Print this post Print this post

Too Much Victory?
The Hungarian Election Results

“For us, Hungary comes first.”

1,478 words

Czech version here


Audio version: To listen in a player, use the one above or click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link as” or “save target as.” To subscribe to the CC podcast RSS feed, click here.

Defying predictions that a more energized opposition would reduce the parliamentary majority of Viktor Orbán’s party, Fidesz, in Sunday’s national election, their result is projected to be identical to what it was in 2014, with over 98% of the votes counted as of this writing: 66.83% of the Parliament (133 seats). This means that not only did Fidesz retain its majority, which was expected, but they even managed to hold on to their two-thirds majority, which means they can continue to make modifications to the national Constitution without having to cooperate with other parties, giving them a monopoly on political power at the national level. There is certainly a great deal of hand-wringing going on in Brussels, Washington, and in the rootless offices of George Soros’ various organizations today.

While this led to jubilation among Orbán’s supporters, it was a heavy blow to the opposition, which had seemed to be much more strongly mobilized this time around, falling for their own rhetoric that popular dissatisfaction with Fidesz across the country was growing. Their hopes seemed to be confirmed by the fact that voter turnout was over 68%, higher than any other national election in more than a decade. Reports throughout the day suggested that voters frustrated with Orbán were coming out in greater force than previously, and late in the day even Fidesz’s own spokesmen were conceding that they had most likely lost their supermajority. In retrospect, however, it seems that while the liberal opposition in the urban centers did indeed turn out in greater numbers, this was counteracted by a greater turnout among conservatives in the countryside, perhaps concerned over the possibility that Fidesz might be weakened. As it turned out, not only did the opposition fail to displace Fidesz, which was widely assumed anyway, but they failed in their more modest goal of ending Fidesz’s supermajority, and in fact they did not reduce Fidesz’s power by one iota.

Once again, as it also had done in 2010 and 2014, Jobbik emerged as the top opposition party, as anticipated by observers. Having moved away from its radical Right roots and reinvented itself as a liberal conservative party since the last election, their strategy seems to have garnered some small degree of success, for in spite of the fact that they have alienated or distanced themselves from many who formed their previous base, they did manage to slightly increase their parliamentary presence, winning 13.07%, or 26 parliamentary seats – in 2014 they won 11.56%, and 23 seats.

Nevertheless, this came as a disappointment not only to Jobbik but to many of their new, more liberal supporters who saw them as the best chance of unseating, or at least reducing, Orbán’s lock on power, in spite of their distaste for Jobbik’s past rhetoric. Whether Jobbik’s new strategy of outreach to liberal voters, and effectively swapping their traditional base for a new (and alarming, from a Right-wing standpoint) one, was really successful with a gain of only three seats remains debatable, although they did at least hold their ground.

Jobbik’s leader, Gábor Vona, had announced during the campaign that if Jobbik failed to obtain a majority, he would resign as Chairman, and he did indeed announce his resignation at his concession speech on Sunday night. It is still possible that he might be re-nominated when his party meets to choose a new leader, but that remains to be seen. Also to be seen is whether Jobbik will continue along the line it has been following in recent years of presenting itself as little more than the “anyone but Orbán” party, or whether they will perhaps try to resume a more genuinely Right-wing program. The latter is fervently to be hoped for, albeit they hopefully will be able to do so enriched by the wisdom garnered by their new approach, and continue to find ways to appeal to more than just Rightist voters. They are certainly still in a better position than anyone else to mount a challenge to Fidesz; the only question is whether they will be able to seize and build on what they have accomplished by going in new directions, or perhaps returning to some older ones.

As for the rest of the opposition, the liberal-socialist MSZP trailed Jobbik at 10.05% and 20 seats (down from 29 in 2014), the EU-friendly Democratic Coalition (DK) won 4.52% and 9 seats (up from 4), and the Green LMP won 4.02% and 8 seats (up from 5). In 2014, the MSZP and DK had been in a coalition with several other Leftist parties, called Unity; a similar coalition did not manifest this time. And given that, even when taken together, the Left-wing parties won only a few more seats than the minority Right-wing party, the latter of which actually slightly increased its power, this is an indication that the Hungarian Left has once again completely failed – as it also failed to do in 2010 and 2014 – to develop any program that appeals to a large number of Hungarians, in spite of some marginal increases. Combined, the Right-wing parties now control nearly 80% of the Parliament. This will surely lead to a great deal of shakeup and soul-searching among the Left in the months and years to come, although for the foreseeable future it is clear that Jobbik – in whatever form it chooses to take this time around – will remain the focal point of the opposition.

Some Right-wing Hungarians to whom I have spoken are fearful that this level of success by Fidesz could actually be dangerous for the party, if not bad for the country. Since 2015, Fidesz has become more or less a one-issue party focusing almost exclusively on immigration and their related conflict with Brussels over the issue of migrant quotas. While this is certainly welcome by people on the Right both within and outside Hungary, it is nevertheless the case that they have been ignoring many other issues of concern to Hungarians, as I discussed in my last article on this topic. Having a reduced majority might have pressured Fidesz to develop a wider program on multiple issues once again. As it is, this may very well entice them to become complacent and simply continue on as they have been doing. While many Hungarians obviously still support Orbán and have indicated that they agree with him that dealing with immigration is a top priority for the country, he is certainly not uncritically admired, and if he doesn’t develop a more dynamic program going forward, it could very well lead to a genuine reinvigoration of the Left and a decline in their own support. Fidesz’s popularity was already declining precipitously in the year following the 2014 election; it was only the outbreak of the migrant crisis and their response to it that reversed this trend. While it unfortunately seems likely that mass immigration is not going to go away anytime soon as a problem facing both Hungary and Europe, in a country that is beset by many problems stemming from poverty, this alone will not be sufficient to keep them in the good graces of the Hungarian majority forever.

On the positive side, this result does indicate that the Hungarian people did not allow themselves to be dissuaded and fooled by the rhetoric stemming from the Western media and the (in many cases Western-backed) opposition groups within Hungary itself – it should be mentioned that the US State Department issued a $700,000 grant to opposition media in December, to name but one aspect of the anti-government campaign – that Orbán is a dictator, that Fidesz has been undermining democracy, and that most Hungarians don’t share Orbán’s concerns regarding immigration and actually favor greater cooperation with the European Union (which implicitly means accepting migrants), and don’t endorse his ongoing conflict with Soros and his minions over the impact they are trying to have on the country. Hungarians are indeed critical of Orbán, as can be seen whenever you try to strike up a conversation with one of them about him, but they clearly view him as their best option under the circumstances. And really, in surveying his competitors, it’s impossible to disagree.

For those of us outside Hungary, we can now look forward to at least four more years of a reliable partner against Brussels and Soros on the issue of mass immigration, a leader in an initiative to construct a possible illiberal alternative to the EU in the form of the Visegrád Group, and an example of a successful populist Right-wing party operating in the heart of Europe. Although here’s hoping that Mr. Orbán will not rest on his laurels and instead develop a broader approach to addressing the problems facing Hungary, both foreign and domestic.

Women in traditional Hungarian dress voting in Veresegyház yesterday.

Related

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

6 Comments

  1. Posted April 10, 2018 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    Great. Now that Orban has more power it’s time for him to declare Hungary Europeans only. Without such a policy there is no way forward. This will kickstart our plan to restore Europe and expel the invaders. Hungary can then be our base to spread our ideology to the other European states.

    • Posted April 11, 2018 at 4:43 am | Permalink

      Orbán is admirable in a number of ways, but as I wrote in my previous article on this topic, we need to keep our expectations realistic. Orbán and Fidesz are populists, they are not ideological Rightists. They would never end immigration in Hungary altogether, and I’m sure they will do everything they can to avoid leaving the EU. And as for using Hungary as a base for a pan-European revolution, they would never go along with that. Over the last few years, they’ve arrested and banned every foreign Rightist who has tried to use Hungary as a platform for their own agenda: Richard Spencer, Horst Mahler, Nick Griffin, Jim Dowson. They would never work with radical Rightists in other countries. That’s not the sort of party they are.

  2. joe
    Posted April 10, 2018 at 2:22 am | Permalink

    Congratulations to Hungarian people and their righteous political elites on their great election victory.
    You proved you do not have to be fascists to win and defend your country.
    Let’s celebrate. Your neighbors and historical allies do it too.

    As promised, when the new parliament constitutes, neutralize that jewish psychopath Soros and
    foreign-financed NGOs whose purpose is to destabilize countries in central and eastern Europe.
    Throw that garbage out as Russia did under Putin.

  3. Posted April 9, 2018 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    That’s a bit of an exaggeration. Prof. MacDonald doesn’t actually say anything about Jobbik versus Fidesz, nor does he say anything about Fidesz protecting Hungary from globalization. Fidesz most emphatically is NOT an anti-globalist party at all; in fact just last year they signed a lucrative agreement with China allowing them to build a railway connecting Budapest and Belgrade that the Chinese want for trade. Then there was the agreement they signed with Israel last summer. There’s also the fact that Fidesz has been allowing foreigners (including many Israelis) to buy up property all over citizenship, and even sells citizenship to anyone who pays the fee (as I recall 100,000 euros). And those are only a few examples of many I could cite. Apart from mass immigration, Fidesz wants to be fully integrated into the globalized world. They certainly have done a number of good things over the years, and they generally have good values, but we shouldn’t imagine that they are some sort of radical Right-wing party, as they definitely are not.

  4. Posted April 9, 2018 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    if he doesn’t develop a more dynamic program going forward, it could very well lead to a genuine reinvigoration of the Left

    The question is, what kind of a Left.

    In a place like Hungary, it could plausibly be an illiberal, nationalist Left.

    the US State Department issued a $700,000 grant to opposition media in December

    Very cynical, of course, esp. considering that the non-Jobbik opposition parties took fewer than 1.5 million votes (per Wiki). A foreign state actor interfering in a small, distant country’s domestic election thus paid $500 for every thousand opposition votes (and this is just one grant), and still came up way short. Bad return on investment. Someone alert Trump; maybe we can get a Tweet out of it.

    • nineofclubs
      Posted April 10, 2018 at 2:45 am | Permalink

      ‘In a place like Hungary, it could plausibly be an illiberal, nationalist Left.’

      Definitely. The question then for white nationalists is whether this would be preferable to victory for right wing globalist politics (as represented by Margaret Thatcher, John Howard etc etc).

      To my mind, the victory of right wing nationalists like Orban is infinitely preferable to the election of globalists of any stripe, because if we view politics through a national lens first and foremost, we can sort out our left v right issues after we have secured our national existence.

      Personally if I were Hungarian I would’ve probably voted for the Hungarian Workers Party (Magyar Munkaspart) – an illiberal, nationalist party of genuine socialism – but I’d still be glad of Orban’s victory, because it’s a victory for nationalism over globalism. Those who view politics primarily through the long-past-it’s-use-by-date lens of left v right play into the hands of globalists like Coca Cola Amatil and George Soros, who seek to divide and rule nationalists.

      .

      .

    Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    The World in Flames

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance