Print this post Print this post

Unbreakable

1,903 words

Unbreakable (2000) is many people’s least favorite M. Night Shyamalan film, but I think it is his best: brilliantly conceived and scripted, beautifully acted and filmed, and quite moving. Since the film is almost two decades old, I trust nobody will complain about spoilers.

Unbreakable is a superhero film, but it does not contain any computer animation, strobe-fast editing, or deafening crashes and booms. Instead, Unbreakable has the pacing and style of an art film. It is highly realistic, but in a glossy rather than gritty fashion. Shyamalan’s camera imbues mundane objects and scenes with a luster that blunts any desire to look beyond their surfaces. His goal — which is communicated even in his use of low camera angles — is to conjure up a world in which the fantastic and heroic exist only in the imagination.

As Elijah Price — Samuel L. Jackson in one of his most emotionally powerful roles — says, this is “a mediocre time.” “People are starting to lose hope. It’s hard for many to believe that extraordinary things live inside themselves as well as others.” The “surprise ending” of the film is the discovery that extraordinary possibilities really do exist in the comfortably superficial world Shyamalan’s camera has created.

Unbreakable may be a superhero film, but the key to its emotional power is that it is an allegory about the fate of everyman—literally every man, and manliness itself—in an overly feminized and bourgeois society that prizes the long and inglorious life over the riskier, more glorious path.

The hero of Unbreakable is David Dunn, played by Bruce Willis. Dunn is a bald, middle-aged, unassuming everyman. He works as a security guard, while his wife Audrey (Robin Gayle Wright) is a physical therapist. The Dunns have one child, their eleven-year-old son Joseph. Of course, “Dunn” has the connotation of dull, and Audrey’s maiden name “Inverso” is an omen of their relationship, since she is the dominant partner in the marriage. She has a profession, whereas David is blue-collar. David also defers to Audrey in all matters connected with their son, including discipline. Joseph wants to look up to his father and spend time with him doing man things, like playing football and working out, but Audrey thinks they are unsafe. Unsurprisingly, the Dunns are both unhappy in their marriage. They sleep in separate beds while they plan their separation and divorce.

Every morning, David Dunn awakens to a feeling of sadness. Later we learn why. In college, David Dunn was not a soft-spoken schlub. He was the star quarterback on his football team, winning games and adulation, perhaps in the very stadium where he is now merely a security guard. David and Audrey were dating in college, and they were in a terrible car accident. David quit playing football after the accident, claiming injury. But it turns out that was just an excuse. Although David had been thrown clear of the car, he was not injured at all, and he had the strength to save Audrey from the burning wreckage.

The real reason David quit playing was Audrey’s moral opposition to football. As an aspiring physical therapist, her purpose was to fix broken bodies, whereas football broke bodies in the pursuit of glory. Thus Audrey domesticated David, getting him to quit football. They both thought it would make them happy, but it didn’t. Domesticity is emasculating. Men can’t be happy without taking risks, and women aren’t really attracted to emasculated men. Modern bourgeois society programs couples to make marriages equal and risk free, even though that is not really what people want, and getting it doesn’t satisfy them.

At the beginning of the movie, David is returning home to Philadelphia from a job interview in New York. His train derails and is struck by a freight train. Everyone is killed except for David, who is not even scratched. After a memorial service for the victims, David finds a note on his windshield asking him if he has ever been ill. The card reads Limited Edition, the name of a comic book art gallery owned by Elijah Price.

Elijah is the only child of an unwed black mother in a Philadelphia slum. He was born with a rare genetic disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, which makes his bones highly brittle. Because of this he spent most of his life indoors, avoiding injury, when not actually in hospital beds. Elijah is highly “breakable.” The children in his neighborhood mocked him as “Mr. Glass.”

Elijah spent a great deal of his life reading comic books, and when he grew up, he turned his expertise into a business. Elijah is convinced that comics communicate truth in symbolic form. Specifically, he thinks that superheroes and supervillains may actually be real. Thus when he heard that David had survived the train crash “miraculously unharmed,” he reached out to him, thinking that he might be an extraordinary person, chosen for a special destiny.

Elijah’s quest is sustained by a metaphysical conviction: “If there is someone like me in the world, and I’m at one end of the spectrum . . . Couldn’t there be someone the opposite of me, at the other end?” Elijah is quite certain this is the case. This conviction is known as the “principle of plenitude,” which holds that all possibilities are actual, or will be actualized in the fullness of time. If Elijah is Mr. Glass, Mr. Breakable, doesn’t that mean there is a Mr. Unbreakable somewhere in the universe? If such a person exists, then Elijah wants to find him. If he does not know his own powers, Elijah wants to help him discover them.

Elijah has at least two motives for his search. First, he thinks the world is in need of heroes to free it from flatness and mediocrity and give it meaning. Second, Elijah believes that discovering his counterpart would give his own life meaning. It would allow him to make something good of his suffering and alienation.

This brings us to a second classical philosophical principle: the actualization of potentiality. For humans, becoming who we really are is the path to well-being or happiness. Each human being has an ideal self, which needs to be actualized. If we actualize ourselves, we feel happy. If we fail to actualize ourselves, we suffer. But whether we flourish or fail, we are the same persons in either case.

David Dunn is unhappy, because he has failed to actualize himself. He fails because he does not know himself, and he does not know himself because his wife convinced him not to test his limits. Unbreakable is a moving film, because self-discovery and self-actualization are necessary for the well-being of every one of us. David, urged on by Elijah and his son Joseph, discovers that he has extraordinary powers: he can intuit crimes by touching people. He is enormously strong. And he is almost invulnerable. Water is his only weakness. It is his kryptonite.

As David begins to understand and actualize his powers, he shakes off the sadness that has haunted his life and ruined his family. He bonds with his son but also feels comfortable disciplining him authoritatively. After his first major rescue, when he saves two children from a home invader who has killed their parents, he carries his wife upstairs to his bed. It is a primal, paleo-masculine gesture, and Audrey loves it. The next morning, the family is united around the breakfast table, and Audrey is cooking for them.

Unbreakable does not merely celebrate paleomasculinity but also specifically white athleticism—contrasted with black fragility. In one scene, we are introduced to a Temple University cornerback who is mentioned early on as being destined to go professional. Every other director would cast a black. But instead, Shyamalan casts a magnificent blond, idolized by white schoolboys who leap up to hang off his flexed biceps. Shyamalan handles it without a touch of irony.

David goes to visit Elijah and tells him what has happened. Elijah asks him if the sadness is still there, and David answers “No.” Then Elijah says, “I think this is where we shake hands.” When David takes Elijah’s hand, he intuits what Elijah has done. Elijah has caused an airplane to crash, burned down a hotel, and derailed David’s train, killing hundreds of people in the process—all in search of a man who could survive miraculously unharmed. Elijah always wondered why he suffered. What his place and purpose were in this world. Finding David gave him an answer. It gives new depth to one of the Joker’s lines to Batman in The Dark Knight: “You complete me.” It is terrifying but logical. Surprising but necessary. For if David is Elijah’s opposite, that makes Elijah a supervillain. If Elijah’s body was so breakable, then of course his mind and character were breakable as well.

But the kids knew it all along. They called him Mr. Glass.

It is an unforgettable scene, brilliantly played by Jackson, whose powerfully expressive voice makes him compelling despite his grotesque appearance and evil deeds. David Dunn walks out of the store, and a caption informs us that he led police to evidence of three acts of terrorism, for which Elijah Price was confined to an institution for the criminally insane.

I loved this ending. You realize with a start that you have just been drawn into a classic “origin story.” But because of Shyamalan’s art-film style, it sneaks up on you. Once you get to the end, of course, you realize there were signs all around you. For instance, Elijah dresses in a quasi-Empire style, carries a cane made of glass, drives a vintage car whose interior is padded with black foam eggs, and runs a high-end art gallery. Aside from black, his colors are purples and dark blues. In his wheelchair, he looks like a cross between Stephen Hawking and Prince. But I never thought Elijah was actually a comic book supervillain. I just thought that he had spent a bit too much time reading about them. James Newton Howard’s understated Holst-like score also intimates genuine heroism and magic without going full Star Wars.

The end of Unbreakable of course sets you up for a sequel. You want a sequel, because Elijah Price is a psychologically interesting villain. He is obviously not maliciously or sadistically evil. He does not kill because he thinks it is bad. He kills because he believes it is good, that it is necessary to find his counterpart. And once he finds him, helps him discover who he is, and sets him on the path to heroism, he feels it is time to confess his crimes. For the sole purpose of Elijah’s supervillainy is to be the midwife to the birth of a superhero, a hero who will eventually save far more people than were sacrificed to bring about his birth.

One wonders what would happen to such a generous but twisted soul if left to stew long enough in the inevitable bitterness of being confined to the equivalent of Arkham Asylum while David Dunn is out saving people.

But I was certain that Unbreakable was just a one-off stunt, and even if Shymalan had considered a sequel, he would have been deterred by the film’s generally unfavorable reception. Much to my delight, however, as I searched for an online version of the Unbreakable script, I learned that in 2019, Shyamalan, Willis, and Jackson will return to the big screen with Glass.

Related

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

14 Comments

  1. Maximus
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    When I read fantastic texts like this I am proud to be a radical alt-right man.

  2. Bryan C. Sawyer
    Posted May 17, 2018 at 5:09 am | Permalink

    THERE IS A SEQUEL TO UNBREAKABLE.

    It’s called Split (2016) with James McAvoy.

    Though the film isn’t promoted as a sequel, it also stands alone as a great movie, but one learns at the end of the film that it’s essentially an origins story for what will later be a villain in the story line M. Night is creating.

  3. Gnome Chompsky
    Posted May 16, 2018 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    I loved it. Tone so quiet, both Willis (a little) and Jackson (a lot) are not playing their typical types of roles.

    Thanks to the several commenters mentioning Split. I missed it, or maybe it wasn’t on screens here.

    Cannot help but wonder if the continuation after such a long time is mainly a response to the execrable rash of Marvel movies.

    Was tempted by iron Man I, for Downey”s acting, saw most on TV, not much good. Last one at the cinema was Christian Bale’s Batman, not great, not bad, and not Disney Marvel.

    I will digress here, with a commenj on a review of American History X (I know the review here was by Spencer Quinn, not Trevor Lynch, both very good reviewers IMHO), but I read the former today.

    At the time, I had a cult religionist friend who was in the process of approaching marriage to a much older (also than me) black Amerian man. They both loved it, and recommended it to me.

    Two points not raised in Spencer’s review:the Svengali of the skinheads is clearly intended as a parody of Wliliam Pierce,

    When the movie ended, it was completely illogical.
    To suffer sn much but lamely give up? I t is nonsensical.

  4. Peter Quint
    Posted May 15, 2018 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Watch “Mom And Dad” (2017) staring Nicolas Cage, and Selma Blair if you want to see some interesting observations on contemporary society.

  5. Nestor
    Posted May 14, 2018 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    Just watched it tonight. Excellent film. Would never have viewed it without seeing it favourably appraised here. Thank you.

    You’re just about the only film reviewer whose opinions I trust. I wish that there might be a whole school of film/art/museum-exhibition/theater/book/etc. criticism from a pro-white perspective. Your own movie reviews are the template, or at least the example, of how such a thing should be done.

  6. Pietas
    Posted May 14, 2018 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    Concur. Best Shyamalan movie by far. Great and insightful review. Split is not as good, but in the same mold. This movie got me hooked on Kanye West.

  7. Dr. Krieger
    Posted May 14, 2018 at 7:07 am | Permalink

    Apparantely the Shyamalan film “Split” is actually a sequel to “Unbreakable”. “Glass” will be the third in a trilogy. In “Glass”, Dunn will be chasing the guy with 23 personalities from “Split” (James McAvoy).
    Now, I gotta see “Split” too

  8. Posted May 14, 2018 at 6:39 am | Permalink

    In Shyamalan’s “Split,” Willis’s David Dunn makes a cameo appearance at the very end, during the closing credit sequence.

  9. Lemur
    Posted May 14, 2018 at 2:56 am | Permalink

    “Trevor”, there is already a sequel of sorts out by Shyamalan – Split (2016). It’s another philosophically rich film doubling as an origin story that occupies the same universe as Unbreakable. Dunn makes a cameo at the end. Well worth a watch.

    Do you think Shyamalan’s outsider status to the mainstream of white American influences his film making? If it does, it doesn’t result in the cynicism of the Jewish relationship to their hosts. I pick up on a slightly observational tone in Shyamalan movies. He’s the interested spectator rather than the passive-aggressive ‘other.’

    • Posted May 14, 2018 at 10:40 am | Permalink
      • Gnome Chompsky
        Posted May 19, 2018 at 8:33 am | Permalink

        I read it, thanks, did not see it at the time, (gave up after the alien invasion one with Mel Gibson, forget the title). Did not much like that, mainly because of the screenplay, also Gibson playing much the same type of character as in Conspiracy Theory, but it was not working in that Shalyamar film, also the Night of the Living Dead references, too heavy-handed.

        Did not hate it, and the quiet tone was good, but it didn’t really work as a whole.

    • Pietas
      Posted May 14, 2018 at 10:44 am | Permalink

      I think Shyamalan is on our side, even if he is Indian. Notice how he cast Adrian Brody(of mixed ancestry, but phenotypically very Jewish) as the bizarre villain in the Village, another philosophically deep movie. I interpret this as a retaliation for the habit of Hollywood directors of casting young blond white males as villains in movies. Something there about scarecrows and hoaxes, I just can’t put my finger on it. John Morgan I bet could lend some insight here!

      • Posted May 14, 2018 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

        He isn’t really a villain… more of a psycho autist. His own “fall” is– in its way– the central tragedy of the film.

      • Lemur
        Posted May 14, 2018 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

        You both make interesting points. The village was an excellent movie, with masterful use of colour and score to conjure an atmosphere drama.

        I interpreted it as a pastoral meditation on the American soul. Both a Puritan (the stiff traditional mores) and Transcendentalist discourse (the return to nature) are thematically present. It’s hard to imagine a more uniquely American religious dyad.

    Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    The World in Flames

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance