Editor-in-Chief
RSS Feeds
Authors
- Kerry Bolton
- Jonathan Bowden
- Buttercup Dew
- Collin Cleary
- Jef Costello
- F. Roger Devlin
- Julius Evola
- Gregory Hood
- Juleigh Howard-Hobson
- Greg Johnson
- Jason Jorjani
- Ward Kendall
- Anthony M. Ludovici
- Trevor Lynch
- H. L. Mencken
- J. A. Nicholl
- Andy Nowicki
- James J. O'Meara
- Michael O'Meara
- Christopher Pankhurst
- Tito Perdue
- Michael Polignano
- Spencer J. Quinn
- Savitri Devi
- Fenek Solère
- Irmin Vinson
- Leo Yankevich
- Francis Parker Yockey
Archives
- December 2019 (26)
- November 2019 (93)
- October 2019 (89)
- September 2019 (72)
- August 2019 (77)
- July 2019 (74)
- June 2019 (62)
- May 2019 (72)
- April 2019 (72)
- March 2019 (63)
- February 2019 (53)
- January 2019 (78)
- December 2018 (64)
- November 2018 (63)
- October 2018 (71)
- September 2018 (61)
- August 2018 (74)
- July 2018 (58)
- June 2018 (60)
- May 2018 (69)
- April 2018 (60)
- March 2018 (88)
- February 2018 (54)
- January 2018 (76)
- December 2017 (68)
- November 2017 (87)
- October 2017 (79)
- September 2017 (73)
- August 2017 (76)
- July 2017 (61)
- June 2017 (57)
- May 2017 (57)
- April 2017 (54)
- March 2017 (65)
- February 2017 (57)
- January 2017 (59)
- December 2016 (52)
- November 2016 (68)
- October 2016 (61)
- September 2016 (63)
- August 2016 (51)
- July 2016 (63)
- June 2016 (75)
- May 2016 (63)
- April 2016 (65)
- March 2016 (75)
- February 2016 (82)
- January 2016 (82)
- December 2015 (97)
- November 2015 (97)
- October 2015 (75)
- September 2015 (78)
- August 2015 (74)
- July 2015 (66)
- June 2015 (71)
- May 2015 (64)
- April 2015 (73)
- March 2015 (69)
- February 2015 (63)
- January 2015 (81)
- December 2014 (61)
- November 2014 (64)
- October 2014 (80)
- September 2014 (60)
- August 2014 (55)
- July 2014 (74)
- June 2014 (53)
- May 2014 (43)
- April 2014 (51)
- March 2014 (50)
- February 2014 (56)
- January 2014 (64)
- December 2013 (59)
- November 2013 (76)
- October 2013 (66)
- September 2013 (60)
- August 2013 (64)
- July 2013 (53)
- June 2013 (70)
- May 2013 (74)
- April 2013 (79)
- March 2013 (67)
- February 2013 (71)
- January 2013 (80)
- December 2012 (64)
- November 2012 (87)
- October 2012 (76)
- September 2012 (72)
- August 2012 (92)
- July 2012 (71)
- June 2012 (78)
- May 2012 (78)
- April 2012 (78)
- March 2012 (69)
- February 2012 (57)
- January 2012 (73)
- December 2011 (71)
- November 2011 (68)
- October 2011 (98)
- September 2011 (61)
- August 2011 (77)
- July 2011 (67)
- June 2011 (61)
- May 2011 (63)
- April 2011 (66)
- March 2011 (66)
- February 2011 (66)
- January 2011 (87)
- December 2010 (89)
- November 2010 (75)
- October 2010 (78)
- September 2010 (75)
- August 2010 (57)
- July 2010 (71)
- June 2010 (42)
Online texts
- Departments
- Contemporary Authors
- Michael Bell
- Alain de Benoist
- Kerry Bolton
- Jonathan Bowden
- Buttercup Dew
- Collin Cleary
- Jef Costello
- F. Roger Devlin
- Bain Dewitt
- Jack Donovan
- Émile Durand
- Guillaume Durocher
- Mark Dyal
- Guillaume Faye
- Tom Goodrich
- Alex Graham
- Dara Halley-James
- Andrew Hamilton
- Huntley Haverstock
- Derek Hawthorne
- Gregory Hood
- Juleigh Howard-Hobson
- Richard Houck
- Greg Johnson
- Ruuben Kaalep
- Julian Langness
- Patrick Le Brun
- Colin Liddell
- Trevor Lynch
- Kevin MacDonald
- G. A. Malvicini
- John Michael McCloughlin
- Margot Metroland
- Millennial Woes
- John Morgan
- James J. O'Meara
- Michael O'Meara
- Christopher Pankhurst
- Michael Polignano
- J. J. Przybylski
- Spencer J. Quinn
- Quintilian
- Edouard Rix
- C. F. Robinson
- Hervé Ryssen
- Ted Sallis
- Alan Smithee
- Ann Sterzinger
- Robert Steuckers
- Tomislav Sunić
- Donald Thoresen
- Marian Van Court
- Dominique Venner
- Irmin Vinson
- Michael Walker
- Leo Yankevich
- David Yorkshire
- Classic Authors
- Maurice Bardèche
- Julius Evola
- Ernst Jünger
- D. H. Lawrence
- Charles Lindbergh
- Jack London
- H. P. Lovecraft
- Anthony M. Ludovici
- Sir Oswald Mosley
- National Vanguard
- Friedrich Nietzsche
- Revilo Oliver
- William Pierce
- Ezra Pound
- Saint-Loup
- Savitri Devi
- Carl Schmitt
- Miguel Serrano
- Oswald Spengler
- P. R. Stephensen
- Jean Thiriart
- John Tyndall
- Francis Parker Yockey
Recent Comments
- K on White Nationalists & Japanese Nationalists Against the Globalists
- Rhodes on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- meforever on Freemasons, Jews, & Romanian Nationhood
- Phineas Eleazar on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- Phineas Eleazar on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- Phineas Eleazar on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- Phineas Eleazar on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- Fenek Solere on Beowulf: England’s Myth
- EF on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- c matt on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- c matt on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- David Rowie on Refuting Chanda Chisala
- C Rhoters on Interracial Marriage & White Genocide
- Bob on Groyper War Paranoia
- Exile on Groyper War Paranoia
Potemkin Equality
991 words
French translation here
In 1787 the Russian count Grigori Aleksandrovich Potemkin organized a tour for Catherine the Great of recently annexed territories in the Crimea. Everywhere Catherine went, she saw villages filled with happy, prosperous peasants and concluded that all was well. Potemkin’s enemies, however, accused him of fooling the Empress by constructing fake villages, islands of prosperity in a blighted landscape. Since then, the phrase “Potemkin village” has come to mean any false façade erected to hide an unseemly reality.
Affirmative Action is one such “Potemkin” program.
Advocates claim Affirmative Action remedies racial inequality: specifically, it addresses the fact that Blacks, Hispanics, and American Indians are “under-represented” at the top of American society (in higher education, the professions, the upper classes, etc.) and “over-represented” at the bottom of society (in menial and manual jobs, slums, prisons, etc.)
They claim that all ethnic groups would be “represented” at all levels of society proportionate to their percentage of the population, were it not for insidious “discrimination” on the part of Whites. If Blacks comprise 12% of the population, then they should also comprise 12% of the doctors, lawyers, and university professors and no more than 12% of the murderers, rapists, and thieves. Any discrepancy is blamed on White racism. Whites exclude Blacks from colleges simply because they are Black, and they put Blacks in prison simply because they are Black. And the same goes for Hispanics and American Indians.
While I do not deny that some such discrimination is real, massive evidence suggests it does not explain all, or even most, of the problems of Blacks and other racial groups.
First of all, Congress banned overt discrimination in the sixties. But it soon became clear that Black achievement would not rise on its own. Thus Affirmative Action, i.e., overt discrimination in favor of Blacks, was adopted.
Second, racial discrimination never prevented Jews, Chinese, Japanese, and East Indians from being “over-represented” at the top of American society and “under-represented” at the bottom. (And conversely, no matter how much money and effort are poured into Affirmative Action, Head Start, and other programs, they are not sufficient to prevent Blacks and other racial groups from failing.)
Third, the discrimination theory simply ignores genetic explanations of inequality. A vast array of scientific evidence indicates that, on average, Blacks are genetically less intelligent and more prone to violence than Whites. So even if there were no anti-Black discrimination at all, Blacks would still be “under-represented” in colleges and “over-represented” in prisons.
Egalitarians ignore genetic explanations because genes can’t be changed (at least with present technology) but social institutions can—assuming we give the government enough money and power to meddle in our lives. If genetic inequality is recognized as the chief cause of social inequality, then the “equality industry”—and its legions of bureaucrats, mollycoddlers, excuse-makers, brainwashers, and bullies—would be out of business.
Thus egalitarians go to absurd lengths to avoid genetic explanations. They continually add new epicycles to the vast, creaking apparatus of social constructionism. One week we hear that low Black achievement results from low teacher expectations. (Teachers tend to expect high achievement from Asians—and some Asians claim this constitutes a form of oppression.) The next week they blame Black underachievement on the fact that Black parents talk to their children less than White parents. (In California, the state even has an advertising campaign to persuade Blacks to talk to their children.) The week after, they blame “micronutrient” deficiencies. (Your tax dollars are going to rectify that problem as well.)
But let’s just accept the egalitarian argument for a minute. Let’s forget notions of procedural and legal equality. Let’s forget the social costs of not training the best possible people to be doctors and lawyers. Let’s just accept that the races are by nature equal. Let’s accept that the causes of inequality are entirely social, and that these can be changed. Affirmative Action still does not follow, because Affirmative Action still does not change any of the alleged causes of inequality. Even by egalitarian standards, it is a failure.
When a Black with an SAT score of 900 is admitted to college instead of a White with an SAT score of 1,200, we have not created a world free of the White ill-will that allegedly keeps Blacks down. In fact, Affirmative Action creates more White ill- will. Affirmative Action does not create a world in which Black children get all the “micronutrients” and parental care and high expectations and quality education that White children get, so that Blacks and Whites can compete for college admissions on a level playing field. No, all Affirmative Action creates is a world that looks like the causes of inequality have been eliminated, a world of Potemkin equality.
Faced with the phoniness of Affirmative Action, egalitarians tell us that, by equalizing social outcomes, we will eventually equalize the factors that cause inequality. By changing the effect, we will change the cause. Nay, by faking the effect, we will change the cause. In short, they appeal to magic.
But wouldn’t the artificial prosperity of Affirmative Action beneficiaries help their children to close the achievement gap? There is no evidence to support this theory. Even in identical environments, Blacks and Hispanics consistently perform poorer on average than Whites and Asians. The children of wealthy Blacks still perform less well than White children of all social classes.
Affirmative Action can create only the illusion of equality. Thus the higher echelons of our society are becoming a Potemkin village increasingly populated by non-Whites who, regardless of their real merits, have been promoted a rung or two above those merits because of their race. Television and the movies portray a fantasy world filled with dumb blondes and Black doctors, lawyers, judges, inventors, and computer geniuses. But behind the façade hides a vast, squalid reality of false promises, false hopes, and outright falsehoods about race—all premised on the refusal to accept racial inequality as a natural fact.
October 14, 2003