Rightist third-worldism is a tendency among people of the broadly understood Right — nationalists, New Rightists etc. — to take the side of the “Third World.” The Third World is understood by them very differently from its original meaning — that is, referring to those countries that were not on either side of the Cold War). (more…)
Tag: European New Right
-
English original here, French version here, Polish version here
Capítulo 1 aquí, Capítulo 3 aquí, Capítulo 5 aquí
Para lograr nuestros objetivos políticos, la Nueva Derecha norteamericana debe entender la relación exacta entre la teoría social y el cambio social, entre metapolítica y política y entre teoría y práctica. Debemos evitar desviarnos tanto hacia un intelectualismo inactivo como un activismo poco inteligente y tal vez contraproducente. (more…)
-
August 3, 2023 Alain de Benoist
Against Liberalism:
Society Is Not a Market,
Chapter I, Part 3: What Is Liberalism?4,142 words
Part 3 of 3 (Introduction Part 1 here, Chapter I Part 2 here)
Translated by F. Roger Devlin
This strictly economic representation of society has considerable consequences. Finishing off the process of secularization and “disenchantment” of the world that is characteristic of modernity, it results in the dissolution of peoples and the systematic erosion of their particularities. At the sociological level, the adoption of economic exchange leads the society to be divided into producers, owners, and sterile classes (such as the former aristocracy) at the end of an altogether revolutionary process. (more…)
-
3,287 words
Part 1 of 3 (Introduction Part 1 here, Chapter I Part 1 here, Chapter I Part 3 here)
Translated by F. Roger Devlin
Liberalism must, however, recognize the fact of society. But instead of asking why the social realm exists, liberals are mainly preoccupied with understanding how society is able to establish itself, maintain itself, and function. Society, as we have seen, is for them nothing but the sum of its members (the whole is nothing but the sum of its parts). It is nothing but the contingent product of individual wills, a mere assemblage of individuals all seeking to defend and satisfy their particular interests. (more…)
-
3,856 words
Part 1 of 3 (Introduction Part 1 here, Introduction Part 3 here, Chapter 1 Part 2 here)
Translated by F. Roger Devlin
Not being the work of a single man, liberalism has never presented itself as a unified doctrine. The authors who have laid claim to the name liberal have sometimes given divergent and even contradictory interpretations of it. Yet there must have been enough points in common between them to consider them liberal authors. It is precisely these points in common that allow us to define liberalism as a school. (more…)
-
July 27, 2023 Alain de Benoist
Francie zmítaná nepokoji
English original here
Více než týden po vypuknutí nepokojů se Alain de Benoist pokouší načrtnout jejich „genealogii“: specifičnost francouzské situace, dlouhodobé problémy s masovou imigrací, kultura zapírání a zakrývání etnické reality, individualismus… – to vše ještě více než v jiných zemích přiživilo plameny chaosu. (more…)
-
3,103 words
Part 3 of 3 (Introduction Part I here, Introduction Part II here, Chapter 1 Part 1 here)
Translated by F. Roger Devlin
Let us sum up. Man is a “social animal” whose existence is consubstantial with that of society. Justice in the first instance is not a matter of rights but of measure; i.e., it is only defined as a relation of equity between persons living in society, so there are no holders of rights outside social life, and within it there are only those to whom rights are attributed. (more…)
-
Part 2 of 3 (Introduction Part I here, Introduction Part III here)
Translated by F. Roger Devlin
Now, for liberalism, man — far from being constituted as such by his bonds with others — must be thought of as an individual unbound by any constitutive form of belonging; i.e., outside any cultural or socio-historical context. (more…)
-
Part 1 of 3 (Introduction Part II here)
Translated by F. Roger Devlin
When liberalism is said to be the dominant ideology of our time, there are always those who protest by citing, for example, the amount of public expenditures or the level of taxation in our country. But this is looking at the problem through the wrong end of the telescope. A liberal society is not exactly the same thing as a liberal economy. (more…)
-
Czech version here
Editor’s Note: The following translation is reprinted by kind permission of Der Schattige Wald at the Actaeon Journal. The interview was originally published in the Italian journal Il Giornale on July 7. (more…)
-
3.306 palabras
English original here
Introducción aquí, Capítulo 2 aquí
¿Qué hay de “novedoso” en la Nueva Derecha norteamericana, y qué relación guarda con la “Vieja Derecha”?
Antes de poder responder a eso, necesito aclarar lo que la Vieja Derecha y la Nueva Derecha tienen en común y lo que las diferencia de la falsa derecha actual: es decir los partidos de centro-derecha actuales y todas las formas de liberalismo clásico. (more…)
-
March 31, 2023 Guillaume Faye
Guillaume Faye:
Od soumraku k úsvitu2.655 slov
English version here
Poznámka překladatele do angličtiny
Následující projev zazněl 17. května 2005 v Moskvě a jeho francouzský přepis vyšel na ruském webu Athenaeum.
Přinejmenším ze tří důvodů mám za to, že stojí za to šířit tento projev v nacionalistických kruzích: první důvod si postupně začíná uvědomovat stále více anglicky mluvících nacionalistů – Guillaume Faye je dnes asi nejzajímavějším, i když ne vždy nejpřípadnějším mluvčím za geneticko-kulturní dědictví související s bělošským odporem. (more…)
-
February 13, 2023 Alain de Benoist
The Populist Moment, Chapter 12:
Liberty — Equality — Fraternity:
On the Meaning of a Republican SloganIntroduction here, Chapter 11 Part 4 here
Translated by F. Roger Devlin
As is well-known, the republican slogan “Liberty — Equality — Fraternity” was first invoked during the French Revolution.[1] At that time it was merely one slogan among many others. Falling into disuse under the Empire, and frequently called into question thereafter, it reappeared during the Revolution of 1848 when it was inscribed as a “principle” of the Republic in the Constitution of February 27, 1848. (more…)