Print this post Print this post

The Power of Myth:
Remembering Joseph Campbell,
March 26, 1904–October 30, 1987

Joseph Campbell & his wife, Jean Erdman Campbell, c. 1939.

2,324 words

Joseph Campbell, the famed teacher of comparative mythology, was born on this day in 1904. For many people, including yours truly, he has served as a “gateway drug” into not only a new way of looking at myths, but into a non-materialistic way of viewing the world. And although as a public figure, Campbell mostly remained apolitical, evidence from his private life indicates that he was at least nominally a “man of the Right.”

Campbell was born into an Irish Catholic family in White Plains, New York. He attended Dartmouth College, and then later, Columbia University, where he studied English and medieval literature. He was not strictly a bookish type, either, being an accomplished athlete, and in fact during his time at Dartmouth he was considered to be among the fastest half-mile runners in the world.

It was during his travels to Europe and Asia during the 1920s and ’30s, as well as a great deal of wide reading while living in a shack in Woodstock, New York, that Campbell developed his interest in world mythology. He also discovered the ideas of C. G. Jung, which were to profoundly influence all of his work. Indeed, he participated in many of the early and historic Eranos conferences in Switzerland alongside not only Jung himself, but such luminaries as Mircea Eliade, Karl Kerényi, and Henry Corbin, among many others. In 1934 Campbell was hired as a professor at Sarah Lawrence College in New York, a position he was to hold until his retirement in 1972, after which he and his wife moved to Honolulu, Hawaii.

Interestingly, in regards to the Second World War, Campbell was a fervent non-interventionist (like his friend, the poet Robinson Jeffers), even in the wake of the Pearl Harbor attack, and in fact gave a public lecture at Sarah Lawrence three days afterwards in which he urged his students not to get caught up in war hysteria and to pursue their educations instead of joining the military. He felt passionately enough about this matter to send a copy of his lecture to the German novelist Thomas Mann, who at the time was working to convince Americans to join the fight against the Third Reich as an exile in California. (Mann sent him a quite angry reply.) And according to Campbell’s biographer, Stephen Larsen, in his journals he comes across as an early Pearl Harbor conspiracy theorist, pointing out that the Roosevelt administration had been trying to goad the Japanese into war for years and discussing the fact that the US Navy had received indications that the Japanese were about to attack in the days prior, but that these warnings were ignored – perhaps deliberately.

While Campbell gave frequent public lectures and published many books, including The Hero with a Thousand Faces in 1949, which was the most thorough overview of his essential ideas, and his four-volume The Masks of God opus, which appeared between 1959 and 1968, in which he attempted to summarize all of the world’s mythologies, he remained relatively obscure outside academic circles until late in his life. His later fame is largely attributable to the endorsements he received from two of his biggest fans. One is Jerry Garcia of the Grateful Dead, who invited Campbell to observe a concert they gave in Berkeley, California in February 1985. (Campbell reported that he was impressed by the event, comparing it to the ancient Dionysian festivals and Russian Easter celebrations.) In November 1986, Campbell and Garcia shared a stage at a conference at UC Berkeley. The other is George Lucas, who frequently cited Campbell’s conception of myth in interviews as being one of his primary inspirations in his writing of the Star Wars films. Indeed, in the 1980s Lucas invited Campbell to come to his Skywalker Ranch to view the entire trilogy (Campbell gave it somewhat guarded praise), and also helped to arrange the most crucial factor in securing Campbell’s late fame: Bill Moyers’ The Power of Myth series.

Moyers, a well-respected figure in broadcasting, filmed a series of interviews with Campbell during the mid-1980s, mostly at Skywalker Ranch, that were edited into six one-hour episodes and broadcast on PBS in 1988, along with an accompanying book of the same name. The series introduces and details Campbell’s ideas in a very accessible and entertaining way. It proved to be very popular, both during its original airing as well as in reruns and on video, and cemented Campbell’s reputation as an influential and respected intellectual in the American popular consciousness. Sales of Campbell’s books began to skyrocket as well. Unfortunately, he himself didn’t live to see any of this, as he had passed away the previous year, but he left behind a large body of work in which he had already presented his fully-articulated worldview.

As is frequently the case with prominent white men who don’t pay the proper lip service to political correctness, it wasn’t until after Campbell’s death that some of his former colleagues and acquaintances began to come forward with accusations of racism and anti-Semitism. This charge first appeared in an article by Brendan Gill in the September 28, 1989 issue of The New York Review of Books entitled “The Faces of Joseph Campbell,” in which he cited purely anecdotal evidence to support his claim that Campbell had been an anti-Semite, including Campbell’s stance on the war as well as the fact that he had praised the Germanic Jung while disdaining the Jewish Freud, and the fact that he had evinced a love of German culture as well as a general dislike of the Abrahamic religions in his work – all of which is undeniably true.

In the letters that were printed in response, some came to Campbell’s defense while others pressed the attack, including a Sarah Lawrence colleague who claimed that Campbell had reacted to the racial integration of the school with horror. (Although again, no evidence for this was ever produced.) His sympathetic friends indicated that Campbell never tried to hide his conservative sympathies, and pointed out that the fact that Campbell was sympathetic to German and “pagan” cultures while disdaining Judaism and Christianity was hardly evidence that he had been a racist. Nevertheless, these charges have overshadowed Campbell’s work ever since, even if they have had no noticeable impact on the popularity of his work. (I first became aware of the controversy shortly after discovering Campbell, sitting at a restaurant in Ann Arbor, Michigan in 1995, when a passing waiter noticed that I was reading The Hero with a Thousand Faces and felt compelled to ask me, “Reading Joseph Campbell, the ol’ anti-Semite, huh?” I later learned that the waiter was a grad student at the University of Michigan.)

Regardless of whether these accusations are true or not, they follow a pattern that is typical for any artist or scholar who refuses to toe the party line. If Campbell had been engaged in “deconstructing” mythology, and showing that the Mahabharata or the Arthurian legends were nothing more than “narratives” expressing patriarchy and sexual repression for example, his personal failings in the eyes of academia would have been ignored. Surely what really bothers academics about Campbell, as well as about scholars with a similar worldview such as Jung, Mircea Eliade, or René Guénon, is that they dared to assert that there is an essential meaning to things, which of course then implies that there may actually be such a thing as values and traditions that are worth preserving.

I first discovered The Power of Myth series on video at my local library in 1995, during a period when I was looking for a new sense of direction and meaning in my life. I was 22, and like most Americans I had been educated in a strictly materialist way of understanding things. For the previous few years I had regarded myself as a Nietzschean, existentialist atheist (in spite of the fact that I only half-understood either Nietzsche or the existentialists). But I soon found this stance to be insufficient as I grew into adulthood and began to better comprehend the complexities of the human condition. It was my discovery of Colin Wilson, who I have written about elsewhere, and Campbell at this time (and through the latter, his own guru, Jung) which persuaded me that there is more to reality and living than what can be known through the five senses. Although I later moved on to other teachers and interests who in some ways surpass them, I will always owe a debt of gratitude to these two figures for “converting” me to something other than a model of a modern major materialist.

The Power of Myth struck me as a revelation, and it caused me to seek out Campbell’s books as well. Like most of us these days, I had always thought of myths as nothing more than quaint stories with some sort of simple moral lesson to be gleaned. Campbell contended that these myths are in fact reflections of a much deeper reality, one that is both metaphysical and which is reflective of deep psychological processes in our unconscious that transcend the individual and are connected to our racial memory. Even more importantly, Campbell first showed me that meaning was in fact anchored in something outside of ourselves, which was certainly very different from what I was being taught in most of my literature classes at the University at the time. I soon began to see everything from a Campbellesque perspective, and I doubt I could have mustered the enthusiasm to finish my degree were it not for the inspiration I derived from him.

The center of Campbell’s worldview is the idea of what he termed the “monomyth.” It posits that underneath all of the world’s mythologies, there is a single structure which they all more or less follow. This structure is timeless, as it is embedded within our consciousness, and can be found in the best modern art and literature – Campbell himself was particularly fond of James Joyce, and in fact the term monomyth itself is derived from Finnegans Wake – as much as in the ancient myths. Campbell believed that this monomyth was the expression of the single metaphysical reality which lies hidden behind the mere appearance of things, and that each culture and era develops its own stories to express this unchanging reality in accordance with “the unforged conscience of their race,” to paraphrase Joyce. In this sense, he shares some commonality with the traditionalists such as Guénon and Julius Evola. I don’t know of any place where the traditionalists have commented on Campbell directly, but surely they would criticize him along the same lines for which they criticized Jung: namely, that he understood myths as merely containing psychological symbols and “archetypes,” and as depictions of psychic processes, rather than as expressions of an objective reality (this is a complaint that a “true believer” in any religion could make against the Jungian conception of myth).

Surely a large part of the success of The Power of Myth, as it certainly was in my case, was due to the fact that Campbell comes across in his recorded interviews and lectures as an extremely likable man with a gift for communicating complex ideas and stories in simple language. He was also a masterful storyteller. He was the very embodiment of your favorite teacher, who (hopefully) turned you on to the wonders of the world of ideas and filled you with the fiery passion to learn more about a particular subject. Like the very best teachers, what you learned from him only marked the starting point in a long odyssey that ended up leading you to other ideas and other destinations in life.

There are certainly many criticisms one can make of Campbell’s conception of things. In addition to the traditionalist objections already mentioned, some scholars have said that not just Campbell’s, but all efforts in the fields of comparative mythology and comparative religion, are flawed in that they emphasize the commonalities between all of the world’s traditions at the expense of the particularities which distinguish them, thus presenting a false universalism. There may be some truth in this, but at the same time it seems to me to be symptomatic of the general postmodern disregard for anything which asserts that there is an essential meaning to things, preferring to study each subject in isolation rather than as part of a whole. After all, how can a three-thousand-year-old story from ancient Greece teach a present-day American anything more than a Toni Morrison novel can? In fact, those old stories may actually be detrimental, given that they depict a way of life that reinforces old social orders rather than emphasizing the need for racial equality or the fluidity of gender.

At his post-war trial on the charge of promoting Fascism, Evola said about his beliefs, “My principles are only those that, before the French Revolution, every well-born person considered sane and normal.” I suspect that Campbell believed something similar, even if he never couched it in language that was quite so incendiary. When we look at the ancient stories, whether they are European, Indian, Chinese, Native American, or whatever, there is certainly a common outlook there which directly challenges the norms and values which we have come to accept as normal in the modern world.

And this, perhaps, is Campbell’s ultimate value from our point of view. There are certainly greater scholars of myth and religion to read. But especially for newcomers, he can open up the world of primordial, timeless, pre- and anti-modern wisdom that still lurks deep within our souls and continues to shape our lives, whether we are consciously aware of it are not. We are all part of a story that began long before we were born and which will continue long after we die. Campbell brings this story, and our place in it, to light like few others can. And this, in the end, is what the “true Right” is really about.

Related

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

8 Comments

  1. Steffen Krauter
    Posted March 28, 2018 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Love these, thank you so much CC team.

  2. PaleoSam
    Posted March 27, 2018 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

    It’s also worth noting that Joseph Campbell was for many years on the “Board of Advisors” for the “Mankind Quarterly” (MQ), which may be the last peer-reviewed quarterly academic journals of physical anthropology that accepts race realism. Any perusal of MQ back issues will clearly demonstrate that Joseph Campbell was listed on the masthead of the MQ. Here is some more about Campbell’s views on racial realism can be found here (by someone who does not agree with them): https://tolkienland.wordpress.com/2016/05/29/joseph-campbell-and-race/

    • Posted March 29, 2018 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

      Thank you for this information. I wasn’t aware of this or I would have included it in this essay.

  3. James Beckley
    Posted March 27, 2018 at 8:05 am | Permalink

    Campbell’s a difficult one for the establishment to deal with. He embodies better than almost any academic alive today the values they all claim to hold but happily abandon as soon as accusations of racism are so much as whispered. Pinker’s attempt to backtrack on his recent comment that the “Alt-Right” has legitimate grounds for grievance has been a particularly cringe worthy example of this kind of duplicitousness and virtue signaling. Peterson may have Campbell’s principle, and to that extent what he does is admirable, but he lacks Campbell’s dignity.

    Campbell ennobled liberalism, that uniquely white Western impulse to consume outward in all directions that suit, defiant of jealous dogmas and fearless of the risks. He was able to do this because his liberalism was tempered by a profound reverence for tradition. And it’s reverence that make a man of the Right, the recognition that some things are simply better than others. His work is the fruit of a cultivated life spent in pursuit of passion and a celebration of that which is worthy to be revered. Even when it falters under honest criticism, and I think these issues are much overstated, it’s always redeemed by the unmistakable joy he took in the process of learning. That joy shows through in his enthusiasm as a teacher and in the divinely superfluous beauty of his prose.

    I share your debt to Campbell. I came across his work at a pivotal time in my life and it profoundly influenced my trajectory, personal and professional. I think it’s great that Counter-Currents recognizes him as another of our figures worthy to be remembered each year.

  4. Born Red Pilled
    Posted March 26, 2018 at 8:17 am | Permalink

    Great, informative read. But I’m not sold on this egalitarianism of myth. I feel that our great indoeuropean myth cycles, those of the Greeks, norse, and the Celtic Arthurian mythos are on a plane above those of the rest, although perhaps there is some good in Hinduism, and I think the Brahmin and kasateya castes shared indoeuropean origins. I haven’t yet read the Ramayana or the Mahabharata, but I want to.

    If you watch power of myth carefully, I think I recall some subtle jabs against Jews or Judaism. At one point Moyers alludes to this, and Campbell rapidly cuts him off, saying “yes, but no group is chosen or exceptional in any way.”

    Thomas Mann had a Jewish wife, although he was an obvious homosexual pederast, judging from his works. One of his daughters entered a marriage of convenience with Auden in order to emigrate out of Nazi germany. This would explain why Mann was keen on inciting the attack on his own country by the USA. Could there be a greater treason of heart? Pound merely dissuaded his country from entering war, yet which was in a cage for ten years?

    The idea that FDR wanted japan to attack the US is not merely conspiracy theory. It’s on solid academic ground. They found extensive evidence in his journals, saying things like if only we could cats paw Japan into making the first move. Mainstream historians believe this, they get tenure, and are not jailed in Europe for their beliefs.

    Makes sense if Campbell was friends with Jeffers. The views attributed to him pretty much mirror those of Jeffers. Great minds and all. 😉

  5. E. Steele
    Posted March 26, 2018 at 7:20 am | Permalink

    The posthumous defamation of any White hero whose legacy doesn’t advance Jewish interests is indeed disturbing. But let’s be frank here: the Campbellian approach to fiction and screenwriting destroyed the art of storytelling for at least the last generation and will continue to do so for some time. Comparing unrelated myths and nudging them into your meta-narrative to validate the pseudo-science of Jungian archetypes can be mildly compelling but it hardly has any objective reality.

    If you want to see the fetid fruits of Campbell’s shaky tree, get thee to your nearest cineplex and see any (((Hollywood blockbuster))).

    • Rob Bottom
      Posted March 26, 2018 at 10:54 am | Permalink

      One of the interesting things about Campbell’s monomyth is that it applies to movies produced before his work went mainstream. “The Writer’s Journey”, a how-to book on Campbell’s framework for screenwriting, includes several examples, like The Wizard of Oz. The author behind it has also been hosting workshops for aspiring screenwriters for decades. It’s not really Campbell’s fault if lazy or uninspired writers follow the monomyth blueprint, particularly when Hollywood is increasingly relying on simple, universally understood stories intended for global audiences.

      • Nestor
        Posted March 26, 2018 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

        It’s not really Campbell’s fault if lazy or uninspired writers follow the monomyth blueprint

        Exactly. It is as ludicrous and unjust to lay the blame for Hollywood’s exploitation and deformation of Campell’s work as it would be to fault Nietzsche for the fact that a couple of Jews hijacked his übermensch idea and perverted it into an (((alien))) (((journalist))) “superman.”

        If anything, this should only make us appreciate Campbell even more (for his originality) and Hollywood even less (for its parasitism).

    Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    The World in Flames

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance