Not Just for Losers Anymore?"/>
Print this post Print this post

Race-Mixing:
Not Just for Losers Anymore?

1,459 words

German translation here

Boldly going where no man has gone before: television's first interracial kiss on "Star Trek"

When most people see whites dating non-whites, the immediate assumption is that there is something wrong with the white. Usually the defects are obvious. We know why a homely or obese white woman is sleeping with blacks or Mexicans: They are willing to overlook her faults because she is white. We know why a geeky, acne-scarred white man gravitates towards Asians: They are willing to overlook his faults because he is white (and of course the aliens are angling for green cards and money as well).

And what about attractive whites who date non-whites? In recent years, more and more white men who are not obvious losers are dating Asians. But according to the conventional wisdom, they probably have hidden physical or psychological defects, such as a self-esteem problem. (Seems pretty reasonable to me.)

Race-mixing is sold as an expression of progress in racial equality: Fair Romeos will no longer be separated from their dusky Juliets by the antiquated prejudices of their parents’ generation. But the ugly truth is that race-mixing usually presupposes racism and racial hierarchies. The whites feel that they are dating or marrying down, and the non-whites feel that they are dating or marrying up.

Chris Pine, the new Captain Kirk

White losers are attracted to marrying down, because they feel that their grateful partners will overlook their flaws for the privilege of marrying into a superior race, and their non-white partners think the same thing: they could never get a normal white, but they are willing to take up with a subnormal one, because they want to marry into a superior race.

An allied attitude is that non-whites can’t be blamed for wanting to date or marry whites. Their racial betrayal is seen as a completely healthy impulse. The attitude is: “Who could blame black men for pursuing white women? Have you seen black women?” “Who could blame Asian women for wanting to date white men? Just look at Asian men!” (Everybody also knows that Asian men and black women are the big losers in the inter-racial dating game.)

These are not, moreover, the attitudes of hardcore racists alone. Virtually everyone believes this, white and non-white, race-mixers included.

I hold these views, even though I know that there are obviously some cases in which they are not true. There is enough interaction between the races now that perfectly normal people can form friendships that turn into romances.

But the attitudes persist, because they are what Burke calls “wise prejudices”–based on past experience, repeatedly confirmed by new experiences, and therefore handy heuristic assumptions to maintain when visiting the Bay Area.

Alan Tudyk & Gina Torres in "Firefly"

But even though everyone believes that white race-mixers are defective, nobody really talks about it. Even the diversity police who obsessively try to expose every other instance of hidden racism, real or imagined, remain silent. I suspect they are silent because they know that a widespread discussion of this attitude would inhibit race-mixing, and they don’t want to do that.

White race-mixers may know they are defective, but they think that others do not divine this fact when they parade their non-white paramours in public . If they knew that others saw them as defective, they might not be so enthusiastic about race-mixing. This is especially true of otherwise attractive and normal-looking white race-mixers, who would not be suspected of having hidden flaws if they did not advertise them by pursuing non-white sexual partners.

There has been a certain normalization of white men dating Asians. Because feminism has made so many otherwise attractive white women into bitches, it is easy to understand why perfectly normal white men are tempted to settle for Asian women, as they seem to be more feminine, submissive, and oriented toward home and family.

But even those who defend whites dating Asians as a normal and healthy reaction to a sick society, will immediately assume that there must be something wrong with a white man who dates a black woman. Even the most delirious Yellow Fever victims balk at that.

Nathan Fillion in "Firefly"

Hence the normalization of white male/black female pairings has emerged as an identifiable action item on the agenda for white genocide.

For a long time, such parings were quite rare in television and the movies. It seemed easier to sell images of black men as wise mentors, crime fighters, scientific geniuses, US Presidents, and God, than black women as attractive sexual partners for normal, non-defective white men.

Yes, there was the famous kiss between Captain Kirk (William Shatner) and Lt. Uhuru (Nichelle Nichols) in the original Star Trek series, but Kirk was under alien influence. Yes, there was race-mixing in Mandingo (the Marquis de Sade meets Uncle Tom’s Cabin), but the white race-mixers were explicitly shown to be physically and psychologically defective. The same is true in Roots. Yes, there was the neighbor across the hall in The Jeffersons. But he was a dweeb. James Bond, of course, is one of the earliest white miscegenators on the big screen, but we assume he is closing his eyes, holding his nose, and thinking about England. And when Bond marries, he marries a white woman.

But in recent years, there has been a trend towards pairing white Alpha males with black women. Not just normal white males, but superior white males. Heroic white males. Winners, not losers.

Rosario Dawson as Roxane

The first time this struck me was in Oliver Stone’s 2004 film Alexander, in which Alexander the Great (you can’t get more Alpha than Alexander the Great), played by Colin Farrell, is paired with the mulatto Rosario Dawson, who is cast as Roxane, Alexander’s queen. (The historical Roxane was the daughter of a Persian aristocrat. She was reputed to be one of the most beautiful women in the Empire. She was probably as Aryan as Alexander himself.)

Then there is Joss Whedon’s superb but short-lived 2002 science fiction series Firefly, in which starship pilot Hoban Washburne, played by the very Nordic Alan Tudyk, is married to Zoë, a black Amazon with grotesquely large lips played by Gina Torres. The character of “Wash” is something of a dork, and he is not the captain of the ship, so he is not the real Alpha. The captain, Malcolm Reynolds (played by Nathan Fillion) is a true Alpha male, and his romantic interest is a white woman, Inara (played by the beautiful Morena Baccarin). But in one episode he is shown lusting after Zoë as well.

In another science fiction series, the new Battlestar Galactica, Alpha male Lee Adama, played by the Nordic Jamie Bamber, marries green-eyed mulatto Dualla, played by Kandyse McClure. (Admittedly, the character is punishing himself and the white woman woman he really wants to marry. But he could have punished himself with another white woman.)

Kandyse McClure & Jamie Bamber in "Battlestar Galactica"

Finally, in the new Star Trek movie, the Alpha male, Captain Kirk, played by the Nordic Chris Pine, is shown lusting after a black woman and even a green woman–but never a white woman. (This essay originally began as a review of Star Trek, but I have nothing to add to Jonathan Pyle’s superb Occidental Observer essay “Star Trek and the Multiracial Future.”)

I am sure that many other examples can be provided.

Why is Hollywood portraying white Alpha males pursuing and even marrying black women? Because they want the Beta males, the Gamma males, and everybody else down to the Omega males, to follow them down the path to white racial extinction.

Jamie Bamber with his real family

The people who create these movies–the directors, the writers, the producers, the casting directors–are not artists. They are abortionists. They are aborting the whole future of the white race. And they are not doing it by accident. We know this, because so many of them are Jews, who are constantly reminded from birth that marrying out leads to extinction for them, and they know that goes for us too. (The fact that many of these Jews marry out make them even worse. It means that they are committing genocide against their own people as well as ours.)

When the white nationalist movement can mobilize the numbers, the idealism, and the physical courage evoked by the anti-abortion movement, then I will stop fearing for the future of my race. And even then, it will take a full-blown revolution, not merely a constitutional amendment, to save us.

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)

13 Comments

  1. FORP
    Posted October 28, 2010 at 1:11 am | Permalink

    I am new to being racially aware, so I have dated and slept with non-White women (Asian, Hispanic and Middle Eastern) in the past (I suppose I’ll be executed by Covington when he takes over for that, and for my side-job). No children or marriage from all of that mind you…European WNs seem to care less than American WNs about such past episodes…

    Anyway, the article is spot on with respect to self-esteem. The defect of low self-esteem is not unusual for a young person (or someone short, nerdy, etc.), and when combined with the strong desire to have sex, and the increasing acceptance of interracial couplings (especially at universities), you get the current situation of race mixing. Young men take whatever they can get if they aren’t racially conscious.

    It would probably be fine if men sowed their wild oats and then “grew up” and married nice White women. But it often seems that a lot of guys are not growing up – and this permanent immature behavior seems OK for Asian women, likely for the reasons mentioned.

    Anyway, media is pushing one message; the only way to counter the message is getting our art (in particular movies) to the masses.

  2. Ragnar
    Posted October 28, 2010 at 4:22 am | Permalink

    “Why is Hollywood portraying white Alpha males pursuing and even marrying black women? Because they want the Beta males, the Gamma males, and everybody else down to the Omega males, to follow them down the path to white racial extinction.”

    This is why racially loyal White men must put forward their ideology with strength, as the strong, manly ideology (which it is), and verbally blast any deviation from it, at every opportunity, as being a retreat into effeminacy.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted October 28, 2010 at 9:03 am | Permalink

      Maybe that will work for some White Advocates, but this isn’t the army, and calling people grabastic chunks of amphibian puke and the like has limited utility in intellectual debates.

      • Ragnar
        Posted October 29, 2010 at 7:26 am | Permalink

        “Maybe that will work for some White Advocates, but this isn’t the army, and calling people grabastic chunks of amphibian puke and the like has limited utility in intellectual debates.”

        I said NOTHING about verbally blasting anybody in such a stupid way. OF COURSE the blasting has to be done with FACTS!

        • Greg Johnson
          Posted October 29, 2010 at 8:48 am | Permalink

          I stand corrected.

  3. LEW
    Posted October 28, 2010 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Another fine essay. I was involved with a Hispanic woman long ago before I realized what I was doing. No kids fortunately. Convincing White men and women that miscegenation is not the way to go is yet another front in the war, probably the most important one. I’m very proud that my kids all look like northern European Nordic prototypes.

  4. cladrastis
    Posted October 28, 2010 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    The production of mixed race offspring is a great tragedy and should be treated as such. I have known a few mixed-race individuals and their parents, and I feel nothing but pity for everyone involved. Having said that, I think it would be productive to have a discussion about the role of mixed-race folks in any European palingenetic movement. I realize that most such individuals will not be sympathetic with our cause or goals (and will identify with the non-white parent), but surely that is not true for all of them (they are after all, half white).

    Personally, I believe in the big tent approach to white nationalism, and I think that those of mixed ancestry should be allowed to contribute to our cause. Yes, ultimately they should all be sterilized (and frankly, if they agree with us, they should WANT to be sterilized), but that does not mean they cannot be productive in other domains of life. Those who are so-inclined should be encouraged to speak out against interracial liaisons – for all the pain and suffering it caused them. Can you imagine what a slap to the face that would be to the Enemy (esp if the individual were particularly articulate)? Can you imagine what an ideological weapon that would be against our co-ethnics who naively celebrate mixed-relationships?

  5. LEW
    Posted October 28, 2010 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    Speaking of miscegenation, my wife has Outsourcing (NBC) on right now. It is promoting miscegenation between an Indian female and Nordic looking American male. This theme really is beginning to emerge everywhere. This Indian female actress is actually quite attractive. I don’t think it’s a good idea to assume even committed nationalist men will never be tempted to miscegenate. There might need to be laws against it in any future ethnostate.

  6. Posted October 29, 2010 at 5:47 am | Permalink

    “Why is Hollywood portraying white Alpha males pursuing and even marrying black women? Because they want the Beta males, the Gamma males, and everybody else down to the Omega males, to follow them down the path to white racial extinction.”

    I think it was Steve Sailer who observed that in the newer Star Trek movies, the level of race [and species!] mixing was actually physically impossible;; a few centuries of it would have eliminated any visible racial or ethnic characteristics, at least the original ones. The rainbow crew on the bridge would only be possible if, conversely, you had strict racial and ethnic [and species!] separation.

    Race-mixing OR rainbow, you can’t have both.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted October 29, 2010 at 8:46 am | Permalink

      Jonathan Pyle’s review on The Occidental Observer (linked in the article) made that point.

  7. mob
    Posted October 29, 2010 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    At the Met, Renee Fleming (Armida) pursues Lawrence Brownlee (Rinaldo):

    http://www.metoperafamily.org/metopera/season/production.aspx?id=10863

    http://theoperacritic.com/reviewsa.php?schedid=metarmida0410

    The floral crown is such a nice touch. . .

  8. George Carroll
    Posted November 17, 2010 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    “…and his romantic interest is a white woman, Inara (played by the beautiful Morena Baccarin)”

    How ironic then that “Morena” is Spanish for “black woman” or “dark skinned woman”.
    Not only that but this actress is Brazilian (which explains the Spanish first name) who most likely (and judging by the pictures of her on the web) is of mixed race like many Brazilians and Hispanics.

    Of course, it’s easy to make that mistake. Mexico, Puerto Rico, Guatemala, etc., are some of the most mixed race regions today, and there are also many of them which clearly still appear to be of European descent (German, Spanish, Italian, etc.) – blonde hair, blue eyes, white skin, white facial features – chances are you’d meet one, fall in love and then die of shock at some family gathering when you see a few black and mulatto cousins show up!

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted November 17, 2010 at 9:45 am | Permalink

      Yes, by all means check out the pictures. The woman clearly does not show any phenotypical signs of racial admixture.

  • Video of the Day:

  • Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    The Lightning and the Sun

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    The Wagnerian Drama

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    An eagle with a shield soaring upwards

    A Life in the Political Wilderness

    The Fourth Political Theory

    The Passing of the Great Race

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    The Prison Notes

    It Cannot Be Stormed

    Revolution from Above

    The Proclamation of London

    Beyond Human Rights

    The WASP Question

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Jewish Strategy

    The Metaphysics of War

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    The French Revolution in San Domingo

    The Revolt Against Civilization

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Archeofuturism

    Tyr

    Siege

    On Being a Pagan

    The Lost Philosopher

    The Dispossessed Majority

    Might is Right

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance