Print this post Print this post

Porn & Race

2,320 words

Pornography is a multibillion dollar industry, a mass medium that has had a very harmful effect upon our people. It emerged in its current unrestrained, ubiquitous form in the 1970s with the release of films like Deep Throat (1972), Behind the Green Door (1972), and The Devil in Miss Jones (1973).

At least two of the female stars of the films died relatively young, a fate that appears to be an occupational hazard.

Italian mob money funded a couple of the early films, and all three were produced and directed by seedy Gentiles (Italian American Gerard Damiano, and brothers Jim and Artie Mitchell).

The head of one of the largest contemporary studios (Evil Angel), John Stagliano, has an Italian-sounding surname. He is married to a former porn actress. Both Stagliano and his wife are HIV positive (Stagliano used to perform). He is reportedly a major benefactor of the Reason Foundation (publisher of Reason magazine) and the Cato Institute, two important libertarian think tanks.

Nevertheless, it is Jews who have long ruled the roost in this realm.

Former porn gossip columnist Luke Ford, an Australian-born convert to Judaism, wrote, “Secular Jews dominate the production and distribution of porn. Just like they’ve had a disproportionate role in the ‘white slave trade’ and other forms of sex commerce.”

The social triumph of pornography coincided with the efflorescence of American and European Jewry. A massive, decades-long legal campaign was waged to force it down whites’ throats. Ironically, pornography is now enshrined as “free speech,” while free speech is increasingly criminalized as “hate.”

The industry sponsors its own legal front group, the First Amendment Lawyers Association (FALA), akin to the Communist Party’s old National Lawyers Guild or the Left’s American Civil Liberties Union.

Porn is systematized prostitution. Intrepid prosecutors tried attacking it as such early on, but well-funded opponents and a judicial system oriented to serving the powerful insured that that they ran into a brick wall.

According to media reports, when film, Internet, sex toys, and “dance club” revenues are pooled, industry-wide revenue amounts to $8 billion a year. There is no reason why this figure, obtained by journalists from a spokesman for the Adult Video News (AVN) trade journal, should be accepted as gospel. The actual figure may be much higher.

A Wikipedia article, now deleted, estimated that porn industry revenue alone—i.e., minus sex toys or dance clubs—in the US was $13.3 billion in 2006 . . . six years ago. And in 2004 the AVN itself had said that collective industry revenue outstripped the individual revenues of both the record industry and major league sports.

But, hey, who’s counting?

No matter how it’s reckoned, there’s a lot of cash flowing into Jewish coffers.

Socially-Destructive Effects

Despite its cheapness, technical crudity, and largely unerotic (gynecological) quality, porn reaches directly into, and manipulates, the most basic instincts. It is “calculated to bypass the brain and go directly to the lower cortex,” as Justin Raimondo put it.

A statistical analysis published on TOO (“Legalized Pornography and Demographic Genocide”) suggested that nations with legalized pornography suffer a drastic decline in total fertility. The author did not examine porn’s likely effect on interracial sex and miscegenation (see below), and attributes problems solely to its influence upon men, which is almost certainly mistaken. Women, too, are manipulated by it—particularly its lessons in interracial sex and lesbianism.

Worse, it alters sexual behavior on a society-wide scale, behavior that is the foundation of family, marriage, and race. That’s a staggering power to place in anyone’s hands, much less the Jews’.

It is therefore telling that one of the first imports into conquered Middle Eastern countries by the US and other imperialist governments via DVD, international satellite, and the Internet, is the social acid of pornography, which dissolves the sexual and communal bonds that unite society, state, ethnic group, religion, and race.

Its power also finds expression in the behavior of US troops, including the acts of humiliation and degradation photographed and filmed at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq:

Far from being a random explosion of Appalachian animality, some real thought went into the obscene antics of the S&M Seven. But whose thoughts? Surely not Lynndie England’s . . .

The Abu Ghraib photo gallery of S&M imagery, far from being a prank, is art. Monstrously perverted, even vile, yet the sheer horror of it, calculated to elicit an emotional reaction, qualifies it as such, at least technically, as much as the work of Robert Mapplethorpe. What we are talking about, in this case, is the art of propaganda, or, at least, the nexus where pornography and propaganda meet. (Justin Raimondo, “Abu Ghraib and the Pornography of Power,” May 15, 2004)

One assumes that crime must be widespread in the industry, but of course no one is looking. The ethnic and political stakes, not to mention the money and social power involved, are too high and too obvious to allow any objective examination.

Are American, “Russian” (Jewish), and Israeli organized crime groups active in the industry? (Eastern European porn appears to be common, and you can frequently identify Israeli and Russian accents.) What about human trafficking and white slavery? Murder? Abuse? The drug trade? Financial crimes, including tax evasion and money laundering?

Who knows?

At the moment there is an intra-Establishment squabble over public health. Not the higher suicide rates, shortened life spans, and serious long-term non-STD health risks women appear to suffer from, but rather the threat of STDs, specifically AIDS.

90% of US porn is shot in the San Fernando Valley—the “other Hollywood”—a strip of dingy suburbs northeast of downtown Los Angeles.

California health law mandates the use of condoms when workers are exposed to blood-borne pathogens. But the industry just flouts the law. Pornographers contend consumers won’t watch films in which condoms appear because it ruins the fantasy.

Unsurprisingly, authorities haven’t enforced the law against them. The Los Angeles city council is trying to change this, but one of the largest producers, Steven Hirsch, founder and head of Los Angeles-based Vivid Entertainment, says: “It’s going to be interesting to see how they do try to enforce it and who’s going to fund it, and all of the time and effort they’re going to spend. Ultimately I think what they will find is people will just stop shooting in the city of Los Angeles. That’s a given.”

Assuming the effort goes forward at all, which it may not, sympathetic courts prodded by well-heeled industry attorneys might fabricate a First Amendment or other “civil liberties” basis for ignoring the law.

But, again, it is an intramural squabble.

Racist Agenda

Porn permeates mass culture from top to bottom despite society’s studied pretension that it doesn’t exist. However, when it comes to race, it is impossible to miss the thumb in the eye and the spittle in the face, even if no one talks about it. (Indeed, spit in the face is a recurring feature of pornographic degradation, another hallmark of Jewish dominance.)

Even a mainstream source ventured that porn “fashion” now suffuses movies, television, and popular music. I heard Tina Fey joke about “MILFs” on NBC TV. Indeed, evidence of its effects is everywhere.

Jews are porn moguls, and also directing voices (often with pronounced Jewish, Israeli, or “Russian” accents) behind the handheld video cams, and populate the ranks of male performers as well.

The Jewish-white racial dynamic is so overwhelming that it impossible to miss.

It is essentially identical to the one described by Marie Syrkin in her scathing critique of celebrated racist novelist Philip Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint (1969)—”the dark Jewboy lusting after the Aryan maiden in order to dominate her world.” She said:

Of what do anti-Semites accuse Jews? The gravamen of the anti-Semitic indictment straight through Hitler is that the Jew is the defiler and destroyer of the Gentile world.

In a classic description of what the Nazis called rassenschande (racial defilement), Portnoy explains that he lusts after blonde shikses not because he is drawn to them individually but because that is how he can “conquer America.” In sexual intercourse his pleasure is that “I can stick it up their backgrounds.” The scene in which he gloats at the contrast between his swarthy body and that of the fair Nordic patrician maiden he possesses is straight out of the Goebbels-Streicher script.

Nor is Roth content with depicting Portnoy as the willful violator of the Gentile sexual background. He must be revealed as the enemy of the Gentile world. For Portnoy, Assistant Commissioner of Human Opportunity, the phony Jewish liberal par excellence, offers as his prime achievement his exposure of an “Ur-Wasp” in the [1950s] television quiz scandals: “Yes, I was one happy yiddel down there in Washington, a little Stern Gang [Jewish terrorist organization] of my own, busily exploding Charlie’s [Charles Van Doren's] honor and integrity, while simultaneously becoming lover to that aristocratic Yankee beauty whose forebears arrived on these shores in the 17th century. Phenomenon known as Hating Your Goy and Eating One Too.”

This is not even funny. It’s plain vicious. (The New York Review of Books, November 14, 1974)

The Jewish obsession with female defilement as fundamental to a broad genocidal assault upon white society as a whole is just as explicit in pornography as it is in Roth.

Pornographers have developed an elaborate taxonomy to describe their offerings, one of the largest categories of which is called “Interracial.” This is a misnomer, however, since almost all of it involves black men on white girls.

The only white nationalist I’ve seen mention this topic is Revilo Oliver back in the 1990s.

Interracial porn is so pervasive that it extends across most of the categories, including “Gangbang,” “Bukkake,” “Wife,” Cuckold,” and others it would be too tedious and pointless to enumerate.

“Interracial” seems to have exploded in a big way in the 1980s, although Marilyn Chambers performed it as early as 1972 in Behind the Green Door. An earlier instance was recorded by French novelist Jean Raspail in The Camp of the Saints (1975):

Ralph Ginzburg, the famous [Jewish] American publisher, had printed a series of photos in his magazine Eros ["Black and White in Color," 8-page spread, Winter 1962], which had caused not a little ink to be spilled. They showed an interracial couple—white woman, black man—in various stages of nude embrace—with a caption that read as follows: “Tomorrow these couples will be recognized as the pioneers of an enlightened age, in which prejudice will be dead and the only race will be the human race.” Yes, that’s what it was all about. And everyone listened with an almost religious awe, because in point of fact, they spoke in the name of death. Only a white woman can give birth to a white baby. Let her choose not to conceive one, let her choose only non-white mates, and the genetic results aren’t long in coming. (p. 294)

The vastly expanded creation and dissemination of black-on-white porn since then is momentous from a racialist perspective. It forms a key element in the racial agenda of both Jews and government.

The open, repetitive depiction of interracial sex, in combination with raw, explicit racial debasement of both white girls and men, has had an enormous impact on sexual behavior in ex-white societies.

This impact has probably been as important, if not more important, than racist mainstream propaganda, not only on the thousands (tens of thousands?) of white girls who passed through porn mills over the last 40 years, but on teen and adult female viewers as well. Even middle-aged whites have been weaned on this stuff, so long has it been around.

Although porn has affected both sexes, its most important impact has been the radical alteration of white women’s real-life attitudes and sexual behavior. It dangles the spicy, titillating lure of “forbidden” fruit before their eyes in a way the racist mainstream media cannot match. It places all of the details, as well as accompanying PC attitudes, directly in front of their eyes.

Often the female performers, who are contemptuously humiliated, mocked, and debased by Jews, Negroes, Mestizos, and others on camera, are instructed to—and robotically do—express contempt for white males in comparison to blacks.

It must be remembered, too, that the entire justification for the Communist-style censorship in America and Europe demanded by Jews, academics, government, and the media boils down to the claim that ideas have consequences. This is certainly true of anti-white pornography.

Jews bleat endlessly about “racism,” “hate,” and the deleterious consequences of intermarriage on themselves. So they know exactly what they’re doing to whites, and the government facilitates it.

There may now be a small occupational caste of Negro producers of interracial porn as well, akin to Negro pimps in American cities. Both minority groups, Jews and blacks, sexually, economically, and emotionally exploit the young white girls under their control.

Indicative of Jewish dominance (for blacks are certainly not naturally dominant) is the vast scale of contemporary interracial sex, and the marked reversal of the historic norm which paired white males with African females but now pairs black males with white females.

Arthur Jensen characterized past black-white liaisons as “a real but relatively low number.” Today, the number of liaisons is far higher and the male-female roles reversed, mirroring depictions in Jewish porn.

In sum, the porn industry is dominated by Jews. Production and distribution of smut is extremely lucrative. Realistically, one must assume that porn and crime, including organized crime, coexist symbiotically.

The massive sexual exploitation—prostitution—of white girls, and the resulting power to alter social attitudes and sexual behavior across society, has enabled Jews to “conquer America” as Philip Roth put it.

There are other racial dimensions to pornography, but the ones mentioned here are the most important from a white perspective and, indeed, the primary ones from a general perspective as well.

“They spoke in the name of death. Only a white woman can give birth to a white baby. Let her choose not to conceive one, let her choose only non-white mates, and the genetic results aren’t long in coming.”

 

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)

63 Comments

  1. Posted January 20, 2012 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Another fantastic article- I always enjoy your writing.

    Have you read Lasha Darkmoon’s pieces on “Russians” and the porn industry?

    Everything is such a revolution, such a scam- they only exist to stick a finger (or god knows what else) in our eye. Do these people exist for themselves as individuals in ANY way at all?

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 20, 2012 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

      Jews seem drawn to parasitical ways of life. They exist for themselves alone. But they cannot exist by themselves.

      • Posted January 20, 2012 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

        They are the Gaius Baltar of humanity.

        (Yes, I know they exist for themselves, but it seems a great part of their existence is relegated to bringing down “the other” even when there is not personal or communal gain- sometimes even antithetical to self preservation or gain. Maybe they’re just assholes.)

        • Greg Johnson
          Posted January 20, 2012 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

          Yes, there is definitely an element of nihilism in Jews, insofar as they seem to destroy for destruction’s sake, but I think that this is just an irrational intensification of a strategy that works well for them right up until it doesn’t and they have to pack their diamonds and flee. Jews don’t know how to use the brakes, which means they hit brick walls and go into ditches (usually driving other people’s countries).

      • White Republican
        Posted January 20, 2012 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

        In “Prophetic Fiction” (Liberty Bell, October 1985), Revilo P. Oliver wrote of David Gurney’s novel, The “F” Certificate (London: Bernard Geis, ca. 1968):

        “The protagonist is an Englishman of good family who has attained a considerable success as a producer of high-grade motion pictures, in partnership with a talented director, a ‘refugee’ from Mitteleuropa. Although no one would dare say so explicitly, the partner is obviously a Kike, who naturally stabs the Englishman in the back financially, partly from greed, but primarily, as he confesses, because he hates gentlemen. He plans to use the studios to produce films of the hardest ‘hard-core’ pornography to induce and spread corruption by exciting the sexual urge that is innate in all viable species of mammals . . . Only the strongest minds can resist the corrosive effect of such morbid excitation. Greed does enter into the Yid’s motives, but he is supplied with large sums of money from unidentified sources to achieve his purpose, which obviously cannot be that of capital investment. It is clear that his greed is merely superficial: he is driven by an innate lust to pollute, to defile, to destroy a civilization he instinctively hates, and to that end he is prepared to sacrifice everything, including his own children. In this part of the story there is a fundamental and timeless truth — a fact of life that it is suicidal to ignore.”

        Julius Evola expressed a similar viewpoint in his Preface to an Italian translation of the Protocols of Zion:

        “To debase, to make all fixed points variable, to make all certainties problematic, to sensualise, to tendentiously exalt what is inferior in man, to spread a sort of terror, calculated to favour self-abandonment to obscure forces and to pave the way for occult influences of the sort described in the ‘Protocols'; this is the true meaning of cultural Judaism. We do not think that there is a genuine plan here, or even a precise intention on the part of every individual; what comes into play is ‘race,’ i.e., an instinct; in the same way, it is in the nature of fire to burn. The fact remains that the whole, disorganised, unconscious influence is in perfect accord with the occult, integral, unitary influence of the hidden forces of world-wide subversion. In order to recognise the existence of international Judaism, it is not therefore necessary to assert that all Jews are led by a genuine organisation, and that their whole action consciously follows a plan. The link is established to a large extent automatically, by nature.”

        I think that Oliver and Evola were right to identify the Jewish instinct for subversion, and not a conspiratorial organization, as the basis for Jewish swarming tactics.

      • Junghans
        Posted January 21, 2012 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

        In speaking of Jewish acts of race defilement, what can top their insufferable, depraved mania for pushing the likes of an Obama onto us? They seem to sadistically relish degrading us with Negritude in any way that they can.

        The Jewish tendency to operate on a ‘hive mentality’ is well noted by Evola and others, but if you think about it, isn’t that mental telepathy characteristic of theirs exactly what Jewish ‘Holocaust’ writers try to project onto Hitler and the German officials accused of Jewish genocide? There was no plan, no budget, no written orders, sparse ‘evidence’ etc, etc, yet the “extermination of the Jews” was purportedly done with a vague wink and a nod by the demonized “Nazis”!

        As regards the Third Reich Era artwork at the top of this article, I might mention the fact that there was a 51 page booklet published in Düsseldorf around 1936-37, with the title of Raßenschändung. There was also an English translation called ‘Defilement of Race’ done at the same time. If anyone has either of these cached, it would be very interesting to see them.

      • Junghans
        Posted January 21, 2012 at 7:06 pm | Permalink

        The author of Raßenschändung was Dietrich Hutten and it was published by the Verlag Deutsche Revolution in both German and English editions.

  2. Posted January 20, 2012 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Have you guys ever thought of doing an audio version of your literary works and putting it up on itunes? Maybe a “best of” or by author/genre etc? I’m sure you could get volunteers to help.

    I’d buy it. There’s so much stuff I want to read on here, but…oof…my eyes.

  3. Slippery Pete
    Posted January 20, 2012 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Great article but I have to critique just one aspect of it. Women are NOT directly affected by porn. They don’t watch it, they don’t like it, and even if they reference it in passing, it’s almost always to turn the heads of the males present.

    What I’m trying to say here is that we men need to take responsibility here. We’re constantly criticizing women for their failings. Well this ones entirely our weakness. I’m convinced porn has ruined MANY male libidos , and if these men aren’t interested in chasing women any more, how the hell can we blame women for not respecting or following our lead! Please men, I beg if you, think before you watch this crap, even if you fail at first, keep trying. Then go out and find your woman, guaranteed she’s there waiting for you, confused, and wondering where all the men are!

    I have to add, the interracial porn is the same, women do NOT watch this stuff. It’s male fantasy that drives it!! No excuses, no bitching about women, no more bullshit. We conquered the world like 10 times over. We will not go down over this as a race, but many within our race will!

    • Michael Bell
      Posted January 20, 2012 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

      This is true for the most part, though I wouldn’t make the general statement that “Women don’t watch it.” Some of them do, but usually only at the request of male partners. But in the end, men are definitely the majority of viewers, which is why female porn stars make much more money than males.

      Convincing men to simply stop watching it will be difficult to do, though I agree that they ought to stop. I imagine that future circumstances, i.e. deeper economic decline, will facilitate the gradual elimination of porn from people’s lives. Aside from the hard core addicts, people mostly watch porn out of boredom, after all.

    • Jim Stark
      Posted January 20, 2012 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

      I agree with Slippery Pete. This is not the jews first line of attack on White women and White society in general. If you think about how much time and money has been spent in promoting miscegenation, it’s a surprise that you don’t see more interracial couples. Of course, this could change if things continue, but I doubt it.

      I’ve noticed that more men seem to cross the color barrier than women. It’s just more shocking the other way around. But telling men to stop watching porn and find a White woman is a little simplistic. White women today are not nice and too demanding. The men that White women prefer today are either conformist or effeminate, not the bad boy as is always thought. Who they sleep with and who they are marry are different. White women will not marry colored men in great numbers, since coloreds are too primitive, insensitive and dumb.

      There are people in our society today that could be considered functional retards. I think the porn industry is recruiting and has always recruited from this element. Most people understand this and probably don’t take the match ups in porn very seriously.

  4. Canadian
    Posted January 20, 2012 at 4:43 pm | Permalink
    • Posted January 20, 2012 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

      Yes, how dare he say those things (out loud)!!!???

      I can’t believe an Abe Foxman quote exists without use of the word “canard.”

      • White Republican
        Posted January 21, 2012 at 12:16 am | Permalink

        Abe Foxman’s rhetoric is so clichéd that I wonder if he’s working from a script, just like Indian telemarketers. I’ve also noticed the frequency with which Foxman quacks “canard” whenever goyim see Jews as they are and not as they pretend to be. By the word, “canard” is the French word for duck, but Jews are better likened to geese: as Westbrook Pegler remarked, they hiss when they speak, they devour everything before them, and they foul everything behind them.

      • Posted January 21, 2012 at 11:59 am | Permalink

        That’s the one Palin should have used instead.

  5. AWM
    Posted January 20, 2012 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    Furthermore, if you ever look at online porn (or so I have been told), you’ll see that it is nicely categorized into various areas of introduction which will soon be brought into the mainstream: voyeurism becomes reality tv, gays/transexuality becomes Sex And The City/Will And Grace, and of course we are now seeing full blown interracial sexuality, normalized onto tv commercials.

    The medium Porn Gefilte fish swim in front of the large MSM Gefilte fish. Sure makes you glad they own Nickelodeon.

  6. zalmoxis
    Posted January 20, 2012 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    not only on the thousands (tens of thousands?) of white girls who passed through porn mills over the last 40 years

    Probably in the hundreds of thousands. I’ve probably personally seen over 10,000. There’s a lot of porn out there. It honestly would not surprise me if over 1 million girls worldwide have been in porn. Actually 10 million would not surprise me.

    In any case, piracy and overproduction will probably kill the porn industry. There’s tons of it for free on streaming YouTube-style sites now, in addition to all the other ways of downloading it that have always been around. I don’t know who actually buys the stuff. I’ve watched a lot of porn over the past decade and I never paid a dime for any of it. Plus, all the porn that has ever been produced is still out there. The only aspect of it that has changed is video quality, and in a few years there will be a ton of HD quality stuff out there too.

    Is porn really that much of a problem? You read a lot of crap about the horrors of porn on WN sites, but I would bet that WNs watch porn at at least the average rate. Also, the feminists/Christians who are the most anti-porn are generally also the most anti-White and pro-Jewish.

    American society has shifted from monogamy to a sort of soft polygyny for reasons that have nothing to do with the mainstreaming of porn. Men are not passing up live women because of porn, they are turning to porn because they can’t get laid.

    • Michael Bell
      Posted January 21, 2012 at 10:19 am | Permalink

      All of the reasons the article gives for us to reject pornography are spot-on. Porn is also a problem largely because it leads men to have the wrong expectations of women, and women, being essentially passive, will often give in if they care about their men enough. And if the girl has any kind of daddy issues, which many do today because of the modern family climate, then she’s even more likely to subject herself to degradation. Men now expect their girlfriends to do the things in the videos, things which, if I knew my girl had done them with someone else, would lead me to break up with her and never speak to her again (as well as be filled with a desire to flog her relentlessly).

      Simply because feminists and what-have-you are anti-porn does not mean that it’s bad for racialists to be anti-porn. We have our reasons, they have theirs. Communists are anti-capitalist, so does that mean that we should send donations to Soros?

    • Stronza
      Posted January 21, 2012 at 10:22 am | Permalink

      There have always been men who couldn’t “get laid”, long before the printing press, dirty pictures, celluloid 8mm film and internet. Can anyone here opine as to what these poor guys did?

      Some men are so stupid, too. A nice next door neighbor who I’d had a few pleasant words with, when I was in my 20s, invited me over for a nice meal; he was a good cook. Then he says, come here, and in the next room, darkened, is a projector all set up with a sheet hanging from the wall. He cranked up the little machine and voila, for the first time in my life I actually see people having sex, c/w assorted unnatural practices that are not a part of our biological history, shall we say. I got upset and couldn’t stand to watch and went home.

      Apparently this was some sort of foreplay to get me in the mood. I’d never had the slightest interest in him in this way. Hope you guys aren’t all quite as stupid as my ex-friend.

      • Michael Bell
        Posted January 21, 2012 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

        It’s good to know that some women still respect themselves. Good job.

    • Armor
      Posted January 21, 2012 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

      Zalmoxis: “The only aspect of it that has changed is video quality”

      In the pre-internet days, when Jews controlled the distribution of porn, they could make money by filming an ugly Jew like Ron Jeremy with nude girls! Since then, I think the porn industry has been partially aryanized by the internet. But the Jews still have sleazy websites dedicated to incest fantasies, interracial sex and other Jewish fetishes, with popup ads that use the word “slut” everywhere.

      “Is porn really that much of a problem?”

      I don’t think it is much of a problem, apart from the Jewish promotion of interracial sex so as to delegitimize racial loyalty. In itself, porn doesn’t have a message about how people should behave in real life. It doesn’t encourage people to see one another as pieces of meat. In any case, the promotion of interracial sex and sexual promiscuity comes mainly from the mainstream media, not from the porn industry. As for who watches interracial porn with White women, I guess it’s mainly Jews and other non-Whites.

  7. Lew
    Posted January 20, 2012 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Well porn consumption is obviously a loathsome vice. Unfortunately, a lot of men having succumbed to it may never fully free themselves of it. I also find it hard to believe there are White men who view interracial porn even in this sick and degenerate society, and even among the lowest dregs of the Omega White male population. White males who are drawn to such content must have very sick minds, and if their genes are taken out of circulation, it is probably a good thing.

    • Michael
      Posted January 21, 2012 at 10:14 am | Permalink

      Lew please, there is no need to assume that White men who watch interracial have something wrong with their genes. I am honestly sick of people assuming that everything is in the blood, that every single little character trait, every instinct and tendency is somehow genetic. What if a White man who was once a watcher of interracial porn when he was younger grows up and eventually learns the error of his ways and ends up a White Nationalist. Would it be better if we got rid of his genes as well? I see no reason to assume that. Does nobody believe in redemption or second chances anymore? You can’t just assume that everyone who fails at first is somehow genetically deficient.

      • Lew
        Posted January 21, 2012 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

        Michael: I don’t believe in making a big deal out of person’s minor mistakes. I actually had in mind the regular consumer of the Black male / White female material, not the transient viewer or young person. I agree with you people go overboard attributing things to genes.

  8. Maaldweb
    Posted January 20, 2012 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Jews created feminism. Feminism creates harems insofar as that every female wants an alpha male (which of course doesn’t/can’t marry them all). At the same time the vast majority of males, bombarded by continuous sexual signals coming either through the jewish media and/or from the scantily dressed and aggressively provocative modern females, remain sexually unsatisfied/frustrated. Then Jews offer pornography to these males as a compensation and make big money out of it.

    You want to fight porn? Restore patriarchy/destroy feminism. How can you do that? Remove Jews off our backs.

    Any other strategy against pornography is moralistic misandric and idiotic crap promoted by the Social CONservatives and their allies the judeofeminists.

  9. Posted January 21, 2012 at 6:07 am | Permalink

    Porn is an interesting case to illustrate that Jewish domination [if you will] of any industry or trade is INHERENTLY bad, without assuming any prior Vast Conspiracy.

    Like comic books or “psychology,” porn is an area for Jews [naturally self-regarding as we know] to work our their own twisted psychological issues, and impose them on the rest of us.

    Liberal anti-porn killjoy Gail Dines actually makes an interesting point in her recent book, Pornland, against those, such as James Hillman and other “archetypal” psychologists, who argue that “porn is fantasy and fantasy occurs in the imagination, not reality, and is creative, valuable and liberating:”

    “What they] miss is that porn actually works to limit our imagination and capacity to be sexually creative by delivering images that are mind-numbingly repetitive in content and dulling in their monotony.”

    Gore Vidal, America First patriot and enemy of the East Coast Jew Literary Establishment, said as much in less and better words decades ago: pornography is for people without imagination.

    But of course the problem is that the substitute offered not only also makes people even less creative [like all mass-culture, music, art, etc.] but furthermore has a definite political or cultural goal. While Liberal Dines is concerned about “racism” in the porn industry, like feminists who object to the ladies’ working conditions, our author here zeroes in on the fact that these Jews are working out there own cultural strategy.

    As someone who “came of age” as on says during the “Golden Age of Porn” [as I learn from the titles of various websites and companies devoted to "retro" porn] the Jewish presence was almost comically obvious, even before I had any inkling of “racial consciousness”. From the brown paper era of Ralph ‘Eros’ Ginzburg to the newstand and cable era of Al “Screw” Goldstein, it was as Jewish as wholesale diamond store.

    And I don’t mean Paul Newman types; I’m talking real Jewy Jewsteins, ethnic stereotypes that could come from the pen of Julius Streicher: short, dark, fat, hairy yet balding. Producers, directors, “writers,” even actors: Ron “Hedgehog” Jeremy was the King!

    And you don’t get any Jewier than this:

    “Ron Jeremy was born in Queens, New York to a middle-class Jewish family;[2] his father, Arnold, was a physicist and his mother a book editor[7] who served in the O.S.S. during World War II, as she spoke fluent German and French.[8] Jeremy attended Cardozo High School in Bayside, Queens, where former CIA director George Tenet and actor Reginald VelJohnson were his classmates.[9][10] He earned a bachelor’s degree in education and theatre and a master’s degree in special education from Queens College in New York.[11] He taught special-education classes in the New York City area and was a substitute teacher for regular classes”

    And the women too! Janey Robbins, Annie Sprinkle [nee Ellen F. Steinberg], Sharon Mitchell [who made the crack whore look popular, even before then invented crack!], etc.

    It’s interesting that women and feminists today complain about the “impossible perfection” of today’s “Barbie[tm] Doll” performers; in the old days, the women may have been “more real” but, being Jewy, they were often hard on the eyes.

    I think this ‘artificial perfection” has do do with a switch, or development, in strategy. The early porn producers were working out their Jewish Mother issues, only more recently have the mother and sister surrogates become ‘not good enough’ — perhaps with the increased money and consequent capitalistic “respect” accorded the “industry” and like trophy wives and houses in the Hamptons, the strategy now is to degrade Aryan women.

    As always, the Jew always wins because he controls both sides. The complaints about “impossible perfection” and “need to unionize” usually come from ugly Jewesses [aka "feminist leaders"] while the Barbie Dolls themselves are promoted by the aforesaid Jewy Jewsteins.

    Ironically, the “impossible” women are perhaps precisely Aryan ideals, no more objectionable, when used rightly [i.e., to promote White culture] than the images of Nordic Storm Troopers and Hitler Jugend of the NS period, which of course in today’s Jew-dominated culture are either “sinister” or “laughable cartoons”.

  10. daniel
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 9:49 am | Permalink

    A decent article, with some excellent background research to begin, but it suffers a bit of incoherence, at least for my tastes, with the talk of Abu Ghraib and condoms. It reminds me of the tedious, liberal argument as if anything is ok, so long as one wears a condom. I know that is not what Hamilton was saying. He was in fact, discussing a failed and flouted tactic of a law requiring that porn actors wear condoms. Even so, call me cruel, but as far as I am concerned, people who get A.I.D.S. from acting in porn, especially Black on White porn, deserve A.I.D.S.

    A good rule for a good woman. If you have to wear a condom, she is probably not a good woman.

    Also, I assume in the few places where Hamilton mentions the “racist” media, that it is a tpo, and he means to say, the “anti-racist” media.

    However, this is all nitpicky of me. Hamilton has here a good start to a good way of addressing a serious problem of how Jews and their criminal organizations are destroying our women and our men’s morale, through sexual exploitation of various means.

    • Andrew Hamilton
      Posted January 22, 2012 at 7:40 am | Permalink

      No, that was not a typo.

      They call themselves “anti-racist,” but of course they’re not. They’re anti-white.

      • daniel
        Posted January 22, 2012 at 7:42 am | Permalink

        ok

  11. Tanja
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    Hello again,
    I do get the impression that Jews are very nihilistic by nature. It’s as if they have a constant need to be the eternal rebel in their “host society” – they’re republicans in a monarchist society, communists in a capitalist society, “liberal dissenters” in a communist society, and so on. (And, of course, race-mixers and cosmopolitans in an all-white society). They’re very fascinating, in a morbid way.

    R.e. the topic of porn:
    I agree that women are not affected by porn in the same way as men. Porn addiction is a social poison for young gentile men. Most women who watch it, probably do so because their men want it. Also, porn has given an entire generation of young men a warped view of sexuality (obsessions with threesomes, and such stuff). I actually ended a my relationship with a former boyfriend over his sick and degenerate views of sexuality. He was spoiled rotten by his consumption of hardcore porn, and his demands were painful and unpleasant for me. No woman with a sane mind would enjoy the disgusting stuff he was into! This is a very tragic development, and I blame the Jewish-owned porn industry for creating these young men who are out of touch with normality and reality.

    PS. Oh, and I don’t feel too sad about Middle-Easterners being subjected to porn DVDs by the Americans. In addition to having savage and misogynistic “family values”, these Muslims are known to be the filthiest porn consumers. (Lots and lots of young women from my home country, Ukraine, have ended up in the hands of Israeli Jewish pimps but also Muslims).

    • Stronza
      Posted January 21, 2012 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

      Tanja, did you read Victor Malarek’s book The Natashas – Inside The Global Sex Trade? (He’s a Canadian Ukrainian, I believe.) I haven’t but I have heard a lot about it. I wonder how far he goes to identify the perps.

      • Tanja
        Posted January 22, 2012 at 1:33 am | Permalink

        No, I haven’t read that book. I heard about it as well, I have to get it sometime. Most of what I said was based on stuff I heard when I traveled back to Ukraine.

        Anyways, it’s no secret that many young women from poor villages Eastern Europe are lured to go abroad and end up in the hands of Israeli Jews and wealthy Muslims.

      • jack
        Posted January 25, 2012 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

        @Tanja

        The more things change the more they stay the same.

        “By 1900,” says Bristow, “Jewish commercial vice was largely incorporated in underworld elements and many of it participants were predators of the poor.” [BRISTOW, p. 89] Jewish pimps, procurers, and traffickers preyed mostly on non-Jewish women, but even large numbers of Jewish women were part of their stables.

        By 1889 Jewish women ran 203 of 289 (70%) of the licensed brothels in the “Pale of Settlement” (encompassing over 20 provinces in eastern Poland and western Russia — an area where Jews were about 12% of the population). 1122 of 5127 (22%) licensed prostitutes in this area were Jewish. [BRISTOW, p. 63] The grievous political dangers for local Jewry in the context of enduring interethnic hostilities, when 78% of the rest of the women were Gentile, many indentured in Jewish houses, is obvious. “

        http://www.rense.com/general32/jewsandwhiteslavery.htm

        Actually Jewish “Russian” mafia and Israeli organised crime which are really the same thing liaison with other ethnic criminal groups like the notorious Albanian gangs who control the sex and drug trafficking networks in Europe.

        There were two cases last year of Israel and Albanian gangs luring Ukrainian and Russian girls into the sex slave industry.

  12. Sandy
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    A Science Fiction novel (Can’t recall it’s title) from the 50’s which I read foretold of a world in which the plebs would have mass runs, casinos and brothels to keep us occupied. We have the mass runs – everything from the New York Marathon to the local cure for cancer run to raise money to buy another monkey to stick pins in- and we have lots of casinos and with the desensitization effects of porn it can’t be long before there are lots of legal brothels.

  13. Petronius
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    Well, Black on White porn seems to be particular popular, I wonder who are the foremost consumers, black males or white males? If it is the latter, White civilisation is in trouble indeed. I also guess that it is precisely the defilement touch about it, that gives the kinks and kicks. There is always a subtext, that it is really a very, very base thing to f*ck a n*gger. Why, it is supposed to be filthy. Beauty and the Beast. So B/W porn is always implicity “racist”, no matter from which angle you look at it. Transgression, taboo breaking and debasement is what pornography used to be about since De Sade’s days.

    In reality, I think that actually only a few people really are attracted to the interracial thing, at least when it comes to have offsprings.

    A related aside: I am just reading in the celebrity gossip news that Heidi Klum is probably going to divorce the world’s ugliest specimen of the Black race, this would finally end history’s worst pairing ever, unfortunately they have already reproduced, at least making a strong case against miscgenation.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 21, 2012 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

      I suspect that Jews are the chief consumers of such porn, and that it is put out there less to be consumed by whites than to psychologically emasculate white men.

  14. Petronius
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 5:06 pm | Permalink
  15. Posted January 21, 2012 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    A related topic Mr. Hamilton might consider is the portrayal of Asian women in Hollywood film. In essence, the only Asian women are young, attractive, pliable . . . and available women. I have been teaching this for years and nothing has changed. See, for example, the Korean-American actress in “Sideways.”

    While Asian Studies scolds use this imagery to castigate “White men” for “objectifying” Asian women (and indirectly feminizing Asian men through their very absence), I suspect the real motive is akin to what Mr. Hamilton posits with respect to black male – on – White female porn: normalizing a certain type of behavior.

  16. White Republican
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    I have to say that I have a soft spot in my heart for Joseph Paul Franklin, who shot and permanently crippled Larry Flynt after that lowlife published black on white pornography in Hustler. William Pierce dedicated his novel Hunter to Franklin.

  17. zalmoxis
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    I think the popularity of Black-on-White porn has to do with the fact that men like seeing women being degraded, and sex with a Black is considered particularly degrading. So in a strange way this sort of porn actually assumes a negative attitude toward interracial sex on the part of the viewer.

  18. Lew
    Posted January 21, 2012 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    It’s worth noting that Larry Flynt is not Jewish. He is probably the only pornographer that’s a household name. Flynt has always been in the vanguard of extending some pretty perverse forms of pornography into what might be called the mainstream space for porn. I remember Hustler being available for sale at gas stations and convenience stores next to the Playboys and Penthouses. Flynt owns the “Barely Legal” brand and runs a chain of titty bars that operate under that name; there is a Barely Legal location on Bourbon street here in New Orleans. The name Barely Legal clearly implies one step above “illegal” which in turn implies pedophilia, or at least inappropriately young by modern standards. Camille Paglia has noted that Vladimir Nabokov, another non-Jew, was responsible for introducing this theme into the American public consciousness. Nabokov published Lolita which is about a middle-aged man and a 12 year old girl in the 1950s. Also, possibly the sickest mind to ever put pen to paper, the Marquis De Sade, was not Jewish either, nor were his readers. Like it or not, Jews have no monopoly on perversion. 

    Quite frankly, I find it hard to believe porn is harmless to society, especially the Internet variety. I just looked up and visited one of the newer You Tube style porn sites. On this site, I’d say about half of the top ten videos with millions of downloads featured incest themes. I mean, damn, WTF??  Even if Jews are producing it, there can’t be that many Jews downloading it.

    When a man wanted to indulge such perverted and salacious fantasies in the pre-Internet days, he had to risk being seen visiting a seedy porn store in a grimy neighborhood. Not anymore. Now these men can go onto the Internet where everything in the book is available on high traffic Web sites, including incest and implied pedophilia. The fact that it is readily available tells these men that they are not alone and that millions of others share their fantasies. Not sure what can be done, but I don’t see how this trend can be anything but harmful.

  19. de Maistre
    Posted January 22, 2012 at 3:08 am | Permalink

    Excellent article touching on a very revolting, still important because of its impact, area.

    Hamilton writes:

    “Ironically, pornography is now enshrined as “free speech,” while free speech is increasingly criminalized as “hate.””

    Yes, is that not more disgusting than just about anything? To write scholarly articles or books about certain aspects of biology or history is outright forbidden by law in many European countries.

    Yet pornography, which obviously has zero to do with speech, is considered “free speech”.

    I think these facts alone and the sheer irrationality of it is enough for a revolution.

  20. Fourmyle of Ceres
    Posted January 22, 2012 at 6:02 am | Permalink

    THEIR GOAL IS GENOCIDE. OURS. WHAT’S YOURS?

    Some quick comments:

    One, Greg Johnson has it right.

    The purpose of pornography is to demoralize US, to make US feel like our lives are inadequate because we aren’t doing, twenty-four/seven. what those people on the screen are doing. Most people can not understand that the people on the screen are basically culls from the herd, “Losers,” – note the capital “L” – in all possible ways. Even the most famous, with one or two exceptions, live miserable lives, and die unmourned, like dogs in the back alleys of humanity.

    There is nothing enobling about this, ever. Quite the contrary, and this is not by accident.

    Two, worse, in many people, it creates a thirst that can not be slaked. The Mind projects emotions to match what the screen inspires, and, all too often, more and more is needed. Hopefully, one either grows forward, or remains enslaved.

    Now, let me give you the counterpoint, from a Masculine perspective, to the women.

    Good, high-quality porn delivers what you promised, but did not deliver.

    Good, high-quality porn does not bring any baggage to “the relationship,” no scar tissues, no drama, and demands nothing from you.

    Finally, a quick comment concerning women and porn.

    One, they hate it because they can not match the lithe, firm bodies on the screen, or the willingness of the young, attractive women to inspire desire in the hearts of men.

    Two, they hate it because they can not control it. Sexual exclusivity, one of their important, court-enforced control systems, in undermined and neutralized by the illusions being told on the screen. Striking too close to home, these are slight variations on the same illusions, the same implied but unkept promises, she used to attract him into a “relationship.” In short, good, high-quality porn promises what THEY promised, and delivers, consistently, without drama, headaches, or hassle. Double plus good!

    Three, the demographers have discovered that women of all demographic markets like one style of porn. This is with elegantly dressed and perfectly coiffed ladies pairing with wealthy, upper-class, powerful, virile men – think of Lord Greystoke, at the ball, becoming who he truly is after the ball – Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle. Remember, Lord Greystoke worse bespoke tailoring, and women highly approve of this. Women would pay to watch the wedding night of Jane Austen heroines, if the bodies of all parties were lithe, firm and perfect. (They LOVE that Regency backdrop!)

    Essentially, to women, “power” – in this case, socioeconomic class – has the same effect on them that pornography all too often has on us.

    Power, and control, by selling illusions that bind you, and manipulating you ever further, until you become an indentured servant in all but fact.

    What’s In YOUR Future? Focus Northwest!

  21. Slippery Pete
    Posted January 22, 2012 at 6:14 am | Permalink

    If I may offer the other gentlemen here a great, and simple, technique for overcoming porn addiction.

    Just make an attempt to see it for what it is. For example, the women are prostitutes, and don’t enjoy what they’re doing. Like most men, I’ve viewed porn, and at one point in my life it was particularly addictive for me. Once I began consciously engaging my fore-brain on the matter, it became much easier to get away from. It was impossible to go back to the fantasy after using this technique. Before I conquered this thing, I searched in vain to find porn where the women really were into it, where the women didn’t wear those prostitute high heels, where the eyes of the actors were not dead and mechanical, and so on.

    I won’t go into the disastrous effects porn had on my libido, and natural love for women. I still don’t really understand why I was always depressed after. It was not irrational guilt or anything, just a low feeling. I can explain it now as the opposite of how one feels when they view great works of art. I guess this is why some people call degenerate Jewish art pornographic. I get a similar “low” feeling from that.

    Now I must return to my coffee, Vivaldi, and the actual women in my life need some attention.

  22. Andrew Hamilton
    Posted January 22, 2012 at 8:07 am | Permalink

    To illustrate how this sort of thing creates real-life behavior, there was a case in Canada of a couple engaging in interracial cuckold sex. I gather they posted photos of the wife with blacks on the Internet.

    They were both attorneys, and the wife is now a Canadian judge.

    But one of the Negroes (a client of the husband) saw a chance to exploit the situation, and did. The psychologist-author of the article below, who works with such couples, essentially portrays the sleazy black as the victim of white racists!

    The husband received a mild reprimand from the Canadian bar.

    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/women-who-stray/201009/honor-and-offer

  23. Posted January 22, 2012 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Alex Linder did a piece on the interracial sex and he used a Julius Streicher approach and posted a photo of a White woman with a negro male IN THE ACT. Well droves of posters slammed it and quit, some later returned but it hasn’t been the same since.
    Yet Linder was RIGHT! The TRUTH of what is going on caused these “hard cases” to run screaming like little girls. The fact is there are many pale-skin males who have their wives cavort with GROUPS of negro males, all the while the pale-skin male acts like a may I use the term “pussy?” In any event the post these online and that is more troubling to me than the commercial stuff. This is a SICK society.

    However, that said, I don’t think erotic films or books, in and of themselves, are harmful. It has been around, erotica, since at least the Egyptians, I’ve seen papyri with sexual acts portrayed, threesomes, etc. I don’t think that caused any of the dynasties to fall.

    Frankly a male who stays a boy can never be a man to a woman, whether he watches naked ladies or goes to church every Sunday.

    However being a puritanical prude is as unhealthy as being a Hustler fan.

    They could have fixed the planet, and it’s sad that they took them off the play, man, because that was the best team in the game.

  24. Fourmyle of Ceres
    Posted January 22, 2012 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    THEIR GOAL IS GENOCIDE. OURS. WHAT’S YOURS?

    Sentry in blockquote:

    Alex Linder did a piece on the interracial sex and he used a Julius Streicher approach and posted a photo of a White woman with a negro male IN THE ACT. Well droves of posters slammed it and quit, some later returned but it hasn’t been the same since.

    I do not want to get into Board Wars here. You are correct that “droves of posters quit,” and rightfully so. I suspect many of them did not just quit VNN; I suspect they looked at White nationalism as a common meeting ground for inept, incompetence, ineffective nihilists. Can you imagine being the caliber of, say, “Geoff Beck,” looking at VNN one day, and saying to yourself, “I’m out of here!”

    The larger issue is these were the high-quality posters. Gresham’s Law applies to organizations as well as currencies. More’s the pity.

    Fortunately, we have sites that are dedicated to larger, much more substantial issues. Sites like counter-currents.

    Yet Linder was RIGHT! The TRUTH of what is going on caused these “hard cases” to run screaming like little girls.

    No, the TRUTH is the “hard cases” simply recognized that such actions were not remotely tolerable to anyone who wanted to help the Race to improve. It simply reduced VNN to a Lowest Common Denominator in terms of commentary and analysis, with precious few exceptions, like “Hugh.”

    What’s In YOUR Future? Focus Northwest!

  25. daniel
    Posted January 23, 2012 at 4:59 am | Permalink

    I can agree that pornography isn’t necessarily all that horrible, provides feedback and otherwise depends upon the participants and purposes of the viewer. However, defending society against “puritanism” doesn’t strike me as an urgent concern of ours.

    I noticed that the “Above the Law” website people had originally intended to publish the Judge’s sex photos for our adult judgement to evaluate. They then replaced the 12 photos with “descriptions” instead, their own evaluation – rather, smug, dismissive, exculpatory remarks, that were in an important sense more offensive in that they provided liberal wash, rather than allowing us to evaluate the pictures for ourselves:

    “She shows the pink”
    “She shows courage in showing her less than perfect body”
    “She performs oral sex on a man” (no mention of race)

  26. R. Rud
    Posted January 23, 2012 at 8:32 am | Permalink

    Great article, Mr. Hamilton!

    One subject that I don’t see mentioned here is that of the female-targeted “romance novel”.

    Years ago a girlfriend of mine showed me her mother’s bedroom… one wall was stacked from the floor to about 5 feet high with paperback romance novels (!!!). I took the opportunity to flip through a few of them and every page I viewed was a fairly graphic sex scene. Since then I have been keenly aware of how many women I see reading them and how often I see them in stores, libraries, etc.

    This particular case would maybe have not been so shocking but for the fact that her mother was a well-established and fairly wealthy medical doctor. Also, her ex-husband was also a medical doctor and also was also observed to have a heavy porn addiction. Both were white. I’ve since speculated that their respective porn addictions had contributed to their divorce.

    My question for Mr. Hamilton : are there any resources / information out there about the preponderance of female “romance novel” porn and its effects? It seems to me like it is just another version of pornography… perhaps the female mind is more attracted to the written word over graphic imagery?

    • Andrew Hamilton
      Posted January 23, 2012 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

      You make an interesting observation. Unfortunately, I don’t know the answer to your question.

      Years ago, in the 1970s, perhaps, I read a couple of romance novels while studying genre fiction. However, there was nothing pornographic in them. I wonder if there’s been a change in content? Do all romance publishers publish sex-heavy material?

      Interestingly, the author I read, who was one of the genre’s bestsellers, was actually a man who wrote under a female pseudonym.

    • Andrew Hamilton
      Posted January 23, 2012 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

      I don’t have time to research it, but I do wonder. I did a Google search on “interracial romance novels.” Apparently there is a romance subgenre called “IR.” But my quick check suggested the pairings for which there’s demand (apparently among black women) are for WM/BF. A Negro author wanted to do a BM/WF romance novel, but was worried it wouldn’t sell. In a forum, she stated that there was “huge” demand for WM/BF books, but had heard the other kind don’t sell!

      See also: http://www.interracialebooks.com/

      That’s the reverse of film pornography and, frankly, the reverse of real-life pairings of blacks and whites also. Around here I see white women with blacks and Mexicans all the time, and their hybrid children also.

      • R. Rud
        Posted January 24, 2012 at 6:42 am | Permalink

        Thanks, Mr. Hamilton.

        Another facet of white-female targeted degradation is the COSMOPOLITAN magazine (and others) which are always prominently displayed at check-out counters at supermarkets. Doing a quick Google image search for ” Cosmopolitan magazine covers” one will note that almost every cover (of the current years) features prominently the word “sex”. Some examples of their articles / features :

        “Bad Girl Sex”
        “Best.Sex.Ever”
        “60 Sex Tips”
        “75 Sex Moves”
        “75 Sex Tips from Guys”
        “5 Best Sex Positions”

        Recently I’ve noticed that they start using the word “Bitch” on the cover. What’s next ? “Slut” ? “PxxxY” ? “Whore”?

      • White Republican
        Posted January 28, 2012 at 12:25 am | Permalink

        It seems probable that romance novels have become increasingly sexually explicit over the past decades. It would be surprising if they haven’t.

        I think F. Roger Devlin has suggested that romance novels and magazines such as Cosmopolitan may be just as pernicious as pornography. He may be right. The attitudes towards relationships, sex, and reproduction that such media instill in their consumers are simply poisonous for society. As Francis Parker Yockey wrote in The Proclamation of London:

        “The message of Hollywood is the total significance of the isolated individual, stateless and rootless, outside of society and family, whose life is simply the pursuit of money and erotic pleasure. It is not the normal and healthy love of man and wife bound together by many children that Hollywood preaches, but a diseased erotic-for-its-own-sake, the sexual love of two grains of human sand, superficial and impermanent. Before this highest of all Hollywood’s values, everything else must stand aside: marriage, honour, duty, patriotism, sternness, dedication of self to a higher aim. . . .

        “Not only the individuals are the victims of this technic of degeneration, but the family and the race are dissolved wherever it touches. Divorce replaces marriage, abortion replaces birth, the home acquires a purely commercial raison d’etre, the family becomes the battleground of individual strife for personal advantage. The erotic-as-its-own-end deliberately reduces the numbers of the race, even as it also disintegrates the higher organism into sand. As a part of the technic, woman is made into a feminist, an unhappy derailed creature who would contest with man in his own domain and seek to lose all the attributes of her polarity which assure her destiny of its unfolding, and guarantee her the natural dignity which is hers. The end of the process is seen in those wide strata in America which have been completely Hollywoodized. Hollywood-feminism has created a woman who is no longer a woman but cannot be a man, and a man who is devirilized into an indeterminate thing. The name given to this process is the ‘setting free’ of woman, and it is done in the name of ‘happiness,’ the magic word of the liberal-communist-democratic doctrine. It accompanies the spreading of inverted Puritanism, which seeks to spread erotomania by surrounding the sexual life with an aura of attractive evil.

        “From the standpoint of the race, the result of this technic of degeneration is the attenuating, and finally the dying out, of racial instincts. The disintegrated victims, shorn of their organic connections with the great superpersonal content of Life, become unfruitful, lose their will-to-power, and soon lack the ability to believe in or to follow anything onward and upward. They become cynical, give up all inner discipline, seek a life of ease and pleasure, and sneer at all seriousness and honour. All intense feelings depart, for they might involve risk and sacrifice. Love of Fatherland gives way to money-madness and erotomania.”

  27. Posted January 23, 2012 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    The forum may wish to consider these thoughts on the topic from the redoubtable Revilo Oliver:

    “I was right about the carrying-power of the vehicle [porn], and it is to be noted that in the following decades the only periodicals of large circulation that dared to print articles unapproved by our rulers were precisely some of the major pornographic journals, of which “conservatives” were busy deploring the presence on the newsstands. “Penthouse,” for example, published the first description of the Jews’ sport when they killed the American seamen on the “Liberty” while their accomplice in Washington prevented the U.S. Navy from spoiling the predators’ fun. The same periodical published in 1980 a lucid analysis of the Federal Reserve swindle and accurately predicted what the pirates were then about to do and have now done. Colonel Fletcher Prouty’s exposure of the vast apparatus of professional assassins and enemy agents that the dim-witted taxpayers finance as the C.I.A. formed a long series of articles in “Gallery.” Both publications, of course, were well established and had assured circulations in the millions before they dared show interest in helping Americans survive.”

    Oliver then makes the cynical observation:

    “That such periodicals still have a potential that annoys our enemies is obvious from the antics of the con men who run the “Moral Majority” racket.”

    http://www.stormfront.org/rpo/PORNO.htm

  28. Sandy
    Posted January 25, 2012 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    http://www.gpsjr.com/?p=1793#more-1793

    There is no such thing as boredom/ There are only boring people. Animals, unless they are unnaturally locked up inside of cages, do not get bored. Neither should you. Ever. Develop an appreciation for the basic wonder of the experience of being alive, and revel in it.

  29. Vick
    Posted January 25, 2012 at 7:03 pm | Permalink

    A photographer friend told me that porn the way it’s been produced over the past 15 – 20 years since the internet took hold is dying. It used to be a photographer willing to stoop to making porn could get by quite handsomely, if need be. Those days are long over. Like every other form of content that can be downloaded digitally, thanks to broadband, the money that pornographers used to rake in is drying up. If Hollywood is feeling the pinch, the pornographers are get squeezed by the neck. In the future, there may be very little original porn made for profit at all. I mention this only to point out that whatever porn is today, it’s likely to change a lot in the near future – maybe not so much in terms of content, but in terms of how it’s made.

    Re: the question of whether porn is a problem. This question boils down to the classic argument of, “how much effect does some form of media have on the individual, and on society.”

    The Andrea Dworkin-style arguments of old school feminists hold that porn makes men treat women shittier. Christian fundamentalists hold that listening to satanic death metal is more likely to make you worship the devil, just like hoity toity elitish lib progressive types would say that listening to too much country music will rot your brain. Some people say that watching slasher films will make a person more likely to become a serial killer. Others say that watching Fox News will make you more stupid.

    The opposite side of that argument is that people aren’t that easily molded by what they watch and hear. You can watch a porn flick, listen to death metal, listen to country music, watch slasher flicks, and watch Fox News without turning into a raping, satanic, rotten brained, serial murder committing, Fox News watching idiot. And obviously this is true.

    But isn’t there a middle ground in there somewhere? I think we all feel in our guts that there is a certain truth to the idea that there is something harmful about such noxious content, even if not all of us are certain of the effects. This is where I suggest a little care and a little precision. I suggest looking at well-verified social science sources that tackle these kinds of problems. There are plenty of liberal social scientists working on these type of questions, and since they’re liberal, they’re well funded. The results they come up will just as easily apply across the spectrum of political debate. Start there, rather than making broad sweeping claims that appear like the usual ignorant fundamentalist stuff.

    I’m not an expert and I don’t know the answers other than that, for me, the question falls within the classic struggle of Modernity vs. Traditionalism that so many of our current problems fall into. Natural human sexuality in all of its many fascinating forms has been upended by the commodification of sexuality. In the West, at least, this means that sexual imagery is generated on a kind of production line running under the logic of the avant-garde sensibility. That is, sex is reduced to the imperative to do something new, shocking, original, outrageous, eye-catching – all in order to make that next buck. And no one is quite sure what the effect this new product has on real humans practicing real sex. Thus people are left scrambling trying to even talk about what “real sex” is in a historical context where Western folks didn’t even talk about sex much really! Personally, I resent that this bullshit marketplace of sexual imagery for sale is leading the conversation. But this is the position we’re in in so many areas of modern life.

    Long story short, I think we can all agree there is a need for some kind of more balanced, probably healthier forms of sexual expression than sex under this system.

  30. MOB
    Posted January 26, 2012 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    I clicked on my above link and it took me to the Netflix HP. Here are two other links; the movie is available dvd and streaming. I’d advise against reading a review or watching a trailer first.
    Queen to Play
    Queen to Play

  • Video of the Day:

  • Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    The Lightning and the Sun

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    The Wagnerian Drama

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    An eagle with a shield soaring upwards

    A Life in the Political Wilderness

    The Fourth Political Theory

    The Passing of the Great Race

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    The Prison Notes

    It Cannot Be Stormed

    Revolution from Above

    The Proclamation of London

    Beyond Human Rights

    The WASP Question

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Jewish Strategy

    The Metaphysics of War

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    The French Revolution in San Domingo

    The Revolt Against Civilization

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Archeofuturism

    Tyr

    Siege

    On Being a Pagan

    The Lost Philosopher

    The Dispossessed Majority

    Might is Right

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance