Print this post Print this post

Secret Agents

Tadeusz de Lempicka, painted by Tamara de Lempicka, 1928

Tamara de Lempicka, Portrait of Tadeusz de Lempicka, 1928

1,455 words

One of the great pleasures of being an explicit White Nationalist is that I get to meet other White Nationalists. If you state your views openly and honestly, you will hear from people who actually agree with you, people who will respect you for your views and for your forthrightness. If you spend your life hiding your beliefs—aside from an occasional wink, nudge, or hint—you will surround yourself with dupes or squishy people who would flee from and denounce the real you. I just don’t see the value in that.

I have always prized intellectual probity over social approval and true friends over false ones, so I have a low tolerance for political dissimulation. I believe that ultimately we are not going to get what we want unless we level with people about what, exactly, we do want (a society of and for white people), and who and what, exactly, we are fighting against (the Christian values that have programmed us for collective suicide and the Jews who are organizing and egging the process along).

I tend toward tolerance, but in this area I have a moralistic streak, and I am quite a bastard when I sense cowardice and dishonesty in people. Really, what I despise is dishonesty out of cowardice. As we will see, there is another kind of dishonesty, a dishonesty of strength and self-overcoming, that I do admire. It is a dishonesty I am too weak to practice. It makes my frankness seem like mere self-indulgence.

One of the great pleasures of editing Counter-Currents and North American New Right—and before them TOQ and TOQ Online—is that “highbrow” publications attract intelligent readers, so I have gotten to know the brightest and the bravest people in our cause. Our enemies—and, sadly, all too many of our advocates—constantly reinforce the image that racially conscious white people are dumb and/or unhinged. I enjoy receiving daily empirical proof that this is untrue.

Tamara de Lempicka, "Saint Moritz," 1929

I am not claiming that I have been especially virtuous here. Indeed, for me there really is no alternative. There are many people in the racialist movement who publish dumb and crude material, either because they are dumb or because they think acting dumb is the only way to reach “the masses.” The trouble with this strategy is that it repulses smart people and attracts dumb ones. Since our movement is small and is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future, I would rather it be smart than dumb. History, after all, is not shaped by small elites of dumb people.

Simply by publishing and selling intelligent materials, I have found myself at the center of a nascent network of highly intelligent racialists. Who are they? Of course I can’t say. People who have something to lose take risks every time they contact people in our movement. The only way they will contact me is if they can be assured that I will keep their information confidential. And I will. My mission depends upon it, and nothing is more important to me than the cause.

But I can tell you what types of people they are. First of all, they are far above average in intelligence, intellectual curiosity, idealism, and creativity. They include college professors, writers, artists, designers, publishers, creative people working in the film industry, businessmen, and professionals, some of them quite prominent in their fields.

They include a disproportionate number of people in their late teens, 20s, and 30s—far younger than the average audience at an American Renaissance Conference or a Council of Conservative Citizens gathering—many of them from upper and upper middle class backgrounds who are headed to or who have graduated from leading universities. With a little luck and a little guidance, they are destined to have a disproportionate influence on society.

In short, I believe that I have the makings of a new intellectual and creative elite, an elite that might be able to play a leading role in our people’s victory.

But it is not an elite yet.

Tamara de Lempicka, "Autoportrait in Green Bugatti,"1925

First, I am often the only racial nationalist these people know, and for the most part, our relationships are merely commercial (they buy books from me) or virtual (email pen pals). We do not have a network yet, just a lot of isolated individuals connected to me by the slimmest of strands. To have a network, we have to create lateral ties between the different strands, linking individuals to the network at multiple points. I am working on that, putting like-minded individuals in touch with one another.

Second, we are few in number and widely scattered around the world. There need to be more of us, and we need to have concrete, face-to-face interactions from time to time. I’m working on that. I am working on bringing in more people and creating safe spaces for face-to-face interactions.

Third, we need people who are plugged into the system and have a lot to lose. But because of these very traits, they cannot afford to be explicit White Nationalists. Not yet, anyway. Nothing would be gained by these people losing their positions in the system by openly avowing White Nationalism in today’s climate.

So what is to be done? We need to keep building our network until we become strong enough, and the system becomes weak enough, for open struggle to have a chance of success. Until then, most of us will have to remain publicly silent, sharing our views with only small circles of trusted friends.

But psychologically, that is very difficult to do. The truth matters to us, or we would not be White Nationalists. Courage matters to us, or we would not be White Nationalists. So it is very difficult for us to withhold the truth, or even pay lip-service to lies, without feeling in our hearts like cowards.

For instance, recently a comrade who is in the position to hire people for his firm told me that he was dreading a conversation with his superior about diversity. He told me that he was planning to flatly declare that he would base his decisions solely on merit. He said that he couldn’t live with himself otherwise.

Tamara de Lempicka, "Portrait of Dr. Boucard," 1929

I told him that this was an immoral self-indulgence. His protests would not change his institution’s commitment to diversity. It would only harm his position in the institution and very likely lead to somebody else being given the power to hire people.

I persuaded him that it would be much better to pay lip service to diversity, keep his power to hire people, and then use that power to hire fellow comrades. To hell with “merit” if the best candidate is a racial or ideological enemy. In such a process, “diversity” could actually help us, since he could use considerations of diversity to exclude Jews on the grounds that they are white people.

Being a White Nationalist has many risks and no rewards. One of my goals is to change this by building mutual aid into our network.

To help square this with his conscience, I suggested that he see himself as a secret agent, as a disciplined political soldier. When James Bond is under cover, he doesn’t reproach himself as a coward for not revealing his true identity. He just thinks of his mission, of his duty. A secret agent does not lie out of cowardice, but out of strength and self-overcoming. He suppresses any self-indulgent frankness for the greater good.

Yes, we need more explicit White Nationalists. But if you cannot be one, don’t reproach yourself as a coward, don’t create an inner conflict that exhausts your energies and may lead you to self-destructively blurt out the truth in a moment of mere weakness and self-indulgence.

Instead, you need to fully adopt the role of a secret agent, burrow deep, rise high, bring your comrades along with you, and be proud.

We know that the present system is unsustainable, but we do not know when it will collapse or how. It could be sudden and unanticipated, like the collapse of communism. Or it could be long and slow. However it happens, though, the people who will pick up the pieces and build a new order are likely to be an organized, networked elite already plugged into the existing power structure.

Let’s just make sure that next elite is ours. The best way to do that is to adopt the role and the discipline of secret agents.

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)

36 Comments

  1. ManUp
    Posted November 21, 2010 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    We are in a war for survival of White Humanity, and in the race war, deception is a proven and necessary battle tactic. Secret Agents, sign up here!

    The gentlemanly Confederates would have improved their chances of Independence from the Radical Republicans if they had thought less like Christian gentleman at war, and more like a besieged ethnicity whose survival could only be earned by ruthlessly outmatching the ruthlessness of their enemy.

    Greg gave the right advice re giving lip service to Diversity. In deception of this type, never give your employer any anxiety or stress that you might not be passionately embracing the Diversity. When at the Sensitivity Training, wit next to the Diversity, and if possible, sit with one on your left and one your right. Surround yourself with Diversity when at the Diversity training. Nod in agreement with everything they say at the Diversity and Inclusion Training Session, and most importantly don’t ever ask logical, rational, or smart aleck questions, and even if you don’t speak much, at least once go on record saying “we need to do more to foster Diversity and help minorities”. Once is all it takes, because after that, you will no longer be a suspect racist, as least not to the higher up Whites who write your paycheck and decide your career fate.

    Measure your success by how well you deceive them, not by how much courageous defiance to race suicide you can muster at a company paid meeting. If you do react with instinct and not deception, you are only marking yourself as a troublemaker, and that will be passed on and on, and eventually a non white superior will use that to either freeze you in place or nudge you out. They get bonus points to teaching the beneficiaries of unearned White privilege how to suffer for the sake of building stronger communities.

  2. Physis
    Posted November 21, 2010 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    I have been robbed in Philly by 4 blacks in 1998. They were black muslims as well. What I have endured after was a nightmare including visiting prison and going to court.

    Now, I should have become an advocate of ”white nationalism”. I haven’t so far.
    For me it is absolutely the same if person is black or white thrash. In Great Britain you can find lots of ”asbos” or chavs who are mostly of white origin. Then you find educated black male with a PhD. My question is therefore; who would ”white nationalist” rather prefer to meet : a) white thrash asbo on crack (or being totally drunk) who is in front of your house with the rest of his gang or b) educated black male from a good family with whom one can talk and have conversation ?
    This is just a pure question, nothing else.
    Low life people in my opinion don’t have color, creed or religion.

    • Posted November 21, 2010 at 7:48 pm | Permalink

      Physis,

      You’ve fundamentally missed the point of White Nationalism. We recognize ourselves as a people with a shared heritage and future. What you’ve asked is as absurd to us as asking me whether I would love my crackhead brother or some random professor. I love my brother, and wish he wasn’t on crack. The fact that there are White folks with problems and Black folks with PhDs only negates the most superficial brand of “White Supremacism”.

      Besides, during the course of your conversation with this sophisticated Black gentleman, you would do well to ask him if he shares the same cosmic vision of humanity that you do. Chances are, he’s an advocate for his people. Chances are, he has a bias (intentional or not) in favor of his own. Chances are, he doesn’t think that your both having been raised well makes him and you somehow “connect” on a higher level than he does with his “brothers”.

      The future belongs to populations that think tribally and work together as teams. This is why you’ve had to move so frequently, why your cost of living has been going up, and why you’re being dispossessed of the very homeland your forefathers fought and died for. It’s because Jews, Mexican immigrants, Muslims, Overseas Chinese, and Blacks are thinking tribally and you’re lost in a fog of sentimental meritocratic platitudes.

      For me, those who are blind to color, creed, and religion are the biggest low-lifes of all. I would much rather spend my time with an unemployed alcoholic who stands for something and is ready to fight for his own people than some globalist windbag who believes in nothing and frames his sense of identity around intelligence and social status alone.

      P.S.
      My brother’s not a crackhead. That was strictly for illustrative purposes.

      • Physis
        Posted November 22, 2010 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

        Matt,

        Thank you for your comment and for your time you spent to write an answer to me. I appreciate it.

        You write:
        ”We recognize ourselves as a people with a shared heritage and future.”
        That is totally fine with me albeit what happens when you meet a person who is whiter in skin then yourself and that person finds out that his great grandfather was black slave from Africa ? I am not making this up it really did happen. By some coincidence that person is from Philly and is called Matt.
        Where would you put him to be? What is his identity actually ?

        What I am saying here is that in US people are often confused with their identity which wasn’t the case (perhaps up until now) in Europe.
        In Europe people don’t have a need to call strictly themselves ”White” since we know who original Europeans are. ”White” as a term comes because Americans of European origin have mixed European identities and there are many of those who are confused with their European roots (I do salute ones who aren’t). On top of that most of ”White” Americans don’t even know the geographical positions of many European countries. What would you say about them ?
        I have heard that myself first hand and met many people from USA who are uneducated about the homeland of their ancestors.
        Because of this and many other issues you have to go ”tribal and white”. Hence when you hear ”White” it sounds like you are either on defensive from Black people or you are in some gang. Now, I am not politically correct and neither I am here to defend ”human rights”. I did my DNA test from both sides of my Family and I have written proof of my origin on the paper (which is only European).
        On the other hand I know that there are many people whose roots are in the Middle East (Semitic) and they consider themselves European Caucasians. They did the same ”origins test” like myself as well in a top class European place for DNA research.
        When you say for example ” I am an White nationalist” to person from Europe what first springs in mind would be: Skinheads, Tom Metzger, David Duke, KKK. In Europe there is Dr. Pierre Vial and his group ”Terre et Peuple” who are Identitarians. No need for ”White” again. My name would be rather: ”Euro-American Identitarian Movement” . If there are Afro-Americans why not instead of ”White” what many others groups and organizations already use – instead just ”Euro – AIM”.

        I will take one good example: A3P – American Third Position. Where in the title do you have ”White” ?

        PS. I don’t have a black friend who has a PhD. That was strictly for illustrative purposes as well and I do believe that your brother isn’t a crackhead.

        • Posted November 22, 2010 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

          My ethnic identity is “White American.” I see this struggle as a tribal one, and believe that the ethnonational tribe is to humans what schools are to fishes and packs are to wolves. For particular historical reasons, “White” is shorthand in the American context for a relatively homogeneous ethnic group: White Americans.

          Many Europeans (and Europhiles) accuse us of not having a true national identity, of being a nationless mass of people who share nothing but our biological race. Were that true, then Europeans probably wouldn’t have such an easy time spotting us when we travel. White Americans do pretty much find the same jokes funny, have similar origins, and (most importantly) have a shared destiny. When I write, I almost always say White American, and I don’t think race is a sufficient foundation by itself upon which to build an identity.

          Euro-American sounds synthetic and manipulative. “White American” is both natural and points to an ethnic extended family instead of an entire “race.”

          • Ed Bebler
            Posted November 25, 2010 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

            Given that Whites includes Jews, doens’t that present a problem? So while you might and I might think of Jews of non-white, the problem is 95% of the white population thinks otherwise.

          • Physis
            Posted November 25, 2010 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

            Ed,
            Exactly. ”White” is ”chewing the chewed” in my opinion.
            Christianity is ”White” , there are ”White” Muslims as well or people who are caucasian and they have changed religion. Are they black ?Nope. They are caucasian as well.
            When you say European-American that is manipulative ?
            Yup. Ancestors of ”White Americans” came from Outer Space.
            I won’t dwell into this anymore. It is pointless anyway.Everybody has their own opinion and I respect that.

          • Ed Bebler
            Posted November 25, 2010 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

            Physis:
            I never said anything about “European-American that is manipulative”. We just need to figure out how to get other whites to think and be more racially conscious.

          • Physis
            Posted November 27, 2010 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

            Hello Ed,
            It wasn’t you who mentioned ”European-American” sounds manipulative. Apologies for that since I was writing fast and I have omitted to mention that Matt Parrott wrote that statement just above your post.
            Thanks for your post.

    • ManUp
      Posted November 21, 2010 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

      Dangerous Whites are dangerous. Look at what we’ve done to each other over the centuries, instead of doing what we should have, and that was to form mutual defense alliances against the invasion of color from our southern borders on both hemispheres, plus Australia’s problems.

      In your question, I’d rather meet the black who probably won’t hurt me, as opposed to the White gang. But I’d be very conscious that if all the money we spent helping him to turn out all White act’n, had be better spent, then the resources would have been spent on institutions that could have cultivated the natural genius of the would-be thugs before they went bad.

      You can’t encounter a black who is educated without seeing a train of White misery following him. All they have above a mud hut, possum in a black kettle, and a bone through their nose is because of White generosity. We have lowered ourselves in mass by a factor of ten for every factor of one that we have raised them.

  3. LEW
    Posted November 21, 2010 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

    “I persuaded him that it would be much better to pay lip service to diversity, keep his power to hire people, and then use that power to hire fellow comrades. ”

    Other than the part about hiring fellow comrades, I did this all the time when I worked in the corporate world; I paid lip service to the diversity regimen while quietly making sure that any resumes I didn’t like went to the bottom of the pile. This included all Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites with a background or educational profile that suggested Liberal SWLPism — and especially Asians.

    • Chubby
      Posted November 21, 2010 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

      “SWLPism”

      ???

      • LEW
        Posted November 22, 2010 at 9:13 am | Permalink

        SWPLism. Granted an awkward construction. What I meant is that I don’t hire White people I perceive as very liberal or who come down here to work with an attitude of superiority, and when you have reviewed as many resumes and done as many interviews as I have, you can easily sniff them out. Some asshole from Harvard once sent in a two sentence application package once. It said something like “Dear Sir, I am interested in the position. I have a Master’s in history from Harvard.” And that was it. I have nothing against extremely intelligent people who went to Harvard, but IMO that was an example of SWPL arrogance.

        If you can hire people folks, do what Greg Johnson says. Hire comrades first, and if you cant’t hire a comrade, consider young Whites who had to struggle to get into the position to be considered in the first place.

  4. Greg Johnson
    Posted November 21, 2010 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    I have encountered no evidence that Tamara de Lempicka was of Jewish ancestry. What is the basis of your claim?

    • White Republican
      Posted November 21, 2010 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

      A casual Google search indicates that Tamara de Lempicka had a Polish mother and a Russian Jewish father.

      • Greg Johnson
        Posted November 22, 2010 at 1:00 am | Permalink

        Yes, some say her father Boris Gurwik-Górski was a Russian Jewish merchant, most that he was a Polish lawyer. So something is fishy here. I suspect that she was not a Jew or part-Jew. She had a Catholic upbringing, married into the Polish then the Austro-Hungarian nobility, and spent her life among European aristocrats, particularly from East and Central Europe. This is not the profile of a Jew or half-Jew.

        • Cugel
          Posted November 22, 2010 at 7:38 am | Permalink

          I researched this on the internet. The claims of Jewish origins of her father can be traced back to a particular biography, which one can read on Amazon. There is no official information, only inferential, from the fact that “Gurwick” is supposedly almost always a Jewish name, and that she gave her friends vague intimations that he may have been Jewish. She was actually born in Moscow.

          • Cugel
            Posted November 22, 2010 at 7:47 am | Permalink

            Oh, and also, one of the barons she married was in fact Jewish.

  5. Mimir's Well
    Posted November 22, 2010 at 6:13 am | Permalink

    Great article, Greg! Your idea of creating a network is so very much needed. I do not know the density of WN’s (WN’s per square mile:)), but it must be growing. We do indeed need to network on a physical, face to face level. It will happen…

  6. Oldtimer
    Posted November 22, 2010 at 6:27 am | Permalink

    “In such a process, “diversity” could actually help us, since he could use considerations of diversity to exclude Jews on the grounds that they are white people.”
    A brilliant point! What a fine idea; to use their philosophy of camoflaging themselves as being “white” (whereas we all know that they consider themselves to be a separate and distinct as well as “superior” race) against them. I love it!

  7. realVercingetorix
    Posted November 22, 2010 at 7:29 am | Permalink

    Excellent comment Matt.

    Multiracialists are well intended but morally confused. Many are moral narcissists.

  8. Ragnar
    Posted November 22, 2010 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    “I believe that ultimately we are not going to get what we want unless we level with people about what, exactly, we do want (a society of and for white people), and who and what, exactly, we are fighting against (the Christian values that have programmed us for collective suicide and the Jews who are organizing and egging the process along).”

    Yes, Christianity is the enemy. We cannot afford the luxury of tolerating this anti-Nature religion for one moment. Christianity is a religion for slaves and weaklings. Nietzscheism is our salvation – embrace it and LIVE!

    http://www.jonathanbowden.co.uk/audio/credo.mp3

    “For me, that goal is Nietzschean: the creation of a perfected, god-like white race that will give meaning and purpose to this godless, meaningless universe.” – Greg Johnson. YES! YES! YES!

    • Posted November 23, 2010 at 8:47 am | Permalink

      @ the Christian values that have programmed us for collective suicide – G.J.

      @ Yes, Christianity is the enemy. We cannot afford the luxury of tolerating this anti-Nature religion for one moment. – Ragnar

      Ragnar, you are both right and wrong.

      In one of the longest entries in my blog, another blogger advances the idea that what we are witnessing “the historical demise of Christianity”. When a star dies, this blogger says, in its last phase it expands into a red giant, before it shrinks into a white dwarf. Liberalism, today’s secular theocracy, is but the red giant of Christendom. And just as a red giant, it is devoid of its core. It expands thousandfold while losing its substance and is about to die. The Twilight of the Idols world we live in consists of Christians and secular liberals who practice a deranged altruism.

      Fair enough. But as Greg Johnson’s piece makes all too clear, in Realpolitik we need to practice a little taqiya if we are to succeed.

      Presently I am reading A Mighty Fortress and, though I come from an anti-Christian background, it’s refreshing to see that a futuristic national socialist country could only flourish in North America by ironing out the conflict between anti-Christians, the pagan Odinists and the Christians after the nationalists won the race war later in this century. As I responded to Felix above, I recommend studying these novels carefully. Covington’s stuff is really a FAQ collection of pragmatism in the real world.

      No, I have not renounced to my anti-Christian views and still have to settle lots of accounts with my abusive Catholic upbringing when I was a child. But I don’t press such views anymore, at least in the WN blogosphere. We badly need to establish a WN network and the help of those nice Christians who are racially conscious.

      • Ragnar
        Posted November 24, 2010 at 11:08 am | Permalink

        Are you saying you think it is good to tolerate lies? Christianity is a lie. I hate Christianity and want all Whites to be delivered from its bondage. This is a manifestation of my love for my race.

        “Truthfully, in this age those with intellect have no courage and those with some modicum of physical courage have no intellect. If things are to alter during the next fifty years then we must re-embrace Byron’s ideal: the cultured thug.” – Jonathan Bowden.

        • Posted November 24, 2010 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

          Of course it’s a lie. And lies must and will die. In fact, the “red giant” of neo-Christianity will degenerate even further into a “white dwarf” star in the forthcoming decades just when a totally new star, White Nationalism, unexpectedly emerges in another astronomical corner of the stellar nebulae.

          This said, read what racially conservative Carter Winfield (a Christian) said to a race traitor, another sincere Christian, on pages 216-218 of A Mighty Fortress and see what do I mean.

          (By the way, the latest NVA video gives a clue about what the whole Quartet is about.)

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted November 23, 2010 at 10:09 am | Permalink

      I think religious tolerance is one of the genuine political and social gains of liberalism, and I want to preserve it. I also think that it is a necessity within the White Nationalist movement, and thus that it will be built into the foundations of the White Republic. But social and political tolerance does not mean that religions are immune from criticism. I want a movement in which there is an ethos of frankness as well as tolerance. I think we must develop that ethos if we are to be effective.

  9. Posted November 22, 2010 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    For some of the best information for Whites: http://www.northwestfront.org

    Maybe you’ve been thinking that there has to be a better way. Maybe you, like us, want to be part of the answer to society’s problems. You can be!
    http://www.hotshare.net/audio/275826-1945324127.html Introduction to the Northwest Front A Homeland For Whites

    Radio Free Northwest is now available on the Party website at
    http://www.northwestfront.org
    http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com
    All four Northwest independence novels can be downloaded for free from
    http://nw-pdfs.tk/

    • Posted November 23, 2010 at 8:06 am | Permalink

      Felix,

      Yes, thanks. But the Quartet is so important a work, and such a vision (I’d dare to say the vision for WNs), that I wouldn’t recommend reading the novels in the internet. Long narrative is extremely tiring for the brain and bothersome on screen. I have purchased copies of the four novels. If you are going to spend some money on books, this is one of the best investments for your personal library.

      P.S. Your second link is dead. See the top of my blog for a live intro link to Northwest Front.

    • Posted November 29, 2010 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

      Felix, The–:

      http://nw-pdfs.tk/

      –link has been hacked or what? It still worked a few days ago… I’ve lots of books to download and this hacking has been going on for some days now. Any other link? Do you know what heppened or how to contact those webmasters?

  10. Posted November 23, 2010 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    @ I tend toward tolerance, but in this area I have a moralistic streak, and I am quite a bastard when I sense cowardice and dishonesty in people. Really, what I despise is dishonesty out of cowardice. – G.J.

    So do I.

    I used to be a chess player, most of whom are notorious for intellectual cruelty.

    Although I’ve given up chess, one of my hobbies is to intellectually crush some of my former friends with no pity because of their dishonesty. E.g., here, here, here (Jews or half-Jews) and here and here (non-Jews).

  11. Posted November 23, 2010 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    “For me, that goal is Nietzschean: the creation of a perfected, god-like white race that will give meaning and purpose to this godless, meaningless universe.”

    Where is that quote from, originally?

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted November 23, 2010 at 10:59 am | Permalink

      Something I said in an online discussion, that has come back to haunt me again and again.

      • Posted November 23, 2010 at 11:41 am | Permalink

        It was an online discussion at Occidental Dissent some time ago, about which Hunter Wallace made a fuss recently and to which I responded in my blog a week ago (that comment reflects my “god-like” views of course, not GJ’s).

      • GP
        Posted November 23, 2010 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

        I don’t think your sentiment is anything to be ashamed of. It reflects our belief that our racial brothers and sisters can be so much more than what they are, more than even they can imagine. I share your aspiration and hope we can bring about the profound spiritual change as well as political change necessary so that in the future virtue triumphs over deceit, honesty over slavishness, and industry over sloth in every endeavor.

  12. LEW
    Posted November 24, 2010 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Ragnar: Are you saying you think it is good to tolerate lies? Christianity is a lie. I hate Christianity and want all Whites to be delivered from its bondage. This is a manifestation of my love for my race.

    There are many reasons to just leave Christianity alone. One reason is that it is already in steep decline and will die out soon enough without help from WN.

  13. Barney
    Posted November 25, 2010 at 2:36 am | Permalink

    Even as a child I considered Christianity to be anti-nature and the OT to be anti-life and anti-God. “Leave nothing alive that breathes” is just one example of this.

    Whoever created this world would NOT choose one tiny group to destroy it. Neither would any group want to destroy the work of a being they respected. On a human level, deliberately destroying or damaging a person’s work says “I hate you”, and the same must apply when that destruction, or the desire to destroy, extends to an entire world.

    Turn the other cheek means let your enemies destroy you. Believe what I say BECAUSE I say it means I consider myself your superior and I don’t want you thinking for yourself in case you realise I’m not.

    I am convinced there is an ultimate authority of some kind, though I wouldn’t pretend to know whether there is one God, a million lesser Gods or something in between. What I do know is that we are all immortal, if only because nothing else would make any sense.

    Apart from dismissing immortality as “spooks in the sky”, I believe Ben Klassen had the right idea with his Creativity religion for White People only, based on the idea that if we can’t prove it, it doesn’t exist. His books are abailable for free download here

    http://www.creativityalliance.com/

    Unfortunately too many people consider themselves Christian because the Christian doctrine as most people perceive it (not as it really is), appears to resonate with White values. To learn the truth means properly studying the bible and learning what a suicidal doctrine Christianity really is, even before adding in the further “Judeo-” corruption.

    Our New Nation will initially be predominantly Christian whether we like it or not, but I would suggest that we subsequently teach our children about “Creativity”, but with immortality put back in. People must be free to choose what to believe, but once Ben Klassen’s ideas are in people’s minds, they will no longer accept obvious lies simply because someone tells them to.

    Priest. Believe what I tell you to believe because I’ve got a direct line to God.

    Thinking White Man. Oh yeah? How do I know you’re not like every other “nutter” who claims to hear voices in his head?

    Let people believe whatever they genuinely believe, but teach Creativity in schools presented as a “basic grounding” in religion.

    Ok. It’s deception, but for the right reasons, and imho it’s better than teaching a suicidal doctrine based on lies and lunacy.

  • Video of the Day:

  • Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    The Lightning and the Sun

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    The Wagnerian Drama

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    An eagle with a shield soaring upwards

    A Life in the Political Wilderness

    The Fourth Political Theory

    The Passing of the Great Race

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    The Prison Notes

    It Cannot Be Stormed

    Revolution from Above

    The Proclamation of London

    Beyond Human Rights

    The WASP Question

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Jewish Strategy

    The Metaphysics of War

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    The French Revolution in San Domingo

    The Revolt Against Civilization

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Archeofuturism

    Tyr

    Siege

    On Being a Pagan

    The Lost Philosopher

    The Dispossessed Majority

    Might is Right

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance