Print this post Print this post

Nordicism Today

1,816 words

HideYourEyesIn general, northwest European nations and nations of predominantly northwest European descent (such as the United States of America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), have in the modern era been more prosperous, cohesive, dynamic, and civil than other European nations. There is a downright boring regularity with which international organizations and think-tanks report, year after year, that the “nicest” places to live are Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Switzerland, Austria, and Canada. The most economically prosperous and dynamic Western countries consistently include the United States, Canada, Great Britain, and Germany (the latter despite absorbing an economically deformed and damaged East Germany).

The relationship between northwest Europeans and other Europeans in some respects parallels that between Europeans and non-Europeans: There is often pronounced envy for the Northwest Europeans’ perceived success, often seesawing between imperfect imitation and nativist self-assertion.

There are something like concentric circles of self-confidence and envy as one goes from the northwest European core outwards. This is particularly evident in the politics of the European Union, in which tensions and crises often reflect heterogeneity between European nations.

Thus France, despite being a fairly strong performer generally, looks longingly upon German economic competitiveness. French elites have also been jealous of German economic discipline in avoiding recourse to inflation and monetary devaluations. French elites’ push to create the euro common currency was in part motivated by a desire to lock France into a Germany-style monetary system in which devaluations and inflation would be materially impossible, thus, they thought, forcing Teutonic discipline and virtue upon the country.

Italy, with a prosperous northern part of the country and an underperforming south, is much the same. The Italians adhere to the European Union as a way of achieving a northern European quality of life and civility. Italian participation in the Eurozone was, quite explicitly, predicated on a desire to abandon the undisciplined chaos of Italian parliamentary politics and its associated inflation and deficits. Italian elites quite self-consciously chose, instead, to subject their country to a semi-authoritarian European macroeconomic regime, in the hope of acquiring German-style monetary and budgetary disciplines.

One could say the same thing of Spain, Portugal, Greece, and indeed most of the Balkans, such as Romania and Bulgaria. In each case, the nation’s economics are mediocre and her politics and society are variably corrupt, and each longs to live like northern Europeans by associating with them through the European Union. The same is true for some prospective nations seeking to join the Union such as Ukraine, Serbia, and Moldova. They all hope northwest European virtue will rub off on them as a result of socialization in a joint polity.

One can enlarge the circle further still: Russia has long been torn between Westernizing and nativist tendencies. No doubt Nikolai Trubetzkoy has written most eloquently on the Sisyphean futility of aping northwest Europeans (whom he called “Romano-Germans”):

Europeanized [i.e. Westernizing] nations, finding it impossible to keep pace with the Romano-Germans and so gradually falling behind, try to catch up from time to time by attempting long leaps. Such leaps distort the entire course of historical development. A nation must cover very quickly a distance that the Romano-Germans covered gradually and over a much longer period of time. It must skip several historical rungs and create overnight, ex abrupto, what arose in Romano-Germanic nations as a result of a “series of historical changes”. The consequences of such “leaping” evolution are terrible. Every leap is followed by a period of apparent (from the European standpoint) stagnation, when it is necessary to bring order to the culture, to coordinate the results achieved by a leap in a particular area with other elements of the culture. During this period of “stagnation”, the nation again falls even farther behind. The histories of Europeanized nations are always characterized by brief periods of apparent “progress”, alternating with more or less protracted periods of “stagnation”. In destroying the wholeness and the unbroken incrementalism of the historical process, such historical leaps also disrupt tradition, which is already fragile in a Europeanized nation.

Let us emphasize: unbroken tradition is a prerequisite for normal evolution. Leaps and jumps create a temporary illusion that the “common European level of civilization” has been achieved, but they cannot advance a nation in the true sense of the word. Leaping evolution wastes national energies, which are already overburdened owing to the very existence of Europeanization. Just as a person who, in trying to keep pace with a speedier companion, will become exhausted and collapse after resorting to long jumps to catch up, so a Europeanized nation will perish after choosing such an evolutionary path and squandering there its national energies. And all of this will happen while faith in oneself is lost, and without the sustaining sense of national unity which was destroyed long before by the fact of Europeanization.

No doubt, trying to acquire northwest European habits through socialization is not an entirely futile idea. But personally, I tend to side with Trubetzkoy and Mircea Eliade in thinking that each European nation should embrace its own personality, rather than lose self-confidence in setting up (northwestern) “Europe” as the ultimate ideal and wasting energies in crudely imitating this imagined model. Nothing is possible, for either a man or a nation, without self-knowledge and self-esteem.

Finally, beyond Europe, Turkey under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk made a strategic decision to shed her imperial, Islamic, and Middle Eastern heritage in favor “joining Europe” with the creation of a secular French-style nation-state. This ambition has failed, Turkey remaining what Samuel Huntington called a “cleft country” torn between civilizations, perpetually kept out of the European Union, and increasingly returning to its Islamic and Middle Eastern roots under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. This is visible, not least, in the Turks’ partial abandonment of secularism and their almost Semitic attachment to Turkish immigrants and their descendants in the West. Erdoğan explicitly considers ethnic Turks in the West, regardless of whether they are first generation immigrants or born there, to be an extension of his nation (in this, the Turkish attitude is identical to that of North African Arab governemnts).

Conversely, northwest European countries are often the most skeptical of the EU project. Great Britain, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, and Iceland have all opted out of parts of the European Union. These countries, being prosperous and civil on their own, do not feel the need for association with other Europeans to improve their lot and are more likely to have the self-confidence to believe they can get by just fine on their own.

There is another aspect of northwest Europeans which is worth consideration: Their nations are consistently the most “pozzed.” Those nations which are the most fanatical and authoritarian in pursuing the imperatives of liberal-egalitarian and multiculturalist ideology, are typically of northwest European stock. Sweden’s notorious excesses are roundly mocked. Canada’s baby-faced Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is a caricature of an effeminate liberal, almost every day performing a new emasculating profession of Potemkin equality, of literally crying to disown his ancestors in the hope of appeasing Amerindians, and of justifying feminist policies on the utterly mindless grounds that “it’s [the current year]!” (Trudeau’s profession of egalitarianism is suspect by the fact that, like Hillary Clinton, he is only a senior politician by being the heir of a political family. His egalitarianism is shown to be an outright fraud by his attack on the BDS movement, which argues for relatively minor economic sanctions on Israel until the Jewish state lives up to the West’s supposed democratic ideals and ceases to oppress the Palestinians. Hence Trudeau has no interest in applying egalitarianism on the world’s most ethnocentric and most privileged ethnic group.) Germany has been the most enthusiastic major European nation in welcoming millions of uneducated, often illiterate, low-IQ military-age African and Islamic males. Great Britain and the United States are in general not far behind in proudly advertising their embrace of the suicide cult.

Correlation does not always imply causation. The roots of northwest Europeans performance and degeneracy are no doubt very complex and difficult to disentangle. I have no interest in resurrecting crude Nordicist theories, extremist interpretation of which have, no doubt, been the among the most important causes for European fratricide and collapse in the twentieth century.

But I also believe that the truth should never fear investigation. It seems too much to think all these correlations are mere coincidences. The speculation of many human biodiversity scholars about the so-called “Hajnal line” often smacks as a euphemism, conscious or not, of Nordicism. Speaking of which, the quite obvious genetic cluster formed by northwest European nations just happens to largely coincide with the outlines of the Hajnal line.

All this fits rather neatly with the traditional thesis that northwest Europeans — having evolved during the Ice Age in a harsh environment with low population density — would have been selected from relatively lower ethnocentrism, and possibly for moralistic cooperation, defined by cultural group norms rather than ethnocentric boundaries. It would certainly predict lower corruption among northwest European nations and higher ethnocentrism and relatively intractable corruption everywhere else. No doubt northwest Europeans’ relative success in creating prosperous and comfortable societies, also tends to reduce the ethnocentric instinct and lower their guard to the threats posed by multiculturalism.

In any event, all this should be freely investigated.

As an addendum, I would stress that I have no interest in advocating “Nordic superiority.” Firstly, parochialism and the narcissism of small differences dividing our nations has been disastrous in the past and will be equally disastrous if maintained in the future. Genetic differences among Europeans remain absolutely minuscule compared to differences between continents, and most pointedly between us and rising China or the exploding populations of Africa and the Ummah.

Secondly, no doubt there are unique desirable adaptations among each European group, which should be preserved, identified, and cultivated. What’s more, what is evolutionarily adaptive is highly contextual, depending on often fluctuating environment. Northwest Europeans may have traits which fostered their dynamism and success in the past, but today these same traits seem to make them uniquely vulnerable to egalitarian and multiculturalist propaganda, and are making them wreck their own nations with the greatest enthusiasm. On current trends, we can safely say that within a hundred years America, Anglo-Canada, Quebec, Germany, Great Britain, France, the Benelux countries, and the Nordic countries will simply cease to exist as nations. The existential prospects for eastern and southern European nations, not forgetting Argentina, are infinitely brighter.

Céline believed that the White race’s fate was sealed with Germany’s defeat at Stalingrad. Adolf Hitler failed perhaps above all because of his contempt for the Slavs, a catastrophic error of doctrine for which he, his Germany, and all of Europe paid then and are paying still an incalculable price. And yet — what irony! — today these same Slavs seem to be those most likely to survive this century and carry on the torch of European civilization.


If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Sandy
    Posted March 6, 2016 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    I thought that the author summed up Justin Trudeau rather well.

  2. Veritas
    Posted March 4, 2016 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    I have to say that, in ‘honor’ of the pathetic picture featured at the top of this column, and considering all that Germany and Sweden have experienced of late with the ‘rapefugee’ invasion of their heimats, is that Liberalism, in various forms and manifestations, among Nordics is a feature, not a bug.

    For so (too) long, a warped kind of ‘transcendental humanism’ has permeated the Nordic and Germanic mind, an almost occult-like obsession with the ‘Brotherhood of Man’ – where nationalism, and even nationality is de-emphasized, where being a ‘gutmensch’ (do-gooder) is more important than being a good German(ic) .. where the only kind of pride allowed or even tolerated is an inverted ‘pride of pridelessness’ – perhaps the worst kind of pride, or more specifically narcissism there is.

    In the epic and famous Ode to Joy by the magnificent Ludwig van Beethoven, the lyrics of the song, who were not written by him but was a poem composed by another German, Friedrich Schiller, captures this Liberal quandary that really seems to vex the Nordic mentality:

    Freude, schöner Götterfunken
    Tochter aus Elysium,
    Wir betreten feuertrunken,
    Himmlische, dein Heiligtum!
    Deine Zauber binden wieder
    Was die Mode streng geteilt;
    Alle Menschen werden Brüder,
    Wo dein sanfter Flügel weilt.

    and this stanza, equally telling:

    Freude trinken alle Wesen
    An den Brüsten der Natur;
    Alle Guten, alle Bösen
    Folgen ihrer Rosenspur.

    Küsse gab sie uns und Reben,
    Einen Freund, geprüft im Tod;
    Wollust ward dem Wurm gegeben,
    Und der Cherub steht vor Gott.


    The bolded text says, in English, that All men shall become brothers,
    wherever your gentle wings hover”
    .. and the other one, again equally telling, is that Every creature drinks in joy at nature’s breast; Good and Bad alike follow her trail of roses.”

    “All men are brothers” and “Every Creature, Good and Evil” are equally worthy = LIBERALISM.

    It really seems like again that this thinking, at least among a very sizable element in Germany, and Germanic lands, contrary to the stereotype of Germans and Germanic peoples being very militaristic, warlike and aggressive, or that they are very ethnocentric, for which real-world evidence and observation do not bear out – for both in a good and decent way (i.e. – the Germans aren’t really the aggressive “Huns” the evil and malicious Anglo-Zionist-American propaganda made them out to be) – and in a bad and pathological way – as we see with the current illegal alien, Camp of the Saints style invasion of heimat Europa.

    Again, contrary to some aspects of Nordicist idealism, from real world experiences and observations, all this evidence seems to point out that this behavior is a feature, not a bug.

  3. c
    Posted March 3, 2016 at 3:28 am | Permalink

    It would be nice to hear from some Danes.

  4. Walter
    Posted March 2, 2016 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    Celine was right. Europe’s fate was sealed with the defeat at the eastern front. This was accomplished with the frantic clapping of madmen in London and Washington. Yet, had the war been followed by a policy of sanity in the Western part of Europe and political leadership not provided by the same spirit that did everything to bring about the break-out of the war in the first place, Europe and its people would not now be with their back to the void at the edge of the abyss. The problem lies then in the way this modern world is choosing its leadership. This is especially egregious in Germany where only anti-politics is pursued: Destroying of German self-awareness, squandering of German wealth on anti-German projects from the UN to Israel to fomenting and participating in wars totally devoid of any German interest, educating youth in preposterous guilt-cultist ways.
    Overall, I do not understand at the most basic level the apparent self-destructive tendency that shines through the modern world.

  5. Carpenter
    Posted March 2, 2016 at 7:34 am | Permalink

    Faye seems to be borrowing a lot from the Americans here.

    The “White Genocide” meme in general has probably been mostly an American thing to this point.

    Seems to be reading Kevin MacDonald as far as the ethnic and genetic differences of Northern Europeans contributing to their egalitarianism goes.

    Did he really say “pozzed”? TRS/Daily Shoah.

  6. Leon
    Posted March 2, 2016 at 1:57 am | Permalink

    One point that needs clarification: ‘Nordicism’, or ‘Nordic race’, as in this text, has often been used as a euphemism for ‘Germanicism’, or ‘Northwest Europeanism’, whose definitions are at least as cultural and linguistic, as they are truly racial, in the modern sense of the world. However from a purely anthropological/taxonomist point of view, the Nordic race can not be said to stop at Germany’s border, since Slavs, Balts, and above all Finns in Northern Europe have all the same physical and measurable traits as do their northwestern cousins. Authors who took a biological view of race, even back in the 19th Century recognized this fact (see Madison Grant’s map of the ‘Nordic race’:

    Let me just say that I think the claims of Nordicism are not completely untrue, but highly overemphasized. Europeans cannot be divided into discrete racial categories based on physical traits, despite the claims of the 19th Century anthropologists. Yes there are extremes at the southern and northern ends of the European continent, but I dare any self-professed ‘racial taxonomist’ to accurately identify the average European by ethnicity. Many claim to be able to, but when they have to guess, they usually guess wrong. Truth is, only a minority of European individuals have phenotypes which are specific to a given region/ethnic group. Nordicists tend greatly to overestimate both the racial and cultural differences between them and non-northwest Europeans.

    • Posted March 3, 2016 at 4:22 am | Permalink

      You might find this of interest: “European genetic substructure”

      • Leon
        Posted March 3, 2016 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

        @Steven J.
        So it’s as I said: Europeans are a genotypic and phenotypic jumble, with only a minority of individuals standing clearly apart.

    • Dane
      Posted March 3, 2016 at 10:04 am | Permalink

      I´m danish, and when I´m in a foreign country I can always spot other Danes from a hundred yards away. Sometimes I will mistake Norwegians, swedes or north Germans for Danes, but most often not. I can even spot Finnish or dutch people when I see them here in Denmark. Just because your tools of measurement isn’t yet refined enough to tell the genetic group variations, it doesn’t mean they aren’t there. Descendants of Scandinavians in America shows the highest degree of social trust, and there are good reasons to believe those traits are genetic. Danish research has shown it was an important remedy in the ability of the vikings to build their power and expand over great distances. Trade was based on mutual trust, and there were no central commander in many of the great raids and invasions.

      “No doubt northwest Europeans’ relative success in creating prosperous and comfortable societies, also tends to reduce the ethnocentric instinct and lower their guard to the threats posed by multiculturalism.”

      Danes are more a tribe than a people, more a big extended family than a cultural entity. As such, I think that ethnocentrism is stronger in Danes than in many more southern Europeans, it is just suppressed culturally. My most liberal friend couldn’t help himself going into a laughing frenzy, when a funny politically incorrect friend of ours pointed out how Africans have another way of eating with their hands, using their hand more like a spoon scooping up the food, referencing Morgan Freeman in Robin Hood and apes. This revealed to me a great repressed ethnocentrism in the most humanistic, moralist multiculturalist Dane i know, with reference to the article on c-c on the secret of laughter by Anthony M. Ludovici, that you laugh when you feel superior adaption. This same guy later tried to purge me because I insisted in our friend groups discussions, that there are race differences. This I believe is not because of weaker ethnocentrism, but of quite the opposite. My friend wanted to dissociate himself from me because I am a sinner, and only if you fell a strong sense of ethnocentrism will you be able to feel a great guilt about it. Sweden may be the most ethnocentric country in the world, but also be the most new wave pc religious country, channeling the Calvinist guilt complex towards their original sin of ethnocentrism.

      The big role mafia plays in Italy, suggests a weaker ethnocentrism to me. The many Danes joining the SS wiking and the Finnish Resistance during ww2 was not only motivated by fear of the soviets, but racial solidarity too. How would a whole nation like Germany be swayed by NS if it didn’t hold a strong sense of ethnocentrism to begin with?

      I´m not so persuaded by the idea that ethnocentrism is lower in the north, only that particular genetically based moralist survival mechanisms (trust) has rendered us more vulnerable to manipulation of our mechanical religious instincts.

    • Veritas
      Posted March 4, 2016 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

      However from a purely anthropological/taxonomist point of view, the Nordic race can not be said to stop at Germany’s border, since Slavs, Balts, and above all Finns in Northern Europe have all the same physical and measurable traits as do their northwestern cousins.


      True, the Nordic race certainly doesn’t stop at Germany’s border, and for that matter, nor are all Germans Nordic, nor certainly are all Slavs Nordic – for both a fair amount of Germans, and many Slavs, belong to the Alpine and, to a lesser extent, Dinaric sub-races – with many of course, in Germany at least, being a Nordic-Alpine admixture.

      There are Nordic populations, to a greater or lesser degree, in all of Europe. A good deal of France, Msr. Durocher’s patrie, as well as northern Italy, have historically sizable Nordic elements among their people as well – as we saw on Madison Grant’s map of the ‘distribution of the European races’.

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4


    The Node


    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes


    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance


    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy


    The Path of Cinnabar


    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace


    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above