Print this post Print this post

Brexit Means Turks Stay Out, a White EU is Possible

brexit1,605 words

White Nationalism just got its best electoral victory in living memory. The UK’s departure from the EU is the first mortal blow to the EU as conceived by the cultural Marxists, the free market capitalists, and the NATO strategists. It is the first step to the EU or some successor state having a European Identity and a coherent Grand Strategy, one that reflects the goals and values of White Nationalists.

Grand Strategy and the EU’s Bipolar Disorder 

The Grand Strategy of a country is something that does not change more than once per century if that often. It is dictated by geology and geography more often than it is voluntarily chosen by a countries leadership. For example, from the Late Middle Ages until the 1980s the primary priority of France has been to divide and contain the Germanic tribes in order to remain the dominant force on the continent. For centuries, the tsars dreamed of a warm water port until they won Sebastopol from the Turks.

From the time of The House of Tudor, and perhaps before, the prerogative of the England was that a hegemon never arises on the continent of Europe. Their involvement in the European Union may appear to some as an abandonment of that goal until one delves beneath the surface to understand the British role in the evolution of European institutions. In fact, the United Kingdom’s involvement in the EU meant that a European Grand Strategy and a European Identity would be impossible to achieve.

Britian thrives on its mercantile economy and has spread economic liberalism wherever the Union Jack has flown. England was blessed with many deep water natural harbors. Its advantage in the number of these harbors over France and other European powers is measured not by “how many more” but “how many times more.” This leads to unusual ecenomic realities, such as the fact that, long after coal mining began in the US, Bostonians, and many others on the East Coast of the US, could get their coal more cheaply by boat from England than via the riverine and overland routes of their own country. Add to that the fact that William the Conqueror led the last successful invasion of England, and we understand the joke in geopolitical circles that Britain is a large lump of coal covered in grass and protected by the Atlantic. They are secure on their island and the world is their zone of economic interest.

Contrast the impact of geography on strategy in England and its successor states with that of Poland. Poland, which lacks natural defensive borders and easy access to global markets, has, since its modern rebirth, spent almost all of its strategic energy on managing its relations with Russia and Germany. To paraphrase Will Rogers, to England and its successor states, a stranger was defined as a trading partner they have not met yet. A rare luxury indeed. Most of continental Europe has (surprise!) a more continental approach than the Thallasocracies of the world. This results in a bipolarism in the strategic mindset of the EU.

There are, generally speaking, two directions that European integration can take: deeper and broader. Going deeper would mean developing a common approach to defense and foreign policy for the first time. Going broader would mean expanding the already existing free trade and freedom of movement zones to new countries.

Britain has always been the strongest voice for a broader Europe. As recently as last year, David Cameron has reiterated his support for Turkish inclusion in the EU. When he took the reins of the Conservative Party he said he would “fight for” Turkish Inclusion. Recognizing how deeply unpopular this elite consensus opinion is, in the month before the Brexit vote, Cameron claimed that this “could not happen before the year 3000,” but Euroskeptics are well aware of the willingness of their political leaders to lie about such things.

Turkey in the EU

The inclusion of Turkey would mean that the largest delegation to Brussels would be from a non-European people. Europe would have the pleasure of looking over the back fence to see Iran and Iraq as immediate neighbors. This is a border surrounded on all sides by Kurds, the worlds largest stateless nation, who dream of a Kurdish state. About 80 million Turks would enter into labor arbitrage with the workers of Europe who are already watching their purchasing power drop as globalization marches forward and Blacks and Arabs march inward. Not to mention the fact that nearly 5 million refugees have recently settled in Turkey from conflict zones in the Middle East.


In terms of security, modern Turkey is turning away from the secular principles of its founding fathers. President Erdogan, who many specialists on the region claim to be a longtime member of the Muslim Brotherhood, has held power for over a decade in Turkey. (The author was once in the office of a devout non-Turkish Muslim claiming to be part of this semi-secret society, who proudly showed off a photo of himself with Erdogan dating back to the early 1990s. The alleged context was building international links within the Brotherhood.) The Lebanese-American journalist Serena Shim was killed by Turkish Intelligence for filming from a distance friendly exchanges between the Turkish Military and ISIS. This NATO member has been a reliable supplier of arms to ISIS, including those plundered from Libya by the likes of Chris Stevens.

Why does the UK support Turkey in the EU?

At this point it should be clear that Turkish inclusion would indeed serve the first priority of UK Grand Strategy; a deeper union is not possible with Turkey involved. It also plays to their strengths by providing a new trading partner and source of cheap labor.

Why does the US support Turkey in the EU?

For the answer to this question one need look no further than the the book The Next 100 Years. It is written by George Friedman, a neo-con who runs Stratfor, which is like Blackwater but filled with former CIA Agents like himself. Friedman also just happens to be Jewish. Friedman identifies the Turco-American relationship as the most important one to develop by the end of the 21st Century.

Turkey is the indispensible country when it comes to building gas pipelines to Europe which will block a possible Russian monopoly. Also, control of the strait leading to the Black Sea will block in the Russian Navy’s Southern Fleet. Just as the UK teamed up with the sultans of this non-European entity in the 19th century to fight their white cousins from Russia, the US foreign policy establishment (regardless of the influence of the Organized Jewish Community) wishes to do the same in the 21st century. Ideally the US government (once it loses its Yiddish inflection) would adopt a racial nationalist foreign policy despite being at the moment a 2/3 White country. Perhaps the best we can reasonably hope for is that it embraces it’s Jeffersonian and Jacksonian traditions at the expense of the recently dominant Hamiltonian and Wilsonian traditions. (See Walter Russell Mead’s, “The Jacksonian Tradition and American Foreign Policy” for a better understanding of these four tendencies.)


Toward the next European Union

Turkey still has its supporters in the upper echelons of Europe’s career politicians, but clearly, the migrant crisis, stagnating employment prospects and purchasing power, the rise nationalist parties, and most importantly Brexit, will cause these venal power brokers to think twice before rubber stamping a Turkish entry into the EU.

A White Nationalist political order is possible on the international scale through a Paris-Berlin-Moscow Axis, which Michael O’Meara has written about previously. The current EU is far from the prototype for this political arrangement, but by doing the hard work of negotiating mutually beneficial economic and monetary policy between Germany and France (two very different but potentially complementary economies), through the continued academic exchanges (and intermarriages) of the university-level Erasmus programs, and by the shared suffering brought on by the misguided policies of cultural Marxist elites, continental Europeans will be better prepared to ratify and enact a Paris-Berlin-Moscow Axis in the coming decades than if the EU were to disappear and all sovereignty be returned to each member state in the next few years.

Thank You Third Way Voters of England!

Brexit was made possible by the turnout of the white middle class and white working class voters of England in record numbers. They bravely ignored their political leaders and moved beyond the Left-Right paradigm to embrace the nationalist option of rejecting the policy of replacement level immigration. This may bring an end to the United Kingdom as currently composed, but this is the only way to keep England for the English.

When we speak of White Nationalism we are consciously redefining the older concept of nationalism. However, “British Nationalism” by definition ignores historic realities, something English supporters were willing to do, but potential support from non-English British people was never forthcoming. In the end, the decision to look to Westminster rather than Brussels was an English one. This author did not believe such an outcome was possible without the prerequisite of Scotland’s departure before yesterday’s vote. The combination of the non-White voting bloc and the bourgeois Lib-Con voting bloc in England seemed challenging enough already, but when combined with the 10% of the UK population in Scotland who were certain to choose Brussels it seemed impossible.

The working and middle class English have shocked the world. The impact of their decision may be felt across this century in ways far more important than temporary shocks to the stock market or a small boost in confidence of anti-EU political parties.


If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Jimmy
    Posted June 28, 2016 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    The decision to look to Westminster rather than Brussels was also a Welsh and Cornish choice.

  2. Patrick Le Brun
    Posted June 25, 2016 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    Apparently President Hollande agrees with me.

    After giving a boilerplate response the day of Brexit on how sad he was for the result…i just heard an excerpt from a speech he gave today on Radio France Info. He said, “Brexit is a tragedy for the British…[like in a divorce] it may be a painful process but those who chose to stay in the family must move on…the European Union makes more sense now.” It sounds like Hollande has moved beyond the grieving process pretty quickly.

    I wonder if he reads Counter Currents?

  3. nineofclubs
    Posted June 25, 2016 at 5:03 am | Permalink

    An excellent, well written article.
    Here in Australia, the reaction of the MSM is one of shocked disbelief. English voters actually IGNORED the urgings of both the Corporate Right (you’ll be worse off) and the Hipster Left (immigrants have rights) to assert their own identity and will.
    I am so proud of the ordinary English people. As we say in Oz, good on you. Fantastic result.

  4. nero
    Posted June 24, 2016 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    They want Turkey in the EU so that they can exploit the Turkish military and consolidate it into the EU military.

  5. Dave
    Posted June 24, 2016 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    An incredibly sharp piece of writing, Patrick. Here in the UK, the result is starting to hit home. What’s becoming clear is the divide between the chattering metropolitan middle classes and ordinary working folk. Much the same as is happening in the States with the Trump campaign. In my lifetime, I can’t recall public opinion in the UK so divided. These are uncertain times for the UK but we are undoubtedly witnessing a trend that the BNP started and UKIP are continuing – namely, that ordinary blue collar, working folk who value family, community, nation and tradition are asserting themselves again. We have many battles ahead before we can proclaim our freedom but, for now, we should take comfort in the fact that there is much wailing and gnashing of teeth across the monied vested interests and liberal left community in Britain today.

    • Gladiator
      Posted June 25, 2016 at 8:19 am | Permalink

      Dave don’t worry about the trendy, cucksuckers, middle finger tippers. Unemployment will take care of them. They won’t handle it and their only solution is to head for the nearest airport!

      White, working blue collar, Andy Capps will stick it all the way down to Dover Cliffs. They did it before and shall do it again.

  6. Awakened
    Posted June 24, 2016 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    “A White Nationalist political order is possible on the international scale through a Paris-Berlin-Moscow Axis, which Michael O’Meara has written about previously.”

    I would love this to happen but you think the US will allow it? There is need to be a change of governments in France and Germany, Le Pen and AFD coming into power, this also would be the end of NATO.

    • Patrick Le Brun
      Posted June 25, 2016 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

      I believe the US will fight this every step,of the way.

      For example, in the March 2017 French Presidential Election there will be a week between the first and second vote. If the Front National is present and doing well in the polls I expect Financial Warfare attacks emanating from the US Government and George Soros against the CAC 40 during that week. Also, since 2008 many commercial banks in small cities and villages have a policy of only replenishing their ATMs with money that clients physically deposit within. I believe that this means it is easier now than in 2008 for a panic to ensue creating a “run on the bank scenario.” Our Enemy’s strategy has been the same for a while, they will trump our “fear of the foreigner” with fear of economic decline.

      If the FN wins there will be an all out attack on the French sovereign bond market in an attempt to 1) put the French State in a defensive posture and force cutbacks in social programs and 2) to scare the French public away from doing anything against the will of the Globalists when voting in referenda.

      I don’t know enough about Germany to comment, but I think their Nationalist Parties are still polling in the low single digits. When I think of the German predicament, I often think of President Kennedy’s line: where peaceful reform is impossible, violent revolution becomes inevitable.

      • Jud Jackson
        Posted June 26, 2016 at 7:29 am | Permalink

        For example, in the March 2017 French Presidential Election there will be a week between the first and second vote. If the Front National is present and doing well in the polls I expect Financial Warfare attacks emanating from the US Government and George Soros against the CAC 40 during that week.

        Interesting point. However, at that time, Trump could well be the president. If that is the case, it seems to me that you can’t assume the US will do what you say they will do.

  7. Posted June 24, 2016 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    Excellent overview of the historical and geopolitical context of Brexit. It gives ample space to that usually unmentioned elephant in the room, the position of Turkey vs the EU. Very clever of Patrick to wrap this all together hours after the Brexit vote. This will be a very informative ‘You Are There’ essay to come back to in the future, when immediate memory of the Brexit context is lost.

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4


    The Node


    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes


    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance


    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy


    The Path of Cinnabar


    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace


    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above