Print this post Print this post

If You Build It, They Will Come:
On the Importance of Political Infrastructure

1,867 words

Show of hands, who here remembers the groypers? Who remembers the Groyper War? Who remembers the plague of frogs which descended upon Conservative Inc.? Who remembers Counter-Currents’ blow-by-blow coverage of the events? Who remembers the incisive analysis, the reports from the trenches, and even the humorous retrospective? Many of you, I suspect, have tales of valor from that erstwhile conflict. In an otherwise bleak and disheartening time, the groypers brought the joy of victory to the Dissident Right, and real victory at that, rather than Trumpian #winning.

Well, I was as euphoric as anyone when the famed takeover of UCLA sent shockwaves through the internet, but this past month has seen me dragged kicking and screaming to dreary, depressing reality. Witness here, the state of the world:

50.6K likes, 10.7K retweets as of February 12th. Nothing but butt-kissing MAGApedes and frothing-at-the-mouth Leftoids in the responses, with the exception of a single voice in the wilderness doubting whether Chuckie Boy is really America First.

Did the naysayers not warn me and other groypers that they’d achieved nothing, that the donor class is still with Charlie Kirk, that Donald Trump was still with Charlie Kirk, that TPUSA was fundraising with (heavily edited) clips of themselves apparently BTFO’ing the groypers. Didn’t Nick Fuentes flush his credibility down the toilet with his laughably bad take on the Soleimani assassination? Could the groypers have actually lost by winning, as I described in my article linked above?

I made a mental note of writing up a retrospective on the Groyper War at some point in the future. Truth be told, my instinct was to start writing immediately, but I decided to at least wait and see the outcome of the America First Political Action Conference organized by Fuentes and others in order to build on what was accomplished in the Groyper War. Wait and see is a good heuristic for these things.

But then I saw Fenek Solère’s excellent reportage on the position of Matteo Salvini in Italy. Of note is the mention of the The Brothers of Italy, led by Giorgia Meloni, as potential allies for Salvini who could guide him to a more sophisticated nationalist position. What is very interesting to me as an outside observer of Italian politics is that there is very little mention of Lega (or Lega Nord as it was known back in the day), but that national populism in Italy is all Salvini all the time. One wonders if there is a party infrastructure in place behind the man.

Indeed, in the comments, I drew an analogy to the bus factor, a measure ostensibly of risk (but actually of fragility) initially employed in software development which calculates how many people have to be hit by a bus before a project is stalled out or completely ruined. Modern corporate projects usually have ridiculously low bus factors due to their focus on efficiency. Efficiency is the elimination of redundancies, which means that usually no more than one person knows how to perform a specific step in the process. Most corporations are one second of inattention away from pandemonium.

If Italian populism is Salvini and nothing but Salvini, then the elite is one assassination, character assassination or kangaroo trial away from victory. Indeed, option 3 is in full swing as the Italian Senate has stripped Salvini of his immunity, opening him up to prosecution on trumped-up charges of kidnapping for “illegally detaining migrants at sea” during his tenure as Minister for Internal Affairs of Italy. There’s a big ole bus barreling towards Don Matteo and organized Italian populism currently has a bus factor of one. That’s bad.

But even if Salvini were to get hit by a bus, Lega would go on. Lega will probably not be as great a force without Salvini and from what I can tell, the party’s secessionist wing is currently holding its peace only due to Salvini’s charisma and the direness of the situation. Without Don Matteo, I expect Lega to retreat to the north — to their beloved Padania, as they’re fond of calling it — and function as a strong regional party, thumbing its nose at Rome.

Let’s turn our attention to America. Much like in Italy, American national populism is very much Donald Trump, and precious little outside of Donald Trump. Unlike in Italy, there’s not even a Lega to fall back on — only the GOP (hawk ptooey). No reliable second-in-command, no institutions backing the national populist agenda, just the man himself, embattled and unable to push through even the smallest of agenda items, a prisoner in the White House, reduced to #winning on buttsex in Botswana and dishwasher deregulation. But as long as he’s in the Oval Office, there is a vector and an avatar for the national populist movement in Washington, shining a beacon of light in the beady eyes of globohomo.

If Trump were hit by a bus, it’d be the end of the organized National Populist movement in America and in all probability, a start of an age of genuine darkness on the North American continent. Like Salvini, he’s been put through the wringer of impeachment and a Senate trial on trumped-up charges, acquitted on partisan lines by the Republican-controlled Senate (I shudder to think what he gave to Mitch McConnel in exchange). His victory in 2020 is not a foregone conclusion, as the demographic situation strongly favors the Democrats. And even with all that being said, he’s a 74-year-old overweight man under unthinkable amounts of stress. So, who steps up after Trump? Who steps up after Salvini?

In my comment on Fenek’s article, I complained that Trump isn’t building any infrastructure that will sustain him and his government. He’s not even taking the most rudimentary of action to stop his supporters, disorganized that they are, from getting banned on social media. Later in the day, it came to me that Trump is, in all probability, too busy with the actual business of government in order to build institutions. This task is usually left to political allies of the President. The ideal man for such activities in the USA would have been Roger Stone, but we know what became of him, and all Trump can do is tweet about it. The guy with the actual infrastructure is Charlie Kirk — so Trump retweets, endorses, and sends Donald Jr. to shore up Charlie Kirk. This support of Charlie Kirk, who serves masters with an agenda inimical to national populism feels like betrayal to nationalists and genuine populists.

And here we come to the groypers and Nick Fuentes and the America First Political Action Conference.

Nick Fuentes, of course, soiled his pants something fierce in the aftermath of the Soleimani assassination, criticizing people who opposed the proposition to bomb Iranian cultural sites in a Telegram rant. Having listened to Fuentes for a longer time than most, I can confirm that it is entirely on-brand for him to do so. Indeed, I do not necessarily disagree with him that destroying the cultural sites of an enemy nation is a bad thing in wartime. I was going to write a piece for Counter-Currents in his defense, but I was talked out of it by a friend who suggested that Fuentes would be better served by learning to live with the consequences of his words.

All that being said, AFPAC is the right thing to do. It is the kind of organization that serves as an incubator for cadre. For too long, our side has been neglecting the importance of cultivating political personnel. The Z Man of the Z blog in particular has paid attention to the reasons why the Buckley right and later Conservative Inc. have failed to develop cadre — they relied on the (correct) assumption that a majority of Americans already quietly support them and all they need to do is rally them for political clout.

Indeed that was the case, but the majority of Americans found themselves unable to think, strategize or create a framework for developing and promoting ideas — this required the cultivation of political cadre which the right simply did not do, preferring instead to drum out conservative intellectuals like Pat Buchanan and Sam Francis who dared question the orthodoxy.

This means that there is no talent pool from which a Rightist, national populist President, or even senator, congressman, or governor can draw staff; and so he is forced to rely on swamp creatures. Furthermore, if there’s nobody to act as staffers for National Populist politicians, there’s no apprenticeship and no next generation of National Populist politicians, which means dangerously low bus factors.

This is not helped by the neurotype that is likely to become a National Populist politician, which seems to include some measure of egomania. At this late stage, I wonder if Donald Trump endorsed Carter Strange in the 2017 Alabama GOP primaries for the US senate out of a fear that a victorious Roy Moore would present a serious challenge from the Right. Judge Moore’s nationalist credentials are definitely stronger, especially in light of the Trump administration’s lackluster successes. The comparable dynamic would be that between FDR and Huey Long — who I believe was the only man who could realistically challenge the FDR machine. A pity for America and pure serendipity for FDR that Long was assassinated.

Insofar as this problem can be solved, infrastructure for organizing, directing, and above all cultivating political talent must be developed. It cannot follow the patterns of the conservative movement, as they’re all wrong and they’re built to appeal to and amplify the normie conservative neurotype (vastly different from Dissident Rightists). If old hands like Michelle Malkin are willing to help, then by all means, they’re welcome, insofar as they realize that their time has come and gone and they are now merely greybeards guiding, but not directing, the young guns. And Nick Fuentes seems poised to build something of worth.

Tellingly, his conference has a higher bus factor than you’d expect. If Nick Fuentes were hit by a bus, or liquidated by the deep state, or mauled by a catboy, the AFPAC would just keep trucking along under the guidance of Patrick Casey and other groyper generals. It’s supposed to be a meeting of the minds for groypers, but also a strategy session, a networking opportunity, and a way of sharing know-how in political organization. Recall that during the Groyper Wars, the entire leadership of TPUSA’s University of Kansas chapter defected to the groypers. Kansas was the biggest TPUSA chapter and the leadership had built it from scratch — that’s skill that’s now transferable to the groypers.

If National Populist politicians want to not only survive, but also push through their agenda, they will need cadre to do it. In the absence of National Populists and dissidents to staff their administrations and generate ideas for them, they will default to cuckservatives, libertarians, and other slave-morality Rightists in order to do so. This will make their already precarious positions weaker. Next time we complain about Trump having forgotten his base, it’s important to understand that he needs a National Populist political infrastructure in order to govern effectively. No such thing exists right now in the US. But if you build it, they will come.

9 Comments

  1. HamburgerToday
    Posted February 13, 2020 at 6:47 am | Permalink

    Nice overview. Good analysis. Campus organizations are normally ‘feeders’ into a post-college national organization. Organizations, however, need money to keep working on whatever they’re working on. The Groyper phenomenon is very much like Fusionism in that the only thing that seems to bind the Groypers together is a rejection of Conservative Inc and it’s failed policies. As for the ‘bus effect’, the simple fact is that most insurgent political and cultural movements are galvanized by a charismatic figure. The wise leaders cultivate organization and talent to expand their reach and assure durability/continuity of the movement over time. Fuentes, Casey, etc appear to be trying to address this problem of insurgent movements. I wish them the best of luck.

  2. Drakonides
    Posted February 13, 2020 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    I never caught Trump fever unlike so many of my countrymen. If Zionist stooge Trump is holding together the American true right then these are dark times indeed. We need strong, honorable nationalists running for office. By the way, an Iranian imperium in the middle east would bring a civilizing influence to that region and would certainly be preferable to the Sunni ay-rab barbaroi currently being supported by the israelis. You dare support the destruction of sacred historical sites? Explain yourself

    • d. deacon
      Posted February 23, 2020 at 3:55 am | Permalink

      Iran is also barbaroi, just to a lesser degree. Only a fraction are “Aryan”.
      It wouldn’t matter if push came to shove, in an apocalyptic scenario precisely, to destroy sacred sites. And World War 3 didn’t happen after killing Soleimani. There are more troops guarding the useless stalemate over in that area, which is a pity, but at least not the war the Zionists wanted.

  3. Bartolo
    Posted February 13, 2020 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    True, we need people and infrastructure. But to get those we need money, since talent and voluntary work only take us so far. Look at Kirk; he is a hack with the charisma of a used condom. And don’t get me started on the black opportunist and others. It’s obvious that he only has a “movement” because he has piles of money. When serious money comes to our movement we will eat them raw.

    • Posted February 13, 2020 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

      If we build it, they (donors) will come. Notice the example of Counter-Currents. It has been financially deplatformed in every way possible, and yet donors still come and donate. When you have something of value to offer, buyers will inevitably spring up.

  4. Johann Theron
    Posted February 13, 2020 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    Great piece tbh. Richard Spencer mentioned the requirement for an “Institution”. Down in South Africa, a Socialist oriented Government resulted in the emergence of a “conservative” political party, a “civic” organization and a right-leaning labor union.

    Their purpose however is not to take over Government at the next election, but to balance the scales in terms of leftism. For example, take Biden as the left establishment and Sanders as the left revolutionary, then the South African Government is the institutionalized revolutionary while the emergent Institutions mentioned above is a left establishment effort. (in this case white, but that is not the point here) In the last elections there were an estimated 6% conservative voters (all voting for many different parties) However, the “institutions” mentioned above caused a significant upswing in the “left establishment” party.

    What I am trying to say is that developing institutions will result in better voter turnout. However, doing it with Conservatives is more challenging in today’s environment.

  5. R_Moreland
    Posted February 14, 2020 at 1:20 am | Permalink

    The lack of an infrastructure has been an endemic situation with the American Right. Even with all the resources of the Republican Party and Conservatism Inc, you do not see anything approaching the network of activist, agitprop, civil disobedience and legal defense organizations which the Left can muster. Eight years of Reagan, twelve years of Bush I and II – none of this built up any of the aforementioned infrastructure, even though these presidents had the backing of the GOP.

    Couldn’t conservatives spare a couple million dollars and perhaps a lawyer or two in support of beleaguered conservative activists on campus? Or set up an ACLU-style organization to engage in lawfare on the behalf of the right? And is it beyond the pale to ask the Republicans to give center stage on their convention platform to Project Veritas?

    I’ve discussed this point with mainstream conservatives. They have a blind spot when it comes to activism. Instead, they appear to believe that all politics come down to the next election, getting their candidates elected and then sending them to the capitol where they can put bills into committees or something. But organizing student fronts? Civil disobedience against the liberal establishment? Even self defense against leftist mob violence is beyond the conservative pale.

    We can chalk this up to the bourgeois mindset, the refusal among conservatives to recognize the reality: the Left understands itself to be at war and acts accordingly. As for Trump, he’s having a difficult enough time under siege in the Oval Office. Looks like nationalists are on their own.

    Interesting thing is that despite all the repression, nationalists have been able to maintain a campaign of activism for years – even if just a viral Internet meme, an IRL flash incident, or a column of Groypers asking inconvenient questions.

    • Posted February 14, 2020 at 2:11 am | Permalink

      I’ve been toying with the idea of pushing through new terminology to differentiate between the dissident and mainstream right. Bourgeois right sounds like a perfect pejorative for the mainstream right, given that that’s their predominant social position and neurotype. I call them Team Mammon in private conversation, maybe that can be utilized. Nationalists on the other hand, would be the warrior right, or thumotic right.

  6. Alex
    Posted February 14, 2020 at 11:33 am | Permalink

    “I do not necessarily disagree with him that destroying the cultural sites of an enemy nation is a bad thing in wartime.”
    Is this really what he said? I may be mistaken but I remember him saying that he opposes taking the EU or any other international body into account when making military decisions. Meaning he doesn’t support bombing cultural sites, he just opposes using UN law and standard as reasoning.
    That is completely legitimate. What kind of nationalist would alter his policy due to international law?

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
 
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
 
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance