Print this post Print this post

Irreconcilable Differences:
The Case for Racial Divorce

1,301 words

Translations: Finnish, FrenchSpanish

To listen in a player, click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link as” or “save target as.”

Black America and White America need to go our separate ways. We need a racial divorce.

Political separation along ethnic lines does not happen every day, and it usually involves hatred, violence, and bloodshed. So most whites simply do not wish to contemplate it. But all-too-many whites are quite willing contemplate a smaller-scale form of separation, namely divorce. And indeed, the model we recommend for peaceful and humane racial separation is the so-called “velvet divorce” between the Czechs and the Slovaks.

If the relationship between whites and blacks in America today were a marriage, we would have divorced long ago. The same is true of whites and Jews, and any other non-white group. White Nationalists are simply proposing a policy of racial divorce.

Legally, there are two kinds of divorce: fault and no-fault. In a fault divorce, at least one party is held responsible for the breakdown of the marriage. Causes include:

  • spousal abuse
  • substance abuse
  • incarceration
  • adultery
  • infecting one’s spouse with a sexually-transmitted disease
  • insanity
  • abandonment

In no-fault divorces, neither party is held to be singly responsible. The main causes are separation and irreconcilable differences. Irreconcilable differences include:

  • Strong personality differences
  • Strong lifestyle differences
  • Strong differences between work and spending patterns
  • Lack of trust
  • Lack of reciprocity
  • Constant bickering
  • Long-simmering resentment
  • Contempt
  • Inability of the relationship to meet the emotional needs of one or both partners

It is interesting that even something as seemingly trivial as different work and spending habits can be a cause for divorce. But earning and spending are a large part of life, and mismatches there can easily spill over into and upset the rest of one’s life.

In the case of blacks and whites in America, there is plenty of fault on both sides. But focusing on historical grievances is actually a trap, simply because groups may be victims, but they are not perpetrators. Collective guilt is meaningless. And many individual whites and blacks today have not harmed or been harmed by one another, so collective historical grievances are not sufficient cause for many to contemplate racial divorce.

For instance, I think it was a terrible crime to introduce black slaves to the New World. But I do not feel a shred of guilt for it. And although my life has been negatively impacted by the presence of blacks in America, most black individuals have done me no harm, and some have actually benefited me. Thus my desire for racial divorce has nothing to do with guilt or innocence or moral judgments of any kind.

Racial divorce is not really about individuals at all. It is about the incompatibility of groups. There are above average blacks who are credits to white society, and there are below average whites who drag our race down. But the character of a society is determined by the average, not the outliers. Thus my desire for racial divorce is based simply on the recognition that whites and blacks as groups have irreconcilable differences that make it impossible for them to be fully happy when forced to live in the same system.

All the common causes of no-fault divorce apply to the relationship of blacks and whites in America: on the whole, the races have different personalities, different lifestyles, different work and spending habits, etc. When forced to live in the same system, these differences create tensions. To use a trivial example, blacks have a very different sense of the passage of time, and when a long line of white people forms while a black Post Office clerk inanely chats away with the customer at the window, the result is resentment. We resent blacks for failing to live up to our standards, and blacks resent us for imposing white standards in the first place.

These problems are not based on history but on nature. Even without black slavery and black crime — even if the past could be completely wiped away and blacks and whites could start fresh on a desert island — these differences would give rise to new frictions and new resentments.

Given these differences, it should come as no surprise that relations between whites and blacks are poisoned with endless bickering, distrust, contempt, and long-simmering resentment and bitterness. Reciprocity is central to our idea of moral conduct, and unequal peoples cannot practice real reciprocity.

Again, if this were a marriage, it would have ended in divorce a long time ago. Any responsible marriage counselor would recommend a no-fault divorce as quickly as possible, because such a relationship is on the road to a fault divorce, when bitterness becomes hatred and hatred becomes violence.

It is false to claim that White Nationalism is based simply on racial hatred. As the author of Confessions of a Reluctant Hater, I do not deny that hatred plays a role. But I believe that hatred must be seen primarily as the product, rather than the cause, of bad racial relationships. I hate other groups because of multiculturalism. I believe in racial divorce because I don’t want to hate other groups.

Most people who divorce do not simply hate one another. Presumably, they originally married out of affection. So usually there is a love-hate relationship. And although blacks and whites in America were forced together — the equivalent of a shotgun marriage — elements of genuine affection have still managed to grow up between the races. So there is a love-hate relationship here as well.

But in some cases, there is no hatred in divorce at all. Both parties simply recognize that they would be happier on their own, and they cordially separate. Furthermore, once people divorce, it is not uncommon for them to like one another more. It is easier to admire some people at a distance. Some people remember why they got married in the first place. Some even make the same mistake twice.

The main reason why individuals are willing to stay in unhappy and even abusive marriages is the conviction that their own happiness does not matter. They believe that duties to God or community or family are more important. Or they believe that they deserve to be unhappy because of feelings of guilt and worthlessness. Divorce is legitimate only if individual happiness is legitimate.

The same is true of bad racial relationships as well. Whites will never be free until we recover the conviction that we have the right to be happy, to flourish as a race rather than just fill the stomachs and empty the bedpans of the Third World.

When Barack Obama prissily reminds whites of the alleged horrors of the Crusades a millennium ago, lest headlines about ISIS give us any ideas about separation from the Muslim world today, or when Jews traumatize our children with Holocaust “education,” we have to see them for what they are: abusive spouses telling us that we are worthless, that we do not deserve to be happy, to keep us in subordinate, exploitative, parasitic relationships.

There is nothing more obscene than being exploited because of one’s conscience, by means of one’s conscience, by those who lack conscience altogether.

White Nationalists tend to be uncomfortable with divorce. We think that divorce rates are too high, because people are too individualistic and unwilling to compromise or to grow as individuals to make marriages and families work. But for all that, we recognize that individual happiness still matters, and that, try as we must, some marriages cannot work and should be dissolved for the good of all.

Our reluctance to condone divorce and our willingness to work to save even doomed marriages should give us insight into the minds of white liberals, many of whom are trying to make multiculturalism work out of the same essentially decent motives.

Yet white liberals are also willing — perhaps too willing — to condone divorce on the grounds of individual happiness. We need to make this tendency work for us. White Nationalism will seem much more appealing if our people come to see that multiculturalism is a marriage made in hell.

If you want to support our work, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every Friday.

Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.

This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , . Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

53 Comments

  1. HamburgerToday
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    Wonderful essay.

  2. B.A
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    Unrelated to the article, sorry, but is there a search facility on this website?

    • Scott Weisswald
      Posted May 29, 2020 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

      On the front page, there is a search bar on the right-hand side just below the menu bar. “Enhanced by Google.”

      • B.A
        Posted May 29, 2020 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

        Thanks Scott. It wasn’t showing up for me, I had looked all over the site.

        After some head scratching, it turns out that my “Ad Block Plus” browser add-on makes the search bar disappear entirely.

        Now it is disabled for this site, it is indeed there on the main page.

        Cheers.
        B.A.

  3. Daniel Robertson
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    Yep, one of your best, and if it wasn’t for the Barack Obama/ISIS thing I’d have no idea this was written a few years ago because it’s as true today as it always was.

  4. Franz
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Fine stuff. And use the other side’s words to confuse the snowflakes:

    “We’re not just somebody that’s desirous of separating from you on our own. The program of separation is given by God and backed by God as the only solution to the toxic relationship between Black and White,”

    — Louis Farrakhan, October 19th, 2017

  5. Dr ExCathedra
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    “Racial divorce is not really about individuals at all. It is about the incompatibility of groups…Reciprocity is central to our idea of moral conduct, and unequal peoples cannot practice real reciprocity.”

    This has been one of the most helpful ideas in prying me off my all-too-long period in life as a liberal (even when I said I was a conservative), assessing the reciprocity in inter-group relationships.

    I had long learned to look for it in inter-personal relationships. I am a therapist, after all. But stupid brain-washed me took a long time to bring the idea to bear when thinking about, and feeling about, other racial or ethnic groups.

    It was and remains a bulwark of clarity for me.

    Because it is blinding clear, once you take off the blinders (sorry for the paradox) there there is NO reciprocity, indeed FAR LESS THAN ZERO reciprocity when it comes to non-Whites and Whites. We are supposed to “care” about them. What they (and their GoodWhite acolytes and mentors) have for us is nothing but envy, resentment, spite and hatred.

    It was shocking, but liberating.

  6. hambone
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    I’m consistently getting errors trying to download files when they’re served on the cdn with http:// links instead of https://.

    eg: http://cdn.counter-currents.com/radio/IrreconcilableDifferences.mp3 <– no good

    https://cdn.counter-currents.com/radio/IrreconcilableDifferences.mp3 <– works

    I think it's cloudflare-related.

  7. Nova Rhodesia
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Excellent.
    Blacks would have to have some viable area that they could call a nation. Perhaps the Southern half of California with multiple independent city states elsewhere? As blacks are geographically dispersed, it wouldn’t be so easy as splitting Czechoslovakia.

    • Vehmgericht
      Posted May 29, 2020 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

      As a serious question: when was the last time a population transfer was effected without triggering an unacceptable level of bloodshed?

      Perhaps the 1923 accord between Greece and Turkey?

      • Nova Rhodesia
        Posted May 29, 2020 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

        I don’t know. Certainly most forced migrations have resulted in incalculable human misery. God willing, we will come to some sort of agreement. The status quo is obviously unsustainable.

        • Visionary 2100
          Posted May 30, 2020 at 6:57 am | Permalink

          The forced resettlement of Germans out of areas now ceded to Poland, the Czech Republic and Russia following World War II was relatively peaceful, but only because the Germans had been thoroughly beaten down and disarmed.

          • Some other guy
            Posted June 6, 2020 at 6:04 am | Permalink

            Visionary 2100 posted:

            “The forced resettlement of Germans out of areas now ceded to Poland, the Czech Republic and Russia following World War II was relatively peaceful….”

            Rubbish: two million German civilians, women, children old folk were murdered or died of hunger, cold and exhaustion when they were expelled at the end of the Second World War from their ancestral homes in Eastern Germany by the brutal forces of the Russian Soviet army and forced to walk hundreds of miles to the bombed-out rump German state. As part of this horror two million German girls and women were raped by the beasts of Stalin’s armies. The Polish and Czech militia then finished the job.

            But “relatively peaceful” it was not: the greatest mass-expulsion in European history, accompanied by savagery on defenceless folk to be expected of Mongol hordes.

    • Mac
      Posted May 31, 2020 at 9:30 am | Permalink

      I think they could easily be repatriated to Africa & they would happily do it themselves, if we gave them a plane ticket & a check. According to Alt Hype’s calculations they subtract around 660 billion dollars a year from the US economy, we could take that amount & divvy it up among their whole population on an individual level. That’d break down to a sizable amount of money per person which would be irresistible to the vast majority of them, especially when you consider they’re so impulsive & have such a low time preference.

      Set it up so that they can only cash their check or otherwise receive their money in some foreign African bank, give them a plane ticket & make it so they have to renounce their citizenship as part of the deal. Could do a massive ad campaign directed towards blacks to make Africa look like wakanda, really tap into the we wuz kangs & how they’ll be free from systemic racism to get them excited about it. I guarantee the vast majority of them would willingly leave the country & all we did was pay them the same amount of money that they’d otherwise subtract off our economy in one single year. We’d make that money back in short order, the country would rapidly improve & best of all, they’d peacefully leave of their own volition, totally worth the cost in my opinion.

  8. Fenek Solere
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    This divorce can’t come soon enough!
    FS

  9. Rob Bottom
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    We cannot have a divorce from blacks because if we did, whites would then seek a divorce from other groups, including Jews. The Jews refuse to let that happen, therefore we’re stuck with the blacks. The Jews forced us into a world war precisely to prevent such a divorce from happening. If we were ever in a position to attempt it again, expect China to attack America, at the behest of the Jews. The fact is, no matter how much they claim otherwise, blacks and Jews will not allow such a divorce without a fight because they know they need us. So what are the solutions?

  10. Jaego
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    A comprehensive analysis, both timely and timeless.

  11. Alexandra O.
    Posted May 29, 2020 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    After watching protests and near riots break out for the past two days, all over the country, resulting in multiple destructive fires in Minneapolis, and the ‘usual’ car-burnings and traffic disruption in Atlanta and Los Angeles, etc., etc. — I am forced to realize: ‘Good grief, this has been going on for my whole lifetime of 75 years! No change really’. In fact, the more we try to force integration, harmony, multiculturalism, intermarriage, and “Let’s all just get along”, the worse it still is! Tonight, watching FOX, CNN, and MSNBC at random, it was all the same. And the thought hit me pure and simple — we absolutely must get AWAY from one another. And then, I open CC, and here is the essay I read about a year ago — which is, of course, the perfect solution. But how can we do this, when the Left pushes so much “kindness”, “equality” and “cultural understanding and appreciation”. especially in our schools? Well, I’m going to begin pushing the opposite idea, by paraphrasing what you’ve written, and maybe enough people will read it and begin to truly think in different terms. There has been a vast racial divide since “1619” — which the Blacks are currently rubbing our noses in — and I say that 400 years has NOT changed a thing, nor will it ever, so let’s try something new. How we are going to divvy up the land among Blacks, Whites, Hispanics, the morose Moslems, and other groups, I have no idea. Maybe ‘gated communities’ are the best idea. I’ve also read a book named “Searching for Whitopia, which discusses the places where Whites have settled to ‘get away from it all’, in Idaho, Utah, and even the canyons of New York City (with oodles of bucks needed there, of course) — so we too could build our own enclaves. We would need some good lawyers to untangle the civil rights restrictions, and maybe that is what we all need to do first, anyway!

    Let’s keep the ideas coming on this subject, because burning down buildings like spoiled children having a tantrum is never going to get Blacks anywhere, and I’m tired trying to be nice and understanding about it! I definitely think that civil rights have long outlived their usefulness

  12. R_Moreland
    Posted May 30, 2020 at 6:18 am | Permalink

    Something to consider is the bizarre effect which blacks have on liberals.

    Liberals inevitably rationalize any amount of black perpetrated criminality, dysfunction, rioting and out-and-out terrorism as a struggle for justice – as we have seen in the liberal capitulation over the current Minneapolis Mayhem. For liberals every day is 16 May 1954, the day before Brown versus Board of Education. Which brings me to my point…

    Liberals tell us that today blacks are “oppressed.” Now, this is a blatant falsehood, since blacks have had by law full civil rights for well over half a century. Moreover, blacks are the recipient of very real legal privileges: affirmative action, black studies programs, government-corporate contracts, the various diversity rackets, etc etc. And we can note the numerous American cities run by blacks and/or liberals which implement an agenda of liberation, yet still evidence the same trends in black criminality and dysfunction (cf Detroit, Selma, Newark, St Louis, Baltimore, Minneapolis).

    Given the current liberal delusion over black “oppression” might we reconsider the alleged oppression of blacks prior to Brown? Especially in light of such liberal disinfo as “hands up don’t shoot?”

    Liberals have created a narrative of blacks being the victims of massive White violence during segregation. But look at the actual number of lynchings of blacks during the segregation era (c. 3500) and then compare that with current stats on black-perpetrated homicide, especially those incident to drive-by shootings, flashmob attacks, home invasions, torture-murders and other acts of, well, terror. Toss in the reality that virtually every urban uprising in the US since the Civil Rights Era, from Watts 1965 and up to the 2020 pillage of Minneapolis, has been initiated by blacks (and not coincidentally, rationalized by the liberal agitprop machine as responses to discrimination, poverty, police brutality, whatever is trending).

    Numerous studies have demonstrated the high rates of black perpetrated crime, and especially black-on-White violence ( https://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/ ). Similar rates can be seen going back to the 19th century. Blacks held power during Reconstruction and this was an era of overwhelming corruption, civil disorder and disenfranchisement of Whites.

    There is an alternative narrative in which segregation was a defensive response by White people to protect their communities from black criminality and to restore a modicum of civil government. One reason for school segregation pre-Brown was to protect White students from black aggression (something which we see no end of in the public schools post-Brown).

    As for a lack of power prior to Brown, there were black political machines in many northern cities which could and did throw their weight around. And every major institution in the US supported the Civil Rights Movement (Supreme Court, corporate foundations, armed forces, television, several presidents). Just consider how far White Nationalism could go today were it supported by any of these power fronts.

    Race realists point out that cities with black majorities are marked by massive criminality, economic collapse and infrastructure disintegration. Similar trends can be seen in European cities which have been enriched by African diversity. And I need not comment on how the rainbow nation of South Africa has fared under black majority rule. It has been White people who have been forced out of the cities their ancestors built due to these black uprisings as well as the non-stop gangbanging, race hustling and school destruction. So who is the victim of racial terror here?

    Of course, liberals have any number of rationalizations for black failure which systemically avoid discussion of the reality of race. And liberal agitprop in the form of endless movies, television programs, news reports and university-corporate seminars creates an illusion of black honor students being victimized by White supremacist violence. The result has been policies based on delusion, like importing the third world into their cities and then expecting them to function to first world standards.

    You can not run any sort of civilization based on delusion. The evidence is seen in the flames rising over Minneapolis.

    (Incidentally, the statistics on lynchings used to be at http://archive.tuskegee.edu/archive/handle/123456789/507 but apparently have been removed. Hmmm…)

    • Lord Shang
      Posted May 31, 2020 at 4:11 am | Permalink

      We whites are not merely a dispossessed majority; we are not merely an oppressed majority; we are a subjugated people. Blacks rule us (along with their bootlicker white allies). I want white freedom.

  13. cecil1
    Posted May 30, 2020 at 9:24 am | Permalink

    I agree about separation fully.

    But this was never a marriage or anything remotely like that.

    So the divorce analogy doesn’t really fit.

    But bang on we need out. Because access to White people is not a human right.

    • Jaego
      Posted May 31, 2020 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

      Access to White people is not a human right. I’m going to steal that. That’s a winner.

      Looks like the Antis are getting thrown under the bus to protect the melaninated darlings. Ever dark cloud has a silver lining.

  14. E. Perez
    Posted May 30, 2020 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Of course, there is a big elephant in the room.

    ‘Peaceful Divorce’ was the solution of National Socialism to the irreconcilable differences between Germans and Jews, manifest, for example, but not exclusively, in Weimar Germany. Jews were encouraged to emigrate, a solution supported by a large fraction of them, provide they get the homeland promised by Balfour.

    It became violent divorce in wartime when Jews were deported in workcamps as they were considered ennemies.

    Although the concept of separating populations has plenty of precedents in history, and has generally not been contested, in the case of NS Germany there have been two types of objections:

    1) Separation was injust to the many well integrated Jews feeling as Germans
    2) Jewishness is a religion and not a race

    The former cannot be denied, but as Mr. Johnson states, divorce ” is about the incompatibility of groups”, not individuals.

    The latter is the usual trap Zionism sets up: Jewishness is only a religion –

    unless you want to immigrate into Israel then suddenly it becomes much more racial:

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israeli-high-court-allows-dna-testing-to-prove-judaism-1.8439615

  15. Oca2gene
    Posted May 30, 2020 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    White flight is the solution. White liberals are more dangerous than black culture. Fact

    • Edgardus
      Posted May 31, 2020 at 6:36 pm | Permalink

      White Liberals have been, (and are indeed to this day) a perpetual problem parallelel with the black problem. To all white liberals: what say you as to the present fork in the road now before us?

  16. Rhodok
    Posted May 31, 2020 at 12:07 am | Permalink

    Agreed on the divorce.
    But we need more than that; blacks in the US today mostly provide the mass, the numbers. But I strongly believe they are led into condemnable behaviour by white elements.
    And they will still be there after the divorce!

    • Lord Shang
      Posted May 31, 2020 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

      I keep saying, the White Ethnostate must be a White Nationalist Ethnostate ONLY. NO LIBERALS ALLOWED. EVER. Liberals are genetically defective at the group level. They are the Death of the West.

  17. Dandelion
    Posted May 31, 2020 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    Minorities will never separate from whites because then they would have nobody to torment and wouldn’t know what to do with themselves.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted May 31, 2020 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

      They won’t do it unless we force the issue. There is no human right to access to white people. We don’t have to live with non-whites. Remember that.

      • Richard B
        Posted June 7, 2020 at 8:08 pm | Permalink

        “We don’t have to live with non-whites.”

        That’s exactly right.

        And we shouldn’t.

        Why?

        One reason, among many, is because, as you wrote,

        “There is nothing more obscene than being exploited because of one’s conscience, by means of one’s conscience, by those who lack conscience altogether.”

  18. Consigliere
    Posted June 1, 2020 at 5:59 am | Permalink

    In a March post, I spoke about administrative separation being the first step towards physical separation. As an example, imagine if we as a political group opted to move all of our assets onto a secure blockchain, like Ethereum. We would have a money system that was in large part “protected” from sovereigns. We could transact at will – we would have our own ethno-economy. (As an FYI – if we locked-up $1T, we would essentially have an economy on par with some of the smaller nations.) Similar cryptographic approaches could be used for voting, and I believe there is an example here from Russia within the last 12-18 months.

    These types of separation strategies should be considered on all fronts.

    However, given the events of the last two weeks, I believe things will begin to accelerate. In this respect, I see two potential options:

    1. Trump sends military personnel to end the riots in America’s cities, and the left uses this as the reason to escalate to full-on “hot” civil war. (There is a potential scenario here whereby “Whites” begin to defend cities in the absence of federal action. If this happened organically somehow, the establishment would side against the “Whites”.)

    2. Trump does nothing in the short-term. The cities burn. Either side “sues for peace” or “brokered peace”. The establishment agrees to a shared power arrangement with the left, specifically the minority groups. The shared power agreement is the first step towards South Africanization of the US. Watch Marco Rubio here.

    Happy Monday.

  19. dante Marotta
    Posted June 1, 2020 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    Hi Guys
    I am unable to listen to or download the podcast, Is this ddos attack related ?
    I right click to download as usual but now its no longer working.
    Thanks and great work.

  20. No more yeasterday
    Posted June 2, 2020 at 4:47 am | Permalink

    Many jews enyoy the way we have to dance now. They will not stop until the last unborn european. Its all because of us and the greatness nature formed us into. The rioting and the hate. Its because the precence of whites. They hate us. Fuck them. As a white person: educate yourself, get in as good company as you can, get better, improve. We are already quality over number, but we are gonna have to get better. This is not over.

  21. Posted June 2, 2020 at 7:54 am | Permalink

    Just want to say I really appreciate the audio.

    I’ve had problems with repetitive stress injuries from computer use, and it’s nice to get the content without having to do a lot of scrolling.

  22. Rasse
    Posted June 4, 2020 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    It was a pleasure to read this as a Finnish translation. Good thinking and metaphor. Thank you!

    https://sarastuslehti.com/2020/06/02/sovittamattomat-eroavuudet/

  23. pg
    Posted June 4, 2020 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    It’s amusing to hear the cry about political correctness, but then those crying turn around and use all kinds of politically correct euphemisms: peaceful racial divorce/reasonable immigration policy/political divorce along ethnic lines (ethnic cleansing/segregation), race realism (racism), job creators/entrepreneurs (capitalists), employees (proletarians), peace missions for democracy (imperialist bombings), “violent criminals” (niggers, wetbacks), healthy patriotism (nationalism) and so on. You’ve already bit your tongue in advance and accommodated the censor’s point of view, as if the content of what you’re saying is going to trick anyone. The only purpose it serves is virtue signaling: “no, we are really not like those bad guys, the Nazis. We are really moral and honorable! Look, we don’t call them niggers or spics when we tell them they have no place here and when it comes down to it we aren’t afraid of using force!” It’s bourgeois politeness.

    • Lord Shang
      Posted June 6, 2020 at 1:01 am | Permalink

      But many of us really are NOT Nazis. I’m not a Nazi, though I am honest, and thus must admit that Hitler’s loss was a catastrophe for white civilization. I’m not even a racial fascist, though I would embrace such if it were necessary to prevent white genocide. Will we have to engage in the genocide of others in order to prevent our own genocide? I don’t think so, not now anyway.

      The cause of white preservation should not be in the least morally problematic, which is what associating ourselves with Nazis, historical or contemporary, makes us seem to normal and ethical whites. Indeed, it is not even “racist” to want racial divorce, at least not if “racism” is understood accurately, as malicious intent wrt the JUST concerns of another race. I am not a racial aggressor, seeking to deprive others of life or property or liberty. I just will not acquiesce in other races stealing my country, liberty, property, and very possibly life.

      No one has a moral right to access white societies, anymore than he would have a right to access someone else’s private property. White nationalism is a just cause, including from a Christian perspective.

  24. Afterthought
    Posted June 5, 2020 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    Why tie this to a controversial metaphor like divorce? Just say we need political and physical separation : aka Partition.

    PS your “slow cleanse” would actually have benefit AFTER Partition as a way to turn any less than perfect division ever more perfect.

    Also there are 5 ways to legally separate:

    Constitutional Convention redrawing the map and formalizing Partition

    Constitutional Amendment allowing for secession (one 3/4ths vote at state level, or two 2/3rds votes, or three 1/2 votes – at two year intervals, for example)

    Senate Treaty ceding land to a new nation

    Court case overturning Texas v White

    Appeal to UN treaty

    Now, a common objection is that the Enemy will not let this happen easily.

    Duh!

    Nevertheless we must have an attractive legal frame work TO UNITE WHITES. If it comes down to a bare knuckle brawl, so be it. But most whites won’t coalesce around any roadmap that includes strife making such a brawl unwinnable.

    How many lost years? Partition Now!

    • Orbán Viktor
      Posted June 7, 2020 at 7:56 am | Permalink

      Wow, a political animal. Rarely seen in this neck of the woods.

      Hereby I declare you an honorary Hungarian.

  25. Tony
    Posted June 5, 2020 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    Never happen. Not this way. A permanent separation is desperately needed but there will be nothing amicable about it.

    The one thing that Negroes absolutely, positively must have is access to White civilization and White largesse. They cannot survive without it. They know it. And they hate themselves for it. Then transfer that hate to us. They would never amicably and voluntarily agree to separate from Whites. They would almost all die. The separation must happen at the point of a spear. Better yet, the muzzle of a .308. With narrowed eyes and cold hearts hardened to their self pitying bleats for mercy and empty promises to do better.

    By the way, it’s not just Negroes going over the wall. It’s every liberal of every stripe. Plus many millions more.
    It will be very very hard. A Holocaust on steroids to the tenth power. Hundreds of thousands will die. Families and friendships will be ripped apart. The temptation to weaken, to falter, to hesitate and re-assess, will be immense and unrelenting. But we mustn’t. We can’t.

    And when it is done? When the last aspiring rapper, the last Somali city councilwoman, and the last university Diversity Officer have been herded into their new homeland? In our exhaustion we turn to gaze at what we’ve wrought. A new paradise. A fledgling paradise to be sure, facing new challenges and innumerable growing pains, but with a future as bright as the Sun.

    As opposed to our current future. Endless unrest and upheaval, violence, rioting, and bankruptcy. A future where every single issue must be viewed through the prism of racism and endless Negro grievance. Where the used needles littering the sidewalk are obscured by piles of human feces and billionaire globalists dismiss us as deplorable because we wanted a decent future for our children.

    But…I fantasize. TPTB/Deep State/globalist uniparty would do everything in its power to prevent it. So, I lead a quiet suburban life, work, mow my lawn, have the neighbors over for burgers and beer, while the outside world churns and comes apart.

    • Lord Shang
      Posted June 6, 2020 at 1:04 am | Permalink

      It won’t be hundreds of thousands, but tens of millions, who will perish in what will either be the Second American Revolution or Second American Civil War. Damn the utopian race liberals for their self-regarding virtue-signaling in bringing these horrors upon us!

    • Oca2gene
      Posted June 9, 2020 at 6:32 am | Permalink

      Truth bomb:

      “The one thing that Negroes absolutely, positively must have is access to White civilization and White largesse. They cannot survive without it. They know it. And they hate themselves for it. Then transfer that hate to us.”

  26. Comtaose
    Posted June 5, 2020 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    The vicious and brutal police of Hong Kong made us see clearly what it looks like when Communists are in power. The violent and destructive riots in US made us see clearly what it looks like when Communists are in infiltration.

    Besides, according to overseas Chinese dissident sources, there were Chinese official figures as inciters and organizers for the demonstrators besieging and protesting outside the White House. Voices recorded on the site contained Chinese phrases “zou, kuai-zou!” (move, move fast!), and the figure was recognized as the military attach and PLA major general Zhang Li. It is evident that the ChiCom infiltration into US society has reached an astonishingly outrageous and hazardous extent.

  27. Some White Guy
    Posted June 5, 2020 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Precisely what I wanted to read after enduring over a week of bad behavior from the nonwhites, yet again. I want nothing more to do with these people ever again. Let the anti-white whites keep them as the expensive pets they so richly deserve.

  28. Harry
    Posted June 6, 2020 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    (Translator did not differentiate between “host people and the guest people”.)

  29. Harry
    Posted June 6, 2020 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    In case your spam mechanism prevented the translated article, here is the original.
    https://avalon-gemeinschaft.ch/?p=650

  30. Harry
    Posted June 6, 2020 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    The accusation of “fascism” is as old as fascism itself.
    https://www.orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc

  31. Dale Gribble
    Posted June 8, 2020 at 4:10 am | Permalink

    Could racial separation take place similar to the Native American and White separation in the 19th century?

    We have a vast reservation system but also a large social services system to take care of Indians, on and off the reservations.

    Still Indians know the reservations are there and they have a lot of autonomy over them.

    They can prosper with revenue from gambling and cheap cigarette sales.

    I could see a reservation system for Blacks but still requiring extensive social services support.

    That would be worth it for peaceful separation and coexistence.

    • JDS
      Posted June 9, 2020 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

      I don’t think that can work: they are too attached

      The Indian knew when the white man won, Africans not so much

      It’ll be like having a pack of hungry bears that you’ll have to keep behind a massive brick wall at all times

      Too expensive

      Ship them all to Africa

      Have the Chinese take care of them

  32. JDS
    Posted June 9, 2020 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    I’m an Israeli, so it’s none of my business what white people decide is best for them

    I sympathize with any legitimate national cause

  33. James B.
    Posted June 9, 2020 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    I would like to respond knowledgeably to a friends online comment recently, which reads:

    “There has never been a period in our history where the law and order branch of the United States has not operated against the freedoms, liberties, and options of the black community when compared to whites of the same system”

    I know it has been said that white America has granted many provisions to blacks for the last 50 years especially. Is there a specific article(s) which addresses this question?

  34. Delfi Media
    Posted June 10, 2020 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    The idea of white and black homelands is, in my opinion, a realistic solution for the current and future problems in the U.S. (but unfortunately not applicable in Europe.)

    It’s a solution where both groups could live and prosper in harmony among themselves, a place where evil racism is non-existing.
    Homogenic ethnostates are indeed more peaceful and harmonious because of shared values, beliefs and cultural heritage, see i.e. Japan.

    The U.S. is even big enough for a third mixed zone, a zone where white liberals (and blacks) can built the utopian socialist paradise of their dreams. Commiefornia maybe? They have a “Russian” bear and a red star in their flag already. A socialist state without those pesky white conservative deplorables. Wouldn’t that be nice?

    I came to this idea, by viewing a documentary about the segregation of islamic Pakistan from India. However this particular divorce wasn’t exactly peaceful. But the idea itself is rather intelligent, because why should muslims and hindoes live together if they don’t want to?
    Why force them in a multi ethnic / religious nightmare where nobody is really happy?
    The multicultural utopia was always a conflictuous divide and conquer model, where “some” with political (and economic) motives benefit, but surely not the average whites or afro-americans.
    I would even go a step further. Why should republicans and democrats / left and right, live together? Both parties / people got a total different mindset and goals, so living together in harmony is an illusion. This idea questions representative democracy itself…
    Well, if you didn’t noticed, the end of liberal democracy is in sight anyway.
    Next model please! Ethno Nationalism!

  35. J. K.
    Posted June 15, 2020 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    Apropos of racial divorce…

    “When It’s Over, It’s Over”

    When it’s over, it’s over
    No use yearning like a fool
    For the things that can’t be

    It was only a matter
    Of precious time before
    We’d read the signs with honest eyes
    Determined to go our separate ways

    As we wander where we will
    May we be at peace until
    We have settled where we must
    And from our feet shake off the dust
    Of wasted time

    When it’s over, it’s over
    Some things were never meant to be
    The truth is we’re different as anyone can be from another
    And so we must be free

    But I wish you well in this life
    As you go about your day
    And stand or fall before your creator
    In a homeland for your race

    As we wander where we will
    May we be at peace until
    We have settled where we must
    And from our feet shake off the dust
    Of wasted time

    When is over, it’s over

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
 
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
 
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance