Print this post Print this post

Tempest in a Sex Pot

1,243 words

I’m a romantic at heart. Perhaps I’m a liberal and a universalist on some visceral level, because I really do wish for a future in which the Jewish people bury their resentment and become a nation among nations. Fortunately, I have Anne Applebaum and her friends in my RSS feed reader to remind me just how fathomless the organized Jewish community is in its bloodlust, its greed, and its guile. From time to time, I need to be reminded of how deeply these people hate us and how busily these people are at work attacking us.

As a writer for the Washington Post, Slate, and other neocon organs, Applebaum and her husband (the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs) helped drag America into the Iraq War. She and her husband are helping expand our NATO war machine deeper into places we don’t belong with the hope of entangling us in even more wars. She and her husband can’t wait for us to stop dragging our feet and send our soldiers off to die in Iran. She and her husband took a leading role in the global Jewish community’s successful campaign to help the child rapist Roman Polanski evade punishment.

While her Polish husband’s back office orchestrations are what made Polanski’s escape possible, she had the audacity to believe she could convince the American public to sympathize with a man who drugged and raped a child in cold blood. After the comments, surveys, and letters started rolling in, she dropped that angle altogether in favor of a more reliable and effective strategy: changing the subject and waiting for us to get distracted. We did. It worked, as it always works. They waited until the public uproar subsided and quietly turned him loose — with barely any attention in the mainstream press given to this imminently interesting turn of events.

Roman Polanski, Holocaust Survivor...and rapist

Roman Polanski, Holocaust Survivor …and rapist

Therein lies the greatest power the Jewish press wields in America . . . not in outright lies but in subtle matters of emphasis and omission.

Applebaum’s most recent article is as tone deaf to popular taste as her cheer-leading for Polanski. Though, in fairness, championing the cause of women who shove raw meat into their privates and call it “art” is a moral improvement over defending outright rapists. It’s entitled “Putin vs. Pop Culture” and it explains how the Russian punk rock protest group Pussy Riot poses a grave threat to Putin’s “dictatorship.” In her antiquated anti-traditional Old Leftist mind, Madonna’s still relevant, and her gassy tirade in support of Pussy Riot struck terror through the halls of the Kremlin.

But the harshest political statement was on Madonna’s website: “I call on all those who love freedom to condemn this unjust punishment,” the singer declared. “I call on ALL of Russia to let Pussy Riot go free.” A clip from her recent performance in St. Petersburg showed her shouting at the crowd: “We want to fight for the right to be free, to be who we are!”

And of all the publicity that the three women of Pussy Riot have received in the past week, that was by far the most dangerous. Not because Madonna is a serious political figure but because she isn’t.

Madonna’s recent ticket and album sales figures speak for themselves, and France’s Marine Le Pen more succinctly captured the deeper meaning of the Material(-ism) Girl’s bloviation in her response to her photoshopping an image of Le Pen with a swastika: “It’s understandable . . . aging singers who need publicity go to such extremes.” The award for both insight and bite goes to Russia’s Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who tweeted “Every former whore seeks to lecture everyone on morality as she gets older.”

There’s this assumption, a sort of null hypothesis on the part of Anne Applebaum and other older liberals and neocons, that female sexuality always sells, and that the Sexual Revolution they’re the vanguards of will get progressively more raunchy and self-indulgent while the whole world continues clapping along. They don’t seem to understand that it’s getting old, and that younger generations — liberals and conservatives alike — are becoming more irritated by sweaty spectacles of people who had no inhibitions in the first place exposing their genitals to jaded bystanders who are neither scandalized nor aroused. They just want it to stop.

Topless Pussy Riot supporter taking down cross in Kiev

The thing about the sexual appetite is that it’s like any other appetite. Just as food tastes better when you’ve been on a diet, sex is more appealing when the Catholic Church is trying to control it. Back in the ’80s, Madonna was not only much more attractive, but the notion of a Catholic schoolgirl rebelling against the prudish and powerful institution and indulging her sexual appetite was a lot more credible. True to its fundamentally reactive and degenerate nature, the Sexual Revolution still relies on traditional architecture and symbols in virtually all of its performances.

When there’s no chapel left for Madonna to make out with a Black Jesus in, no church left for Lady Gaga to make a mockery of, and no cathedral left for Pussy Riot to vandalize, what do they plan to erect in their place? Nothing, save perhaps for some cold and uninspired government offices with some motivational posters and STD awareness banners. Why? Because the Sexual Revolution is one tentacle of the Jewish Revolution, which is and has been driven by an exclusively resentful and destructive spirit for centuries.

Three punk rockers, members of a band known more for its desire to cause outrage than to make music, surely didn’t look like much of a challenge to the Kremlin. But when one accounts for the vast potential for copycats — the same radical Ukrainian women’s group has recently protested not only in Kiev but also in Minsk and Davos, while others have protested in Marseille and New York — as well as the inevitable eye-catching photos, not just on news pages but also in the entertainment sections, one can see how this story could run and run.

Madonna Flashing in TurkeyAnne Applebaum is correct when she predicts that the whole world will take notice when an attractive topless woman takes a chainsaw to a religious totem. People will probably pause to glance at the big drawing of a penis on a historic bridge. Millions of people ran to their laptops to download the footage of the sagging, deflated, elderly breast the 50-something Madonna fished out of her costume at her recent concert in Turkey.

But as Anne should have learned from the Polanski affair, not all attention is positive attention. There are limits to the gullibility and sexual depravity of the American people. They’ll pause to rubberneck at the tempest in a teapot the way one help but gawk at a traffic accident, but that doesn’t necessarily translate into support or even fleeting consideration of whatever  message is written on their bare flesh.

I, for one, hope Anne Applebaum, Madonna, and Pussy Riot continue to loudly and proudly desecrate our religious and cultural symbols, flaunt our taboos, and host their orgies in public museums. Symbols can be re-built. Values can be re-asserted. And bystanders can recover from the most gruesome spectacles. The important thing is helping educate the public about what Jewish hegemony and the capitalist reign of quantity portend. Maybe — and perhaps I’m being a hopeless romantic again — our people will start keeping score of many of our projects they’ve perverted and how many of their perverts they’ve promoted.

 

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

36 Comments

  1. Lew
    Posted August 22, 2012 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    Man, this essay was not a home run; it was a freakin’ grand slam. Fine work. One of your best that I have seen.

    Symbols can be re-built. Values can be re-asserted.

    This line reminded me how the Soviets demolished the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow. It was re-built decades later after communism passed from the scene. So, yes, symbols can be rebuilt. It has been done before. The symbolism there, a reclaiming of ancient Russian spiritual tradition, is probably as important or more important than the new physical structure.

    • Posted August 22, 2012 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

      This line reminded me how the Soviets demolished the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow.

      I wasn’t familiar with that episode. Reading about it made my evening.

      Thank you.

  2. Stronza
    Posted August 22, 2012 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    “There are limits to the gullibility and sexual depravity of the American people.”

    So when is this limit going to be reached, do you think? Some things just keep on going.

    • Posted August 22, 2012 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

      The rock solid super-majority of Americans balked at the star-studded all-hands-on-deck campaign to rally in Polanski’s defense.

      Attempts to drum up support for the Iran War have been met with a collective sigh.

      Attempts to promote illegal immigrant amnesty went from being on the GOP platform to being a leftist fringe thing…even when watered down.

      The whole Pussy Riot thing has remained firmly marginal, despite considerable efforts to promote them as a cause celebre.

      The majority of Americans continue to reject “gay marriage”, despite considerable efforts to promote it as a grave civil rights issue.

      Good Christian Bitches was canceled in its first season.

      A thoughtful review of that list will show that our overlords have found ways around popular sentiment. But that’s beside the point. Plan A was to arouse popular sentiment in favor of their goals. Executive privilege, judicial activism, false flag stunts, and subterfuge can all be employed to work around popular opinion when it fails to bend…but it remains a positive sign that our opponents are being frequently driven to Plan B.

      Plan B carries the risk of provoking outrage. It carries the risk of radicalizing growing segments of the population. It carries the risk of being effectively exposed. It’s a transition from us merely following our leaders to and “us and them” paradigm which is far more strategically favorable for us in the long run.

      We have yet to gain the institutional strength or tactical skills to translate their vulnerabilities into our victories, but I do believe we’re witnessing a gradual and organic immunity building up to Jewish and corporate propaganda. People aren’t quite ready to grapple with the very marginalized subjects we’re dealing with over here, and they may not be moving in our direction at all…but I don’t believe they’re following multicult mania as feverishly as they were in the last couple decades.

    • uh
      Posted August 23, 2012 at 8:45 am | Permalink

      WHEN ALL OF THE ALCOHOL RUNS OUT, obviously.

      • Stronza
        Posted August 24, 2012 at 8:52 am | Permalink

        How can the alcohol run out? Ever heard of stills, grain, yeast, sugar & water?

        Anyway, If you want to have something to barter with in the coming hard times, stock up on liquor now, including malt type beer. You’ll have it made in the shade: white people will give you anything you want in exchange. Their guns, their jewellery (but what are you going to do with that), any food left in their pantry, their daughters – you name it.

      • uh
        Posted August 28, 2012 at 10:08 am | Permalink

        Joke. Whites will be drinking away their souls forever.

        Woh, woh — daughters? I’ll take my distilling kit out of storage for that.

  3. denikin
    Posted August 22, 2012 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    “Fortunately, I have Anne Applebaum and her friends in my RSS feed reader to remind me just how fathomless the organized Jewish community is in its bloodlust, its greed, and its guile.”

    Like Nietzsche said, they’re the greaters haters there have ever been…and yet they preach about tolerance because they know it’s a great weapon against Whites.

    • Basileus
      Posted August 23, 2012 at 9:06 am | Permalink

      I lurk a well know (jewish owned) forum, one of the poster there is the living East Coast Neocon Jew stereotype: Pushing for War with Iran at the same time trying to disassociate himself and others American jews from their influence in American foreign policy.

      The mask is falling.

  4. Sutton Who?
    Posted August 23, 2012 at 1:06 am | Permalink

    I love this article! I love the passion.

    Whose idea was it to use the tag “old whores”? I am still chuckling over that. The devil is in the details.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted August 23, 2012 at 1:08 am | Permalink

      Guilty

      But I expect that over the years, as the boomers age but do not mature, we will have many occasions to use that tag.

      • Proofreader
        Posted August 23, 2012 at 2:55 am | Permalink

        Perhaps one might say that they age disgracefully.

      • Jaego Scorzne
        Posted August 23, 2012 at 9:45 am | Permalink

        Yes, they fancy themselves unaging Vampyres, but since they can’t look in the mirror, they can’t see themselves fading. And sunlight will destroy them. They used to know that – but they seem to be forgetting. Opportunity knocks.

  5. Nemesis
    Posted August 23, 2012 at 4:49 am | Permalink

    “Pussy Riot” are as vulgar and puerile as they are passé. Pleasing to see that others are of a similar opinion.

  6. anon
    Posted August 23, 2012 at 7:11 am | Permalink

    Spot on.

    “Therein lies the greatest power the Jewish press wields in America . . . not in outright lies but in subtle matters of emphasis and omission.”

    This is critical. People base their opinions on what they know. Most people only personally know about where they’ved lived and the areas where they’ve worked. The rest – 99.99% of the data they base their opinions on – they get from the media. It’s easy then to manipulate those opinions by simply leaving out some of the data and relying on “reasonable” and “fair-minded” people to come to the correct decision (from the manipulators point of view).

    When you think of it that last part is the sickest of all. Their manipulation is based around the good qualities of the people they are trying to destroy: high trust, the importance of being reasonable, the importance of being fair. All they have to do is omit some information so that some situation doesn’t appear to be fair when it in fact is and hey presto they can make white people self-harm.

    They may not even be consciously aware of it but unconsciously they must be aware because their strategy revolves around it – manipulating information in such a way that they use white people’s inclination to be “fair”to destroy them. Unconsciously they must know.

    • Basileus
      Posted August 23, 2012 at 11:48 am | Permalink

      Do you know about Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays? Mass propaganda manipulation disguised as “Public Realtions” was a Jewish strategy since the beginning of the 20th century.

      Even the NPR is aware of this: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4612464

      There is also BBC documentary Century of the Self: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prTarrgvkjo

    • Lew
      Posted August 23, 2012 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

      Out of curiosity, what makes you think there is a possibility media Jews are not consciously aware of it?

      • Verlis
        Posted August 23, 2012 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

        Lew,

        Realistically, in some cases it’s going to be conscious, in other cases not. Or put better, in some cases there is going to be greater consciousness and in others lesser consciousness. Remember, Jews, whatever their shortcomings, are still humans and thus still subject to the same psychological pressures as everyone else. If some things are too difficult (too painful, too uncomfortable, too frightening etc) to think about, then oftentimes we simply don’t think about them. We truncate our thought processes so as not to have to think about them. After a while it becomes habitual and we thus have a secondary reason not to think, for if we were to think about these things we’d have to admit that we’ve been deceiving ourselves (and others).

        For example — an easy, everyday example — think of some sleazebag friend (yours or someone else’s or just conjure one up). He may successfully (ie somewhat sincerely) deceive himself that he “means nothing by it”‘ when he subtly flirts with your wife, but should it happen that your wife and he are together alone he may well find himself, to his “amazement,” taking the next step, and his self-deception is laid bare, to himself and to all.

        Some Jews (many? most?), you have to believe, (very) successfully deceive themselves that they’re helping to “create a better world” through the lies they tell, the emphases they choose, and the facts they omit. Certainly by this point in time many of them almost completely unconsciously go about it. After all, in their eyes, if the things WNs wish to emphasize are true or important, then what has their group being doing for the last hundred years? That’s a scary thought.

      • Fourmyle of Ceres
        Posted August 24, 2012 at 12:12 am | Permalink

        Lew asked an obvious question:

        Out of curiosity, what makes you think there is a possibility media Jews are not consciously aware of it?

        Verlis went to his usual seminar caller tactics. Covington correctly defined how they work. Let’s use Verlis’s example, as an example:

        Verlis in blockquote:

        Lew,

        Realistically, in some cases it’s going to be conscious, in other cases not. Or put better, in some cases there is going to be greater consciousness and in others lesser consciousness.

        Bit of a slide, there, as Verlis slips away from Lew’s precise question concerning “MEDIA Jews,” and slips into vague responses concerning, well, Jews. All Jews.

        “…greater consciousness and …lesser consciousness” is a vague reframing of the term that more accurately describes what Lew is describing. “Consciousness” is a very broad, very loosely defined term. I prefer the much more accurate term “intent.”

        Now, taking the skullcap from Verlis for a moment, we can rephrase his statement as a much more accurate reply to Lew’s question:

        “Realistically, in some cases it’s going to be consciously intentional, in other cases not. Or put better, in some cases there is going to be greater conscious intent and in others lesser conscious intent.”

        That’s better, and far more accurate.

        Remember, Jews, whatever their shortcomings, are still humans and thus still subject to the same psychological pressures as everyone else.

        That’s now how the Jews see it. THEY see it as they are Gods, and we are mere humanity – of the soil, lower creatures, cattle to be led, and slaughtered. The Lubavitch rabbi said so openly, so confident was he in this power.

        As to “the same psychological pressures as everyone else,” note that these “pressures” are mediated by two factors: (1) the Hive Mentality reinforces each other in their pursuit of common goals – the enslavement of Mankind, and (2) they are taught, every time they go to temple, that they are superior beings, inhabiting human bodies, to help steer mere humanity in more useful directions.

        Does the barking of dogs, the braying of donkeys, really bother you? No, because you are a higher form of Consciousness, and can place them in their place, a proper context. That is how the Jews hear our complaints, the mere braying of donkeys.

        If some things are too difficult (too painful, too uncomfortable, too frightening etc) to think about, then oftentimes we simply don’t think about them. We truncate our thought processes so as not to have to think about them. After a while it becomes habitual and we thus have a secondary reason not to think, for if we were to think about these things we’d have to admit that we’ve been deceiving ourselves (and others).

        This is all too true for us, as we have been effectively infantilized by the public indoctrination system. We can counter this, and we are. The Jews use the Hive Mentality with the Rabbinate acting as an eternal compass pointing towards True Judaism, true conquest of the animals of the earth. If one Jew finds the challenges too difficult, he might wish to block the pain of failure. The Rabbinate will insure the ball continue to move down the field, while the fallen player is rehabilitated into effectiveness.

        For example — an easy, everyday example — think of some sleazebag friend (yours or someone else’s or just conjure one up). He may successfully (ie somewhat sincerely) deceive himself that he “means nothing by it”‘ when he subtly flirts with your wife, but should it happen that your wife and he are together alone he may well find himself, to his “amazement,” taking the next step, and his self-deception is laid bare, to himself and to all.

        Largely asked and answered, but note that his intent can not be masked. Note, also, that you used the traditional framework the Jews chose for us, that of the passive, all but helpless bystander. How much better if, in your example, we combined Consciousness with ADULT Intention, and whipped his ass when he crossed the line? The Jews don’t like such thinking, save in the safe psychological distancing of their media creations, the Dreams they have chosen for us, and which serve to short-circuit our own Masculine Individuation.

        Their greatest fear is our SEEING them as they are, and developing our own Warrior Caste. They have the Rabbinate, we have the Warrior Priesthood.

        Some Jews (many? most?), you have to believe, (very) successfully deceive themselves that they’re helping to “create a better world” through the lies they tell, the emphases they choose, and the facts they omit. Certainly by this point in time many of them almost completely unconsciously go about it.

        A century of success, on their part, implies no such deception is present. There is the Intention of demonic Domination, and not righteous Dominion. Again, it only seems “unconscious” for them to go about this, as it is inculcated as second nature, rewarded at temple every Saturday. Again, it is not “unconscious,” it is the very conscious outcome of deliberated Intent by the Hive Mind.

        After all, in their eyes, if the things WNs wish to emphasize are true or important, then what has their group being doing for the last hundred years? That’s a scary thought.

        The Truth finally comes forth, as the Jewish Mindset stands revealed.

        “If you are so right, why are we always winning?”

        The short answer is, we have been misled, often times quite intentionally, by our nominal “Leaders.” They energy Whiter nationalism could have harnessed for the last century has been dissipated on a series of profoundly, willfully selected to be, ineffective acts. In effect, one series of false flags after another, one series of lightning rods designed to insure the static electricity would be harmlessly grounded, were set to divert, neutralize, and nullify any attempts at White nationalism, with two exceptions, Rockwell and Covington.

        All other attempts at organizing along White nationalist lines were channeled into the harmless activity of CONservative nationalism. This helped to insure a critical mass of White Racial Awareness never developed with the Intent of personal and political effectiveness.

        These last issues are where the Jewish Hive Mind works with relentless activity.

        That’s why the Northwest Republic is of such tremendous importance to us. it allows us to define what is best of US, on OUR Terms, for a welcome change.

        The Jews were quite content to supply us with “Leaders” who considered dental hygiene optional, and who considered green satin bedsheets as formal attire. The puppies chased their tails, and Charlie Brown ALWAYS has the football pulled away by Lucy at the last second.

        The Jews were quite content to finance false flag lightning rods, like Buckley’s “National Review,” and more importantly, the use of Buckley CONservatism to replace Taft (NATIONALISTIC) Conservatism.

        We can learn from this, and we are.

      • anon
        Posted August 24, 2012 at 8:25 am | Permalink

        @Lew
        “Out of curiosity, what makes you think there is a possibility media Jews are not consciously aware of it?”

        Verlis explained it. In my terms it’s cognitive dissonance. Whenever they take yet another home invasion and black-on-white race murder of a young white woman and call it a “botched robbery” and whenever they take a hispanic killing a black in self-defence and try and turn it into white-on-black race murder they have to briefly step into white morality. They need to step in and out of white morality to make the manipulation work. They need to step into it to tailor their message to the moral code of the people they are trying to genocide and then step back into their own genocidal morality.

        During those brief seconds they must know how vile they are.

        (I’m sure some are fully conscious but i think you’d need to be an actual sociopath to not get dragged down by the cognitive dissonance. I think most of them are only culturally sociopathic and it’s those i was thinking about.)

      • Lew
        Posted August 24, 2012 at 10:54 am | Permalink

        I might buy cognitive dissonance instead of collective sociopathy if Jewish behavior suggested an explanation other than sociopathy. But, their behavior and their writings are too consistent. What they do today is not an exception. It’s their norm and their cultural ideal. The Jewish ideal is destruction, exploitation, and death to non-Jews. The old testaments tells Jews to go out and take the goy for everything they’ve got. They did it then; they’re doing now (Bernie Madoff).

        Matt opened his essay by stating he needs an occasional reminder of the depths of their ill will. I do as well. Maybe this is an example of how Christian universal morality has warped my thinking.

      • Verlis
        Posted August 24, 2012 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

        In my terms it’s cognitive dissonance.

        Cognitive dissonance arises through (painful) awareness that one’s actions do not coincide with one’s professed beliefs or values. I don’t believe such awareness exists among Jews at this point, not even close.

        Fourmyle,

        Believe what you like, but if you’re interested in the truth, the truth is I’m not Jewish. You’re so heavily invested in your political position I don’t think you quite realize how nutty (to put it frankly) you sound when you insist that I am. If I were Jewish I would welcome more viewpoints like yours, because I’d correctly view them as helping do my job for me, since it’s not the overwrought passion-mongers they’re concerned about; it’s personable rationals with the ability to resonate with their audience that worry them. I don’t expect for a moment that you’ll change your ways (decades worth of Attack and Instauration prove me right on this point) but it’d be a real pity if your influence were allowed to sway this blog from the course it’s plotting.

        Lew,

        I might say the same to you. Your opinion doesn’t concern me in the slightest. Some people benefit the causes they support from the freedom to make their own minds up; others don’t.

      • Lew
        Posted August 24, 2012 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

        Verlis,

        Is there something in particular I said you want to dispute? Does the old testament not encourage swindling the goy? Is Bernie Madoff not a Jewish swindler? Let’s hear it.

      • Fourmyle of Ceres
        Posted August 24, 2012 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

        Verlis in blockquote:
        I appreciate the opportunity to deal with skillful “seminar caller” types, who keep trying to shift agenda in their direction, and away from The Truth – or even the topic of the thread. Skillful threadjackers are a sign we are being taken seriously, in part for the reasons I mentioned above.

        Fourmyle,

        Believe what you like, but if you’re interested in the truth, the truth is I’m not Jewish.

        The issue is not, “Are you RACIALLY Jewish?”

        The issue is, are you the servant of Judaism? The answer seems pretty clear. Your replies are merely of critique, and not criticism, much less the higher criticism. Of course, said critique is entirely consistent with the philosophy and practices of Judaism. Is there any doubt why?

        You’re so heavily invested in your political position I don’t think you quite realize how nutty (to put it frankly) you sound when you insist that I am.

        Ad hominem attacks, all the while not addressing the issues I addressed. Sounds like the rabbinate is running low on intellectual ammunition. They’re like that, when you can perceive the web they weave. Good.

        Game to NANR.

        If I were Jewish I would welcome more viewpoints like yours, because I’d correctly view them as helping do my job for me, since it’s not the overwrought passion-mongers they’re concerned about; it’s personable rationals with the ability to resonate with their audience that worry them.

        Actually, their biggest fear is being identified as Jews when they do not wish this. It ruins the element of surprise, and makes their perfidious duplicity all the less effective. And, as we all know, they pretty much created and supported the “overwrought passion mongers,” with their practiced political ineffectiveness. Good goyim, they. And those colored satin bedsheets! And their practiced mannerisms! So willing to blame nebulous transnational entities – “the “International Bankers, the Insiders, Communists, Red Communists, Soviet Communists, Chinese Communists, Marxist Students, the Trilateralists, the United Nations, the Civil Rights Movement” – all with the specific purpose of looking everywhere but the common thread uniting and controlling these organizations, Judaism, the Racial philosophy which is the EXACT opposite of Christianity.

        Set to NANR.

        I don’t expect for a moment that you’ll change your ways (decades worth of Attack and Instauration prove me right on this point)…

        When you are correct, which ways are worth changing? Why? The proof of this pudding is not the red herring of Attack and Instauration, but the fact that you are not willing to discuss the substantive issues I raised in reply to your position.

        “I don’t expect for a moment you will change your ways,” either. Judaism, particularly the power of The Destroyer as a Cultural Transformer, runs deep, indeed, and changing the course of that dark current requires the power of Redemption.

        …but it’d be a real pity if your influence were allowed to sway this blog from the course it’s plotting.

        Greg Johnson has steered the course of this blog quite well. I can only wish I had greater effectiveness, which would allow my Ideas to be more influential, for the best of reasons – using the Northwest Republic as the New Polaris.

        Match Point to NANR.

        Now, the course YOU are “plotting for this blog” is….

  7. Posted August 23, 2012 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    Very nice pattern-detecting. I’ve commented on the situation, and linked to your piece here:
    http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2012/08/pussy-riot-control.html

  8. JustaWhiteMom
    Posted August 23, 2012 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    Matt, thank you for this wonderful essay. You give me hope for the future!

  9. DictionaryGirl
    Posted August 23, 2012 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Great article. I would love to see you or someone else come up with a very detailed list of examples of this tentacles attempted grasp in all of its varieties. It is so easy to get caught up in trash-TV; you see that it’s “wrong” and is a train-wreck you can’t stop watching, but it’s hard to see where it’s all coming from. You can’t see behind the scenes until someone makes you aware of what you’re being brain-washed with.

  10. Armor
    Posted August 23, 2012 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Madonna and Pussy Riot remind me of the Carpentras affair in France in 1990. Grave steles had been damaged in a Jewish cemetery in the small town of Carpentras in the South of France. A body had been taken out of its grave. The government and the media used the sorry event to bury people under a massive propaganda campaign. Le Pen’s National Front was accused of being the main culprit. Two months later, the massive campaign helped Jewish prime minister Fabius to push through a law forbidding holocaust revisionism. The authors of the misdeed were identified in 1996. They had nothing to do with the National Front.

    That was a massive propaganda operation, and I think it explains the spate of copycat vandalism in French cemeteries and churches in the next decades. The targets have been mainly Christian. Many tomb vandals and arsonists see themselves as rebels. They are anti-Christian and like heavy metal. But they are really low IQ copycats. They have been encouraged by the media propaganda.

  11. Demosthenes
    Posted August 23, 2012 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFlx55OANg8 video of the destruction of Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow.
    Truly sickening behavior.
    I hadn’t been familiar with the destruction of Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow.
    You expect as much malice from Turks and Muslim Arabs but from Russians, even Russian Jews, it’s distressing.

    • Donar van Holland
      Posted August 25, 2012 at 7:21 am | Permalink

      There are no Russian Jews, just Jews who happen to live in Russia. Jewish identity trumps all other identities and loyalties. In fact, Jewishness forbids all other loyalties.

      • Basileus
        Posted August 26, 2012 at 12:03 am | Permalink

        Book of Esther is their favorite book…

  12. Junghans
    Posted August 24, 2012 at 6:47 am | Permalink

    If you want to know what Jews are capeable of today, Google what they did to the Children’s Zoo in Gaza a few years ago.

  13. Patt Marrott
    Posted August 24, 2012 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    I’ll disagree only in that Matt has, in passing, briefly referred to these whores as attractive. No way. No body, no face, no nothing. The one chopping the cross down has no tits, period. What difference does it make when she goes topless. Total retards, sterilize them and off to exile.

    Oh, and good article by the way.

  14. anon
    Posted August 25, 2012 at 8:37 pm | Permalink

    @Lew
    “I might buy cognitive dissonance instead of collective sociopathy if Jewish behavior suggested an explanation other than sociopathy.”

    I’m not being clear.

    Jews have developed a culture of self-induced paranoia based on the idea that all non-Jews dance in the blood of the Jews. This gives them the motive and moral justification to wage stealth wars of genocide against other nations while pretending to themselves it’s pre-emptive self-defense.

    So their *culture* is sociopathic but most of them aren’t *individually* sociopaths.

    The point that struck me after reading this article was that it’s wouldn’t be enough for them to simply have culturally sociopathic Jews in the most critical nodes e.g. news editors – it’s ok for the standard journalists but for the most critical nodes they’d need people who were actual sociopaths too (imo).

    It’s probably not important. It was just a thought that occurred to me.

  15. Freeborn
    Posted August 28, 2012 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

    Didn’t Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre try to rehabilitate the Marquis de Sade?

    Like Polanski Ol’ de Sade wasn’t a nasty paedophile at all. He was a libertarian pushing back sexual frontiers. Exploring his Id or his Ego.

    And Freud? Well he was the just a psychotherapist right?

    Not according to Eustace Mullins: http://www.whale.to/b/mullins49.html

  16. Freeborn
    Posted August 28, 2012 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    For bloodlust, greed and guile beat this:

    http://rachel-corrie.blogspot.co.uk/2008/04/how-rachel-corrie-really-died-hint-not.html

    This is the sickest hate-site I’ve ever seen. It’s dedicated to besmirching the memory of Rachel Corrie.

    Notwithstanding these sickoes this is how most of us would like Rachel to be remembered:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqUKYyuCe8c

  • Video of the Day:

  • Kindle Subscription
  • Our Titles

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    The Lightning and the Sun

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    The Wagnerian Drama

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    An eagle with a shield soaring upwards

    A Life in the Political Wilderness

    The Fourth Political Theory

    The Passing of the Great Race

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    The Prison Notes

    It Cannot Be Stormed

    Revolution from Above

    The Proclamation of London

    Beyond Human Rights

    The WASP Question

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Jewish Strategy

    The Metaphysics of War

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    The French Revolution in San Domingo

    The Revolt Against Civilization

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Archeofuturism

    Tyr

    Siege

    On Being a Pagan

    The Lost Philosopher

    The Dispossessed Majority

    Might is Right

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance