Print this post Print this post

Some Indecorous Thoughts on the Impending Demise of Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Justice Ginsburg at Justice Kavanaugh’s swearing in.

1,886 words

I had a talk recently about current events with a cuckservative friend of mine. He’s a Trump supporter, but not a particularly enthusiastic one. He recognizes that these days, all the good sense is found on the Right and all the crazy on the Left. But at heart, he’s a libertarian, and quickly gets prickly whenever I bring up race. So, usually, I don’t.

When the topic of Jewish Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s recent fall, in which she fractured three ribs, came up, I made the offhand comment that I wished the old bird would die already. “Retire,” he corrected me. “I would prefer she retire. It’s never right to wish death upon anyone.”

(Yeah, he’s a fairly serious Christian as well.)

As I felt the gears in my mind furiously cranking out all the reasons why I would prefer ol’ Ruthie McGinsbucket to just go ahead and kick it, I realized that I couldn’t share any of them with him. These are warlike thoughts, and my friend, bless his heart, doesn’t realize yet that we are at war.

My most powerful argument comes from a chapter in Jared Taylor’s splendid essay collection If We Do Nothing, which I reviewed for Counter-Currents nearly a year ago. In “Brown v. Board: The Real Story,” Taylor recounts how the illegal scheming of two Jews played a major part in the fateful 1953 Brown v. Board of Education decision which ended the era of racial segregation in public schools and began the era of activist courts. The Jews were Justice Felix Frankfurter and his former clerk, Philip Elman, who was working in the Justice Department at the time. Of course, Taylor is too gentlemanly to bring up the Jewishness of these two villains (let alone draw any counter-Semitic conclusions), but since what they did was not terribly gentlemanly, I don’t think they deserve the benefit of anyone’s restraint. They certainly aren’t going to get mine.

As Taylor describes it:

In June 1953, the Court put Brown back on the docket and invited the new administration to file a brief. Eisenhower’s people wanted to stay out of the controversy entirely, but unbeknownst to them an agent for Felix Frankfurter was working at a high level in the Justice Department. Philip Elman had clerked for Frankfurter, and was in constant contact with his own boss about Brown. He told the Solicitor General that a Supreme Court invitation to comment on a case was like a command performance, and he offered to handle the case.

Elman and Frankfurter both knew that back-channel communications was wrong. A party to a case is never permitted to have secret discussions with a judge who will decide a case. In a long 1987 article in the Harvard Law Review, in which he described in detail the collusion that went into the Brown ruling, Elman conceded that what he did “probably went beyond the pale” but, he added, “I considered it a cause that transcended ordinary notions about propriety in a litigation.” He wrote that he and Frankfurter kept an appropriate professional distance on all other cases, but made an exception for Brown. To them, ending school segregation was so important it justified unscrupulous maneuvering.

Prior to this, Frankfurter had also instructed his clerk Alexander Bickel (another Jew) to “ransack the history of the [Fourteenth] Amendment in the hope of finding something that would justify striking down segregation,” according to Taylor. Frankfurter had done this without telling the other judges, which vindicates Taylor’s “unscrupulous maneuvering” charge and supports his claim that Frankfurter was “desperate to end segregation.”

Clearly, these three were living down to the anti-Semitic stereotype of the scheming, disloyal Jew, and doing so at an important time in history. To quote Counter-Currents editor Michael Polignano in his essay “The Browning of America” (found in his excellent Taking Our Own Side), “[U]nless Brown and its legacy are swept away, some Chinese historian of the next century will write that Brown was the beginning of the end of the United States as a whole.” I agree with this assessment. After Brown, there were fewer and fewer legal obstacles towards the mongrelization of the white race and its civilization. There were good reasons for segregation and similar Jim Crow laws in America. They preserved the nation’s founding stock as well as the great civilization it inherited and towards which it contributed. They also helped to keep the peace, given the criminal nature of many blacks. Inherent to these laws was a confidence in the greatness of the people who created them. Blacks and other non-whites were lucky to live in proximity to white people, even in subservience, since whites treated them better than their own people did. Until Brown v. Board of Education, this was common knowledge across the white world and beyond. After Brown, things got complicated, and clearly became worse for whites in America.

But it isn’t this so much that makes me yearn for Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s un-mortal coiling. It was Taylor’s following paragraph (my emphasis):

In September 1953, something happened that completely changed the complexion of the Court: Chief Justice Frederick Vinson, a strong opponent of judicial activism, suddenly died. As Elman reports in his 1987 article, Frankfurter met him soon after in high spirits. “I’m in mourning,” he said with a huge grin. “Phil, this is the first solid piece of evidence I’ve ever had that there really is a God.” Elman writes that “God takes care of drunks, little children, and the American people” and showed His concern for America “by taking Fred Vinson when He did.”

Any self-identifying white should be offended by this. Further, knowing now that just a tiny bit of anti-Semitism in 1953 (by, say, keeping Jews off the Supreme Court) could have spared us the abomination of Brown v. Board of Education is a painful lesson, indeed. In keeping with this lesson, however, it’s only fair to ask in 2018 if it would be appropriate to show the soon-to-be-expired Ruth Bader Ginsburg the same respect that distinguished Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter showed Justice Vinson. If Frankfurter had actually celebrated the man’s death and used it to rhetorically affirm his faith in a benevolent God while slipping a knife between the ribs of white America, then by all means, Ruthie, cash in your chips and buy the farm. Bite the big one. Pop your clogs. Turn up your toes. Put on that old six-by-two pinewood overcoat, baby, and buy a ticket on that last great train to glory.

Of course, there is no reason why we can’t be civil about this. I am not calling for foul play or criminal activity. I simply hope she dies peacefully and from natural causes in her sleep, surrounded by her loved ones. I hope she gets to say goodbye to each and every one of them and squeeze the little ones on the cheeks before her soul ascends to heaven on the wings of countless harp-playing angels in beatific epiphany, and takes her rightful spot at the left hand of God. I’m sure it will be a beautiful funeral.

Where the Notorious RBG would prefer such a scenario play out after Donald Trump leaves the White House, I, on the other hand, would prefer it happen tomorrow. Just a minor timing difference. Nothing more.

Seriously, even a cursory look at this woman’s history on the Supreme Court will reveal that she has opposed every single case that would have benefited whites as the major American demographic. It’s almost as if she has the same opinion towards white people that Frankfurter had. In 2003, she concurred with the Court’s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger which upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s anti-white discrimination policies. In 1996, she authored the Court’s opinion in United States v. Virginia, which ended the Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admissions policy, claiming it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment – the same Equal Protection Clause that she made sure no longer protects whites from affirmative action. That she was eroding the armed forces of a traditionally white nation by adding women to their ranks was an added bonus, I’m sure.

In Shelby Country v. Holder in 2013, she dissented from the decision to strike down the constitutionality of a section in the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Thanks to that, states with a history of racial discrimination in voting no longer have to obtain clearance from the federal government before changing their voting laws. This decision led to some states “implementing voter identification laws and becoming more aggressive in expunging ineligible voters from registration rolls,” according to Infogalactic. This is an important measure in keeping illegal immigrants from voting as well as in rooting out corruption, and Ginsburg opposed it. Basically, she wants to make it harder for states to prevent illegals from voting and easier for black corrupto-crats like Brenda Snipes of Broward County, Florida to allow felons to vote. Of course, these are two demographics which overwhelmingly vote Democrat and against the racial interests of whites.

Then there’s abortion. This vile creature has done everything in her power to make it as easy as possible for white girls and women to kill their fetuses under any pretext. Again, from Infogalactic:

She discussed her views on abortion rights and sexual equality in a 2009 New York Times interview, in which she said regarding abortion that “[t]he basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman.” Although Ginsburg has consistently supported abortion rights and joined in the Court’s opinion striking down Nebraska’s partial-birth abortion law in Stenberg v. Carhart 530 U.S. 914 (2000), on the fortieth anniversary of the Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113 (1973), she criticized the decision as terminating a nascent democratic movement to liberalize abortion laws which might have built a more durable consensus in support of abortion rights.

Ginsburg was in the minority for Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), a 5-4 decision upholding restrictions on partial birth abortion. In her dissent, Ginsburg opposed the majority’s decision to defer to legislative findings that the procedure was not safe for women. Ginsburg focused her ire on the way Congress reached its findings and with the veracity of the findings. Joining the majority for Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. (2016), a case which struck down parts of a 2013 Texas law regulating abortion providers, Ginsburg also authored a short concurring opinion which was even more critical of the legislation at issue. Writing for herself alone, Ginsburg asserted the legislation was not aimed at protecting women’s health, as Texas had claimed, rather Ginsburg asserted the law was meant to impede women’s access to abortions.

Yes, Ruth Bader Ginsburg doesn’t vote any differently than Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sottomayor. But these three aren’t eighty-five years old and breaking ribs while falling. These people aren’t at death’s door the way Ginsburg is. Is it really wrong to actively wish for her death when Felix Frankfurter all but danced on the grave of Fred Vinson? Is it wrong to peg both her and Frankfurter as Liberal Diaspora Jews when these two have dedicated their careers to thwarting the interests of whites? In 1953, Justice Felix Frankfurter exhibited a warlike attitude towards whites when he did what he could end segregation. Can anyone blame whites today for having a similar attitude towards his successor in Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

Spencer J. Quinn is a frequent contributor to Counter-Currents and the author of the novel White Like You.

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

13 Comments

  1. Hamilton
    Posted November 20, 2018 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Here is my prediction: RBG will be kept alive until months before the 2020 election, she will then resign, the Republicans having established the principle that a Supreme cannot be nominated and confirmed before a Presidential election the Dems will run both their Presidental and Senate campaigns on this issue alone, it may be a very tough election no matter how unhinged their nominees may be.

  2. sterplaz
    Posted November 15, 2018 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    1. Who in hell elected RBG to decide what gov’t can/cannot do? Once upon a time those words of hers would have had her hurled off that court. Today, after relentless ((( brainwashing ))) most people think what she said beatifies her.

    2. I think Breyer is in his 80s (looks like it) as well. I would like to see Kagan and “wise latina woman with the richness of her experiences” suffer some calamity, natural or not. Let RBG and Breyer succumb to old age. And hope Kagan/sotomayor do this in the next two years while Trump and a Republican Senate are still around.

  3. PekkaL.
    Posted November 15, 2018 at 4:43 am | Permalink

    The enemy gives us two choices.

    We can voluntarily change our societies to non-white countries. If we submit, we are allowed to live.

    Or we resist and then they will start (again) A Revolution. This is being prepared in any case, just to be sure. They talk about “polarization” as if it was bad. Yeah, sure, that’s what the write in their “media”. Well, they want maximum polarization, because that will draw the lines of an oppressor and oppressed. They certainly do not wish a society, where different ethnic groups live happily segregated. No Sir, they want oppression, conflict, hate.

    That is what this Enemy did all of the end of 1800’s in Russia. They prepared the ground for massacre. And that is what these people want. Or, of course, we are allowed to make a multicultural suicide.

    I tell You, my friends. With this Enemy, there is no other solution than fighting them. No prisoners taken. You can talk, you can write, you can, yes, you are allowed. But in the end, You need boots on the ground. People, who resist, if needed, until death.

  4. Gnome Chompsky
    Posted November 14, 2018 at 7:46 am | Permalink

    Ginsburg, as a younger but equally ‘beautiful’ and hook-nosed member of the ‘judiciary’, was part of the moves to pornify your nation.

    As for broken ribs, had more than a few (total about twelve to date, but that is counting breaking the same ones twice), one right now (bicycle accident), pretty sure, from Sunday, but I will see how it goes until Fri. morn.

    As for RBG, it is comical. My only reaction is LOL.

  5. Rob Bottom
    Posted November 13, 2018 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    “[U]nless Brown and its legacy are swept away, some Chinese historian of the next century will write that Brown was the beginning of the end of the United States as a whole.”

    How did the Brown decision affect other Western nations? I must admit I don’t know, but it seems as though integration came part and parcel with the sweeping changes to immigration laws across the whole Western world in the mid to late ’60s in the wake of Hart Cellar. I could be wrong, but aside from South Africa, the Brown decision appears to have not only ended segregation in America – it squashed any possibility of it across Europe! If that’s the case, the above quote doesn’t capture the true scope of the matter.

  6. Lance
    Posted November 13, 2018 at 12:26 pm | Permalink

    Whites get abortions at a rate lower than Hispanics and blacks. If her motive in these decisions was to hurt white people, wouldn’t it make more sense for her to want abortion banned to increase the reproductive rates of minorities?

    • Posted November 14, 2018 at 6:17 am | Permalink

      Good point… her evil mindset (and that of others of her ilk) isn’t so much about race-hatred as it is about wanting to encourage the injury, murder, and/or corruption of the innocent.

      • Niko
        Posted November 14, 2018 at 7:25 am | Permalink

        Oh, but she is certainly also an anti-white race hater.

    • Hollywicker Man
      Posted November 14, 2018 at 10:10 am | Permalink

      RBG is the Fairy G-dmother of making Abortion synonymous with Women’s Rights, in the hearts and minds of young white women. It’s not simply a matter of more white babies being aborted. Millions of white women become radicalized against “the patriarchy” by this meta-subject, it’s their gateway toward joining feminist/socialist movements, thus replenishing the Jewish army of useful idiots, while delaying and demonizing marriage. On a darker level, we now have Abortion parades, Abortion comedy at official events. Jewish “celebs” like Lena Dunham mainstream Abortion into a teary-eyed, group hug cosmo rite of passage for white girls. The coarsening of American culture c/o death in a pink velveteen jumper.

      I too hope RBG does a fatal Slinky down the Exorcist steps, but not until early 2019. Her Hollywood biopic is being released at…Christmas. Her death would subversively scrooge up the entire season.

  7. Benjamin
    Posted November 13, 2018 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    As to the abortion issue: it’s far from clear cut or easy to take a stance on.

    For one, although abortion does leave a bad taste I my mouth, it doesn’t follow that it should ergo be illegal.

    As a single guy, if I had the choice between going out with a woman who had a son by another man, even a White one, and one who had an abortion, I’d prefer the latter and rank her more highly in terms of partner status. Sounds messed up, but I’m just being honest, and I’m pretty sure that like 90% of guys, if they were chilling out with their friends knocking back a few beers would say the same.

    Second, while White women do have abortions, legalized abortion for all results in a net decrease in non-White births and helps preserve the ethnic homogeneity of America for a longer period of time.

    Instead of debating abortion and getting all worked up over something that will never be overturned over the status quo, we should instead focus on root causes. It’s a fake hot button moralist issue, like weed legalization that ultimately doesn’t matter.

    To paraphrase Henry Throeau: instead of hacking away st the branches of evil, we should be striking at the root.

    Instead of pro-choice vs pro-life, we should be focusing on the social reasons why so many women give birth out of wedlock or in poor economic circumstances in the first place and work to clean up the culture, reinstate monogamy & early marriage, etc.

    Even with abortion on demand, under a country with that kind of culture, rates of abortion would be decreased by like 90%.

    At any rate, I agree with OP’s general thesis. These people are at war with us, so RBG won’t be getting of social signaling crocodile tears from me. Good riddance.

    • Franz
      Posted November 14, 2018 at 1:35 am | Permalink

      Benjamin —

      Good job here:

      “… we should be focusing on the social reasons why so many women give birth out of wedlock or in poor economic circumstances in the first place …”

      Fine to see ANYONE not drinking that rank old Kool-Aid,

      Fact is, baby boomer girls were keeping birthrates low quietly and on their own, and for good reason: If you spent half your childhood standing in long lines, why set new white kids up for more of the same? Not possible to say what percentage of that non-childbearing involved abortion. My guess is not much; the moralizers way overplayed their hand.

      Conservatives of the Christian variety wasted 20 precious years protesting abortion, while ignoring the outsourcing and the out-of-control border. To some degree they were very probably set up.

      When the childbirth issue came up, it was the doing of one Benjamin Israel Wattenberg, who in his book The Birth Dearth told us all the economy would fall if we continued being frugal with lives, as Europeans have always been. You don’t need me to tell you Ben was also an enthusiastic open-border advocate. And also… never mind. Ben’s dead, happy to say.

      It went together for years, apparently, back then. How many Evangelicals were delighted when Mexicans arrived to fill the pews emptied by downsized whites?

      A social history of the last fifty years will be miles away from the doggerel caricature found on the MSM and believed by millions. But then it’s always the whiners who write history, as we all know.

  8. 21st Century WN
    Posted November 13, 2018 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    ” If our buildings, our highways, our railroads should be wrecked we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who could redeem our power. But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for the future would be forever gone .” – United States Senator Theodore G. Bilbo 1947

    • Gordo
      Posted November 14, 2018 at 9:31 am | Permalink

      ” If our buildings, our highways, our railroads should be wrecked we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who could redeem our power. But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for the future would be forever gone .” – United States Senator Theodore G. Bilbo 1947

      Thank you for finding that quote, I’ve been looking. So very true and one reason they hated Bilbo so much.

    Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    The World in Flames

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance