Print this post Print this post

The War on Whites in Advertising:
A Follow-Up

1,916 words

Shortly after publishing the article discussing “The War Against Whites in Advertising,”I received a lot of comments, messages, and social media posts – the support for the article was tremendous, thank you. One message we received was in regards to the “Banned German oral sex Sprite commercial.” The reader wrote us and asked us to look into the commercial. What I found was far more interesting than even the reader might have known. The video is below. It depicts a white, blonde woman on her knees in front of a black man, and we hear her thinking, “I could really go for a Sprite right now” as she performs oral sex on him, and at the end she has Sprite foam sprayed all over her face while she thinks, “I love Sprite!”

The first thing I found when researching this one was that the advertisement was not one that the Coca-Cola Company (which own Sprite) ran in Germany or elsewhere. The commercial was, in fact, a speculative advertisement, or “spec ad.”

Spec ads are independently-produced advertisements that have not been commissioned or requested by a company. They are a way for those working in the advertising industry to boost their portfolio or win contracts with prospective employers by showcasing their skills. Spec ads are the equivalent of a “writing sample” in some ways, but can serve as a way to shift advertising trends while pushing social norms. Popular spec ads generate attention, and advertisers often take notice. This particular spec ad hit over a million views within days after first being published online, and has since been viewed millions more times as it has been re-uploaded and shared on social media and Websites.

The ad being “fake” is one thing which I immediately found interesting, but this goes much deeper into the woods. The Huffington Post article that discussed the ad mentioned that the name of the producer and director was Max Isaacson . . . Isaacson? Interesting last name. I searched for the name on Twitter and found an account matching that name, listing a Website in its bio section. The Website is for BroSis Pictures, and provides a short bio of Max:

He took that incredible eye for visuals, and moved into the director’s chair, shooting a number of music videos, and commercials for campaigns such as HBO’s True Blood, as well as an unlicensed “Banned German Sprite Ad” which became a huge viral hit, breaking 1.2 million views in two days.

Max Isaacson’s Twitter account links to the site, confirming that I had the correct Max Isaacson. I quickly searched through his posts, assuming I might confirm my conceit that there was a noticeable Jewish influence in race-mixing propaganda, which I discussed in my previous article, in the “Purveyors” section. Here is what I found:

…and these.

The ad was not created or paid for by Sprite, nor was it even created in Germany. Instead it was financed and directed independently by Max Isaacson, a New York Jew. The significance of this cannot be overstated. There was no financial incentive. Nobody requested that this commercial be produced. It is not as if Sprite had this idea, and that Max was merely the person who brought their vision to fruition. The entire project, from start to finish, was a Jewish expression of ethnic hatred towards whites, again using blacks as their pets, to send a message – in German, no less. The commercial was “fake” only in the sense that it was not produced or endorsed by Sprite. Its message, however, was very real.

 

How fitting that Max uses a rat as his Twitter profile photo. I have little doubt that if rats could communicate with us, they would be deeply offended by being associated with such vermin.

It’s Not About the Money

There is a legitimate argument to be made pertaining to media companies using “diversity” in advertising and other content: It is that the free market dictates everything, from the ethnic makeup of ads to the political themes in films. On its face, this idea seems plausible. After all, companies exist to sell products and services, and it logically follows that any action taken by companies should be carried out as part of an effort to maximize sales and profits. This outlook, although reasonable, is myopic and lacks several key factors in its analysis: Primarily that the goals of individuals within organizations, and the stated goals of these organizations themselves, are not always what they seem.

Mainstream news organizations do not exist to uncover and disseminate the truth; they exist as the propaganda wing of the international Left. This should not be a controversial statement by any means. If one was not already aware of the lying and manipulative nature of the press, the 2016 election coverage should have been sufficient for nearly everyone to have noticed its incredible bias. CNN, for example, is negative towards President Trump ninety-three percent of the time, and their ratings continue to drop. Taken together, the primary US news sources, including FOX, average eighty percent negative coverage of Trump, in a country where half of the voters supported Trump, at least as a rejection of Clinton.

If gaining viewers and making money were the highest priorities for these news organizations, would they be so openly biased? And so openly engaging in political activism that they must know would alienate half of their potential viewers? To them, it’s not about the money. Sure, the money is necessary, certainly a goal somewhere, but they have clearly demonstrated that they will sacrifice profits in order to shape a narrative, control the flow of information, and warp political discourse. It is also necessary to note that a mere six corporations control ninety percent of the media in America. Television stations, radio stations, newspapers, films, social media, video games, comic books – virtually all media produced is filtered through the small, international clique of the media conglomerates.

Marvel comic book sales have also been declining following an effort to introduce “diversity” into their character line-up. These new characters include females and black teens, as well as biracial and Muslim heroes. The move towards a more “diverse” comic book industry was not a reaction to demands from the fans, but was the result of the efforts of organizations such as Women in Comics Collective International, an organization that promotes women and non-whites in the comic book industry.

When asked about declining sales, Marvel VP David Gabriel said, “What we heard was that people didn’t want any more diversity.” The feedback from fans was clear: They were alienating their core demographic and abandoning classic characters to make way for their new, “diverse” iterations. Gabriel’s honest comments sparked outrage and were called a “public relations nightmare for Marvel’s diversity initiative.” Gabriel then, of course, “clarified” his comments and backstepped a bit, but the statement was already made, and it coincides with the evidence of sales numbers and readership demographics.

This past summer saw the lowest number of summer ticket sales Hollywood has seen in the past twenty-five years. As one article on this put it, “What is clear: This summer was marred with multiple high-profile films that flopped stateside, including The Mummy, Baywatch, The Dark Tower, and King Arthur: Legend of the Sword.”

Sir Bedivere from King Arthur.

The NFL has lost twenty to twenty-five percent of its viewers over the past two years. Despite widespread opposition to the players who were kneeling during the national anthem, as well as declining viewers and ticket sales, the League continued on. Nike, Under Amour, and Ford all expressed support for the NFL players’ “protest” and freedom of expression.

People tune in to sporting events, read comic books, watch TV, and go to the cinema to be entertained, not to be lectured, derided, and thrust into the political arena. If it was simply about the money, CNN, Hollywood, Marvel, the NFL, and all those others who are currently experiencing losses due to their political meanderings would surely alter course to mitigate further damages. The “free market,” in a sense, has spoken. The argument is correct in that manner. However, what some fail to understand is that companies are not always responsive to free-market demands for several reasons. Many are simply in positions where their customer base can decline, and they can still make enough money. Others simply decide that the utility of political activism – be it taking a knee, or promoting miscegenation – is more valuable than high profits. The hostile elite in positions to make those decisions might have such a deep-seated and atavistic ethnic hatred for us that they will gleefully lose money in the short term if it helps to usher in our long-term demise as a civilization. No matter what is really the case, one thing is clear: It’s not about the money, it’s about sending a message.

The Other Side of the Coin

In my previous article, I wrote about the incessant use of interracial couples in advertising, particularly the depiction of white women with black men as the most common. Recently it occurred to me that there are indeed times when white women, white couples, and white children are used in propaganda without any hint of miscegenation or mongrelization. In a very subtle, yet sinister, ploy, white people are often used in a culturally and psychologically damaging way. When the press wants to tell us to stay single, not have children, and fight “overpopulation,” they direct the message solely to a white audience.

There are several articles that make this point perfectly clear. To cite only two examples, according to NBC News, “[s]cience proves kids are bad for Earth. Morality suggests we stop having them.”

And The Guardian says, Want to fight climate change? Have fewer children.”

These articles argue that extra people on Earth contribute to climate change; therefore to fight climate change, we must not have so many kids. The photos they use are all of white children. This is very curious considering global pollution, fertility trends, and population projections. In light of the data, the photos should depict only non-white children. After all, they are worried about overpopulation, right?

In articles that discuss the “science” of happiness, urging people to stay single, or not to have kids, suddenly “diversity and inclusion” are no longer of any concern. The only time white women are seen without black men in the media appears to be when the articles are telling women to remain single and childless – a rather unsettling discovery, as can be seen in three examples, here, here, and here.

 

When a nice white couple is depicted in the media, this is how: without children. On one side of the coin, the enemies of our civilization promote constant dysgenics and social chaos through race-mixing, and on the other, they encourage white Europeans to spend time alone – atomized, deracinated, and childless. This is propaganda with the sole intent of creating a world without us.

 

 

 

Related

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

20 Comments

  1. Tony Hayers
    Posted April 10, 2018 at 7:24 pm | Permalink

    Number 1 story on PRAVDA, oops, I mean BBC News site:

    ‘I’m not having (WHITE) children because I want to save the planet’

    What’s the best thing you can do to help save the environment? For Anna, a cycling instructor and writer living in Bath, it’s to have fewer children.
    She has chosen not to have any at all.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/stories-43699464/i-m-not-having-children-because-i-want-to-save-the-planet

    How much of an EGO do you need to have to imagine that you, in your 70 years alive on a 4 billion year-old, still-molten gigantic sphere , out of BILLIONS of humans living and dead , are a SAVER OF PLANETS ???

  2. Matt Grey
    Posted April 10, 2018 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    Their chutzpah grows exponentially and time is passing. What are we going to do?

  3. Goncalo
    Posted April 10, 2018 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    That anti-European ad is the most sick, vile, degenerate and infuriating trash I’ve come across. Thank you for writing about this attack on Europeans. If anyone would like to clean their eyes and remind themselves of who and what we are fighting for, I’d suggest watching the video “White Propaganda” on the Thulean Perspective channel.

  4. Timmy T. Bone
    Posted April 10, 2018 at 6:49 am | Permalink

    I think the article is excellent as was the previous one in exposing what is happening. Here is the reality, none of this is about $$, getting new customers, blah, blah, blah…. this is PROPAGANDA pure and simple. Its designed to DESTROY white culture from the inside out. As for the whom is doing it – we all know the answer but thanks to their control of the media top to bottom, left to right it will never be exposed.
    If you say it than you will immediately be labeled as racist. Why should whites care that the group whom no one is allowed to talk about has total control of the media and is HOSTILE to whites?

    On the cover of the newspaper today today (which my 81 year old father continues to read) – on there is slobbering about the Tuskegee airman. A few days ago we had to see the slobbering over the assassination of Martin Luther King. EVERY SINGLE DAY there is some pro black thing, some anti-gun thing, etc… The paper is extreme, extreme left wing. Worse than the NY Times.

    But there is sunshine in all of this – the general public HATES advertising. The general public no longer reads newspapers, doesnt want to pay for cable subscriptions. NOBODY wants to pay for anti-white political garbage. That is why movies are bombing and newspapers are going bankrupt.

    This is also why they are frantic to censor the internet. They dont control it yet. Google, Facebook and Twitter have become far to big, know to much and are quite willing to stifle “hate speech” if whites complain about what is happening. Denigrating whites is ok but you better not say anything about anyone else. Google, Facebook are controlled by the same group of people that you are not allowed to mention. I dont know about Twitter.

    Keep up the good fight. Conflict is coming. At some point its going to get physical ala S. Africa. Bet on it.

    • Leon
      Posted April 10, 2018 at 8:42 am | Permalink

      Lol “going to get physical”. I don’t know what on earth would make you think you’d want that to happen. It won’t be pretty for you.

  5. manfred arcane
    Posted April 10, 2018 at 3:49 am | Permalink

    Concerning the last bit, there is something to be said about the growing popularity of anti-natalist philosophy among the lefty white intelligentsia, as well as the slow but steady leaking of the likes of Benatar and Ligotti into the wider pop culture…

  6. Jez Turner
    Posted April 10, 2018 at 3:37 am | Permalink

    Bravo! First-rate research! Essential reading for those needing to be de-brainwashed.
    “Mainstream news organizations do not exist to uncover and disseminate the truth; they exist as the propaganda wing of the international Left. … they have clearly demonstrated that they will sacrifice profits in order to shape a narrative, control the flow of information, and warp political discourse. … People tune in to sporting events, read comic books, watch TV, and go to the cinema to be entertained, not to be lectured, derided, and thrust into the political arena. If it was simply about the money, CNN, Hollywood, Marvel, the NFL, and all those others who are currently experiencing losses due to their political meanderings would surely alter course to mitigate further damages. …
    The hostile elite in positions to make those decisions might have such a deep-seated and atavistic ethnic hatred for us that they will gleefully lose money in the short term if it helps to usher in our long-term demise as a civilization. No matter what is really the case, one thing is clear: It’s not about the money, it’s about sending a message.”

  7. Franklin Ryckaert
    Posted April 9, 2018 at 11:23 pm | Permalink

    @ R. Houck

    I would like to suggest you to write a similar article on “The War on Whites in Search Engines”. I have done a little research myself. I searched in Google Images the following subjects :

    great american inventors
    happy american white people
    happy american white marriage
    happy american white children
    happy american white family

    What I got is about 90% pictures of black or mulatto or black + white people.
    For Bing images I got exactly the same pictures.
    Google is owned by the Jews Sergey Brin and Larry Page. Bing is owned by Microsoft. See for yourself.

  8. JimB
    Posted April 9, 2018 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    Terrific article… illustrating a terrifying reality: WHITE GENOCIDE.

    Propaganda promoting race-mixing and “fewer (WHITE) children” today… but outright savage butchery of our people the obvious conclusion in the not-very-distant tomorrow.

    Better WAKE UP, WHITEY!!!

  9. Nancy
    Posted April 9, 2018 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    An article full of horror, and very insightful. It gives me the same feeling I felt long ago when I watched the scifi series “V”, where lizard aliens were coming to earth to feast on humans and drive them to extinction. Unfortunately its not fiction.

  10. Rob Bottom
    Posted April 9, 2018 at 8:10 pm | Permalink

    It really makes you wonder, what kind of society would we be living in if we were in control of our own media? It is always interesting seeing adverts for products made in Japan and comparing what we see, to what they see in Japan. Of course, Japanese companies outsource their advertising to “Western” firms, and thus cede control of the messaging in them. Some that I have personally seen from Sony and Nintendo tend to showcase a happy nuclear family for Japan, while in America they show multiracial couples or friends gathered.

    You could also probably do an entire article just dissecting Ikea catalogues. In the latest one, you can find a cute young white girl hanging out at a black boy’s house (with his little sister joining them). In last year’s edition, a white mother with two adopted or mix-raced daughters frolic in their Ikea furnished livingroom. Sweden is truly cucked.

  11. Ronald Christ
    Posted April 9, 2018 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    Capitalism is against borders of any kind: cultural, racial, sexual, religious, etc. The Jew’s vulgar Sprite ad was probably only rejected because it’s too honest in this regard. No need to give the game away.

  12. Posted April 9, 2018 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    yes, there is anti-white/pro-nonwhite bias in advertising, media, hollywood, etc…but it has little to do with jews or leftism…it has to do with money.

    nonwhites represent growth in the supply of workers and consumers, which props up the ponzi economy and makes the rich richer…so therefore the big corporations/CEOs/plutocrats etc are always pushing diversity progaganda, like those ads above…they been doing it for decades…

    however, white working class culture represents an obstacle to importing more nonwhites into the workplaces, neighborhoods etc…so the elites/upper class/big business do not like the white working class. They want to grow the supply of workers and consumers …and they need nonwhites to do it. The white working class have long stood in the way.

    The elites thus set the tone for the white collar professional culture. They have the money and power to do so. And so push diversity in the white collar workplace.

    And those who want to get ahead, they fall in line with what those at the top want..

    That way they get money. So they can have sex, buy a home, have kids, and buy their kids the GI Joe doll with the kung fu grip.

    • Yo joe
      Posted April 9, 2018 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

      No it has to be political. The nonwhites coming in are mostly Hispanics and it’s always blacks with whites in the commercials, most often black men with white women. Now assuming this has a positive effect on all black men(uncertain), it probably has a negative effect on black women who resent white women for taking their men, as they should. This factor was thought to have hurt Hilary in the election somewhat. So that’s a wash.

      I imagine a silent majority of whites are vexed by these factors, but I bet it doesn’t greatly effect their spending choices. Only a handful of the most hard bitten stormfronters might actually boycott products for race mixing adds, and a few liberals may buy more.

      Overall I think you can logically show its a wash or slightly detrimental economically. If it were about economics, they would hit Hispanics very very hard, because there are actually far more Hispanics than blacks in th US, and their numbers are growing rapidly. Cometh the caravan!

      It’s certainly political, but as to what group or who specifically is behind it, that’s another, more nuanced discussion. It may not be possible to determine definitively.

    • R. Houck
      Posted April 9, 2018 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

      In my previous essay, I addressed the idea of appealing to a “diverse” audience. This explanation falls flat in many ways, primarily in the fact that they ignore the majority of potential pairings of mixed-race couples, in favor of a very particular combination, white women with black men.

      Further, the research of mixed-race couples clearly demonstrates that the rate of Hispanic women, for example, in interracial relationships is quite high, yet they are not depicted with men of other races very often, why is that?

      There is also research, which I discussed, that shows people have an adverse and unpleasant reaction to seeing interracial couples. Surely those involved in marketing would have seen this study as well, no?

      In this essay, I discuss industry after industry losing money due to their insistence on a very particular narrative, which is inarguably Left-wing, and I’ve provided enough evidence to at least make one question the level of ethnic activism at play. Your idea that this is simply about money cannot stand up to the fact that Marvel knows they are losing money, which a sales executive has explicitly stated, by appealing to “diversity”. With that knowledge, the company has decided to continue down the same path of losing profits.

      By the way, Stan Lee, of Marvel fame, and Isaac Perlmutter, the current Marvel CEO – both Jewish.

      • R. Houck
        Posted April 9, 2018 at 7:45 pm | Permalink

        EDIT – It appears Isaac Perlmutter is the former CEO and current chairman.

  13. Eric
    Posted April 9, 2018 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    Demonic. Truly demonic. Thank you for this article. It has opened my eyes wider than they already were.

    Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    The World in Flames

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance