Print this post Print this post

Link Yourself to White Nationalism

Graphic by Harold Arthur McNeill

Graphic by Harold Arthur McNeill

772 words

Finnish translation here

There’s a snapping point–some arrive at it later than others–beyond which one’s compass of esteem is truly decoupled from popular societal norms. My own sense of status and respect has long since broken free from that orbit, now revolving around the admittedly small and powerless world of tribal and traditional comrades.

While it once required an act of social courage to stand for our identity and interests, I now embrace the denunciations and attacks as badges of honor. That’s the essence of radicalism in contrast to mainstreaming, and it has nothing to do with violent outbursts, unrealistic objectives, or alienation. Actually, given the nature of this society, becoming an identitarian and traditionalist radical is the solution to the problem of alienation.

We’re destined to win despite ourselves, because we and we alone possess a sacred truth: we are not the sovereign and solitary demigods of humanism, secularism, and global capitalism. We are vital building blocks in something much greater than ourselves, parts of something transcending self. All we need to do is translate our rhetoric into action and act in unison, the wheels of fate will take it from there.

I had the honor of finally meeting David Duke at Stormfront’s Smoky Mountain Summit this past weekend. I joked during my speech that I could brag that I’m now officially “linked” to the living legend of White Advocacy. If only we were all as closely linked as our enemies would like to imagine! If there were an authentic solidarity borne of mutual familiarity and respect between the different factions, an overarching unity transcending self, we American White Nationalists would be a serious force.

It seems like a no-brainer, ditching White Nationalism and its much-maligned leadership in favor of some fresh new angle devoid of “baggage”. If only it were that easy. For starters, almost everybody has managed to associate themselves in some way with the dreaded “movement”. Our enemies don’t merely honestly disagree with us in a sober and fair-minded way. They don’t care that your post at Stormfront was sensible and respectful of the human rights of non-Whites. Stormfront is linked to a man who’s linked to an organization which is linked to a movement which is linked to incidents of vigilantism several decades ago.

You are a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews and a klansmanwhowantstolynchinnocentblackmen.

There’s no point in appealing or objecting. According to Leftist Logic, opposing gay marriage is proof that you’re gay and objecting to white genocide is proof that you’re a genocidal maniac. It’s a rigged game of guilt by association and insinuation. You can closely and openly associate with a domestic terrorist and go on to be President if that domestic terrorist happens to be a Leftist, but the SPLC’s disingenuous Kevin Bacon Game against White Nationalism isn’t so lenient. Even Republican politicians who stand with Israel and support Obama’s amnesty are irredeemably racist villains to these cranks.

There are some who’ve managed to slip through the diamond heist laser grid of taboos. Those men and women have the option of pacing and framing their message as they wish. TradYouth’s organizational framework is inclusive of shadow chapters which receive resources and support while sticking with relatively benign branding. That’s all well and good, and we don’t all have the temperament or circumstances to be full-throated White Nationalists. But you cannot and must not make a stand unless you intend to dig your feet in and remain standing. As with a pack of wolves, attempting to run and hide only encourages them. Throwing comrades from your sleigh to keep the wolves at bay only encourages them.

“Solidarity” is a concept so passionately embraced by the Left and unfamiliar in our circles that White Nationalist solidarity sounds like a contradiction in terms. White Nationalism is a very broad label inclusive of anybody who happens to be white and be an ethnic and/or racial nationalist. Period. It’s fashionable for everybody to come up with some rhetorical angle to wriggle out from under that label, offering some narrow ad hoc definition. But our enemies are not so easily hoodwinked and the only quantifiable product of this supposedly clever tactic is further erosion of our solidarity and strength.

If only we could actually be what our opponents accuse us of being: fascists. This revelation, that we must wrap each fragile faction in our movement into an unbreakable fasces, is the necessary first step in transitioning from a random assortment of powerless dissidents into a united stormfront capable of breaking the opposition and guaranteeing a future for our folk and faith.

Source: http://www.tradyouth.org/2013/08/link-yourself-to-white-nationalism/

 

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

7 Comments

  1. Jethro Bodine
    Posted August 14, 2013 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    Stormfront’s Smoky Mountain Summit is itself exclusive of other WN’s.

  2. Franklin Ryckaert
    Posted August 14, 2013 at 4:25 am | Permalink

    Guilt-by-association is one of the most primitive but effective tactics to denounce your opponent. The leftists accuse you of “racism”, therefore you are a “Nazi”, therefore you “wanttokillsixmillionjews”? Well accuse your leftist opponent of being a “Communist”, who is therefore a “Stalinist”, who therefore “wantstokillsixtysixmillionrussians.” Keep on doing it untill your opponent implores you to return to a more reasonable debate.

    • Fourmyle of Ceres
      Posted August 14, 2013 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

      Franklin Ryackert has it right, but he stops at a “reasonable” point. A quick comment follows his “reasonable” point.

      Franklin Ryckaert in blockquote:

      Guilt-by-association is one of the most primitive but effective tactics to denounce your opponent. The leftists accuse you of “racism”, therefore you are a “Nazi”, therefore you “wanttokillsixmillionjews”? Well accuse your leftist opponent of being a “Communist”, who is therefore a “Stalinist”, who therefore “wantstokillsixtysixmillionrussians.”

      Good so far, and an excellent example of Mantra Throwing, as defined on the Whitaker BUGS site. However, Mr. Ryackert sets a reasonable limit, which is, metapolitically, ineffective, with the unreasoning.

      Keep on doing it until your opponent implores you to return to a more reasonable debate.

      No.

      They are engaged in a total war against us on all fronts. Their goal is the GENOCIDE of the White race.

      “Negotiating” with them is like “negotiating” with cancer. The two step solution is to remove the power of the cancer to affect you and yours, and building a stronger, more resistant body to the cancer.

      We are not dealing with symbionts. We are dealing with parasites, who do not care if they kill their hosts. Quite the contrary, in fact, as they move on to fresher, more powerful hosts, their thirsts never slaked by anything less than total victory, the proof of which is genocide.

      For the last fifty years, we have been reasonable with the unreasonable. This must stop, and we must remove as much energy from the parasite as possible. A good way to do this is to send money to counter-currents, each and every month.

      Better us, than them.

  3. Fenria
    Posted August 14, 2013 at 12:58 am | Permalink

    If we want a united movement, then people need to stop trying to find and invent ways of dividing the movement. We must look at each other not through the lens of what our stances are on today’s petty social issues, but as white people, as Aryan people. View the world through the lens of, “Is it good for white people.” For sure, our enemies view the world through the lens of what is best for them, and our enemies are not going to split their ranks over some nonsense like tattoos or what kind of music certain members listen to. Whites are so busy dividing that we’ve forgotten how to come together.

    And seriously, anyone who claims to be part of this movement but tries to sow discord by creating idiotic divisions over tattoos, music, dress, haircolor, or paganism is an agent provocateur, and you people know who you are. We all do.

  4. Tim
    Posted August 14, 2013 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    What is this new habit of white subgroups denouncing their general classification.

  5. Posted August 13, 2013 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    People, above all Leftists, fear any form of unity that is based on White identity, Why? — Because if we do ever unite, nothing could prevent us from doing exactly what needs to be done (don’t read too much into that leftys). They know that every other ideology would crumble, shatter and blow away in the wind. In other words, they would be out of business. White nationalism would be all consuming because it is authentic and perfectly normal. It would be a restoration. So they promote the abnormal and keep it occupied and divided with petty labels and accusations.

  6. Evan
    Posted August 13, 2013 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been a poor, disloyal, backbiting member of the movement, at times leveling nonsense attacks on its leaders and generally behaving like an Arkham Asylum resident. Being linked, though, is one of the basically important matters to establish, and for many of the reasons Mr. Parrott cites I’ve always made sure that I am.

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4

    Reuben

    The Node

    Axe

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance

    Standardbearers

    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    Archeofuturism

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Tyr

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above