicial punishment, not much is lost, and the establishment can say “hey look, the rules count for us too.”
I’m glad you mentioned the lottery by Shirley Jackson, a classic story on the scapegoat motif. There is a weird relationship between this story and Those who Left Omelas by Ursula leguin. Both are famous short stories on the scapegoat motif by famous female writers of the fantasy genre! There are other more obscure stories on this motif from the same time period, for example the pit of wings by Ramsey Campbell.
I have something of a conspiracy theory that these stories occur together not by accident but as a sort of meditation by the Jewish community on its own behavioral patterns. Writers are either paid or commanded to write stories on a particular topic. Those in the publishing industry may better understand what I mean.
In regard to the mentioning of Shirley Jackson’s story The Lottery: it is typical that the “literati” and cultural elite (if one can include Jackson; I think she can) use a small town (the epitome of “old”/traditional America to have this happen. The political LEFT, who have invaded and taken over the US culture, are notorious for doing this. The whole American South comes in for this treatment, and it continues to this day.
If crowd/herd mentality abuses someone, it is more likely found in urban areas where those kinds of attitudes are more prevalent. In the 1940s and beyond, this was typical: constantly belittling and “s*%$” kicking traditional America.
Most Christians have been big on shame as a mechanism of social control, but it wasn’t always so. Gnostic Christians, for example, thought that the path to salvation involved systematically violating all 10 of the Commandments. Quite logical, since they also thought that the Jewish God was evil. But the other Christians wiped them out, as they so often have done to heretics.
It’s always amusing, though, to see the right joining with feminism, a cause they usually despise and blame for myriad ills. And did you hear about the Muslims? Why, they don’t give women any rights at all! Won’t even let them drive!
Oh, the humanity!
Thank you for your most enlightening article, Rhondda. However, we don’t know (or do we) what set this whole matter off. My guess is that Mr. Weinstein committed some financial jiggery pokery against those who are even richer than he is and they struck back by organizing all these Recovered Memories. Nobody, including Weinstein as you say, has much if anything to lose. Win-win all around!
Regarding shame, Jones is expounding on something written by University of Texas philosophy professor J.Budziezewski called “The Revenge of Conscience.”
https://www.firstthings.com/article/1998/06/the-revenge-of-conscience
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment