Print this post Print this post

Looking Back at Black & White Genocide

KillTheBoer2,829 words

Back in 2012, I caused some controversy with a pair of articles that touched on the issue of genocide: “Is Black Genocide Right?” closely followed by “Is White Genocide Right? The leftist website, Daily Kos responded to the first one with “Right-wing eZine sinks to new low; calls for ‘Black Genocide.’”

This was amusing as not only did the Daily Kos obviously misunderstand the article (I doubt they properly read it), but they also probably support the only functioning system of Black Genocide in force today, namely mass abortion, which kills Blacks in the USA at a rate five times more than Whites. Oddly, they did not even bother to mention my second article.

The odium that the first of these articles acquired (it still features prominently in the Wikipedia entry for “Alternative Right” was enhanced when the decision was taken by Richard Spencer to remove both articles, while “excusing” the first of them as something heavily ironic — along the lines of Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal.” This was done, according to memory, in order not to “embarrass” a prominent anti-immigration activist, with a more mainstream approach, whom Richard was attempting to add as a contributing editor of

Given the ease with which the article could be used as to score cheap points by the Left, there was a certain rationale in that move, so I deferred to Richard’s judgement, but I couldn’t help thinking at the time that we were running counter to the essence of the Alt Right, which in my mind is the quality of never backing down or moderating a message unless it can be disproved, no matter how many “jimmies” are “rustled.”

My instincts were, of course right, because redacting the article did not remove it as a weapon in the Left’s armoury. Instead it removed it as a weapon in ours, allowing it to be cited and misconstrued in the same way that Hillary Clinton tried to distort what the Alt Right is in her recent attack on Trump.

For this reason I believe it is time for both articles to see the light of day once again, so that they can be properly read. They both contain much sense and a lot of heart, as well as the kind of “Big Picture” thinking that has always been one of the defining — and Faustian — characteristics of the Alt Right. Rather than being “trollish” pieces, as sometimes claimed, both were written in a mood of profound seriousness and deep reflection. As such, I remain intensely proud of them to this very day.

Despite the title of the first one, both are actually about the subject of White Genocide, the first being an attempt to reframe the active and ongoing question of White Genocide by making an alternative case for genocide for another group that simply is not threatened by genocide — quite the reverse in fact. The point made is that if there is to be genocide — and the Left seems hell-bent on arranging that for us — then why should it be Whites?

The second essay takes an already deep question and goes even deeper, exploring the sense that all of us in the West must have — to some degree — that there must be something fundamentally flawed about us Europeans, if the totally dominant civilization that we created over millennia is on the verge of destroying itself and its core groups within what looks like a mere two centuries. Genocide is not a word to be taken lightly, but neither is the future of European Man.

Is Black Genocide Right?

Originally published at Alternative Right (February 14th, 2012)

It strikes me that one of the main things about having a good debate is how it is framed. Get that right and the chances are something good will be the outcome. However, for too long now, when we consider questions of race, especially questions concerning the Black race, we have been framing things in completely the wrong way. Instead of asking how we can make reparations for slavery, colonialism, and Apartheid or how we can equalize academic scores and incomes, we should instead be asking questions like, “Does human civilization actually need the Black race?” “Is Black genocide right?” and, if it is, “What would be the best and easiest way to dispose of them?” With starting points like this, wisdom is sure to flourish, enlightenment to dawn.

This might seem shocking to the usual gang of idiots, but right now very similar questions are being booted about and nobody seems to be batting an eye, all because the questions refer to White South Africans: “Does South Africa actually need the White race?” “Is White genocide right?” and “How many of the White devils do we have to rape, kill, mutilate, and bugger before the rest of them fuck off?”

MetaphorThese questions are being asked and answered every day in South Africa as any visitor to the blog Boer Genocide will attest. The blog collects and collates news stories on an unending flood of racially-motivated atrocities — a Herculean task that has to be done because no one else, least of all the Western media, is moving a muscle to do so. And it must be deeply unpleasant work too as the crimes reported are truly horrendous and disgusting. A recent and quite typical story concerned a disabled White man, Thys Henzen, 43, who was arrested on a trumped up charge, beaten by Black police, and then savagely sodomized by Black prisoners in the police cells, something that is not uncommon and which has been likened to a “war crimes pattern.

His ordeal started on 29 January 2012: he was roughly arrested that evening inside his own home, brutally assaulted, thrown into the police vehicle despite his physical frailty — and a few hours later the totally helpless Afrikaner man was dragged from his wheelchair inside the SAPS-cells — and raped with considerable violence by a black detainee: one man had held a blanket over his mouth while another sodomised him. He has been examined and given a first round of antiretroviral medicine to prevent AIDS-transfer. However — he cannot afford the entire course of medicines he would need to make sure he won’t end up with AIDS after his ordeal.”

Boer Genocide’s title works like a question, positing the end of an unfinished story: Boer Genocide . . . question mark! With an increasing number of Whites excluded from the job market and reduced to poverty by the government’s blatantly racist employment policies, and with thousands of rural Whites murdered on their isolated homesteads, the answer to this question looks increasingly obvious.


But why should Whites even be in a position where we are forced to consider such a possibility? The White race is history’s victor. We conquered Africa and the Africans on the sheer merit of the superiority of our race, culture, and society, and in a land that was largely going to waste we built an affluent and modern society capable not only of supporting a large number of our own people but also a vastly larger number of Blacks than would otherwise have been able to survive there. Of course, Black labour helped, but if that hadn’t been there, we would have imported White, Indian, or Chinese labour and have done the job anyway.

Rather than asking about White genocide, it surely makes more sense by any objective standards of utility, morality, or progress, to ask whether there should be such a thing as Black genocide.

This is not just a tit-for-tat idea either. In the changing nature of the New South Africa, which is still essentially a collection of White-created-and-maintained institutions being gradually but inexorably Africanized — i.e. corrupted, ground down, and barbarized — we see the true nature of the society that will emanate from the continuing exaltation of the Black man; a world of savagery, disease, and death, replenished by a wild, thoughtless fertility; a world that will set no store on the higher values that have characterized the civilizations created by other races.

Although there are doubtless many South African Blacks who behave in ways that we could call decent, we have to wonder how much of this is real and not affected, when savagery of the worst possible kind seems to constantly lurk under the surface in even the most banal of situations.

No doubt Lloyd Doksande and Fanie Msiza could have been passed off by liberal apologists as examples of the decent, modern Black South African, content to rise up in the new South Africa by his merits and labour, but that was before the two workers at a Wimpy restaurant in Kempton Park decided to murder their young White manager, Lambert Theron, 21, after he refused to let them “borrow” money from the till. This murder seeps with a savagery and genocidal hatred as so many crimes against Whites do. Once the attack commenced, the purely financial motive clearly took a back seat to sheer race hatred as the two men stabbed Theron at least 30 times, kicked in his teeth, cut off his lips, and crushed his head with a meat hammer.

The basic habits, ideas, and practices that help civilization to survive and prosper in other parts of the world seem largely absent among large elements of South Africa’s Black population, and it seems that it is only a matter of time before the country sinks to the level of poverty and savagery endemic in most of the rest of Africa and places like Haiti and Detroit. If this is the case, then, rather than the question of White Genocide, shouldn’t the debate really be focused on whether Black Genocide is something worth considering?

Rather than getting bogged down in specific, emotionally-wrought cases like the brutal sodomization of a disabled man or the savage killing and mutilation of an honest young manager, we really should consider the bigger picture. As we know, the world is becoming increasingly over-populated, while at the same time vital resources are being rapidly depleted. The world will be unable to support much of its future projected population growth. In fact we are probably heading for a great “die off” in which hundreds of millions of our kind will cease to be.

With Europeans and some Asians having much less children, most of the population growth leading to this future crisis is projected to come from Africans. This is the race that history and the present example of South Africa proves is least able to take care of itself; a race that has contributed almost nothing to the pool of civilization and which even shows little inclination to stay within the bounds of that civilization; a race that also seems to harbor a potent inferiority complex and savage hatred towards the creators of that civilization; and a race that votes to keep the ANC in power, the very party that helps power their increasingly genocidal attitude towards Whites.

Maybe it’s unfair to tar every Black in South Africa with the genocidal tar brush, but the support the majority have given to the ANC at least allows a reasonable case to be made for the kind of collective racial guilt that also serves as the basis of the ANC’s efforts to pull Whites down to the level where they can be raped, sodomized, murdered, and mutilated.

Is White Genocide Right?

Originally published at Alternative Right (February 20th, 2014)

In my previous article I dared to ask the rhetorical question of whether Black genocide was something that should be contemplated. The question was asked to draw attention to the abuse of Whites in South Africa documented by the blog Boer Genocide, which contends that the country is in the early stages of a genocidal campaign that aims to eradicate the White population of South Africa.

A few facts: Since the ANC took power in 1994 approximately 800,000 Whites out of a population of 5.2 million have fled the country, while in rural areas several thousand Boers have been slaughtered on their farms, often with the kind of mutilation that would be precluded by strictly economic motives. Meanwhile the government pursues measures like racist employment legislation, increasing gun control, and the raising of special militias that have a creepily genocidal bent to them.

But all this talk of genocide has got me thinking again. Just possibly, the proponents of White genocide and the thugs who are carrying out its preliminary actions actually have a point after all; a point that is a lot bigger and wiser than the point they actually have in their heads, which is probably just a tangled ball of savage inferiority, mixed with hatred, greed, and lust.

The greater point that those blooded hands and yellowed, hate-rimmed eyes unwittingly carry is that the existence of the White race in its present form is a curse upon this planet and that until that curse is removed either bodily or spiritually the entire human race is condemned to be dragged down in an increasingly dysgenic spiral that will feed its barbarism and savagery.

We could sit here till doomsday toting up Whitey’s enormous lead in the civilizational stakes, and come to the mistaken conclusion that the White race is an unmitigated blessing, but the important thing is not how big and fast your car is but in which direction it is headed. White civilization may be driving a high performance luxury car, but it is headed straight towards a cliff. Meanwhile the other races and civilizations, in their jeeps, jalopies or, in the case of the Africans, tricycles made out of tin cans, are at least trying to head in the right direction, one that the greater universe all around us, in its deep, profound, impersonal way, approves of.

Life in South Africa may gradually be reverting to the mean of the rest of Africa, but at least that mean is a Darwinian one. In other words, at its very base it is a progressive one, where weakness and stupidity are gradually, drop by bloody drop, grain by grain, penalized and leeched out of the system, however inefficiently. Left alone and with enough time, natural processes in Africa should raise up a better race, civilization, and culture than the ones currently there.

But, wherever the White race extends its hand of influence, these healthy tendencies, which sometimes take on extremely ugly forms, are curtailed in a thousand little ways, whether through charity, aid, medicine, “democracy,” human rights, the imposition of false war or false peace, or other forms of social, political, and economic interference.

With Whitey on the scene feeding the improvident and lazy and putting local farmers out of business in the process, doing deals with the corrupt, fattening the parasites, paying off the guilt merchants, and curing self-inflicted ailments, a dysgenia is created in which the African, or any other group that comes under their baleful benevolence, has a much reduced chance of developing the kind of self-reliance and positive individual and group traits that lead to progress.

Whitey, living by these same dysgenic standards in his own shrinking lands and being a soft touch for everyone else, has perhaps harmed his own chances even more, but there is a resilience in the race that may overcome this handicap and allow it to continue spreading its dysgenic miasma far and wide for centuries and even millennia to come.

So, imagine if you will a world without Whites. Such a world would also lack bleeding heart liberalism and dog-eyed posters of starvlings that can only live through White charity. Without the White man to carry it, the White man’s burden would very quickly have to learn to stand on its own two feet or die. To us in the pampered West this all sounds terribly cruel, but unthinking, over-sentimentalized negation of cruelty, of the kind that we Whites love to indulge in, destroys ultimate hope.

Understandably, White Nationalists, in their human weakness, feel a similar sentimental attachment to their race, flawed as it is, as I do myself. But, by doing so, aren’t we just taking a narrow, short-termist, even tribalistically selfish view of the greater good of humanity? Surely one of the differences between us and the idiots of “The Left” is that they think in mere years or decades, while we think in terms of millennia or even billions of years.

If the White race, besotted with universal notions of equality, human rights, philanthropism, cake for everyone, and race guilt for itself, is a barrier to the long-term progress of the entire human race, then surely a strong case can be made for the removal of that race not only from South Africa but from the entire world. The only alternative is to cure it of its unhealthy tendencies that threaten the rest of humanity, something that may or may not be possible.

What’s starting to happen in South Africa is certainly not pretty, but maybe it is part of a much greater plan that only generations, millions of years hence, will properly understand.



If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)
This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged , , , , , , , , . Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Richard Edmonds
    Posted September 2, 2016 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    “Providing aid to Africa results only in the increase of its population and of its problems”, the view of the Irish journalist, Kevin Myers, writing in the Irish Independent (of 10th. July 2008). The article was entitled: Africa is giving nothing to anybody except AIDS.

  2. Lyle Bright
    Posted August 31, 2016 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    What interests me in this piece is that to get its message requires having made the decision to value highly, and even to over-value, oneself, and with that I mean European peoples and cultures. The gist expressed in it goes directly against every liberal tenet. It is ‘unthinkable thought’ and is not, not really, ironical.

    To take such a stand in our greatly emotionally-softened present will be seen, in any context, in any country, as thoroughly radical. To think in these terms requires a meta-political distance; a sort of analytical coldness that may be necessary, yet which will be a rather hard sell.

    Reading this, I wondered if I should take it almost at a *therapeutic level*. By that I mean that the function of this sort of thinking is to create and improve a sort of categorical thinking which, in our present, we have lost. To think in these strict categories requires a mind-set that is rarely encountered nowadays. I could cite Lothrop Stoddard in many of his titles, and Madison Grant of course. They described it all in stark detail.

    Should this ‘style’ of thinking (is it a style? or is it discipline?) be revealed to those who are new to thinking critically in our present, about our present? It will surely freak them out and turn them off. In short it will horrify ‘the women’. I suppose this is one aspect of the problem, perhaps a large one: It is nearly impossible gievn the training and indoctrination of the present for many to think in clear, precise, non-emotional and hyper-realistic terms. But if they cannot think in those terms the issue of survival and prospering of Europe and white culture will not come to pass.

    A whole new Idea needs to be presented, nourished, strengthened and presented. (And that is my summation of the valued work of this site and others like it).

    Kindle Subscription
  • EXSURGO Apparel

    Our Titles

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Forever and Ever

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Tyr, Vol. 4


    The Node


    Carl Schmitt Today

    A Sky Without Eagles

    The Way of Men

    Generation Identity

    Nietzsche's Coming God

    The Conservative

    The New Austerities

    Convergence of Catastrophes


    Proofs of a Conspiracy

    Fascism viewed from the Right

    Notes on the Third Reich

    Morning Crafts

    New Culture, New Right

    The Fourth Political Theory

    Can Life Prevail?

    The Metaphysics of War

    Fighting for the Essence

    The Arctic Home in the Vedas

    Asatru: A Native European Spirituality

    The Shock of History

    The Prison Notes

    Sex and Deviance


    On the Brink of the Abyss

    Beyond Human Rights

    A Handbook of Traditional Living

    Why We Fight

    The Problem of Democracy


    The Path of Cinnabar


    The Lost Philosopher

    Impeachment of Man

    Gold in the Furnace


    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Revolution from Above