Print this post Print this post

In South Carolina, Criticizing Jews & Israel is Now Hate Speech

Rep. Alan Clemmons and Sen. Larry Groom, the ultimate cuckservatives, who led the fight for the bill

1,667 words

Something happened in South Carolina last month that seems to have escaped the attention of the mainstream media, for some unknown reason. On April 12, South Carolina became the first American state to legally define the criticism of Jews or the state of Israel as anti-Semitism. The definition goes into effect on July 1.

South Carolina legislators had attempted to get the law passed as a separate bill last year, but while it passed the state House of Representatives by 103-3, it then stalled in the Senate due to concerns that it violated the First Amendment. The bill’s backers managed to bypass this difficulty by attaching it as a proviso to the state budget for 2018-19, which passed the Senate on April 12, 37-4.

The bill adopted the language that is already in use by the US State Department to define anti-Semitism. The proviso was attached to the Commission on Higher Education section, in Part 1B Section 11 H030 of the bill, and reads as follows:

11.23. (CHE: Prohibition of Discriminatory Practices) (A) In the current fiscal year and from the funds appropriated to the Commission on Higher Education, the commission shall print and distribute to all South Carolina public colleges and universities the definition of anti-Semitism.

(B) For purposes of this proviso, the term definition of anti-Semitism includes:

(1) a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities;

(2) calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews;

(3) making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as a collective;

(4) accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, the state of Israel, or even for acts committed by non-Jews;

(5) accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust;

(6) accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interest of their own nations;

(7) using the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism to characterize Israel or Israelis;

(8) drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis;

(9) blaming Israel for all inter-religious or political tensions;

(10) applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation;

(11) multilateral organizations focusing on Israel only for peace or human rights investigations; and

(12) denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, and denying Israel the right to exist, provided, however, that criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic.

(C) South Carolina public colleges and universities shall take into consideration the definition of anti-Semitism for purposes of determining whether the alleged practice was motivated by anti-Semitic intent when reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of a college or university policy prohibiting discriminatory practices on the basis of religion.

(D) Nothing in this proviso may be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or Section 2, Article I of the South Carolina Constitution, 1895.

It’s quite clear that the language of this bill is so broad that it could conceivably cover just about anything critical that could be said about either Jews or Israel. The bill is expected to be signed into law by Governor Henry McMaster, who has already pledged his support for it; assuming it is, then unless it is challenged by the courts, it will go into effect as planned.

While this development is worrisome, it should be emphasized that this proviso only impacts South Carolina’s public colleges and universities, and that unless it is proposed and passed again, it will only be in effect for one year, until the budget expires. Nevertheless, there is no question that this is an important step towards the criminalization of anti-Semitism – or whatever they choose to call anti-Semitism – throughout the United States, and certainly the proviso will be used to make trouble for any student, staff, or faculty member at an educational institution in the state who might question Jewish influence on America or Israeli policies during the next academic year. Students at USC in the autumn had better not think of discussing Kevin MacDonald or Gilad Atzmon’s ideas, let alone some Counter-Currents articles, unless they want trouble.

This is not the first legislation related to anti-Semitism to pass the South Carolina legislature. In 2015, the same body passed a bill which made it illegal for state institutions to do business with companies that are boycotting Israel as part of the Boycott, Divest, and Sanctions (BDS) movement that seeks to punish Israel for its treatment of the Palestinians, although in this it is hardly unique, given that 24 states have thus far passed similar legislation. And one should not forget that only last summer, 43 members of Congress voiced support for a bill aimed at criminalizing the BDS movement on a federal level.

Also last year, the residents of Dickinson, Texas were offered the opportunity to request funds from the city government for repairs and reconstruction in the wake of Hurricane Harvey, only to discover a clause in the agreements which required that they certify that they would not participate in any boycott of Israel in order to receive the funds.

And even more importantly, Senators Tim Scott and Bob Casey proposed nearly identical legislation to South Carolina’s at the national level when they proposed the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act for the Department of Education in 2016.

Some Counter-Currents readers might be tempted to attribute this trend to Jewish influence. But while there are certainly Jewish advocacy groups who have called for and celebrated South Carolina’s move, in surveying the news reports, it seems that there are just as many who oppose it. Likewise, representatives of South Carolina’s educational institutions have spoken of their concern over how this could affect their campuses’ welcoming of free speech (although they are quick to add that they condemn any form of “bigotry”). Some Jewish academics who oppose the legislation and are critical of Israel themselves say that they dislike the implication that being Jewish and being pro-Israel are one and the same. Professor Barry Trachtenberg, the Director of the Jewish Studies program at Wake Forest University in North Carolina, even said that the law was more likely to exacerbate anti-Semitism than to dampen it – which seems to be a reasonable assumption.

And indeed, the bill’s champion, State Representative Alan Clemmons, is both a Republican and a Mormon. He seems to have made it his cause to be more pro-Jewish than most Jews are. A vocal critic of the BDS movement, last year he even went so far as to attack the pro-Israel J Street PAC for being anti-Semitic on the grounds that it opposes Israel’s occupation of the West Bank – something that was almost universally condemned by Jewish groups from all points of the spectrum. As for the current bill, he claims that he introduced it due to the recent rise in anti-Semitism across the United States, and specifically in response to bomb threats that were made in early 2017 against Jewish institutions in South Carolina. (Apparently, Clemmons didn’t get the news that many of these bomb threats were in fact made by an Israeli Jew.) And just this week, Clemmons took advantage of a photo op by flying to Tel Aviv to step over the bodies of Palestinian children to be present at the opening of the new American embassy there, alongside Jared and Ivanka.

So I think that what we have here is not, except in an oblique way, an example of the impact of Jewish power on America – as Prof. Trachtenberg has pointed out, legislation like this is more likely to have the opposite effect in the long run. It is rather a case of white American politicians taking up the cause of Jewish “rights” in an attempt to virtue-signal to their Republican constituents – let’s face it, the Republican Party is still the vector for jingoistic pro-Zionism in America – and to potential pro-Semitic donors. Of course, we must be willing to question the influence of Jewish power on America, and the West as a whole, but at the same time, we have to recognize that we cannot deal with the problems we face by scapegoating Jews. Whatever role Jews have played in getting our society to the point it is at now, there are an even greater number of non-Jews who are more than willing to get with their program.

But the larger issue here is the continuing rise of neoliberal totalitarianism in America. The last year has seen an unprecedented rise in public outcry over “hate speech” in the United States, leading to the attempted suppression of some Right-wing forums that I don’t need to detail here. This, coupled with the recent study which found that forty percent of millennials are fine with limiting free speech that is offensive to minorities, is indicative of a worrying trend. Legislation that attempts to set Jews up on a pedestal is only part of the larger phenomenon targeting any speech or activities that question the multiculturalist, globalist paradigm, which views America as nothing more than the harbinger of the colorless, soulless world to come that is said to be inevitable, where we will become nothing but a Third World plantation. Indeed, in neoliberalism, nothing is true and everything is permitted – except, of course, to question the neoliberal paradigm itself. And it is quite obvious that, should legislation such as this “proviso” ever be enacted in a broader sense, sites like Counter-Currents, the Institute for Historical Review, and The Occidental Observer will quickly become history. And erased even from history, most likely.

Let’s hope that day never comes. But in the meantime, we will persevere.

Related

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

19 Comments

  1. Miha M
    Posted May 23, 2018 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    Poles have many great proverbs about Jews. One of them goes something like this: Once Jews start passing laws to protect them, their persecution isnt far away.

  2. jud jackson
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    Nice Article John. Can you define the difference between “NeoLiberal and NeoConservative”?

    • Lemur
      Posted May 19, 2018 at 5:45 am | Permalink

      They’re very similar ideologically – global democratization, social liberation, market economics. They tend to differ over method. Neo-liberals prefer to determine policy via consensus in an institutional context, whereas the neocon believes in unilateralism. Domestically, the neo-liberal is more willing to redistribute resources, while the neocon will elect ‘market based solutions.’ Both consider socialism and libertarianism and unworkable ideologies though. In America, neo-liberals used to be the junior partner in foreign policy, although with the increased aggressiveness of the Democrat elite we may be in a process of fusion.

      • nineofclubs
        Posted May 22, 2018 at 1:24 am | Permalink

        A good explanation I think. I’d add that both generally subscribe to neo-classical economic fundamentals. That said, there is some minor difference on the question of redistribution – as you describe.

        In an Australian context ‘politics as usual’ is a contest between globalist neo-liberals (Labor) and globalist neo-cons (the Liberal Party).

        To paraphrase an anarchist slogan from the 70’s;
        Whoever you vote for, LibLab wins.

        .

  3. Don Ate
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Great article. I’d like to see more in-depth coverage of the Jewish/Zionist organizations that pressure US politicians at all levels. Name the names. People think its just Soros or AIPAC or the ADL. In fact it’s literally hundreds if not thousands of well-funded organizations (local, national, international) acting behind the scenes as a coordinated network. Especially in campaign financing. One of the network’s recent big pushes has been laws criminalizing BDS. Need to bring this into the open. See “Big Israel” by Grant Smith.

  4. Tony B.
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 7:45 pm | Permalink

    Never trust a Mormon.

  5. Aiser
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    South Carolina is also the state that keeps re-electing Sen Ms Lindsey Graham. He is perhaps the biggest pro-Israel first politician in all of the senate and congress combined.

    Why is it that southern state have such a bad habit of electing southerners that care so much for Israel? Northern states don’t have elected officials with such strong pro-Israel ties, unless those elected officials are Jewish themselves.

    • Ewan Cummins
      Posted May 23, 2018 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

      In a word: heresy. The South has a disproportionate number of Evangelical Protestants, many of whom adhere to millenarian and Dispensationalist theological ideas.

  6. rhondda
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    https://thefreethoughtproject.com/israel-kills-dozens-civilians-state-passes-law-labeling-criticism-anti-semitic/

    Now this is interesting. I don’t know who these guys are, but I suspect liberals. However, perhaps the freedom of expression is a crossover issue between right and left. Numbers do matter.

  7. rhondda
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    https://thefreethoughtproject.com/israel-kills-dozens-civilians-state-passes-law-labeling-criticism-anti-semitic/

    Now here is one of those cross-over issues. I think these guy are liberals. However, the issue of freedom of expression and opinions does cross all political lines in the west. Perhaps only one issue, but it is a start. Just saying.

  8. A. Yell
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    “Some Counter-Currents readers might be quick to attribute this trend to Jewish influence. But while there are certainly Jewish advocacy groups who have celebrated South Carolina’s move, in surveying the news reports, it seems that there are just as many who oppose it.”

    Oh come on! You REALLY think that this isn’t the product of politically active Jewish plutocrats like George Soros? You think that these Fundamentalist Christian Neo-Cons AREN’T being rewarded for their work by wealthy members of the Tribe??? LOL! All this objecting on the part of people like Trachtenberg is just the usual Jewish Two-Step that they always engage in! The political shabbos goy Retardians are just there to provide EXTRA coverage. Please wise up.

    • Posted May 17, 2018 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

      If you look above, I did include this: “It is rather a case of white American politicians taking up the cause of Jewish “rights” in an attempt to virtue-signal to their Republican constituents – let’s face it, the Republican Party is still the vector for jingoistic pro-Zionism in America – and to potential pro-Semitic donors.”

      Of course I know that there are rewards for these politicians to follow the Zionist line. But I think it’s a mistake to believe that that is the ONLY reason why they do these things. I think most of them do it out of genuine conviction.

      • E. S.
        Posted May 17, 2018 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

        Agreed JM. I think the “Gawd, Guns’n’Mama” type Goy Republicans (particularly of the Southern variety) have been rationalizing their support for Israel from the beginning with “enemy-of-my-enemy” type thinking (re the Muslim Palestinians). At this point, and especially since 9/11, they truly believe it.

        • William Barnwell
          Posted May 17, 2018 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

          Born and raised in South Carolina, and have been around this mentality my entire life, including many in my own circle. Many southern conservatives see Israel in a conflict and struggle with those that are hostile to the United States, and see the Israeli/United States political alliance as necessary. Of course the Evangelicals see a Biblical imperative to support the Jewish people and the State of Israel, and there is a complete lack of understanding of the degree of anti-White Christian sentiment found within the Jewish cultural elite in this country. There is a great racial consciousness and awareness in regards to blacks, but the JQ is very difficult to approach down here.

          • Pietas
            Posted May 17, 2018 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

            True, but these ideologies have been constructed by long haul political and deep cultural maneuverings, such as with the Scofield bible, which has been analyzed at this site, I believe. These are small minded people who have been furnished a particular worldview. That wasn’t accident or coincidence.

          • Pietas
            Posted May 17, 2018 at 10:18 pm | Permalink

            A coincidence of political, cultural, and economic forces Greg Johnson would term “hegemony.”

  9. Posted May 17, 2018 at 11:12 am | Permalink

    As sad as this is, it is also very instructive. Israeli fanboyism has been a thing in the South for decades, whereas South’s attitude towards domestic problems was an aloof “we just wanna be left alone”. Well, that thing that you “just wanna” is the thing that your enemies are going to deny you first.

  10. Rob Bottom
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    Is this a to-do list? Reads like one to me!

    • Right_On
      Posted May 17, 2018 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

      Top comment! Really cracked me up . . .

      UK authorities use the same working definition of anti-Semitism in their guidance to police forces. What does “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews” even mean?

One Trackback

    Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    The World in Flames

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance