Print this post Print this post

Counter-Currents Radio 
Greg Johnson interviews Richard Spencer on Radixjournal.com

spencer49:03 / 112 words

[jwplayer file=”http://cdn.counter-currents.com/radio/Johnson-Spencer-2014-01-10.mp3″ streamer=”rtmp://s3cxt7hxkp9tvh.cloudfront.net/cfx/st” provider=”rtmp” duration=”2943″]

To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save target or link as.”

To subscribe to our podcasts, click here.

Greg Johnson interviews Richard Spencer of the National Policy Institute and Washington Summit Publishers about his new webzine Radixjournal.com. Topics include:

  • The aims of Radixjournal.com
  • The relationship of the webzine to the Radix print journal and Radix publishing imprint
  • The future of print publishing
  • The upcoming Radix volume on Pop Fascism
  • The controversial end of Alternative Right
  • 2014 plans for NPI, WSP, and Radix

We apologize for the audio quality of Richard’s portion of the interview, which sounds a little garbled and clipped on the low end.

 

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

41 Comments

  1. james hamilton
    Posted January 14, 2014 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    I’m sorry but i just stumbled into all of this recently…& stuff like this has my eyes go wide & i say: ‘What…on…earth???’ (I just read the Andy Nowicki thing & i just want to say 1) maybe he was exhausted when he wrote that, 2) altho i get it i still have to say ‘I fear for their sanity!’ — Cow in Cow&Chicken) I spend sometimes 8-16 hours reading til i have eyestrain trying to reconstruct this stuff to the point that i have any idea what you folks are talking about. I hope & pray CC doesn’t go down in flames. Maybe someone could write a primer of “The Essential Stuff You Need To Know For Those Of You Who Are Movement-Clueless & Just Joined Us 5 Minutes Ago”…? Btw I know basic Latin but I too had the kitchen-appliance reaction to ‘Radix’.

    • Izak
      Posted January 15, 2014 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

      “Radix” really isn’t the most common Latin word. I know it from studying the Vulgate: “Radix malorum est cupiditas” = Greed is the root of evil. Chaucer has the Pardoner quote that one ironically in the prologue to his tale.

    • Kudzu Bob
      Posted January 15, 2014 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

      A newbie’s guide to what Greg Johnson likes to call “this thing of ours” is a good idea, perhaps in the form of a pamphlet no longer than the Communist Manifesto. The very gifted Gregory Hood would be an excellent choice to write it.

  2. Coenradt
    Posted January 14, 2014 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    The unfortunate thing about it for me is actually the end of the Vanguard Radio podcasts. Talk and writing in the alternative right is often so focused on the “heavy” topics, that a lighter touch like the Vanguard podcasts was very welcome. In those shows, Richard, Colin and Andy seemed like friends, and I found their discussions entertaining for this very reason. Even their voices, a combination of high (Spencer and Liddell) and low (Nowicki) worked well together. To my mind more podcasting focusing on culture and lighter topics, in an informal format, would be most welcome and perhaps, with the right combination of personalities and intellects, less onerous to produce. Maybe that’s something to consider here at CC.

  3. Posted January 14, 2014 at 5:29 am | Permalink

    Only I can resolve this.

    Bondi Beach, Sydney, December 2014.

    Colin and Richard agree to meet at sunset and beat the shit out of one another until the sun disappears in the west.

    After, we scoop up all the bikini-clad women in sight, and head to the nearest watering hole.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 14, 2014 at 5:30 am | Permalink

      I’d pay to see.

    • Evan
      Posted January 14, 2014 at 9:01 am | Permalink

      That’s actually much better than how we tend to handle things, with petty backbiting and hissy fits.

  4. rhondda
    Posted January 13, 2014 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    Gee, I thought sneaky stab your friends in the back and then blame them was what teenage girls and church ladies did.

  5. WG
    Posted January 13, 2014 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    Izak wrote:

    The only one who really looks good in the fallout of all of this is Andy Nowicki.

    A toast to Andy!

    Seriously? Andy was possibly the worst thing about Alt-Right. Have you seen his latest piece on masturbation?

    http://alternative-right.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/wank-yankers-new-frontier-in-marriage.html

    The guy’s a total dork who made Alt-Right look silly, amateurish, and uncool.

    It’s understandable that Richard would want to distance himself from this rubbish.

    • Izak
      Posted January 13, 2014 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

      I personally can’t stand Andy’s blog posts. He seems far more concerned with blogging about the same sexual themes over and over than thinking about the bigger picture — which includes variety and breadth. To put it gently: one gets the feeling that his own personal hobby horses are the driving force behind most of his work on these topics, not any loftier or more practical ideas.

      I’ve never read one of his novels, so they could be amazing for all I know. As a blogger, however, he just doesn’t seem to have much to say. I’m not defending his blog posts.

      I’m defending his decision to avoid stupid flame wars over questionable business decisions.

  6. Flytrap
    Posted January 13, 2014 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    After listening to this and “Silent Night of the Long Knives” I think it’s obvious that Richard is too clever by half. Why he thinks Radix as a brand is better than Alternative Right I don’t understand. Radix sounds like a new line of kitchen stoves, Alternative Right is a perfect encapsulation of the mindset of the movement. To me, it seems that he’s created more work and enmity for himself.

    • Petronius
      Posted January 13, 2014 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

      I think “Radix” is not a very clever choice as a title. For anyone who isn’t familiar with Latin it sounds way too odd without being catchy, and for anyone who is it is a bit all-too sophisticated and pretentious.

      • Greg Johnson
        Posted January 13, 2014 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

        I agree that it is an inferior brand to Alternative Right, but I think that Richard really feels the brand has been ruined.

    • BlackSun
      Posted January 14, 2014 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

      In the “What I Was Thinking” podcast on the Radix Journal site, Richard Spencer explains why he did this, and it wasn’t a branding issue. Radix is a more radical concept, and the world “right” was deliberately avoided to steer clear of the entire right-left divide inherited from the French Revolution. Radix is the next step beyond Alternative Right, not a continuation of Alternative Right under a different name. It’s intended to do more deep thinking and promote a radical new vision of a future society, which is not what AR was all about.

      I generally liked Alternative Right – the concept was good, and there’s certainly a place for a webzine covering that ground. However, Richard is no longer interested in doing that any longer, so there is no reason for him to continue it. As a radical, I’m more on the same wavelength as Radix, so I hope it works out well and turns out to be what Richard envisions.

  7. Petronius
    Posted January 13, 2014 at 5:34 am | Permalink

    I couldn’t help this impression, but in last months before the plug was pulled the commentariat of AltRight seemed to be made up 80% of obnoxious, narcisstic retards with flashy costume Nazi avatars.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 13, 2014 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

      That was my impression too.

  8. Petronius
    Posted January 13, 2014 at 5:27 am | Permalink

    The eternal fate of right-wing groups who multiply by cell division.

  9. Vacant Serif
    Posted January 13, 2014 at 5:25 am | Permalink

    Excuse me, but what about the readership? I see no new articles for weeks and finally realize something is amiss and have to do a Sherlock Holmes impression to find out whats going on. It seemed as if that detestable philosemite that is always threatening to become a moderator finally did. Enormously unprofessional, self centered, and not at all cricket is how it seems to me. I understand wanting to protect ones “brand”, but this comes of as essentially allowing Rachel Maddow to shut down a valuable resource and an interesting community of regular commentators. To say this was handled poorly would be a supreme understatement.

  10. Oops
    Posted January 12, 2014 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

    I believe Richard was afraid of the flak he received from the Left and Rachel Maddow. The way he did it was wrong and he needs to apologize to Colin. Colin’s angry reaction is justified.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 12, 2014 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

      There’s nothing wrong with Richard being embarrassed and irritated by being held responsible for things that were published on Alternative Right after he left it. I completely sympathize with him. I neglected to mention it in the interview, but there was a brief period when Hunter Wallace (!) was put in charge of TOQOnline after I was fired from The Occidental Quarterly. Of course he didn’t last long. But frankly, I would have preferred to burn it down than see him squatting in the house that I built.

      But it is easy to avoid these sorts of conflicts. Cyberspace is infinite, after all. So why fight over little patches of it as if it were physical ground? When the owner of a site wants to end it, other people can put websites online very quickly and very cheaply.

      Yes, brands and established audiences are important. But in cyberspace, these things rise and fall rather quickly, so whenever there is a conflict, the smart thing is to split and set up different shops. The system regards us as a cancer. Well, let’s start thinking like one. The faster we divide and metastasize, the quicker we will kill it.

      • Jaego
        Posted January 12, 2014 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

        Start thinking like a Cancer: now that’s a powerful image and one worthy of a lot of thought. Any White Nationalist Oncologists out there? That would make a hell of an article.

  11. Izak
    Posted January 12, 2014 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Hey, I liked this interview, and I appreciate that you got Richard to talk more about the issue. I pretty much agree 100% with what Richard said about Colin. The guy definitely has self-control issues, but he is a very good writer when he’s being edited and held to very high expectations. It’s a shame he doesn’t hold himself to high expectations, because he can definitely meet them.

    In some ways, I think the internet has done a great job of weeding out people like Colin from high influence in public discourse. I’ve read some of Karl Marx’s letters, and he also can get really nasty and vitriolic, despite being a brilliant (albeit obviously wrong) thinker and good writer. If the internet existed during Marx’s time, he probably would have gotten into a bunch of stupid flame wars and made everyone go, “Man, this Karl Marx guy needs to shut up. I certainly wouldn’t but any of his books — he’s much too butthurt.”

    And of course all the criticisms toward Richard are valid, I think. He obviously hurt people’s feelings.

    The only one who really looks good in the fallout of all of this is Andy Nowicki.

    A toast to Andy!

    • Posted January 13, 2014 at 9:51 am | Permalink

      Point well taken, but I have to point out that Marx actually did a fair amount of “flaming” even without the help of the intertubes. He and Engels had a cottage industry of writing ponderously Germanic “funny” attacks on anyone who dared to think for themselves: Bauer, Proudhon, Stirner, etc.

      For decades, Stirner was known only as the subject of Marx’s ire, in a book about 3 times the size of Stirner’s own (called “St. Max”, ahahahah, get it? No?)

      It all goes back to the Christers, who I think originated the concept of the ‘flame war’ by simply burning their opponents’ books, leaving scholars with no record of their enemies except their own “refutations.”

      • Izak
        Posted January 13, 2014 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

        Hahaha, I suppose you are right! Although according to this wikipedia article I just accessed, their anti-Stirner tirade in its whopping 500-page entirety was not published until the 1930s — probably for the greater good of the universal proletariat.

        Trolls of the world, unite!

  12. Daniel Antinora
    Posted January 12, 2014 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    The issue is of great importance. The issue is who owns to movement. Nobody does. We don’t make decisions in a vacuum. If this is really a “community” then the community gets to decide.

    Richard doesn’t own Alternative Right and you don’t “own” Counter-Currents Greg. The suggestion is risible. All of a sudden we are libertarians? Lockean property rights prevail?

    What kind of National Socialism is this?!

    This is no swipe at anybody. This is about who we are and what we stand for. Anybody that would suggest Richard was justified to do what he did is wrong since the actions are Zukerbergian even when interpreted in the most positive light. He should do penance or be shunned. Period. If we can’t police our own community than it doesn’t deserve the name.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 12, 2014 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

      Yes and no. Yes, legally Richard does own Alternative Right, and I do own Counter-Currents. No, in that Richard stepped aside from AltRight and let Andy and Colin run it for a while. Psychologically, they took ownership; they added to it; they had “sweat equity” in the venture; legally, they might even make a case for “Squatters’ Rights.” Richard obviously does not see it that way. They wanted a consensus decision. He thought that ultimately he had the right to do what he wanted, regardless of their preferences. He in effect has evicted the squatters. They feel that they were treated in a peremptory and roughshod manner. I think that Richard needs to see it from their point of view and apologize to them. I think that Colin owes an apology or two as well. Andy not so much. But once the air is clear, Richard should still prevail. AltRight should be mothballed, and Andy and Colin need to create their own brand and platform.

      What I take away from this is to pay everyone as I go. Otherwise, you risk exploiting the idealism and creativity of people to improve your property, without ever intending to give them equity. There’s a lot of that in the movement, and it just creates conflicts and bad feelings down the line. I do not wish to create the same sort of situation that Richard admits he mistakenly created with AltRight.

      So just to reiterate. I own Counter-Currents. I am the sole owner of Counter-Currents, which is a platform and a business for communicating ideas. All of my authors retain ownership of their articles and contributions. I promise my readers and authors to keep Counter-Currents online permanently, either as an active site or as an archived site. If I take a book out of print, the author has the absolute right to reprint it as he sees fit. But if I see fit to leave Counter-Currents, I will not allow the brand to continue under the editorship of others, because realistically, that would be a source of anxiety and conflict down the line.

      Richard is right to try to shut down AltRight. He was wrong not to have shut it down a long time ago. He was wrong to allow Andy and Colin to develop proprietary feelings. And he was wrong to discount that any squatters’ rights that he might have to respect were created when he allowed Andy and Colin to farm his abandoned tract.

      • Daniel Antinora
        Posted January 12, 2014 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

        As always you are a gentlemen but we do have a genuine disagreement here. Which is not the end of the world. I’m not saying you don’t “own” Counter-Currents according to established law and custom. I’m saying the prevailing custom is wrong in this particular instance. The movement isn’t private property. I’m not coming out against private property. I’m against the attempt to privatize collective enterprises.

        At least you’ve went on record with your position and your commitment to leave everything as is.

        Also, I believe you’ve done your best to be the peacemaker here. Hopefully it’s made.

        Lastly, and I’m not sure exactly how it works, but Archive.org should be able to enable someone to generate a mirror of the site from within a month and leave it up and static at another URL.

        • Greg Johnson
          Posted January 12, 2014 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

          Given how prone the movement is to conflict, I think that keeping things as “Lockean” as possible is the best way to avoid exploitation and conflict.

          • Daniel Antinora
            Posted January 12, 2014 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

            Lolz.

            We’re undisciplined hacks compared to the Left and the You-Know-Whos…

            Maybe you’re right. What was the title of the purportedly nuanced take on White Nationalism by that Jew called… Imagined Communities?

          • Greg Johnson
            Posted January 12, 2014 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

            That was Benedict Anderson, and I think he was talking about nationalism as such. But point taken.

        • jannik
          Posted January 13, 2014 at 3:51 am | Permalink

          As far as I know, The Anderson Brothers, Benedict and Perry, are not jews.

          • Greg Johnson
            Posted January 13, 2014 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

            Yes, I think they were non-Jews as well.

  13. Lew
    Posted January 12, 2014 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    Richard Spencer strikes me as the professional. Why in the world would you want to repeat his mistake and establish a business relationship with Collin Liddell? Liddell has attacked you and ridiculed you. He didn’t have the judgment not to publish “Is Black Genocide Right”? And in the aftermath of this unfortunate business dispute about a web site, he’s the only one being unprofessional. He speaks in terms of dicktators and just told us Spencer is “too lazy” to edit?

    There is something juvenile and reckless about this man. In one of those Hitler threads, I’m pretty sure I remember him boasting that he has enough personal wealth to be set for life and therefore not give a shit about the consequences of actions. That remark said more about him than I think he realized. He does come across as trust fund loudmouth at times.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 12, 2014 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

      I don’t propose establishing a business relationship with Colin, beyond publishing him from time to time.

  14. yule
    Posted January 12, 2014 at 6:57 am | Permalink

    I wonder why Mr. Spencer chose the word “Radix”.

    Is it connected with the word ‘radical’?

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Posted January 12, 2014 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

      Yes, radical is derived from radix, which is the Latin word for “root” or “foundation”, “origin”.

    • yule
      Posted January 13, 2014 at 5:09 am | Permalink

      In Richard Spencer’s own words:

      “With ‘Radix’, I really wanted to get away from defining ourselves negatively. ‘Radix’, the word, has been a kind of idee fixe for me for a while. I love this word that means “radical”, that means “race”, and so many other things. This idea that we need to get to the root of the matter. We need to get away from these fairly meaningless issues like tax policy or gay marriage, or what have you, and really get at the heart of something and uncover it. To really understand it.

      [From ‘What Was I Thinking’ podcast, January 3, 2014, 15:45-17:00.]

  15. Colin Liddell
    Posted January 11, 2014 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    Spencer, as ever, talks very sweetly but says a lot of crap. There is no denying the man’s charm, just as there is no denying the charm of many popular politicians and successful used-car salesman, but basically all he is saying is:

    “I killed a perfectly good site with hundreds of articles, tens of thousands of regular readers, millions of hits, and one of the few brands for dissident viewpoints because I was too lazy to edit, not every article was ideal to how I want to be perceived, and – boo hoo, sob – Rachel Maddow criticized me.”

    Plus: “I destroyed important personal alliances that will now be almost impossible to rebuild while pissing away much of my credit in the movement simply because I was too egoistical to see AltRight as the collective effort that it was.”

    Richard’s communication skills would have been better served keeping Andy and me in the loop rather than trying to charm the Counter-Currents audience so that we could have worked out a solution that served all our interests as well as those of the wider movement.

    My anger at Spencer (and also that of Andy, who is one of the most mild-mannered people I know) is genuine and something I have to deal with in a way that does the least harm to our movement, but I also hope that the fact that it exists will continue to surprise Spencer (who reveals an interesting blind spot in that he never expected it) and help educate him into turning down the glare of his ego enough to see some of his faults in this matter.

    Essentially I wish him and Radix well so long as he gives up his insane quest to found his new venture on the mangled corpses of his previous venture.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 12, 2014 at 2:00 am | Permalink

      Colin, I will allow you one swipe at Richard because he took one at you, but it ends here.

      I hope you guys eventually apologize to one another (because you both have legitimate grievances) and hug it out, for the greater good.

      Let me also state, for the record, that if I ever decide to stop publishing CC/NANR, I will simply mothball the site, keep it online forever, and give all authors carte blanche to republish their work as they wish. I don’t think that will happen, though, but it needs saying.

  16. Rever Leo
    Posted January 11, 2014 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    Richard is a well brought up highly educated European American. His people terminate business and social arrangements in a more mature and considerate manner. This affair reminds one of an ‘African no’.

  17. Sir Church
    Posted January 11, 2014 at 9:20 am | Permalink

    Can we use a little will to power and put aside our differences for the sake of the race? Every race is a race of jerks, so let’s just be above it all.

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4

    Reuben

    The Node

    Axe

    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes

    Demon

    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance

    Standardbearers

    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy

    Archeofuturism

    The Path of Cinnabar

    Tyr

    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above