Print this post Print this post

Kevin MacDonald’s Individualism & The Western Liberal Tradition
Part 8: Why Are Whites Canceling Each Other?

Whites cleaning up the mess blacks made of Minneapolis.

1,582 words

Do you know why Europeans across the political spectrum — liberals, conservatives, socialists — are morally committed to a politics that is leading to the dissolution of their millennial racial identities while promoting the racial identities of non-white immigrants within their own nations?

There are many answers out there: whites have been brainwashed by elites in control of our schools, media, and government institutions; the importation of immigrants is a strategic ploy by Leftist parties to create a permanent bloc of immigrant voters; corporations are looking for cheap labor and real estate development.

But the deeper answer puts the blame right in front of whites themselves: immigrant diversity is rooted in a culture that takes the individual as its basic ontological principle, disparaging any form of ethnic nationalism among whites in favor of the rights of all humans to become citizens of European nations. The Western ideals of individualism, egalitarianism, and moral universalism are the ultimate causes.

White Moral Communities

In our extended review of Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition, we have seen that for Kevin MacDonald, individualism is the core principle of Western civilization. The root of this principle is the separation of the individual from kin-based ties. It would seem, then, that MacDonald would hold this separation responsible for the plight of whites today. His answer to this question, however, goes beyond a straightforward blaming of liberalism. The West today is not dominated by free-wheeling individuals. It is dominated by extremely powerful “moral communities” in the media, universities, “civil rights” organizations, political parties, and business groups. These moral communities are “pervasive throughout the institutional structures of the West.” The “conventional morality and intellectual discourse” of the West is dominated by “Leftist ideologies of race and ethnicity.” While the “cohesion” of these communities is not grounded in ethnic ties, it is still “tribal” in the sense that those who dissent from its values are “socially ostracized” and curtailed in their ability to make a living.

These moral communities, moreover, are not bereft of a biological basis — they are anchored in an evolved psychological need humans have to seek a “social identity” inside groups where they are positively valued. The members of these moral communities are no less inclined than kin groups to view outgroup members in negative terms. The negatively evaluated outgroup is defined primarily as a white who has an ingroup attachment to his ethnic group or race. The individual rights of those who dissent from these moral communities can be curtailed since they are members of a hated outgroup.

While the moral communities of whites are not based on kinship ties but on morally approved principles, MacDonald brings up research studies, including his own, showing that ingroup favoritism and discrimination against outgroups remain very powerful biological drives. Experiments have shown that Western individualists will favor their own group even when those groups are “constructed using random labels for ingroup and outgroup. . . and even if there are no conflicts of interest between the groups.” The need to identify with a group, to wish to be validated by ingroup members and discriminate against outgroup members, is an evolved result of natural selection and it is a tendency that continues to prevail among whites despite their condemnation of biologically based identities. The mental processing that goes on in the expression of these identities is “not the result of conscious reflection, but more like an innate psychological reflex.”

In the same vein, MacDonald draws a distinction between implicit and explicit processing of social or ingroup identities among whites. Just as whites have an instinctive need to form ingroups that exclude outsiders, they have an instinctive inclination to prefer members of their own race, as is evident in white flight, choice of neighborhoods and schools, and in what some have identified as “stuff white people like.” But since these biases are prohibited in white communities, these behaviors are manifested implicitly rather than expressed consciously or explicitly. Whites have been socialized to control their ethnocentric tendencies. Their evolved ethnocentric inclinations are thus kept in check by their conscious “higher brain centers located in the cortex,” which is the area of the brain that reasons and assimilates the values of society. Since Western culture is “hostile to white ethnocentrism,” the higher brain inhibits the instinctive ethnocentrism of whites.

White moral communities also provide lucrative jobs, security, and emotional comfort to white individuals who abide by the ideological rules. We are not dealing with ethereal beings motivated by high-minded principles. Those who engage in “competitive virtue signaling” are self-interested creatures with highly charged emotional feelings of moral righteousness. These feelings are very pleasurable, and may lead to an irrational addiction to incessant moral approval from one’s ingroup members. MacDonald cites an authority about “the pleasure of knowing, with subjective certainty, that you are right and your opponents are deeply, despicably wrong. . . that your method of helping others is so purely motivated and correct that all criticism can be dismissed with a shrug, along with any contradicting evidence.”

PM Justin Trudeau’s political career has been all about virtue-signaling.

In other words, to understand why whites are so vehemently obsessed with diversity and so keen on (or at least indifferent to) their own replacement, one needs to keep in mind the powerful economic incentives and emotional comforts that characterize the supposedly “conscientious” communities of whites. The “empathy” whites have for non-whites is backed up by “a very elaborate infrastructure” that provides multiple opportunities for whites. Whites have been “incentivized” economically and emotionally.

Some in the Dissident Right think the way to overcome these moral communities is to encourage whites to exhibit stronger ethnic identities just like blacks and other minorities. But this message would go against the central thesis of MacDonald’s book, which is that white individualism has a genetic basis. The moral communities whites created in the past were not antithetical to their interests, but were indeed the most successful communities created in history — the basis of immense achievements. As I argued in earlier parts, following MacDonald’s line of thought, the city-states created by the ancient Greeks, the incredibly successful republican form of government created by the Romans, and the highly dominant nation-states of modern Europe can all be seen as “moral communities” created beyond the old tribal and highly nepotistic communities of non-whites.

Personality of whites

This chapter has a very insightful section showing that whites have unusual personality traits. Insomuch as whites developed relations with wider tribal networks and went on to create city-states and institutions based on merit, their concern for reputation did not end “at the border of the family and the wider kinship group.” Whites sought “a moral reputation as capable, honest, trustworthy and fair” in the wider society and nation. There were evolutionary pressures for conscientiousness, responsibility, reliability, trustworthiness, dutifulness, and honesty outside the kin group. It is not accidental that all the moral philosophies seeking concepts with universal validity (fairness, impartiality, due process) were developed by whites.

I can’t recall a historian of civilizations writing about this fundamental contrast in personalities. Modernization theorists in the 1950s identified these personality traits as products of modernity per se. Educational experts and aid packages were lauded as the way to create multiple Switzerlands in the African continent. But personality systems run deep. Corruption and ethnic nepotism are pervasive in modernized Third World nations.

This lack of trust beyond the kinship group is the fundamental problem that prevents the development of civil societies in much of Asia and Africa, where divisions into opposing religious and ultimately kinship groups define the political landscape. People who have good jobs are expected to help their relatives, leading to high levels of corruption.

But if we can’t remake our personalities in an African way, how are we going to counter the suicidal moral communities of the West? MacDonald’s answer is that whites do have an implicit inclination to favor their own race, to be ethnocentric. The problem is that the Left controls the moral communities. These communities were not anti-white in the recent past. But the “culture of critique” is currently in charge of “programming the higher areas of the brain” of whites, so the explicit culture is continually suppressing the “implicit ethnocentric tendencies of white people.” This is what the ADL and the SPLC are about: policing the thoughts and behavior of whites while promoting the ethnic interests of Jews.

MacDonald anticipates that as whites become aware of their “impending minority status” this will trigger white ethnocentrism. Whites will come to the realization that their culture of individualism, rule of law, and social trust require them to create moral communities that are “adaptive in a Darwinian sense.” Whites will come to the realization that in nations that are committed to multiculturalism and the celebration of the ingroup identities of non-whites, their only hope for survival is to create strong ingroups based on moral principles that value white history, traditions, and family — and exclude those who seek the destruction of whites.

If you want to support our work, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every Friday.

Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.

Notes

This article originally appeared at the Council of European Canadians.

 

5 Comments

  1. Ghost of Arminius
    Posted July 15, 2020 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    I agree with this analysis. As an American, and due to my particular upbringing, I have always valued the emphasis upon individualism — the concept of “the self-made man,” that “you can do what you put your mind to regardless of your background or situation,” etc. But individuals aren’t born in vacuums, and we are all part of a larger social, cultural, and genetic network that influences us in ways we often don’t even recognize.

    Wasn’t it Locke who argued that every person was born a blank slate? The truth is, while there is certainly much potential in each and every human being, there are certain parameters that determine his or her ability to do or achieve certain things. There will be some people who’ll never become a great composer, a top astrophysicist, a master chess player, or a star basketball player, no matter how much they may dream of it. It seems to me that both the Left and Right (I’m speaking mainstream here) put far too much emphasis on nurture over nature. Liberals, especially Marxist types, will argue that environment and social conditions are everything, and most conservatives I know, for their part, likewise believe that any Haitian, Guatemalan, or Philipino can — under the influence of the right ideological persuasions — step right off the boat and become as American as George Washington. The discussion of race and genetics as determining factors in these matters is generally taboo in the West, probably because of the simple fact that the Germans lost WWII and anything associated with “Nazism” became verboten.

    I want to remain positive about the prospects of a Caucasian West persisting through this century and beyond, but I don’t know if there is a sizeable enough remnant to carry on the pride, the traditions, the learning, and the history. I encounter young whites all the time who have no sense of self-identity beyond being advocates and warriors for all the “oppressed minorities” among us. They’ll get out and march for Black Lives Matter but they won’t lift a finger to defend their own people, even seeing them as the enemy. It’s a sad state of affairs.

    Finally, I would add to the above analysis that, in my view, Christianity has made much of this possible and perhaps even inevitable. “There is no Jew or Greek, no male or female,” the apostle Paul said. And Jesus commanded, “turn the other cheek,” and “to him who would take your coat, give him your cloak also.” These are idealistic universalist principles embedded in the West’s holy book — bound, ironically, with the very tribalistic/ethnocentric writings of the Jews. I would venture to guess that most White Christians are hopelessly committed to the same multiracial, multicultural utopia that the most hardcore of Liberals dream about — theirs will just be ruled by Jesus, a Jew they also happen to worship as God himself. You just can’t make this stuff up.

    • J
      Posted July 16, 2020 at 1:51 am | Permalink

      Christianity has betrayed you

      Read secular by design by Alan W Cecil

      • Ghost of Arminius
        Posted July 16, 2020 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

        I have never heard of that author or book, but I looked it up and read a little about it and it appears to be a pro-Noachide text. For those unfamiliar with the term, according to the rabbis, there was a “covenant” that the Hebrew god made with the “children of Noah” — before the Hebrew nation had come into existence, and before the Torah was given on Mt. Sinai to the Hebrew people that set would from then on set apart Jews from the rest of mankind, i.e. the chosen people. It’s the way of life for the “righteous gentile.”

        With all due respect, I have no interest in playing the role of second-class citizen in some other ethnic group’s social order/religious system. I don’t begrudge the Jewish people their intelligence, their right to take their own holy book seriously, or even their pride and sense of superiority. But it is rather audacious of them to hold such opinions while denying them to everyone else, or at least to Whites, as they have vigorously done especially since the end of World War II.

        From my understanding of reading Jewish literature, there is an inherent sense that all the goyim are to be the eternal servants of the Jews. The Christians are already there — being, as they are, the willing slaves of THE perfect Jew, Jesus Christ, whom they worship as God-in-the-flesh. Which is ironic, given that the Jews generally despise their idolatry rather than beam with pride that one of their own is honored as God. But I digress…

        The point is, the only way I could ever be a Noachide is if I somehow became convinced that Judaism was the true religion, the Hebrew Scriptures an accurate reflection of history, and Jewish supremacy over my people and all others was truly the only way.

    • HamburgerToday
      Posted July 16, 2020 at 10:25 am | Permalink

      The thing about a great unraveling such as Whites have experienced, is that it creates a yearning for order and stability. Yes, the young have been indoctrinated into anti-White-ism, but I wasn’t raised to be White Nationalist or a National Socialist and I would consider myself to be both of these thing. People in general are attracted to strength and certainty. For the moment, that’s what anti-White-ism offers them. However, eventually, large number of Whites in that milieu will be plowed under by the purity testing essential to any Puritanical movement. What every awakened White has to do is to radiate strength and loving-kindness as much as is humanly possible and be prepared to work with those who are now our enemy when they come looking for answers and acceptance. I’m not a Christian, but without some aspect of intra-group loving-kindness exemplified by Christianity, I don’t think Whites can easily recover.

  2. Patrick
    Posted July 16, 2020 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    Individualism is the dumbest thing ever.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
 
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
 
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance